[Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 02:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #29) More issues: * plugins loaded twice After some look at the code and some testing I have found that all the plugins in the plugins directory are loaded, so they are loaded twice since they appear twice in the package... In my opinion either the *.so without version number should be removed, or they should be moved to *.so without version numbers. Ok, I will remove the plugins dangling in the /usr/lib directory. * a plugin is not functionnal **WARNING** Unable to load plugin /usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2.so' **WARNING** Message is '/usr/lib/ntop/plugins/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2.so: undefined symbol: gdome_str_mkref' hrmm.. good spotting. And there is also another error, but it may only happen on the first run **ERROR** LASTSEEN: Unable to open LsWatch database (/var/ntop/LsWatch.db)- the plugin will be disabled Did you test to see if it re-occurs ? The file is present on my system. * many unneeded files in the docs: CONTENTS FILES ntop.txt README.Suse INSTALL BUILD-MinGW.txt BUILD-NTOP.txt ntop-autotools.* PORTING RedHat-rpmbuild-HOWTO.txt, and certainly DAG I will remove the %doc doc/* line * should depend on logrotate Done * less rpmbuild warnings with the following line in %setup chmod -x docs/ntop-autotools.pdf *.c *.h plugins/*.c plugins/*.xml Done * you should remove /usr/lib/libntop.so, /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so and /usr/lib/libntopreport.so since there are no associated headers and also since they use -release, see below. Removed * myrrd seems to be an old included version of rrdtools. It shouldn't be used but instead linked against the system rrd, unless there is a very good reason not to do so. myrrd is indeed an older rrdtool, however, according to Luca, it has been modified enough to warrant using it instead of the system provided rrdtool. I will leave it with myrrd. * upstream uses the -release for libtool using the package version, this is wrong in general, since it trigggers a soname change even when the abi don't change, however those libraries are not meant to ne linked against, so if the *.so that don't have the release within their names are not distributed it is right. I am not sure I follow you here. Could you clarify? * The mechanisme described under PRIVACY NOTICE should be disabled in the default case (and reenabled with, for example --version-check) or completly disabled. I have disabled the version check in the init script. * ntop doesn't seems to be interruptible by a control-C. It doesn't seems right to me but I may be wrong. Maybe for a similar reason, when killing ntop on the first run when ntop asks for a password, the console is broken. A control-C does shut down ntop here. Its not instant, it performs a graceful shutdown. This last issue is not blocking the inclusion in extras in my opinion, it is more for upstream. I am working on Ralf's glib concern at the moment, so I wont post the updated srpm and spec. I have mostly corrected it, however, it still looks for libglib.so incorrectly when building the xmldump plugin. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 07:24 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
MUSTFIX
===
* -devel subpackage missing the -%{release} component of e-v-r when requiring
the base package.
Fixed, new version is here:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet-1.1-2.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 07:24 EST --- Correction that should be: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 07:30 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
rpmlint warnings:
W: ogre-devel no-documentation
- Can be safely ignored since docs are in a -doc subpackage.
E: ogre-devel invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libOgrePlatform.so libOgrePlatform.so
- Not sure where this is coming from.
Oops, I meant to fix that one but never got around to fixing it, rpmlint is
unhappy because that is an unversioned .so directly under libdir. Since this lib
actually gets dlopened by libOgreMain I've moved it to libdir/OGRE
MUSTFIX
===
* The 'tr' trick in Source0: is cute, but my preference is to limit
macro substitutions in Source0 to simple %{name} and %{version} only.
Anything more complicated (like spawning subshells) becomes
harder to read. In this case, just hard code the version string.
Erm, shouldn't that be a should fix. Nowhere in the guidelines it says use of
macros etc is forbbiden in Source0. I know some people want to copy and paste
the Source0 URL to wget, some people even want it to contain 0 macro's. I say
those people should learn to use spectool -g name.spec which will do the macro
expansion and cut and pasting for them, directly calling wget. - EWONTFIX
* -devel subpackage should use full version in base package dependency (it
is missing -%{release}), or add a comment why it's not needed:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Fixed
* BR: flex, bison seem to be unnecessary.
