[Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 03:12 EST --- * Thu Dec 14 2006 Enrico Scholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.5.16-2 - added a requirement for plugins to the main package - do not ship README.debian anymore - improved URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/libextractor/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218887] Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218887 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 04:06 EST --- Dupplicate? Please see #188478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 05:02 EST --- rpmlint is not silent on RPM W: crystal-clear no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/48x48/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/48x48/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/32x32/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/32x32/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/22x22/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/24x24/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/22x22/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/24x24/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: crystal-clear dangling-symlink /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/16x16/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/16x16/apps/gnome-main-menu.png The symbolic link points nowhere. W: crystal-clear symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/Crystal-Clear/16x16/apps/kmenu.png /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/16x16/apps/gnome-main-menu.png Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 07:16 EST --- Further to Tobi's previous comments this is a cross-distribution SPEC, targeted at Fedora (FC5 tested), Mandriva (2006 tested) and SUSE (10.2 tested)... and uses a couple of conditional statements to reflect this. The 'touch' work-around (FC5 tested) was for an issue in 'rpmbuild' which seemed to be creating unnecessary binaries for a Python script we distribute. Our goal is to release 1.2.0 before Xmas (1 week) and we are still looking for a sponsor should anyone be able to help - The work involved should be little/minimal for this person. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219990] Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-timer-plugin - Timer for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219990 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: xfce4-timer-|Review Request: xfce4-timer- |plugin - Timer from the XFCE|plugin - Timer for the Xfce |panel |panel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 09:55 EST --- Well, * For main package: -- Requires: plugin(%name) -- What I meant was main package (libextract) should require at least base plugin package (libextract-plugins-base). plugin(%name) is not provided by libextract-plugins-base and then currently extra plugin package is needed for main (libextract) package. * For fake plugin package (libextract-plugins) Dependency for pdf plugin (libextract-plugins-pdf) is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 10:02 EST --- Just to update everyone. Gstreamer-plugins-good is still at 0.10.4 in Fedora Development. This week should see the release of a version compliant with Jokosher's requirements. LADSPA is a new requirement in Jokosher 0.2 however it is also packaged in FE. I'm not sure of policy for updating gstreamer in FC6 however I think this will be a showstopper until FC7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 10:20 EST ---
wrt. the %{python} macro - the spec files were originally made by people from
the pyvault project, and as a courtesy to them I would like to keep this in
because it makes it easy to rebuild and sync changes with them.
If other packagers are allowed to use %{__rm} to invoke a command that has not,
afaik, changed its name for over 30 years, then surely as a packager I can be
granted this one small peculiarity :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://www.cgtobi.de|http://www.aqsis.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219956] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture - Abstract Base Class to build modules to capture output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219956 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 10:57 EST --- Also built for FC-5 and FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219950] Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Spell - A formatter for spellchecking Pod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219950 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 10:58 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219957] Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Strip - Remove POD from Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219957 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 10:59 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219949] Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Which - Portable implementation of the 'which' utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 11:11 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219943] Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GPS-PRN - Package for PRN - Object ID conversions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219943 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 11:14 EST --- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 11:15 EST --- The osgi.sharedConfiguration.area is incorrect. It needs to be as Ben mentioned in comment #14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 11:15 EST ---
in reply to comment #6:
Sure, it's not a blocker, if you want to maintain it that way you can do so.
One related issue is that I see you call %{__python} in the install step.
Won't that fail on systems where %{python} has been defined as something like
'python23' ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 12:06 EST --- In my view there is no problem with the license since the License owner is included. That what this text try to say no? Thought it conform (!? need to confim ?) to the extras rules which can now provides binaries (and sources) firmware which are needed to support hardware. (exemple has been discussed with ipw2200-firmware ). Thought the Spec file provides 404... You can see #218887 but version is the same... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 12:55 EST --- I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux and the problem is that I do not run selinux myself, so I do not know what (if anything) is required to run this with selinux. Should I remove the selinux stuff from the init script? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 12:56 EST --- That's true. As you have seen I've added links to fedora logo as kmenu icon. Is there any better solution for this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 13:08 EST --- Yes, just turn it off for now until the selinux bits are ready, otherwise the semange bits in the init script will generate an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 13:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux and the problem is that I do not run selinux myself, so I do not know what (if anything) is required to run this with selinux. Should I remove the selinux stuff from the init script? IMHO yes. In the absence of an SELinux policy for the server, it will run unconfined by SELinux, and there will be no definition of the type pokerserver_port_t, so the semanage call to assign that type to a specific port number won't work. Someone would have to write a policy for the server to make any of that worthwhile. Which is pretty much what Wart said, only he said it quicker than me :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 13:30 EST --- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Dec 18 2006 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.32-2 - Remove semanage call in init file until an selinux policy is written - Add comment to %%check section indicating that it is not functional - Update TODO comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 13:31 EST --- oops, SRPM URL for comment #4 should be: SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 13:48 EST --- OK, I'll pick it up. I've tried the latest 1.5.0.1 which seems to work fine with all the packages I have over at freshrpms.net, so I'll submit a package of that version to this bug report once I'm 100% sure all is working (haven't tried easytag again with that version yet). At that point, someone will have to reassign the but to themselves in order to do the formal review, since I can't review a package which will be my own (obviously). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 13:57 EST --- what will be the next step ? I hope to see this module in extras asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 14:04 EST --- I will do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct
Rendering Infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 14:57 EST ---
Both issues fixed.
Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-3.fc7.src.rpm
diff of spec:
--- driconf.spec-2 2006-12-16 20:31:44.0 -0700
+++ driconf.spec2006-12-18 12:55:27.0 -0700
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: driconf
Version:0.9.1
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@
Patch1: driconf-0.9.1-setup.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel
+BuildRequires: python-devel
+BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
BuildArch: noarch
Requires: pygtk2
Requires: glx-utils
@@ -40,9 +41,29 @@
%find_lang driconf
+cat EOF %{name}.desktop
+[Desktop Entry]
+Name=Driconf
+Comment=configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
+Exec=/usr/bin/driconf
+Icon=/usr/share/driconf/driconf-icon.png
+Terminal=false
+Type=Application
+Encoding=UTF-8
+Categories=Application;X-Fedora;
+EOF
+
+desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \
+--dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/ %{name}.desktop
+
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+%post
+update-desktop-database /dev/null 21 || :
+
+%postun
+update-desktop-database /dev/null 21 || :
%files -f driconf.lang
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -69,8 +90,13 @@
%{_datadir}/driconf/screen.png
%{_datadir}/driconf/screencard.png
%{_datadir}/driconf/driconf-icon.png
+%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop
%changelog
+* Mon Dec 18 2006 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.1-3
+- Changed pygtk2-devel BuildRequires to python-devel
+- Added desktop file.
+
* Sat Dec 16 2006 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.1-2
- Added Requires for pygtk2 and glx-utils
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 15:05 EST --- I'd like to request a review for this for FC-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 15:19 EST --- With our intent to move all packages externally, can this split wait until then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 15:37 EST --- *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 15:43 EST --- Thanks hpj. I'm doomed timewise until early January, I hope to pick this up again then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|208686 |208687 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 16:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Thanks very much to FESCO members for approving this. Before proceeding further on this review i think i should wait for FE-KMOD-APPROVED set on this bug. Set. I should have done this earlier. My mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 16:32 EST --- Hi, if this package is dependent on other packages can you please add those to the depend list. If not can you please go ahead and push this out for devel and FC6? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||208169, 216105 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||219972 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||219972 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||171543 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||171543 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||171543 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||171543 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||171543 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 18:49 EST --- I have placed all the dependencies in bug #171543 so now this one can be closed and pushed for devel, then when all sub packages are done you can push to fc6 and close 171543. Does this make sense? I need python-twisted-core and python-twisted-web as soon as possible for my package review. Please let me know if I have missed any dependencies for bug #171543. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 19:12 EST --- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.4/fedora/development/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.0-6.beta4.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.4/fedora/development/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.0-6.beta4.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Dec 15 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.4.0-6.beta4 - Update to 1.4.0-beta4 - Various cleanups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 21:55 EST --- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-13.src.rpm Yeah sorry, when the new eclipse RPMs came out I built new packages for myself but forgot to add them to this review. Enjoy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209112] Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gspca - v4l2 kernel module driver for webcams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209112 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 23:29 EST --- Now i am looking for Sponsor. Is there any FESCO member watching this review can review this package please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219962] Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystal-clear - Crystal Clear KDE Icon set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219962 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 23:52 EST --- Can you check whether https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557#c17 is helpful to you. I have already suggested this in your https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 23:53 EST --- Are you willing to implement solution given it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557#c17? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-19 01:43 EST --- I saw tarball Is single line in LICENSE file, acceptable? This package is in the Public Domain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
