[Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 03:27 EST --- Well, for prelude-lml: * -devel package issues - First of all, is this package of any sense? I don't know how only installing one header file without providing any .so symlink libraries can be used for any other applications. For example, /usr/include/prelude-lml/prelude-lml.h contains const char *lml_log_entry_get_message(const lml_log_entry_t *log_entry); However, to what library should I actually link to use this function *lml_log_entry_get_message ? The other things are: - prelude-lml.h includes: - #include libprelude/prelude.h #include libprelude/prelude-log.h - This means that -devel package should need Requires: libprelude-devel - The description of Requires is wrong. * BuildRequires: -- BuildRequires: libprelude, libprelude-devel, pcre-devel -- - libprelude is not necessary - mockbuild log says: -- snip checking for pcre-config... /usr/bin/pcre-config checking for pcre_get_named_substring in -lpcre... yes checking fam.h usability... no checking fam.h presence... no checking for fam.h... no checking for FAMOpen in -lfam... no checking whether FILENAME_MAX is declared... yes checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes snip *** Dumping configuration *** - Enable FAM support: no - Enable unsupported rulesets: : yes + make snip -- Why is FAM support disabled? NOTE: fam.h is included in gamin-devel. * For debuginfo issue: - Mockbuild log says: --- + rm -f /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/prelude-lml/debug.la + rm -f /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/prelude-lml/pcre.la + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/prelude-lml extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-lml/pcre.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-lml/debug.so cpio: prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/src/.libs/prelude-lmlS.c: No such file or directory - THIS LINE 377 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump --- The description of THIS LINE means that a needed file for debugging this package is missing and this should be fixed. Again mockbuild log says --- creating .libs/prelude-lmlS.c (cd .libs gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -fno-builtin prelude-lmlS.c) rm -f .libs/prelude-lmlS.c .libs/prelude-lml.nm .libs/prelude-lml.nmS .libs/prelude-lml.nmT --- rm -f .libs/prelude-lmlS.c is wrong and this should not be done. * Documentation - Some %doc files are encoded with non-UTF-8 encodings. Please change to UTF-8. --- /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 08:12 EST --- Gawain, so what do we do make sure firefox15 profile is not modified? firefox2 IMHO must be completely parallel-installable (e.g. separate home-dirs for both firefox15 and firefox2) IMHO, otherwise it's unsuitable for Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 08:17 EST --- NO. scigraphica should own the libdir and libscigraphica should add to it - NOT the other way around! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 08:43 EST --- FYI firefox2-2.0.0.1-2.1.fc6.src.rpm builds just fine on FC6/x86_64. Thanks. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 09:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) Gawain, so what do we do make sure firefox15 profile is not modified? firefox2 IMHO must be completely parallel-installable (e.g. separate home-dirs for both firefox15 and firefox2) IMHO, otherwise it's unsuitable for Extras IT is not an elegant solution, but the .desktop file uses the -ProfileManager switch. I'm not sure that we can automatically create another profile and copy everything over. If some one else has some pointers on if/how this can be done, I would love to hear about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221084] New: Review Request: dkms - Dynamic Kernel Module Support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221084 Summary: Review Request: dkms - Dynamic Kernel Module Support Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/dkms/dkms.spec SRPM URL: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/dkms-2.0.13-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This package contains the framework for the Dynamic Kernel Module Support (DKMS) method for installing kernel module RPMS. DKMS has been included in Fedora Extras since March 15, 2005, though we couldn't find a formal review ticket for it. Gary Lerhaupt, Matt Domsch, and Tom Callaway all reviewed the spec at that time prior to its importation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 09:30 EST ---
Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.5.10-12.at.src.rpm
* Sun Dec 31 2006 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.5.10-12
- Add %%{_libdir}/libfakeroot to %%files.
- Add %%check.
* Fri Dec 29 2006 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.5.10-11
- Extend the %%description a bit.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 09:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) IT is not an elegant solution, but the .desktop file uses the -ProfileManager switch. heh, that's why I missed it -- I started firefox2 from the command line :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220890] Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when
playing audio CDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 09:33 EST ---
Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio-0.99.12p2-8.at.src.rpm
* Fri Dec 29 2006 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.99.12p2-8
- Change Group tag.