./configure was checking for them but indeed it builds fine without, removed.
New version is here:
* Fri Jul 7 2006 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.1-2
- Make -devel package Requires on the main package fully versioned.
- Move libOgrePlatform.so out of %%{_libdir} and into the OGRE plugins dirs as
its not versioned and only used through dlopen, so its effectivly a plugin.
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ogre.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ogre-1.2.1-2.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 07:36 EST --- This ming development snapshot is broken, I'll repost a new srpm once there is a new snapshot with the fix (allready in cvs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 08:07 EST --- - Fixed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs and %%find_lang in changelog - added category System and delete-original in desktop-file-install Spec URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap.spec Srpms URL : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gdmap/gdmap-0.7.5-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 08:09 EST ---
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint's output is clean
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}
- MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and
meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
- MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file,
then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is
included in %doc.
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
- MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
- MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least i386.
- MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires.
- MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.
- MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the
dynamic linker's default paths
- MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable
- MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
- MUST: Permissions on files are set properly.
- MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section
of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in
detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: There are no Large documentation files
- MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it
is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present.
- MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries
- MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix
- MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives
- MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and
that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install
section.
- MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
SHOULD Items:
- SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING
- SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386.
- SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
- SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane.
- SHOULD: No subpackages present.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197559] Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM adapter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-chinese-standard: Chinese Linux Standard IM
adapter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197559
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 08:19 EST ---
Thanks for uploading
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clsi/scim-chinese-standard-0.0.1-0.1.src.rpm
Here are some review comments:
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
E: scim-chinese-standard description-line-too-long This is an adapter to allow
SCIM to interoperate with the Input Method specification of the Chinese Linux
Standard.
W: scim-chinese-standard mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
Fixing in attachment.
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
OK
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec
OK
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Attached spec file is reworked in Fedora format to meet the guidelines.
- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible
license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of
Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
I think some of the code is derived from scim, which is LGPL.
So I think the license should also be LGPL.
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
Ok.
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
Ok.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
Please upload an updated .tar.gz file to Sourceforge.
Do not include autom4te.cache/ in the tarball. It is 2MB. ;-)
Please use make dist to generate the tarball.
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one supported architecture.
Builds file on FC5 x86_64.
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion
of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Builds ok with mock for fc5.
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Adding %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/IMEngine/*/
- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
ok
- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line.
ok
- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
ok
- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the
macros section of Packaging Guidelines.
ok
- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should
be removed in the spec.
OK
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
OK
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
SCIM runs okay with scim-chinese-standard installed.
