[Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 02:00 EST --- should be good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 02:02 EST ---
New patch seems to work well, then
diff -up aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py.docfix
aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py
--- aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py.docfix 2007-09-25 21:16:54.0
+0200
+++ aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py 2007-09-25 21:17:19.0 +0200
@@ -698,8 +698,8 @@ class ParameterDialog(gtk.Dialog):
uri = filenameify(self.pluginloader.get_uri())
name = filenameify(self.pluginloader.get_name())
helpfilepaths = [
- filepath('../doc/zzub/plugins/' + uri + '/index.html'),
- filepath('../doc/zzub/plugins/' + name + '/index.html'),
+ filepath('../doc/libzzub-0.2.3/plugins/' + uri +
'/index.html'),
+ filepath('../doc/libzzub-0.2.3/plugins/' + name +
'/index.html'),
]
for path in helpfilepaths:
print searching for '%s'... % path
-
It may be better that this aldrin require specific version
of pyzzub, i.e.
Requires: pyzzub = 0.2.3
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] New: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec SRPM URL: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: a python wrapper for SCIM input platform. With it, IM developers may use python language to create Input Methods. This package also includes a sample input engine - English Writer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 03:08 EST --- need fix 1)Add BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser),pygtk2-devel 2) Remove BuildRequires: autoconf, automake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 03:08 EST --- Upstream is on vacation for the next couple of weeks with no Internet access. I'll ping them when they return and try to get this moving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 03:18 EST --- thanks for your updates to SPEC. But sorry I can't approve this package as I can still see package file /etc/gssapi_mech.conf from install of libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package libgssapi-0.11-1.fc7 What workaround I can suggest here is to add Provides: libgssapi = 0.11-1.fc7 Obsoletes: libgssapi = 0.11-1.fc7 below following line in SPEC file Requires: krb5-libs = 1.5 When built with above changes and tried to install on F7 machine as it gave me rpm -Uvh libgssglue-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm libgssglue-devel-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgssapi.so.2 is needed by (installed) libtirpc-0.1.7-7.fc7.i386 libgssapi.so.2 is needed by (installed) nfs-utils-1.1.0-3.fc7.i386 libgssapi.so.2(libgssapi_CITI_2) is needed by (installed) libtirpc-0.1.7-7.fc7.i386 libgssapi.so.2(libgssapi_CITI_2) is needed by (installed) nfs-utils-1.1.0-3.fc7.i386 That mean you need to ask all packages that depends on libgssapi.so.2 to build against libgssglue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 03:17 EST --- Duh? Why 4Suite!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 03:28 EST ---
scim-python.spec and scim-python-0.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm have been refreshed. Please
check it.
Below is diff from scim-python.spec.
Thanks.
===
--- scim-python.spec.in (revision 49)
+++ scim-python.spec.in (working copy)
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
Source0:http://scim-python.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext, gettext-devel, autoconf, automake,
libtool, python
-Requires: scim python-enchant
+BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext, gettext-devel, libtool, python-devel,
pygtk2-devel, perl(XML::Parser)
+Requires: scim, python-enchant, pygtk2
%description
Python IMEngine for SCIM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 03:43 EST ---
- I think the License field should say LGPLv2+
- gettext-devel will pull in gettext anyway
- %{_libdir}/scim*/* are owned by scim so it should be
%{_libdir}/scim*/*/%{name}*.so say
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:07 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
- I think the License field should say LGPLv2+
- gettext-devel will pull in gettext anyway
- %{_libdir}/scim*/* are owned by scim so it should be
%{_libdir}/scim*/*/%{name}*.so say
Those problems have been fixed and files have been refreshed. Please check it.
Thanks.
===
--- scim-python.spec.in (revision 49)
+++ scim-python.spec.in (working copy)
@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Python IMEngine for Smart Common Input Method platform
-License:LGPLv2
+License:LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
URL:http://code.google.com/p/scim-python/
Source0:http://scim-python.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext, gettext-devel, autoconf, automake,
libtool, python
-Requires: scim python-enchant
+BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext-devel, libtool, python-devel, pygtk2-devel,
perl(XML::Parser)
+Requires: scim, python-enchant, pygtk2
%description
Python IMEngine for SCIM.