- Fix libcdaudio-config for libdir != %%{_prefix}/lib.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 09:42 EST --- Too bad, that would had been a nice addition to rpmlint. Anyway even more thanks for spotting this with eyeballs. :) Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-CharWidth.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-CharWidth-0.04-2.at.src.rpm * Sat Dec 30 2006 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.04-2 - Add ownership of some perl folders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 09:50 EST --- Please consider also upgrade paths to F?7, a firefox2 user in FC6 would be rather annoyed finding his half year old profile imported over instead of what this package would maintain. And this kind of upgrade path would only be possible from the main ff package. E.g. in any case Chris cooperation is a must for this package (Obsoleting/Providing this package and catering for collecting user data) and if he gets that much involved, then perhaps it would be more worth to him to issue an ff2 update for FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for
SciGraphica
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 10:08 EST ---
Well,
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
Unsure:
Does the -devel need ldconfig to be run?
I believe the package guildline says it has to be done
for the package and its
subpackage that contains a *.so.
It is not necessary. As when you try ldconfig -v and it returns like:
-
libGL.so.1 - libGL.so.1.2
-
ldconfig checks libraries with somajor if the library has
somajor/sominor. and .so files are not (necessary to be) checked.
(In reply to comment #8)
The scigraphica directory must belong to the
application and not the library.
Umm.. Ownership distribution between libraries - applications is
of second importance or less.
First of all, all directories created during installation must
belong to some package. You can install libscigraphica without
any applications which may use this library. %{_libdir}/scigraphica/
_must_ be owned by this package.
There are other issues.
--
/usr/share/aclocal/libscigraphica-2.0.m4
--
This should be in -devel package and owning aclocal m4 files means
-devel package should need Requires: automake
libscigraphica-2.0.pc says:
---
Requires: glib-2.0 gtk+-2.0 gtkextra-2.0
---
This means that -devel package should require -devel
as well as pkgconfig (Please check Requires section of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines)
And.. this package contains many documentations (xml/header files,
etc) and image files and keeping timestamps on these files
are strongly recommended. Please keep timestamps on these files.
(I have not tried, however for many cases
-
make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL=%{__install} -c -p install
--
works.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 10:25 EST --- Please correct libscigraphica first. Apparently --- BuildRequires: gtk2-devel gtk+extra-devel BuildRequires: pkgconfig --- This should be required by libscigraphica-devel, not by BuildRequires of this package. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig This is not necessary because no libraries installed by this package are installed under default path on which ldconfig tries to search. (In reply to comment #5) NO. scigraphica should own the libdir and libscigraphica should add to it - NOT the other way around! See my comments on bug 220967. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 11:05 EST --- Yes, I'll do the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 11:14 EST --- Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-1.src.rpm changelog - New stable release 1.5.1.5 - Fixed symlink-should-be-relative rpmlint issues - Removed numerous entries on kmenu - Added examples in a new -doc package - Building pdf handbook for different languages - Breaking down -doc package for different languages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209217] Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209217 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 12:00 EST --- This package is now a subpackage of libpreludedb. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 209215 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 12:00 EST --- *** Bug 209217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 12:07 EST --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 12:24 EST --- Pretty simple and straight-forward. * builds in mock environment. * MUST: SOURCE matches upstream APPROVED. I'll leave these up to you to consider: * SHOULD: Summary shouldn't include pkg name (ie, don't include Kio_resources) * SHOULD: Description is too long, imo. Could probably omit 2nd paragraph. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 12:39 EST --- Thanks Rex :) * Mon Jan 01 2007 Chitlesh Goorah chitlesh [AT] fedoraproject DOT org - 0.2-2 - Removed package name from summary - Fixed description, since it was too long -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 12:56 EST --- Well, A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines = Licensing -- is not LGPL and this is correct * Use rpmlint - W: fakechroot doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/fakechroot-2.5/ldd.fake /usr/bin/perl - Well.. I understood first when I read the following. - doc-file-dependency : An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. - For this package, - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --requires fakechroot /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl - THIS libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- and /usr/bin/perl is actually not necessary. When I all changed the permission of %doc files to 0644, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpm -qp --requires fakechroot-2.5-11.1.i386.rpm /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) and the dependency for /usr/bin/perl disappears. Change the permission of %doc files to 0644. (However, I think this is somewhat bug of rpmbuild?) B. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = This is okay, except for written in A. Please fix the issues in A. Other things are okay. This package (fakechroot) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 13:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines = Licensing -- is not LGPL and this is correct I meant Licensing -- is now LGPL and this is correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 13:18 EST --- Another issue. -- + make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1' Making all in pixmaps make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/pixmaps' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/pixmaps' Making all in scigraphica make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/scigraphica' Making all in widgets make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/scigraphica/widgets' if /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I../../pixmaps -I../../scigraphica -I../../scigraphica/dialogs -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/gtkextra-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12-I/usr/include/python2.5 -I/usr/include/python2. 5/Numeric/ -DWITH_NUMERIC_PYTHON-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O -W -Wall -DWITH_WARNINGS -MT gtkplotart.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gtkplotart.Tpo \ . This means that gcc optimizes this code finally by -O, not -O2? If so, this should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for
SciGraphica
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 13:21 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
The scigraphica directory must belong to the
application and not the library.
Umm.. Ownership distribution between libraries - applications is
of second importance or less.
First of all, all directories created during installation must
belong to some package. You can install libscigraphica without
any applications which may use this library. %{_libdir}/scigraphica/
_must_ be owned by this package.
So Paul what do think about this? I actually know people that use libscigraphica
without needing scigraphica.
There are other issues.
--
All fixed.
Happy new year to one and all.
Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-4.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 13:22 EST --- With fixes, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 15:00 EST --- Any news with this package? I've already seen it in Debian. I'll be happy to see it in Fedora as well. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 15:47 EST --- I'm pasting a part of a private mail between me and Dan, at his request. On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: About the spec file - why do you manually edit the Makefile instead of running ./configure during %build ? and in %install $(MAKE) DESTDIR=$(DEB_DESTDIR) install $(DEB_DESTDIR) has the path for the debian package build root. I think it will look much more cleaner with these changes. Suggestions are based on aspell-ar package from Debian (which I maintain with others). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||149781 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Component|915resolution |Package Review --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 16:12 EST --- Thanks for the review! Final changelog entry: * Mon Jan 1 2007 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.5-12 - Remove executable bits from scripts in documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 16:52 EST --- Removed the Rezlooks-Aerials theme since it required an extra metacity theme and icon theme. New spec url is the same as the old one. New SRPM url: http://www.krakoa.dk/fedora/gtk-rezlooks-engine-0.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 17:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) fixed and built in the development tree, awaiting signing. Thanks for the great work Jef, would you push this package for FC6 too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 17:05 EST --- Soon it will be, Terje :) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189830] Review Request: xmms-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: xmms- |Review Request: xmms- |scrobber - Audioscrobbler |scrobbler - Audioscrobbler |plugin for XMMS |plugin for XMMS --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 17:38 EST --- Fix typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221108] New: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221108 Summary: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/openarena/openarena.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/openarena/openarena-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: OpenArena is an open-source content package for Quake III Arena licensed under the GPL, effectively creating a free stand-alone game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 17:49 EST --- concerning the debuging thing I got the following information from upstream: This is the way automake+libtool handle building the program. More specifically, this is related to the handling of pre-opened modules. You will notice similar behavior with prelude-manager, but this is all generated libtool code. because of the missing .so symlink libraries in the -devel I got this: The prelude-lml.h header provide the necessary API for contributor to write LML plugins. The function (*lml_log_entry_get_message, used in your example) is a public function available from the LML core. Plugin loaded by LML have access to LML public symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 21:26 EST --- 1.4 final shouldn't be that different from the last beta. Hopefully I'll have new SRPMS up in a day or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 21:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) Another issue. 