A fixed spec file and tarball is at:
http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-chinese-standard-0.0.1-0.2.src.rpm
I think these files
%{_libdir}/scim-1.0/IMEngine/standard-im.so
%{_libdir}/scim-1.0/Helper/standard-helper.so
should be named chinese-standard-*.so also to avoid confusion
with any later CJK standard, or other international standard.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197908] Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: im-chooser - Input Method configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197908 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 10:06 EST --- The RPM lint error is safe to ignore because there is nothing that would go in a lib dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 10:11 EST --- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.10.0-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 7 2006 Alain Portal aportal AT univ-montp2 DOT fr 2.10.0-1 - Update to 2.10.0 - New extra tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] New: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Description: NAS is the audio equivalent of an X display server. The Network Audio System (NAS) was developed by NCD for playing, recording, and manipulating audio data over a network. Like the X Window System, it uses the client/server model to separate applications from the specific drivers that control audio input and output devices. It is also needed to support sound's in Qt. Problem: The license. The autor write: Copyright 1995 Network Computing Devices, Inc. Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name Network Computing Devices, Inc. not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of this software without specific, written prior permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED `AS-IS'. NETWORK COMPUTING DEVICES, INC., DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL NETWORK COMPUTING DEVICES, INC., BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT, TORT OR NEGLIGENCE, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. Translation: You can do whatever you want with this software! what type of license is it? And can it use in FC extras?? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 10:13 EST --- Created an attachment (id=132052) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132052action=view) The first spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197937 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181831 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|UPSTREAM|NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 10:58 EST ---
A few comments:
1. Regarding license, for now, use something generic like
License: Distributable
2. use lower case pkg name, like
Name: nas
3. libaudio.so.2 should be in main pkg, not -devel
4. -devel should (instead)
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
5. /etc/nas is unowned, add to main pkg
%dir /etc/nas
6. %{_includedir}/sound is unowned, change
%{_includedir}/audio/*
to
%{_includedir}/audio/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 11:07 EST --- All MUSTFIX items addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 11:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #30) (In reply to comment #29) Ok, I will remove the plugins dangling in the /usr/lib directory. I was speaking about the /usr/lib/ntop/plugins/ directory: every file in this directory ending in .so is loaded. And there is also another error, but it may only happen on the first run **ERROR** LASTSEEN: Unable to open LsWatch database (/var/ntop/LsWatch.db)- the plugin will be disabled Did you test to see if it re-occurs ? The file is present on my system. It re-occured. I guess I know why, since for an unknown reason most of the files in /var/ntop/ belong to root, although I never started ntop with -u root. Maybe this comes from the kills of ntop while it asked for a password? myrrd is indeed an older rrdtool, however, according to Luca, it has been modified enough to warrant using it instead of the system provided rrdtool. I will leave it with myrrd. Ok. But at least put a comment in the spec file. And you'll have to watch out the rrdtool updates, especially the security issues... I have disabled the version check in the init script. It is still used during the required first run that sets the password. I think it shouldn't. A control-C does shut down ntop here. Its not instant, it performs a graceful shutdown. Not when ntop is asking for a password. At least seems so to me. I'll retest with the next srpm. (and I get that with ntop -t 4 interrupted by control-C: ven 07 jui 2006 17:37:06 CEST RRD: Thanks for using the rrdPlugin ven 07 jui 2006 17:37:06 CEST RRD: Done ven 07 jui 2006 17:37:06 CEST CLEANUP: Freeing device eth0 (idx=0) *** glibc detected *** ntop: free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x0962c2d8 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x1fec88] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_free+0x78)[0x20216f] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(ntop_safefree+0x2c)[0x935d4c] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(cleanup+0xf13)[0x937953] [0xb7f08420] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(_ntopSleepWhileSameState+0x2f)[0x95b09f] ntop[0x804b12f] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x1b0794] ntop[0x8049d31] === Memory map: Abandon ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197489] Review Request: ming - SWF output library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197489 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 11:45 EST --- moreover the java bindings are not free software... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 11:47 EST --- ok fixed here the new .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 11:48 EST --- Created an attachment (id=132061) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132061action=view) 1.8.-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #132061|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 11:53 EST --- Ignacio seems to be MIA, so I'll help push this one along. http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-ruledispatch-0.5a0-1.svnr2115.src.rpm * Thu Jul 6 2006 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.5a0-1.svnr2115 - Use sitearch instead of sitelib in the files - Remove python-abi requirement - Ghost the .pyo files - Add the URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 Bug 192052 depends on bug 183953, which changed state. Bug 183953 Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 12:38 EST --- *** Bug 197608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 12:41 EST --- I give up. I have seen activity from the package submitter on the mailing lists but can't get any response. So I'm closing this bug. At this point, consider my approval revoked. I will be happy to re-review at a later date if this bug is reopened or if someone else wishes to submit this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 12:42 EST --- I will close this ticket if I don't hear back soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO||163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197545] Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ReadBackwards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197545 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:02 EST --- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:07 EST --- I was planning to install rawhide on a VM this weekend, in order to test with the added eclipse 3.2, to see if nothing breaks, specially my patch to disable the native javahl interface to see if something fixs it in the current incarnation of FC-6. but If you can review it with the patch, better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197552] Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:24 EST --- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 Bug 197726 depends on bug 197552, which changed state. Bug 197552 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197726] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197726 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) The requires list for this module comes up with: perl(Set::Infinite) = 0.59 perl(Set::Infinite) = 0.59 Sorry, I was trying to watch for those kinds of things, but I guess I missed this one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:30 EST --- Source1: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/nas/nasd.init Source2: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/nas/nasd.sysconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NAS The Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #132052|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Your two manual versioned dependencies are duplicated by unversioned dependencies found by RPM; you will have to remove yours or filter RPM's. I dropped the manual dependencies. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.16-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197608] Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BuildBot - build/test cycle automation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:35 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
MUSTFIX
===
* The 'tr' trick in Source0: is cute, but my preference is to limit
macro substitutions in Source0 to simple %{name} and %{version} only.
