[Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 02:17 EST --- Well, I downloaded your srpm from other system. Checking now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 02:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) Some remarks: * I'd recommend to let the *-docs package put its doc files into /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-%version I'm afraid thats impossible, as rpmbuild erases that dir before checking %files: Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46262 + umask 022 + cd /home/hans/projects/fedora-extras/wip/avr-libc + cd avr-libc-1.4.6 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 So writing %doc /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo won't work because if foo was installed there it will be erased. And using %doc foo, will make it end up as /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo * I don't think shipping the man pages in /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-%version/man is a good idea. It will break avr-man when installing the rpm w/ --exclude-docs I'd put them somewhere else, e.g. /usr/share/avr-libc, /usr/avr/share/man or even /usr/avr/sys-root/usr/share/man. I'd use /usr/avr/share/man. Here is a new version which moves the manpages to /usr/avr/share/man, Trond any chance you could review this? Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 03:23 EST --- It is a simple and small package :) For KDE users, there is a package kmenu-gnome. It installs all gnome/gtk applications in a seperate menu if GNOME;GTK; are in the Categories of the desktop file. Edit your desktop file so that the category line looks as follows: Categories=GNOME;GTK;X-Fedora;System; Because right now, gnome/gtk applications are mixed up with kde/qt applications in kmenu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 06:01 EST --- Weird. I've tested it on 3 machines, two FC7's in enforcing and on -Devel, again, in enforcing. Can you dig out the exact error from messages? Oh, what's the output of ls -lZ /usr/lib/libkbluetooth.so.0 Mine is: ls -lZ /usr/lib64/libkbluetooth.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx root root system_u:object_r:lib_t /usr/lib64/libkbluetooth.so.0 - libkbluetooth.so.0.0.0 - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 07:06 EST --- Okay. - This package (proxychains) is APPROVED by me - Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure above), please make a note on this bug that you did so. If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 07:24 EST --- Ville, I cannot seem to reproduce the :9/:10 problem and I've tested 4 different phones (3 Nokia's, one SE) and my palm. (E.g. I'm getting :7 with my SE K800). Does it continue to happen with -24? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 07:46 EST --- Fixed timestamp and directory ownership issues. I have also contacted the gdesklets maintainer to resolve the directory ownership. Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-2.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 07:47 EST --- Fixed timestamp and directory ownership issues. I have also contacted the gdesklets maintainer to resolve the directory ownership. Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-2.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:04 EST --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:04 EST --- There seems to be quite a bit of confusion here. Just forget about any particular channel numbers (dunno if that's the correct term, but I mean the :9 :10 :12 and friends). I no longer know what you might mean by the :9/:10 problem so here goes: Problem 1: kdebluetooth doesn't find an OBEX file transfer service on a channel that would work with my N70. The SDP view lists an OBEX File Transfer icon but that doesn't work for me (:10), it returns an empty view. Before beta3, I patched kdebluetooth to find additionally the one that works for me (:12, identified by a proprietary PC suite file OBEX transfer thingy ID or something in addition to the usual OBEX file transfer one), but the patch no longer applies. I have the bug/RFE open upstream, and will maybe look into refreshing the patch sometime so it'd apply to post-beta3 sources again. Problem 2: Without URL escaping colons, Konqueror eats my obex2 URLs when I type them into the location bar and hit enter as described in comment 22. URL escaping the colons works, see comment 27. Neither of those problems is a blocker for this package - the first one is an upstream kdebluetooth RFE, and the second either a bug in Konqueror or a problem between chair and keyboard. Just forget about them as far as getting this package to Fedora is concerned. Regarding the first problem, I think Nokia PC Suite for Windows installs something to the phone when it is used the first time - maybe that has done something to OBEX in my phone when I tried it, dunno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:10 EST --- I have created an account (owentl) and requested membership to the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:12 EST --- There will be a new release and spec file within 2 weeks. I was diverted to other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:37 EST --- Ville, OK. Now I get the full picture. Can you post the BZ# of the RFE of problem 1 so I can subscribe to it? Either way, I did some monkey coding and adopted your patch to B3. Does it solve the problem? As for problem 2, I can reproduce it on my Nokia 6230 - konq indeed eats my URL when I hit enter. Have you reported it upstream? * Sun Jul 08 2007 Gilboa Davara gilboad[AT]gmail.com 1-0.0-25.beta4 - Adopted Ville Skyttä b2 patch to p3. (Hopefully) re-enable Nokia N73 obex support. - Patch out Configure services. (Disabled in B3) SPEC: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.25.beta3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:42 EST --- Created an attachment (id=158729) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158729action=view) N70 support. Take/1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:42 EST --- Well, * NOTE: For now gdesklets itself does not work on rawhide. On Fedora 7, it and this package seem to be working. Okay. -- This package (gdesklets-goodweather) is APPROVED by me. -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 08:54 EST --- One last thing. I need someone to review this bug. Anyone up to it? (Before I spam fedora-maintainers?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 09:19 EST --- Thanks, but the patch in 0.25 doesn't appear to affect anything. Comment 4 has info about my upstream bug report. I haven't reported the URL eating issue anywhere. One new finding with 0.25 (no idea if it was present in earlier revisions): when browsing my phone, in addition to the (as discussed) non-working-for-me OBEX File Transfer icon, I see a OBEX Object Push one. When double-clicking it, I get an error dialog saying Protocol not supported: obex and nothing more happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 09:47 EST --- Created an attachment (id=158731) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158731action=view) suggested spec file Well, for me current spec file seems too complicated. Would you check the spec file attached which I suggest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 09:50 EST --- Perhaps I think that your spec file can be simplified as bug 245571 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 09:57 EST ---
* I see you fixed all the above issues.
