[Bug 374791] Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #282641|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 03:18 EST --- Created an attachment (id=283721) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=283721action=view) libnxml spec file rev4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 374791] Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 04:38 EST --- Please also provide the new srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 05:05 EST --- *** Bug 312901 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 05:56 EST --- Finally dealing with this, sorry for taking so long: BuildRoot doesn't match the most preferred value: This is a non-issue, I'll keep on using the BuildRoot created by rpmdev-newspec Added files to %doc DISCLAIMER HACKING NEWS TODO As for the getopt issue. I just dont know how to deal with this, or if it's an issue at all. Upstream is dead so I can't ask there. I've looked to other distributions, and neither debian nor gentoo seems to deal with the issue. Any advice here is most welcome. Re-built package using the debian tarball as upstream tarball. The debian tarball does not include non-free files: httptunnel-3.3/doc/rfc1945.txt httptunnel-3.3/doc/rfc2068.txt httptunnel-3.3/doc/rfc2045.txt See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393374 iconv is provided by glibc-common, which is part of the base packages one can always assume to be present. Replaced iconv lines with more elegant function and moved it to %prep Package doesn't require dos2unix anymore. I think that's it. Updated package: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/httptunnel.spec http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/httptunnel-3.3-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 374791] Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 06:01 EST --- SRPMS: http://hs1.eu/code/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libnxml-0.18.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226489] Merge Review: tftp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226489 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 06:39 EST --- Hi, I am the new maintainer. Thanks Patrice, for cleaning this up, I don't know why I was assigned to this bug. Could somebody please take the review? The packages in rawhide look good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 07:37 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint httptunnel-3.3-4.fc9.src.rpm
httptunnel.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 24)
empty output for the binary package
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:GPLv2
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: d538fdf35a0dfd5f3164fa79a1a156c912d6da62
/tmp/httptunnel_3.3+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:devel/x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:i386 and x86_64
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
*** APPROVED ***
Before commit, please try to do the cosmetic change identified by rpmlint
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226372] Merge Review: rhpl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: rhpl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226372
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 07:38 EST ---
looks something goes wrong in CVS
cat sources showed me
d922d4303847d85e540057527950969d rhpl-0.211.tar.bz2
But spec wants tar.gz not bz2
Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 419741] New: Review Request: photoml - An XML DTD and tools for describing photographic metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419741 Summary: Review Request: photoml - An XML DTD and tools for describing photographic metadata Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/photo/photoml/photoml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/photo/photoml/photoml-0.22-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Photo Description Markup Language (PhotoML) is primarily intended to provide an XML format and tools for describing details of photo creation, processing, and content in a collection of photographs. It is designed to be appropriate for a wide variety of photographic formats, including roll film (such as 35mm and 120/220), sheet film (such as 4x5 and 8x10) and digital images. The type of information represented, while allowing description of details of content, creation etc. for digital images, does not support some of the more low-level housekeeping details that might be necessary in an application such as an online database of digital images. In particular, PhotoML is not yet another web photo gallery generator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 398581] Review Request: 8Kingdoms - 8 Kingdoms is a 3D turn-based fantasy strategic game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 8Kingdoms - 8 Kingdoms is a 3D turn-based fantasy strategic game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 08:17 EST --- I finally found the time to import and build this, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 320421] Review Request: cwrite - console editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwrite - console editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320421 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 08:52 EST --- Okay. Now cwrite itself is okay. Then as this is a NEEDSPONSOR ticket: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416761] Review Request CppAD - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request CppAD - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 09:12 EST --- Seeking A Sponsor: I failed to mention in the description above that this is my first package, and I are seeking a sponsor. You can find out more about me at http://www.seanet.com/~bradbell/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 374791] Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413451] Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 09:42 EST --- Did a local build, went fine without errors, tried on a couple of Czech PO files from KDE4 and works without problems. Looking over the spec file doesnt revel any breakage of Package Guidelines. One possible issue might be packaging of translations but the situation with including kdesdk in KDE4 is so far unclear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226372] Merge Review: rhpl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rhpl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226372 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 09:49 EST --- Whoops, that will teach me to just copy and paste makefile rules over without actually looking at them. Switched the spec and really building again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 374791] Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and
creating XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 09:58 EST ---
For 0.18.1-4:
* License
- From whole tarball license check, this is licensed
under GPLv2+.
* Parallel make
- Please support parallel make (i.e. add %{?_smp_mflags} to make)
on %build section
- And please remove %?_smp_mflags from make install on %install
section. Using parallel make on make install frequent fails
due to install directory creating timing problem
(and not %?_spm_mflags)
* Dependency for -devel subpackage
- Please check the dependency for -devel subpackage.
%_includedir/nxml.h contains:
-
22 #include curl/curl.h
23 #include sys/types.h
24 #include sys/stat.h
25 #include fcntl.h
26 #include unistd.h
27 #include stdarg.h
28 #include stdlib.h
29 #include string.h
30 #include errno.h
-
This means libnxml-devel should have Requires: curl-devel.
* pkgconfig file libdir
- %_libdir/pkgconfig/nxml.pc contains:
--
3 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
--
This is wrong on 64 bits architecture.
* rpmlint
- rpmlint complaint shows
-
libnxml-devel.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/libnxml-devel-0.18.1/html/structnxml__namespace__t__coll__graph.map
libnxml-devel.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/libnxml-devel-0.18.1/html/structnxml__entity__t__coll__graph.map
--
If these files are not needed, please remove these.
* Timestamps
- Please try to use
---
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL=install -p
---
to keep timestamps on installed files (here installed header
files). While sometimes this does not work, this way usually
works for recent Makefiles.