Anything more complicated (like spawning subshells) becomes
harder to read. In this case, just hard code the version string.
Erm, shouldn't that be a should fix. Nowhere in the guidelines it says use of
macros etc is forbbiden in Source0. I know some people want to copy and paste
the Source0 URL to wget, some people even want it to contain 0 macro's. I say
those people should learn to use spectool -g name.spec which will do the
macro
expansion and cut and pasting for them, directly calling wget. - EWONTFIX
While there are no explicit guidelines against this, I feel that it falls into
the spec file must be legible category. I don't think we should have to rely
on spectool to decipher source urls. I'm willing to live with macro
substitutions, but I think shell escapes add too much indirection.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197739] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197739 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:40 EST --- Looks good now. The dependency list is now: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Set) perl(DateTime::Span) perl(Params::Validate) perl(constant) perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197744] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:54 EST --- I'm not entirely sure how much of the email I should include in the package. (I had to reach the author via a third party. :-) I've included the relevant bit in a README.LICENSE in -3. Given that it is confirmation of the license statement in lib/OpenFrame/Argument/Blob.pm, I hope that's sufficient. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-OpenFrame-3.05-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 13:57 EST --- Thanks for the support Paul! Wart, There are plenty of examples in FE with similar and much much harder to read shell scriptlets, please if this is the only blokcer approve. What gain is there in my removing the shellscript only to readd it with the first upstream release. I want a new upstream release to be as easy as: -bump %version -reset %release to 1 -add changelog -spectool -g -rebuild Now I know things aren't always going to be as easy as this, but having to manually edit Source0 for each upstream update is a pain, especially since one then has to remember the prefered filename-formating for all upstreams, or goto the website of upstream find the download page and find out the correct URL that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:00 EST --- Yes, that looks reasonable; we now have some blanket statement of what the license is. Unfortunately the dependency list includes: perl(Pipeline) perl(Pipeline) = 2.00 which has been clarified to be a blocker since this review was started. That is the only remaining issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:00 EST --- I didn't realize that there was already precedent for this type of thing. I hadn't seen it until now. While I don't necessarily like it, I won't have it be the only thing blocking the review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:06 EST --- Ping. Any response from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:29 EST --- Can you correct these ? a spec file in a srpm w/o world-read perms can cause issues with mock chitlesh(SPECS)[1]$rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/kicad-2006.06.26-3.src.rpm W: kicad strange-permission kicad.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. W: kicad strange-permission kicad.desktop 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. W: kicad mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:35 EST --- Thanks! Imported build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 Bug 196744 depends on bug 196710, which changed state. Bug 196710 Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:36 EST --- I'm introducing this package because currently we include the BouncyCastle JCE in java-1.4.2-gcj-compat, whereas it really deserves to be its own package. I don't think BouncyCastle should go in Extras because it is a crypto library and therefore needs approval by Red Hat legal. The upstream BouncyCastle tarball includes the patented IDEA algorithm. The tarball in this SRPM has those sources and references removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #132061|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:38 EST --- Created an attachment (id=132080) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132080action=view) 1.8.