* The spec file name should remain as %{name}.spec without the version
information.
On F7 when I run pida I get a number of errors displayed to the console.
Appears to be missing requires?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Download]$ pida
09:47:32 failed to import services.pythonbrowser =
pida.services.pythonbrowser:Service
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py, line 78, in
__load_entrypoint
cls = entrypoint.load()
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 1912, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/pythonbrowser.py, line
34, in module
raise Exception('Bike is not installed')
Exception: Bike is not installed
09:47:33 failed to import services.scripts = pida.services.scripts:Service
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py, line 78, in
__load_entrypoint
cls = entrypoint.load()
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 1912, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/scripts.py, line 24, in
module
import pida.pidagtk.contentbook as contentbook
ImportError: No module named contentbook
09:47:33 failed to import services.webbrowse = pida.services.webbrowse:Service
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py, line 78, in
__load_entrypoint
cls = entrypoint.load()
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 1912, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowse.py, line 29,
in module
import gtkhtml2
ImportError: No module named gtkhtml2
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window.py:243: GtkWarning: quit:
missing action buffermanager+quit_pida
self.__uim.ensure_update()
It appears that you are missing gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 and others. Are these
necessary? Can you disable this support to make the messages go away?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 10:17 EST --- OBEX object push returns the same protocol error in my case. I've reported it upstream. [1] Having a bad code-monkey day (lack of sleep) I tried replacing obex with obex2 in kdebluetooth/kioslave/sdp/btsdp.cpp:247, it works (no error), but I'm getting an empty konq window. - Gilboa [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147678 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 10:45 EST ---
* The spec file name should remain as %{name}.spec without the version
information.
It still is. There is no way I could upload 2 files with the same name on the
same server. :-)
On F7 when I run pida I get a number of errors displayed to the console.
Appears to be missing requires?
There has been a new upstream release-- 0.5.0. I am going to package it and
upload a new pair of SPEC and SRPM soon.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 12:38 EST --- Still no response; setting NEEDINFO. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 12:41 EST --- No response in three weeks; setting NEEDINFO. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 12:43 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: proxychains Short Description: Provides proxy support to any application Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 12:45 EST --- It's been six months since the last comment by the submitter; setting NEEDINFO. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 12:55 EST --- much simpler! Rebuilt srpm per your suggestions Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-3.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 12:55 EST --- I cleaned up the spec file per your suggestions. latest files: Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-3.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:00 EST --- Do you have an fixed srpm to propose about Mamoru comment ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:15 EST --- By the way, do you have a time to review one of my review requests (bug 247124)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:19 EST --- Okay. This package is now no problem. This package (gdesklets-calendar) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:24 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gdesklets-goodweather Short Description: weather and forcast display for gdesklets Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:46 EST --- Okay. * Please remember to contact with gdesklets maintainer and to discuss directories ownership issue. This package (gdesklets-quote-of-the-day) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the
construction of tcltk widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:49 EST ---
As the new version of R has been released,
There is the new spec and srpm resepcting the R packaging guideslines:
SPEC:
http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec
SRPM:
http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-10.fc6.src.rpm
I have tested it when it is the only package installed in %{_datadir} there is
no warning any more.