5/Numeric/ -DWITH_NUMERIC_PYTHON-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O -W -Wall -DWITH_WARNINGS -MT gtkplotart.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gtkplotart.Tpo \ . This means that gcc optimizes this code finally by -O, not -O2? If so, this should be fixed. This is caused by the configure scripts assuming it building a CVS checkout (the developers have enabled some extra debugging options for CVS builds, and mistakingly shipped a configure script generated in a CVS checkout). Regenerating the configure script should have worked, but it failed because some expected file are not shipped in the released package. I've fixed it and some other issues I noticed while looking at this. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 21:44 EST --- I discovered building this package (as is in last spec) fails when python-numarry is installed. This is because the configure script is kinda confused by python-numarry and python-numeric both providing 'arrayobject.h'. This is resolved in this build. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 22:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) concerning the debuging thing I got the following information from upstream: This is the way automake+libtool handle building the program. More specifically, this is related to the handling of pre-opened modules. You will notice similar behavior with prelude-manager, but this is all generated libtool code. Then? actually .libs/prelude-lmlS.o is used in prelude-lml as -- gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=g eneric -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wnested-externs -Wunused -o prelude-lml -pthread .libs/prelude-lmlS.o prelude-lml.o udp-server.o regex.o log-entry.o log-source.o log-plugins.o lml-options.o file-server.o lml-alert.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -L/usr/lib -lprelude -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lrt -ldl -lpcre ../libmissing/.libs/libmissing.a -- and debugging prelude-lml actually needs prelude-lmlS.c, so prelude-lmlS.c should not be removed. because of the missing .so symlink libraries in the -devel I got this: The prelude-lml.h header provide the necessary API for contributor to write LML plugins. The function (*lml_log_entry_get_message, used in your example) is a public function available from the LML core. Plugin loaded by LML have access to LML public symbols. Well, then what library actually provides *lml_log_entry_get_message? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for
SciGraphica
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 22:41 EST ---
Well, some minor things and issues.
Minor:
* BuildRequies
pkgconfig, gtk2-devel is not necessary. These are (finally) required
by gtk+extra-devel
? Group: Development/Libraries (main)
Usually Development is used for -devel package and the
group of this type is System Environment/Libraries.
Should be fixed:
* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/
is not owned by any package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 22:58 EST --- Actually I know this application because I use this for cowsaver, one of hacks which can be used for xscreensaver. I will review this. * Use cp -p to keep timestamps (Timestamps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * Please fix the description of man package according to installed paths. * How about randomize a cow which is choosen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 23:05 EST --- Created an attachment (id=144618) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144618action=view) wrapper script I use to randomize cowsay c.f. animalsay, which I use for cowsaver to randomize animal used by cowsay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|171543, 219954 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 23:28 EST --- pec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-3.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Dec 31 2006 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.32-4 - Add full path to exec in desktop file - Add pkgconfig to devel subpackage - Convert icons to png format and store in icons directory - Update TODO Jef: Can you test the icons out on this release? Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 23:31 EST --- I am unable to download above links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 23:31 EST --- I am unable to download SPEC and SRPMS files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-01 23:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) pec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-3.src.rpm Ack, this is supposed to be: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-4.src.rpm I apologize, I am notoriously bad for copypasting without updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-02 01:13 EST --- Menu entry and menu icons appear to be working in this release. I think the only important thing left is the issue of whether /usr/lib/poker-network/poker-interface should be moved to /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokerclient2d and if it should be renamed to poker-interface.so for clarity. the python add-on package naming issue is less clear since there are already poker-whatever packages in the tree which you'd have to also rename to meet the python-whatever guidance. I'm not going to block on that since these poker-* packages make a consistent naming group. If someone else has a problem with it, you'll have to go into the tree later and rename and do some virtual providing. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-02 01:15 EST --- Ville I don't have a Fedora account since I haven't been sponsored yet. I forgot to state that this was an unofficial review, but Jeffrey knew that because I was providing several unofficial reviews for his packages. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
