[Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 02:13 EST --- Is this issue discussed on fedora-devel? Not understand why we need to patch pirut dependency? Why can't configure successfully detects it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 02:09 EST --- [SpecURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SrpmURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.433.beta.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #52) FWIW, you could probably drop sepostmaster altogether --- that symlink is only kept around for compatibilty with pre-8.2 startup scripts. Your pointed out is fair enough. I dropped /usr/bin/sepostgresql in the updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 02:06 EST --- New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-2.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Fix mock error - Support Python 2.4 and Python 2.5 Sorry for the Comment #4, one shouldn't make important decision when he has a running nose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 02:41 EST --- Okay. -- This package (libpanelappletmm) is APPROVED by me -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts-|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts |fonts (splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts-|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts |fonts (splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 02:58 EST ---
missing following guidelines
- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts-|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts |fonts (splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts|Package Review: cjkunifonts- |(splitted from fonts- |fonts (splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 02:48 EST --- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkunifonts-fonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:04 EST --- About the name: I still think I prefer just calling it cjkunifonts since that seems the closest to upstream name CJK Unifonts. [the srpm url is http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:13 EST --- The paths aren't nice. I'll fix all paths in tcl and related packages after the tcl8.5 will be out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:21 EST --- New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-2.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Issue raised in Comment #6 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:21 EST --- Looks perfect now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:22 EST --- New SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm.spec New SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/libsvm-2.84-3.fc7.src.rpm Changed: - Issue raised in Comment #6 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:05 EST --- Thanks for the review :-) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libpanelappletmm Short Description: C++ interface for Gnome panel applets Owners: denis Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkuni-fonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 03:37 EST --- http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070828_cjkuni-fonts/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 04:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #55) I dropped /usr/bin/sepostgresql in the updated package. Oops, it was /usr/bin/sepostmaster, no need to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 04:07 EST --- Hmm. That isn't a failure I recognise ... could you try it again? It rebuilds fine for me in mock on my machine. (Not against development when I just tried, but that looks more like yum crapping out rather than a build problem.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 04:53 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. a7bd21b21510e9634950715c2b4a4ce9 libsvm-2.84.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + libsvm package Requires: glibc libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + libsvm-devel package Provides: perl(libsvm) Requires: glibc libsvm = 2.84-3.fc8 + libsvm-python package Provides: svmc.so Requires: /usr/bin/env libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libsvm = 2.84-3.fc8 python = 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 05:00 EST --- Well, this time rebuild succeeded on x86_64 and ppc, failed on i386 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133694 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133707 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133696 And the previous time, it failed on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=132362 Now I guess this is due to parallel make problem. Would you try to drop parallel make support and re-upload new srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 05:16 EST --- Parallel make disabled. Weird, wonder why this hasn't shown up before now ... http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice-3.2.1-8.fc7.src.rpm http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/extras/ice.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 05:43 EST --- Here are the updated spec file and SRPM: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fitzsim/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.14.b18.snapshot.src.rpm Here is the new snapshot: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/source/icedtea-1.3-a9c9ee1b6479a84f2153be67fce85b0dbf371398.tar.gz The updated SRPM fixes the remaining release-critical items: 1. plugin location on x86_64 2. documentation for -plugin and -src 3. licensing issues 4. s/OpenJDK/IcedTea/ in version output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 05:39 EST --- You should fix this warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/applications/system-config-vsftpd.desktop, because the file shouldn't be listed twice. rpmlint output: W: system-config-vsftpd no-dependency-on usermode W: system-config-vsftpd dangerous-command-in-%preun rm another spec things: The license could be GPLv2+ ? %defattr(-,root,root) is usually %defattr(-,root,root,-) I'm not sure if vendor couldn't be fedora. You are upstream so you can decide it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 06:11 EST --- We don't ship any dvi files and it doesn't really matter. But I've added this for completeness in -13. Please close this bugzilla if everything else looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 06:42 EST --- A couple of comments on the latest changes for building with nss rather than openssl: 1. The package is still configured to use /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt, which is provided by openssl and hence that's why there was a dependency on openssl. Is there an equivalent cert bundle provided by nss? 2. The curl-devel requirement for libidn-devel is real (or at least it was): see http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-November/msg07551.html (the pkgconfig file for curl does reference -lidn too, which would suggest the dependency is still valid) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 06:48 EST --- #002: I don't know what to do with this one #006: Is this needed? I don't get any rpath complaint - and it was configured with --disable-rpath. Please review https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 07:31 EST --- Almost. There is still the automake = 1.6.3 obsoletion that annoys me. I sent a mail on -devel, we'll see what people respond. And if nobody responds for some day I'll repost on -packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:25 EST --- Thanks, it's building now. btw. texlive 0.11 will be out in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:24 EST --- Done. See: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-3.fc7.src.rpm https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:07 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
#002: I don't know what to do with this one
Add
%{__sed} -i s|\%u \%u|\%u| src/%{name}.desktop
after
%setup -q
#006: Is this needed? I don't get any rpath complaint - and it was
configured
with --disable-rpath.