-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:44 EST --- FC4 will get deprecated near and for new packages I think FC5 and FC6 are ok. OK, it's only that I have a vested interest in EL4 support too. (: I can patch my own local builds if you're not willing to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 14:51 EST --- I guess we missed adding Req's for the scriptlets: Requires(preun): chkconfig /sbin/service Requires(post): chkconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197967] New: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ Description: GKrellM charts SMP CPU, load, Disk, and all active net interfaces automatically. An on/off button and online timer for the PPP interface is provided. Monitors for memory and swap usage, file system, internet connections, APM laptop battery, mbox style mailboxes, and cpu temps. Also includes an uptime monitor, a hostname label, and a clock/calendar. Additional features are: * Autoscaling grid lines with configurable grid line resolution. * LED indicators for the net interfaces. * A gui popup for configuration of chart sizes and resolutions. Note 1: This packages is moving from core to extras! The core packages also includes the gkrellm wireless plugin, but that _really_ should be packaged seperatly as its a completly seperate tarbal. Expect a review request for gkrellm-wireless soon (ish) Note 2: I'm going on a short vacation from monday 10 juli till friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet thats why. Note 3, rpmlint output: W: gkrellm-daemon dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel Needed, can be ignored W: gkrellm-daemon incoherent-init-script-name gkrellmd The initscript is / was called gkrellmd in FC, changing the name to be consistent with the package name would cause more pain then its worth. W: gkrellm-devel no-documentation There are no development related docs to package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 15:09 EST --- No. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197936] Review Request: nas: Network Audio System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nas: Network Audio System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 15:25 EST --- It is better to build an extra spec file for FC4. But this is not an real problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196740] Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 15:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) I didn't realize that there was already precedent for this type of thing. I hadn't seen it until now. While I don't necessarily like it, I won't have it be the only thing blocking the review. APPROVED Thanks, actually the precedents for this is where I learned todo this, thats how one develops bad habbits :) Imported build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 Bug 196744 depends on bug 196740, which changed state. Bug 196740 Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: autogen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 15:31 EST ---
Not trivial to review due to lots of issues:
* AutoOpts licence is LGPL, not GPL!
* Run rpmlint on the binary rpms! It gives further hints.
* -devel DSO files (*.so) in non-devel package!
* -devel package is missing %defattr definition
* missing scriptlet dependencies for /sbin/ldconfig
* INSTALL %doc file is irrelevant to users
* /usr/include/autoopts/ is orphaned
* /usr/share/autogen is orphaned
* pkgconfig file is executable
* worrisome compiler warnings, not limited to:
putshell.c: In function 'optionPutShell':
putshell.c:203: warning: format '%1$ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 2
has type 'uintptr_t'
putshell.c:203: warning: format '%1$lX' expects type 'long unsigned int', but ar
gument 2 has type 'uintptr_t'
guileopt.c:126: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 4 ha
s type 'int'
defParse-fsm.c:395: warning: embedded '\0' in format
* /usr/share/autogen/libopts-27.1.2.tar.gz -- ???
* Error during installation and package removal
(Get better *.info scriptlets from the Wiki! Avoid the wildcards!):
install-info: excess command line argument `/usr/share/info/autogen.info.gz'
install-info: excess command line argument `/usr/share/info/autogen.info.gz'
install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/share/info/autogen.info-1.gz';
nothing deleted
* Provides: libopts should be versioned: libopts = %{version}-%{release}
* rpmlint ~/tmp/reviews/autogen/autogen-5.8.4-2.src.rpm
W: autogen strange-permission autogen-5.8.4.tar.bz2 0666
W: autogen rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf %{buildroot}
* The main package installs some executables into /usr/bin which have
_very_ generic names, which pollute the global namespace and which
bear a huge risk of causing collisions in the future:
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/autogen
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/columns (!)