@@ -40,9 +40,8 @@
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING README TODO
%{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.so
-%{_libdir}/scim*/*
-%{_datadir}/scim-python/engine/*
-%{_datadir}/scim-python/setupui/*
+%{_libdir}/scim*/*/%{name}*.so
+%{_datadir}/scim-python/*
%{_datadir}/scim/icons/*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:10 EST --- Can you prepare a draft spec file and I will give feedback. Look at the new fonts-korean.spec as an example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:11 EST --- updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect.spec updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect-0.6.0-3.src.rpm changes - fixed URLs - removed unneeded BR: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:19 EST ---
Those problems have been fixed
Thanks. :)
and files have been refreshed. Please check it.
Could you please provide the urls for the spec and srpm for each revision.
The release number should be bumped too please.
You need to own %{_datadir}/scim-python/ too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:22 EST --- rpmlint says scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so I think it is not a blocker but you might prefer to use a relsymlink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:27 EST --- ugh, sorry, buildreqs listed should also have been under Good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:30 EST --- * For python sitelib/arch directory, please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: cpl - ESO |Review Request: cpl - ESO |(European Sothern |(European Southern |Observatory) library for|Observatory) library for |automated astronomical data-|automated astronomical data- |reduction tasks |reduction tasks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:36 EST --- * Rebuild fails at least on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175148 - Note: the build.log says: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/scim-python-0.1.2-1.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/*.so Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.la /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so scim.so must be installed under python_sitearch (i.e. under /usr/lib64), not under python_sitelib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 04:48 EST ---
How about
http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
for the source url?
Do you have a better one?
Also I just noticed the Buildroot should updated to the current
recommendations:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 05:07 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Could you please provide the urls for the spec and srpm for each revision.
The release number should be bumped too please.
Sorry. I refreshed the files on web. I do not reserve the old version.
You need to own %{_datadir}/scim-python/ too.
Fixed. add %dir %{_datadir}/scim-python
(In reply to comment #6)
rpmlint says
scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so
scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so
I think it is not a blocker but you might prefer to use a relsymlink.
It has a little difficulty to create relsymlink now. If it is not blocker, I
will try fix it later.
(In reply to comment #8)
* Rebuild fails at least on x86_64
Fixed. Please retry it.
Thanks
The new URLs:
http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec-2
http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.2-2.fc7.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 06:04 EST ---
* cool. So many comments. thanks to Jens and Mamoru.
*rpmlint on SRPM says
scim-python.src:54: W: macro-in-%changelog dir
Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead
to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that
affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in
possibly rewriting history on subsequent package revisions and generally
odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros
in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'.
* on RPM it said
scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so
Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments.
scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so
Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments.
* And build.log showed
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so
So from %files section you should remove
%{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.so
* otherwise package looks ok.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 06:17 EST --- Still seems not okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 06:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) Still seems not okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175238 Could you tell me how to build it on koji? When I update the spec file, I may try it by self. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 06:47 EST --- You can try by: koji build --scratch target srpm_you_want_to_try Currently target can be dist-f8 or dist-fc7-updates-candidate. If rebuild ends successfully, the result binary rpms are put under htt://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/your_FAS_name/task_task_id/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 06:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) If rebuild ends successfully, the result binary rpms are put under htt://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/your_FAS_name/task_task_id/ Of course this is http:// -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 06:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) Still seems not okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175238 I modified to fix rpmlint checking warning on SRPM and build warning for rpm. And I also fix the build problem for X86_64 arch, but without test. :-/ The new URLs: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec-3 http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:05 EST --- It passed the koji build. The problem is in a Makefile.am in the tarball. It does not install the .so file into /usr/lib64/... in x86_64 arch, and it still install .so into /usr/lib/... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:01 EST --- I think if macro is not getting expanded to lib64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:15 EST --- In that case you can use arch specific patch for Makefile like say %ifarch x86_64 %patch1 -p1 %endif and need to change accordingly at other places in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:11 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint complains for RPM as cdcollect.i386: E: no-binary cdcollect.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib But these can be ignored for mono packages. + source files match upstream. 33f71604b9dfb84497b4bc2fce69e89b cdcollect-0.6.