no it's not needed. Forget it.
Please review https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/komparator-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm
Next time do post the SPEC file as well together with the SRPM
Fix #002 as mentioned above, I'll approve it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:14 EST --- I committed the changes I was advocating. You can build if you like them, I can revert the changes you dislike if you want to. I also clarified the licenses. There is currently no tag for the texi2html documentation license, I asked spot to add it to the wiki, in the mean time I used MIT-like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (splitted from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (splitted from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Package Review: cjkuni-fonts|Package Review: cjkunifonts |(splitted from fonts- |(splitted from fonts- |chinese). |chinese). --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:00 EST --- Just remembered again: the urls should be on an external site please so that everyone can see them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts |Package Review: cjkunifonts |(splitted from fonts- |(split from fonts-chinese) |chinese). | Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:44 EST --- Created an attachment (id=176161) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=176161action=view) cjkunifonts.spec-2.patch Here are some more changes and some of the changes again from the first patch. Please be consistent with the vertical spacing: either use one or two spaces between each section. In this patch I made all the sections double-spaced but single-spaced is fine too. BTW IMHO it would be easier to do the %install in parallel for uming and ukai like in the initial version - that would make maintenance easier. If you're unclear about any of the changes please feel free to ask questions. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:48 EST --- Please also rename the spec file, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225655] Merge Review: coreutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: coreutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225655 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:58 EST --- Seems to me that everything is right (except the license tag which is still the old GPL one), this is not a blocker for me. I reassign to me and set feodra review to +, Michael or Kevin you can reassign to you if you want to, I didn't do most of the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #51) Meantime please check if the results meets what you expect. Oops.. The results are under: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=133932 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_133932/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:51 EST --- This time rebuild passed. It is unsure if I can check the results today (in Japan = UTC+09h) Meantime please check if the results meets what you expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 08:59 EST --- All done: SPEC: http://vsftpd-config.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/vsftpd-config/trunk/system-config-vsftpd.spec RPM - for download use: www.sf.net/projects/vsftpd-config/download Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:01 EST --- APPROVED. I'll take care of the documentation license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:06 EST --- BTW any chances to see powerpc-version of IcedTea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:26 EST --- David Walluck pointed out on IRC that IcedTea should use the system versions of third-party libraries it requires (e.g., libpng). I agree and wanted to mention here that we plan to do this work before Fedora 8. I also wanted to mention another plan to solve a problem brought up in this discussion: I would like a cleaner solution to the lib vs lib64 alternatives naming problem. I'm toying with the idea of proposing $LIB support for the alternatives command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:21 EST --- I was told in #fedora-devel by ivazquez that patching out the check for pirut in configure would be fine since the Requires and BuildRequires are taking care of that. The configure file basically does: $ $PYTHON -c import pirut ...to check for the availability of the Pirut modules. However importing the Pirut modules also imports gtk. Importing Gtk needs DISPLAY to be set and a running X. Although one can take care of DISPLAY, I do not think we have X running on the Koji build servers. Hence the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:16 EST --- I forgot to thank Kostas for his patch and him and everyone else for their interest in this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:11 EST --- Approved Thanks, Tom! I know there's still work to be done, but this is an excellent addition to Fedora and I look forward to its inclusion. Don't forget to do the fedora-cvs flag setting and requesting. I'd also say that a release note is in order, but I'll leave that up to you to set the flag or not (not that I really know what it does ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #29) BTW any chances to see powerpc-version of IcedTea? We're working on PowerPC support. We're investigating using CACAO's JIT as a short-term solution and longer term we're working on a PPC port of Hotspot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora_requires_release_note ||?, fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:35 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: java-1.7.0-icedtea Short Description: IcedTea Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 09:51 EST --- Adel, Fix the issues, but sourceforge (it is the palce I upload my specfile to) is unreacheable via ssh. Will ping you as soon as the spec ans srpm url's are updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 10:04 EST --- oops, I meant fixed the issues ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 10:07 EST --- I forgot to assign this to myself. What should we do about the rpmlint 0.81 requirement? Lower the required version of rpmlint or block on this package until that gets in? Alphonse? Ville? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 10:26 EST --- CVS Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 10:39 EST --- I've never created a configure script before but from what I understand it's a bash script... this would work: python_sitelib=$(python -c from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()) echo -n Checking for pirut... if [ -d $python_sitelib/pirut ];then echo Yes, $python_sitelib/pirut else echo 'No' fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 260441] New: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://pguiman.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/pguiman/trunk/pguiman.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pguiman/pguiman-0.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The PostgreSQL Manager is a graphical user interface for administration of a PostgreSQL database server. Users new to PostgreSQL database server can use this tool to quickly set up a working database. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 11:23 EST --- If this is approved, please set the fedora-review flag to '+'. (It should be set to '?' while the package is being reviewed and to '+' once approval is given.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 11:27 EST --- === The package komparator is approved by ME . === -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 255561] Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: d3lphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 11:05 EST --- The new texlive 0.11 is now uploaded and repodata updated. It newly contains japanese support and fixes/changes proposed by Patrice and others. We should consider this one final IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 11:07 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jetty5 Short Description: Jetty webserver and servlet container Owners: jjohnstn Branches: F-8 InitialCC: overholt Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 11:21 EST --- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/20070829_cjkunifonts/cjkunifonts-0.1.20060928-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 11:21 EST --- I haven't checked how this package works, if it works (even partially) without rpmlint installed, or if it works (even partially) with an older rpmlint. If it actually absolutely requires a version of rpmlint that can be invoked on specfiles, my humble opinion would be to block it until such a rpmlint is available in the target repos. See also comment 3 and 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 12:34 EST --- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/wyrd.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/wyrd-1.4.3-2.fc7.src.rpm This new spec now uses a conditional to BR ocaml-camlp4-devel like it is described in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag for F8 and beyond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 13:25 EST --- description fixed. http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-4.src.rpm http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora_requires_release_note ||-, fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 13:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-rake Short Description: Ruby based make-like utility Owners: lutter, sseago Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Bug 254016 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Bug 254015 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 13:35 EST --- Bug shouldn't have been closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 14:05 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: openmsx Short Description: An emulator for the MSX home computer system Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 255381] Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmsx - An emulator for the MSX home computer system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 14:37 EST --- Please resubmit your CVS request with your FAS name instead of e-mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 15:05 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: jetty5 Re-name package to jetty. Sorry, I know this was just approved and imported, but I should have brought this up during the review. I was thinking about having parallel-installable jetty's (5, 6, etc.) but we don't care about that. I'm an idiot, sorry :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 225726 depends on bug 224627, which changed state. Bug 224627 Summary: emacs 22: trademark issue with Tetris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224627 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 257181] Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: komparator - kompare/sync files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 15:34 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: komparator Short Description: kompare/sync files Owners: nbecker Branches: devel F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D
stunt driving game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 15:41 EST ---
* rpmlint: Ok
W: maniadrive-data dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/maniadrive/rayphp
../raydium/rayphp
The relative symbolic link points nowhere.