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/getdefs (!)
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/xml2ag
This alone would be a blocker criterion. Upstream ought to choose more
unique names and e.g. use a proper autogen_ prefix.
* /usr/share/aclocal/liboptschk.m4 looks for a missing script.
* /usr/share/aclocal/autoopts.m4 looks for a script which is only
included in the -devel package! It is not working this way!
* autoopts-config man page is in main package, script is in -devel package!
* Section 3 API manuals are in main package instead of -devel package!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||176712 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 15:38 EST --- Trying to get FE-GUIDELINES blockers right; sorry for the spam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||176697 OtherBugsDependingO|176697 | nThis|| BugsThisDependsOn||181445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|181523 | OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||176712 OtherBugsDependingO|176712 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||190101 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197981] New: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-wifi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/gkrellm-wifi-0.9.12-1.src.rpm Description: Plug-in for gkrellm (a system monitor) which monitors the wireless LAN cards in your PC and displays a graph of the link quality percentage for each card. --- Notice please play special attention to the Obsoletes and Provides gkrellm-wireless. Previously this package was (wrongly) integrated into the gkrellm package itself, and there it was called gkrellm-wireless despite upstreams different name, this packages should automaticly replace gkrellm-wireless, hence the Obsoletes Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 16:17 EST --- Okay, This package now is approvable. But as discussed I cannot approve it untill I sponsor you, we have some automated scripts which check things like approved packages actually getting imported into CVS and the likes, and until sponsored you cannot approve. I'm looking forward to your next package Some things to make this one perfect: -remove -Rc param from chmod, there is nothing to _R_ecurse and begin verbose isn't nescesarry either as rpm already show the command with the full (wildcard expanded) filelist. -remove this no longer valid comment: # Get the used icon on the right dir with the right name and get rid of the unused icons -please put empty lines between your different changelog entries, so that the changlog looks like this: %changelog * Thu Jul 04 2006 Nikolai brkamikaze at gmail.com - Fixed almost all rpmlint errors; can't figure out how to get rid of the 'no-v - Fixed the desktop file and the icons to use more standard standards :-) * Tue Jun 27 2006 Nikolai brkamikaze at gmail.com - Added the automake14 to BuildRequires to help 'mocking' the package. * Sun May 7 2006 Nikolai brkamikaze at gmail.com - First created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196749 BugsThisDependsOn||196827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to ATT's GraphViz tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to ATT's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196749 BugsThisDependsOn||196827 OtherBugsDependingO||196837 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||196837 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197981] Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-wifi - Wireless monitor plugin for the GNU Krell Monitors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197981 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 16:19 EST --- Note 2: I'm going on a short vacation from monday 10 juli till friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet thats why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196837 OtherBugsDependingO|196837 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196843] Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls Alias: php-pear-Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196843 BugsThisDependsOn||196847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||196843 BugsThisDependsOn||196847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 16:19 EST --- p.s. 1) I'm going on a short vacation from monday 10 juli till friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet thats why. 2) If you open a new review request please put me in the CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197411 BugsThisDependsOn||197413 BugsThisDependsOn||197417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 196229] Review Request: xkeyboard-config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xkeyboard-config https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 16:21 EST --- *** Bug 197939 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197419 BugsThisDependsOn||197420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||197974 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||197419 BugsThisDependsOn||197420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195942] Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Veusz - a scientific plotting package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195942 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-07 16:30 EST --- SRPM URL: http://download.gna.org/veusz/rpms/review/veusz-0.10-7.src.rpm Spec URL: http://download.gna.org/veusz/rpms/review/veusz.spec Thanks for spotting that. I've fixed the sitearch/sitelib problem and tested the package on an x86_64 and an i386 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