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + GConf scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + Package cdcollect-0.6.0-3.fc8 - Provides: config(cdcollect) = 0.6.0-3.fc8 mono(cdcollect) = 0.2.2825.11093 Requires: /bin/sh config(cdcollect) = 0.6.0-3.fc8 gnome-sharp gtk-sharp2 = 2.8.0 mono-core = 1.1.17 mono-data-sqlite sqlite = 3.3.5 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:19 EST --- Where's the KWin theme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:21 EST --- Is the BR kdebase-devel actually needed here? I think it isn't, it's needed only for the KWin theme, which isn't part of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:25 EST --- Is this still waiting for any builds or we can CLOSE this review ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:27 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cdcollect Short Description: Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:32 EST --- * For scim-python*.so: - Well, this package installs scim-python.so under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ (on i386), however on my rawhide system the directory /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ does not exist and _perhaps_ this must be installed under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/ (this directory is owned by scim-1.4.7-5.fc8) - Similary, /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI does not exist on my system, and /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/ is owned by scim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 07:54 EST --- If you don't already the scim pkgconfig config from scim-devel should be used to give you the correct install location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 08:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #19) * For scim-python*.so: - Well, this package installs scim-python.so under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ (on i386), however on my rawhide system the directory /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ does not exist and _perhaps_ this must be installed under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/ (this directory is owned by scim-1.4.7-5.fc8) - Similary, /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI does not exist on my system, and /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/ is owned by scim yes. you are right. Other scim-* say scim-hangul, scim-anthy are installing under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/ and /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/ For this you need to patch configure.in run autoconf in SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 08:08 EST --- SCIM_MODULEDIR=`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=moduledir scim` should help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 08:22 EST ---
or just directly patch configure file but that made me to have %files section
for that as
%{_libdir}/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so
%{_libdir}/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so
instead to have it as
%{_libdir}/scim-1.0/*/IMEngine/scim-python.so
%{_libdir}/scim-1.0/*/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so
which is preferred by most of other scim-* packages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:34 EST --- It's here: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/ I apparently didn't file a review request for it. Will do so now (and double check that I didn't miss any others) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||306951 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306951] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kde-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kde-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kde-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve kwin theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:39 EST --- Provide me package links as you did in initial comment. I just assumed since the spec file and srpm were in the exact same place you could continue to used the original links. Sorry for such a bad assumption. I'll guess I go head and cut and past them from the original posting. What workaround I can suggest here is to add Provides: libgssapi = 0.11-1.fc7 Obsoletes: libgssapi = 0.11-1.fc7 below following line in SPEC file Requires: krb5-libs = 1.5 updated spec and srpm. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/libgssglue/libgssglue.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/libgssglue/libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm rpm -Uvh libgssglue-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm libgssglue-devel-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: Of course there will be dependency problem because I have not been able to check this package in! As soon as I can check this package in, those dependency problem will go away because I will be able to update the packages at are depending it. Please note *all* the packages that are dependent on this I maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:38 EST --- err, the urls are wrong, Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kwin-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kwin-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:43 EST --- Well, it doesn't actually use a *trademarked* logo (this is just the old Fedora font on a big blue background, right?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:47 EST --- Okay, yea, let's make this one system-logos then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230164] Review Request: rt73usb-firmwa re - Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:47 EST --- ok, this package can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230164] Review Request: rt73usb-firmwa re - Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:54 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rt73usb-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors Owners:kwizart Branches: F-7 InitialCC: empty Commits by cvsextras: yes Thx for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 09:53 EST --- Updated again: Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:06 EST --- * thanks very much that finally you got my point that links must be provided each time to reviewer to avoid confusion between old and new SPEC. * But that doesn't mean you should not increment release tag. And for above change, do you think its so small to previous SPEC you provided? No. You must update release tag and provide new links for final review. *Remember to run rpmlint on all SRPM,RPM files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:01 EST --- No, I mean if it's not trademarked, you can just put the graphic in the theme. Or leave it in fedora-logos, either or. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:11 EST --- ah right, that's even nicer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:15 EST --- This patch got lost here: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/redhat-artwork/devel/redhat-artwork-7.0.0-kdm-userlist.patch?rev=1.1view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:12 EST --- Than's patch to fix bug #276731: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/redhat-artwork/devel/redhat-artwork-7.0.0-kwin-bluecurve.patch?rev=1.1view=markup got lost again. Can this please be committed to the upstream tree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:22 EST --- sure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 10:29 EST --- thanks, applied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||307171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307171] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve kdm theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|4Suite |Package Review --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 11:28 EST --- Sometimes the component gets changed randomly. I don't know if this is a firefox bug or a bugzilla bug. It's no big deal; I just change it back when I have something else to add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 11:51 EST --- What is going on here? It's over two months since the package was approved and I can't find anything in CVS. There are some bugs too: o license policy has changed since review: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing License should be changed to GPLv2 o build not honor compiler flags: http://tinyurl.com/2n3qqh o should build latest release: new release from 2007-08-03 available I have created an update package fixing these bugs, it's here: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070803snap.fc7.src.rpm Do you still want to maintain this package for Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 11:59 EST --- Almost. Just fix the license for real before you import it. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 11:57 EST --- Have pushed an update. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:01 EST --- It needs kdebase-devel because configure complains if it is not there... Just mock-build it and see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 11:58 EST --- * But that doesn't mean you should not increment release tag. And for above change, do you think its so small to previous SPEC you provided? I did, I went from -1 to -2 and group all the comments under the RPM review changelog which I think *very* appropriate. Why artificially increase version numbers for basically the same bug (or process in this case). Also, Isn't up the the discretion of the maintainer to decide when and why to increase a version number? I would surely hope so. No. You must update release tag and provide new links for final review. No. I feel the way I'm managing this tag for my package is just fine. Now if so choose not to let this package into fedora due to silly issue like tag number (after working on this for 3 weeks) so be it... *Remember to run rpmlint on all SRPM,RPM files. I did and I see no errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:04 EST --- the configure script complains if it is not there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:03 EST --- but then you need to make this package require bluecurve-gnome-theme ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:40 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:37 EST --- cvs done. There isn't really any procedure to review a seperate spec for el branches. Perhaps you could do some testing and get it all working for epel and then request branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:44 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230164] Review Request: rt73usb-firmwa re - Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink® RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 12:42 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 13:09 EST --- i don't know, aside from the dir ownership issue, it makes more sense for bluecurve-gnome-theme to require bluecurve-metacity-theme, not the other way around... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 13:14 EST --- A few complaints: the manpages are executable, which rpmlint dutifully complains about: aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/e2writeboot.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/sdisklabel.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/isomarkboot.1.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/swriteboot.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/abootconf.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/netabootwrap.1.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man5/aboot.conf.5.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/aboot.8.gz I notice that the normal set of compiler flags aren't used. Now, this is a bootloader so I can understand why, although there are userspace programs included which perhaps should be built like any other userspace program. Given that this is for Alpha, though, I can't even be truly sure what the proper compilation flags are. This package does not meet the versioning guidelines; when 1.0 is released, it will sort lower than the current package name. The guidelines specify the proper version and release to be used as: 1.0-0.2.pre20040408 You can increment the '2' for each new revision, and when 1.0 is released you can just use 1.0-1 without worrying about any sorting issues. There's a COPYING file in the tarball, which must be included in the package. * source files match upstream: a8ae8f2bf549c1cc79ea66a0a11c8db5c0257ce0d94b97418eb1c658723b12d2 aboot-1.0_pre20040408.tar.bz2 X package does not meet versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text included in tarball but not in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. ? compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, alpha). * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no way to test this pacakge. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are not appropriate (executable manpages) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307601] New: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX-1.10.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A library for: - A+R/B trees to use for lists or maps (associative arrays) - Deques (double-ended queues) (Stacks (LIFO) / Queues (FIFOs)) - platform independent opendir-style directory access - platform independent dlopen-style shared library access - auto-storage strings with direct access - command line option (argv) parser - shell-style config file parser - platform independent random number generator with transparent /dev/urandom support - various string, memory and zvec ops -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libHX URL||http://jengelh.hopto.org/f/l ||ibHX/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 14:28 EST --- My fault. I must have just done the RHEL sources and forgot to do FC for some reason. If you want to maintain it or help, that is fine with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173054] Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173054 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 15:00 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: wavpack New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307791] New: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/twitux.spec SRPM URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/twitux-0.50-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Twitux is