I believe this is OK and points to a file in the main maniadrive package but
will check when I review that also.
* Package named correctly: Yes
* Patches named correctly: Yes
* Spec file named correctly: Yes
* Licence(s) acceptable: Yes
* Licence field matches: No () see below
* Licence file installed: Yes and included upstream
* Spec file in American English: Yes
* Source matches upstream: N/A (upstream sources are repackaged by necessity)
* Locales use %find_lang: N/A
* Contains %clean: Yes
* %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: Yes
* Specfile legible: Yes
* Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock devel/i386)
* Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A
* Owns directories it creates: Yes
* Duplicate files: No
* Permissions set correctly: Yes
* Consistent macro use: Yes
* Separate -doc needed (for large docs): N/A
* %doc affects runtime: No
* Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A
* .pc files in -devel: N/A
* .so in -devel: N/A
* -devel requires base: N/A
* Contains .la files: N/A
* Owns files it didn't create: No
* .desktop files included and installed correctly: N/A
* Filenames valid UTF8: Yes
1. The license field says GPLv2+, but I believe it should be GPL+
The README states GPL and the version (as I understand it) stated in COPYING is
not sufficient. Unless the GPL version is specified in the source or
accompanying documentation then it is GPL+, I couldn't find a reference to that
specific version but if there is one, let me know.
2. Not a blocker but I suggest converting README from iso-8859-1 to UTF8.
Otherwise the package seems fine.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 15:44 EST --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs.
Alias: MyBashBurn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 15:45 EST ---
You should use this URL in the Source-Tag:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261581] New: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/xmlroff/xmlroff.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/xmlroff/xmlroff-0.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: xmlroff is a fast, free, high-quality, multi-platform XSL formatter that aims to excel at DocBook formatting and that integrates easily with other programs and with scripting languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 16:14 EST --- I'm currently unable to build this mock against i386/devel: a - raydium/compile/myglut.o a - raydium/compile/web.o a - raydium/compile/hdr.o a - raydium/compile/shader.o a - raydium/compile/atexit.o a - raydium/compile/path.o /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [libraydium.so.0.0] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs File created: libraydium.a.0.0 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74579 (%build) I guess a missing BR on zlib-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 16:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm currently unable to build this mock against i386/devel: a - raydium/compile/myglut.o a - raydium/compile/web.o a - raydium/compile/hdr.o a - raydium/compile/shader.o a - raydium/compile/atexit.o a - raydium/compile/path.o /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [libraydium.so.0.0] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs File created: libraydium.a.0.0 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74579 (%build) I guess a missing BR on zlib-devel? Yes, I think so, can you add that please and give it another try? Thanks for all the effort. I'll get back to you on all the reviews as time permits, I'm awfully busy at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 16:27 EST --- I'm just waiting for a reviewer comment at this point. This isn't assigned to a reviewer currently. I was going to go hunting for a reviewer next week if someone doesn't step up this week. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 17:14 EST --- java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.14.b18.snapshot.fc8 built successfully in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232358] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232358 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 17:25 EST --- When I download the Spec or SRPM, they only contain nullbytes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239280] Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login
brute-forcer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239280
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 17:43 EST ---
- The conditional is not correct according to:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-1c550109af0705ccb71329619b99428af2fd3e25
%if %fedora = 7 has to be %if 0%{?fedora} = 7
- The license tag needs to be adjusted:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261801] New: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.bx.cz/px.