Regards
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:49 EST --- Tyler, as now I am sponsoring you, you can formally review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:56 EST --- This cannot be closed, this is already in Fedora, was in core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 14:10 EST --- Oh, joy. Well, then it's essentially a merge review. And so it may come down to this package being pulled from the distro if we can't get any response to review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 14:20 EST --- However it seems that there is still a problem: $ mock ../SRPMS/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-10.fc6.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while unpack cache setup No srpm created from specfile from srpm: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-10.fc6.src.rpm ending done I have tried with 3 different RPMs and I have always the same error... whereas the rpmbuild and rpmlint give none... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 14:30 EST --- Thanks for the update. There's really very little to this package, and while I have no understanding of the application itself and no possible way to test this, I doubt anyone else in the reviewer pool does either, so I'll go ahead and finish up this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 16:10 EST --- - Summary: - * Duplicate BuildRequires: libXt-devel (by libXmu-devel) * RPM builds and functions on both F7 and rawhide. - Details: - OK - Mock : Built on F-7 (x86) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is QPL OK - License match packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: 5c1eba8291385c630b8099fa9b042455 tgif-QPL-4.1.45.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. FIX - BuildRequires are not redundant. OK - %build and %install stages are correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - No large doc files not in a -doc package OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories that other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Does not contain any .la libtool archives OK - .desktop file installed correctly OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version --- Rpmlint output: --- OK - silent on both srpm and main package rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 16:13 EST --- I will do the formal review. Please post a note when you have updated the package for the latest upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 16:59 EST --- See root.log in /var/lib/mock/fedora-[version]-[arch]/result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 17:26 EST --- msmtp was built successfully with libgsasl support. For now I'm leaving the package as it is and I'm closing the bug. If there is a single user request for using alternatives I'll modify the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 18:48 EST --- ZI fixed almost everything. I'm going to upload it in 1 or 2 days. I had a busy week at work, that's why it took this long to fix it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel
chips
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 21:05 EST ---
I note that the %{?dist} tag is not present. This is not an absolute
requirement, but I need to make sure you understand how you maintain multiple
branches and the necessary orderings between them without out it. (And if you
have to ask how you do that, you probably just want to add the dist tag and be
happy.) See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag for more info.
You don't need the manual libusb runtime dependency, and in fact it's
misleading. rpm will find the appropriate library dependency by itself, so
there's no reason to tell it. The built package won't work with any libusb with
the required version, it will work with only a libusb package that provides the
version of the libusb library that it was built against. It's best to just let
RPM figure things out, which it does quite well in this case.
Review:
* source files match upstream:
eef7c56d4915880c1faa67d6b20be727352f5002955a29bbd24020462f733792
dfu-programmer-0.4.2.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
X dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
X final provides and requires has unneeded libusb dependency.
dfu-programmer = 0.4.2-1
=
X libusb = 0.1.10a
libusb-0.1.so.4()(64bit)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't the hardware needed
to test this.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193712] Review Request: sos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 22:38 EST --- OK, cool. The source matches upstream, summary looks good, the spec is cneal with no extraneous bits, rpmlint is quiet. I'd say it's ready to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 23:20 EST --- Thank you for your initial comments. Updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/tgif.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SRPMS/tgif-4.1.45-3.fc8.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/tgif-4.1.45-2-3.diff --- * Mon Jul 9 2007 TASAKA Mamoru [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4.1.45-3 - Clean up BuildRequies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247402] New: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gspiceui SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gspiceui Description: GNU Spice GUI is intended to provide a GUI to freely available Spice electronic cicuit simulators eg.GnuCAP, Ng-Spice. It uses gNetList to convert schematic files to net list files and gWave to display simulation results. gSchem is used as the schematic generation/viewing tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247405] New: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/compiz-bcop.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/compiz-bcop/compiz-bcop-0.1.3-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: Bcop is a tool to autogenerate code for working with options in compiz plugins; this is required to build some plugins, and gives a great help to developers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247406] New: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz = 0.5.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz = 0.5.1 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/libcompizconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity through plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains the library for plugins to configure compiz settings. - BuildReq: compiz-bcop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 247408] New: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/compizconfig-python.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains bindings to configure Compiz's plugins and the composite window manager. --- BuildReq libcompizconfig - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |one.com)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 01:48 EST --- For some reason, I am unable to create the SRPM for adesklets with that result: $ rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/adesklets.spec error: Unable to open temp file. RPM build errors: Unable to open temp file. I am not sure what cause rpmbuild to not create a temporary file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