a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||307801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307801] New: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gnome-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gnome-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gnome-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gnome-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve GNOME meta theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307821] New: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: SooperLooper is a realtime software looping sampler in the spirit of Gibson's Echoplex Digital Pro. If used with a low-latency kernel and the proper audio buffer configuration it is capable of truly realtime live looping performance. (was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200941) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307891] New: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: A C++ Library used for accessing information collected by the program lsvpd. The lsvpd package also uses this library for storing the system vpd collection. A request to add lsvpd will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307901] New: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/lsvpd.spec SRPM URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/lsvpd-1.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: This utility lists device Vital Product Data (VPD), which includes the following information and more: vendor, version, revision level, serial number. This utility has been tested on ppc64, ppc, and i386 platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 15:52 EST --- You are still missing build dependencies on perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) so you miss some test suite coverage; this changes the test results to: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=11, Tests=29, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.42 cusr + 0.15 csys = 0.57 CPU) It's good to have full test coverage but you don't seem to want to add those two bbuild dependencies for whatever reason so I won't block on it. The license field is fixed, so rpmlint is quiet. The following issue remains: X package version is not compliant with guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 16:01 EST --- Ok, I can take it. I did a updated package with some style changes, can notting have a quick look and (hopefully) ack? SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils-0.0-1.20070803snap.fc7.src.rpm You then have to set fedora-cvs to ? and say something like this: Package Change Request == Package Name: scsi-target-utils Change Owner To: terjeros Thanks for the nice work and quick reply! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 16:11 EST --- This builds fine and rpmlint is clean; I'll run through the checklist as soon as I get home this evening. But unfortunately it doesn't run: ImportError: No module named pysolsoundserver This happens even if I pass --nosound. It looks like there's code to detect that the module isn't there (look for warn_pysolsoundserver) but the import isn't wrapped in a try block. When I get home I'll have to see if I can't hack it a bit. Or this could grow a dependency on the sound server, except that it would have to be a circular dependency, and in that case they should probably just be bundled together in one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 16:33 EST --- imported and build set ExcludeArch: ppc64 as Mono doesn't exist there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 16:52 EST --- Do you really need the %post and %postun update-desktop-database? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:02 EST --- I made the change suggested in comment 5, fwiw (and the similar change for the kdm theme) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:01 EST --- GPL is not a valid value for the License-Tag, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 Afaik, these categories in the desktop file should not be used: X-Fedora Application And I guess these, too: X-PlanetCCRMA X-Digital_Processing X-Jack Maybe you want to add this category: Audio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:07 EST --- or if we merge this with bluecurve-qt-engine, then this issue becomes moot. I'm still curious for opinions on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:06 EST --- that's because configure has: KDE_SET_PREFIX KDE_CHECK_FINAL KDE_USE_QT AC_PATH_KDE to pull in $(kde_datadir) I don't know what those macros, I just copied it verbatim from redhat-artwork. For now i'll add the BuildRequires, but we might be able to trim that and drop the BuildReq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:11 EST --- I've added a dependency on Test::Pod but not on Test::Pod::Coverage, as it built without, and made it rpmlint-clean, which I believe brings package version into compliance with guidelines. SPEC: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std.spec SRPM: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std-v0.0.4-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:14 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: higlayout Short Description: Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: empty Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:15 EST --- Created an attachment (id=207541) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=207541action=view) Patches spelling of Connecting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) BR: java-devel should be replaced by BR: java-javadoc (even if sinjdoc doesn't do crosslinked javadocs at the moment) - java-gcj-compat-devel provides java-devel. Otherwise looks good to me, feel free to import and fix before the first build. Nothing provides java-javadoc, thats why I put java-devel there, but you are right, that is the same as java-gcj-compat-devel. So I'll take that out before import. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-26 17:14 EST --- APPROVED, with following notes: - Dependency on glib2-devel unnecessary (pulled in by libsexy-devel) - Requires(post), Requires(postun), %post and %postun also unnecessary - Connecting is misspelled in upstream code and translation, patch attached. Please apply and forward to upstream. MUST • rpmlint: OK • package name: OK • spec file name: OK • package guideline-compliant: OK • license complies with guidelines: OK • license field accurate: OK • license file not deleted: OK • spec in US English: OK • spec legible: OK • source matches upstream: OK • builds under = 1 archs, others excluded: OK • build dependencies complete: OK* • locales handled using %find_lang: OK • no dupes in %files: OK • permission: OK • %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK • macros used consistently: OK • Package contains code: OK • desktop file uses desktop-file-install: OK* • clean buildroot before install: OK • filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD • package build in mock on all architectures • package functioned as described: OK • require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 305761] Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