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bx.cz/px-0-8.noarch.rpm Description: px started in a folder with images (gained from a digital camera) creates dot prefixed new smaller images, thumbnails, necessary files and index.html page. After processing the content is prepared for display on a web server. Description for images can be easily created by gthumb-2.7.8-3 image viewer (let’s try key c). After description modification don’t forget to re-run px for index.html regeneration. A live working example is here: http://www.bx.cz JavaScript viewer works in: MSIE 6,7 Firefox Opera Konqueror Galeon ... Now I'm fixing several bugs - they are bearable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] New: Review Request: éc olier-fonts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/%c3%a9colier-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/%c3%a9colier-fonts-1.00-0.1.20070628.fc8.src.rpm Description: Écolier are a set of latin fonts created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimick the traditionnal cursive writing French children are taught in school. He kindly released two of them under the OFL, which are redistributed in this package. The fonts are especially useful used in conjunction with educational software -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-f onts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:20 EST --- The review should be trivial as the spec file is largely inspired from existing fedora font packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:20 EST --- [SpecURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec [SrpmURL] http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.434.beta.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #48) For example, the PL and -test subpackages Require: postgresql-server, which would mean you'd have to duplicate those as se-specific versions. (Which maybe you have to do anyway, for the PLs ... are they going to be binary-compatible? What about postgresql-contrib?) The binary-compatibilities strongly depends on the internal implementation. Because SE-PostgreSQL modifies several data structure like HeapTupleHeader to store its security attribute, we cannot share *.so files in binary- compatible. Therefore, these are deployed on /usr/lib/sepgsql in the updated version, as the previous one. This manner follows Library Name Conflicts in the Conflicts Guidelines. As you mentioned, when we use any other PL- or contrib modules, these also have to be built for SE-PostgreSQL. However, these are not duplicate ones. I want the latest one to be reviewed and be put on the next phase again. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-f onts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:24 EST --- Is it acceptable to have accented letters in package names? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-f onts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:34 EST --- I don't know if we have an official policy on this, but the infrastructure should be able to handle this nowadays (after some embarrassing failures when bodhi was first deployed) Since the contents are tied to a locale, I'd hate to mangle the naming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-f onts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:41 EST --- The infrastructure maybe (and it would even be a good test...) but what about people scripts and stuff that use the package names? The locale may be use another encoding than utf8, this may call for troubles in that case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:51 EST --- -it's valuable to mention that dot prefixed images don't disturb viewing of original images with another viewer - for example gthumb -for nonsupported/obsolete browsers the script is switched off but the basic functionality of the page is preserved - try to visit offered sample page with MSIE 5 or MSIE 5.5 -description of an image is an attribute of thumbnail tag title=My image description, it is possible to easily change/fix it by hand without necessity to start Perl script px again -the index.html contains compressed EXIF data - when the user visits a huge gallery it saves bandwidth - the content of the index.html is decompressed and finished on the client side -users can add their own additional stylesheets into index.html - the css list will be automatically added into relevant drop-down menu -settings of viewer is preserved by cookies -original images are used for magnifier (buggy) - it needs good bandwidth -if user enables allow multiple instances in Viewer settings the number of images is only limited by available memory on client computer - z-index works flawlessly, it works as stack, last clicked image is on the top of stack -for additional information please read embedded manual page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-f onts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:54 EST --- skvidal abadger1999 seem to think the technical problems linked to the naming (if any) should be fixed and not ignored. So naming is not a blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 261881] Review Request: écolier-f onts - Ãcolier court fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: écolier-fonts - Écolier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||261961 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 18:59 EST --- I'm not too worried about the non-utf8 locale case: 1. utf-8 is the default fedora encoding, so that's what we should optimize for 2. almost every fedora locale migrated to utf-8 long long ago 3. I thoroughly doubt any user of a non-utf8 locale (be it because this locale is some complex obscure asian stuff or be it because the user is an US sysadmin which has not understood i18n needs yet) will be interested in this particular package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 19:24 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libsvm, libsvm-devel libsvm-python Short Description: A Library for Support Vector Machines Owners: dchen Branches: F-7 InitialCC: dchen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 19:25 EST --- Sorry for the delay, I've been swamped of late. I promise to try and finish this up this week... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