* %doc
- IMO
%files devel
%doc test/
is better than %doc test/* to hide all test code under test/
directory from the top documents directory
(%_defaultdocdir/%name-%version)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413451] Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 10:12 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kaider Short Description: Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance Owners: kkofler,ltinkl,than,rdieter Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413451] Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 10:14 EST --- Review requests should be assigned to the reviewer, not the submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 400911] Review Request: pioneers - Turnbased board strategy game (colonize an island)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pioneers - Turnbased board strategy game (colonize an island) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400911 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 10:27 EST --- CVE fixed, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 10:39 EST --- Can you please add: Obsoletes: kdeaddons to this package? (Note: only kdeaddons, not kdeaddons-extras. For kdeaddons-extras, all that's left in it is the atlantikdesigner and that's bound to stay, as atlantik is still there in kdegames3.) There is no single replacement for kdeaddons, but I think this is the most appropriate place to obsolete it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 10:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) Can you please add: Obsoletes: kdeaddons to this package? Sure. I'll also upload the version for kde-3.97.0 later the day (when I've figured out how to package the language files properly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 11:16 EST --- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/8/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.15-2.fc8.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/8/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.15-2.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Dec 10 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.4.15-2 - Get rid of zero length map files. - Shorten descriptions of voicemail subpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420081] New: libwps - A library for importing Microsoft Works documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420081 Summary: libwps - A library for importing Microsoft Works documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://uwog.net/~uwog/libwps.spec SRPM URL: http://uwog.net/~uwog/libwps-0.1.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: libwps is a library for importing the Microsoft Works word processor file format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413451] Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 12:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413561] Review Request: ruby-revolution - Ruby binding for the Evolution email client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-revolution - Ruby binding for the Evolution email client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 12:26 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420161] New: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/python-bugzilla/python-bugzilla.spec SRPM URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/python-bugzilla/python-bugzilla-0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: python-bugzilla is a python library for interacting with bugzilla instances over XML-RPC. Currently it only supports the Red Hat Bugzilla web services. This package also includes the 'bugzilla' commandline tool for interacting with bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 396171] Review Request: clamav - Anti-virus software (for EPEL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav - Anti-virus software (for EPEL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396171 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 12:39 EST --- Yeah, I just looked at the amavisd-new spec. ;( It's heavily tied to the wacky way the fedora clamav is setup... (understandably). I guess my plan to have a sane clamav package for epel is pretty doomed. :( Would you be willing to let someone else maintain a amavisd-new package working with this clamav version for epel? I guess if not, we should try (again) to find a group of people willing to maintain the fedora clamav for epel. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 13:28 EST --- Ping? Hope that someone will take this review soon ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413561] Review Request: ruby-revolution - Ruby binding for the Evolution email client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-revolution - Ruby binding for the Evolution email client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413561 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 13:35 EST --- Rebuilt on all branches, requested on bodhi, closing. Thank you for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 415211] Review Request: WebKit - Web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WebKit - Web content engine library Alias: WebKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=415211 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 13:54 EST --- Err; forgot to set the fedora-cvs flag. Stupid me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 396171] Review Request: clamav - Anti-virus software (for EPEL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav - Anti-virus software (for EPEL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396171 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 14:33 EST --- Just to mention it: At work, I'm using a rebuild of the Fedora Rawhide version from clamav and it works - on RHEL5 and RHEL4 (okay, on RHEL4 I had to do some small modifications to the spec). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 14:37 EST --- (Unofficial, I can't approve anything.) The guidelines say you shouldn't have a full-stop at the end of the summary line in your spec. Rpmlint also threw up two other things: python-bugzilla.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-bugzilla-0.2/selftest.py python-bugzilla.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bugzilla.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 14:34 EST --- Neil, The GPL is unique, in that it explicitly says: If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. Thus, we cannot go off of the versioning in COPYING, we need to look at what the code itself says. (This is why it is important to include license/copyright information in code headers). Most of the code in this package has no license or copyright attribution, but one of the headers (netconsole.h) specifies GPLv2+, so go with GPLv2+ for the license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 414791] Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 14:43 EST --- Spec URL: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/evolution-zimbra.spec SRPM URL: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/evolution-zimbra-0.1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Fixed mock errors and also rolled a new tarball from Subversion (revision 3), which now includes my up-and-running patch. I also now have a patch for Fedora 8, which just involves changing a few version numbers (http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/evolution-zimbra.f8.patch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 15:07 EST --- No. The one header that includes copyright information specifies that we can use a later version than GPLv2 at my option. I'm opting not to. The COPYING file indicates GPLv2, thats what I'm going with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420431] New: Review Request: gkrellm-top - GKrellM plugin which shows 3 most CPU intensive processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420431 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-top - GKrellM plugin which shows 3 most CPU intensive processes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/gkrellm-top.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/gkrellm-top-2.2.10-1.src.rpm Description: A GKrellM plugin which displays the top three CPU intensive processes in a small window inside GKrellM, similar to wmtop. Useful to check out anytime what processes are consuming most CPU power on your machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 15:31 EST --- That is simply wrong. Blocking this package until the License tag is corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420501] New: Review Request: silkscreen-fonts - Silkscreen four member type family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420501 Summary: Review Request: silkscreen-fonts - Silkscreen four member type family Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/silkscreen-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/silkscreen-fonts-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Silkscreen is a four member type family for your Web graphics created by Jason Kottke. Silkscreen is best used in places where extremely small graphical display type is needed. The primary use is for navigational items (nav bars, menus, etc), but it works well wherever small type is needed. In order to preserve the proper spacing and letterforms, Silkscreen should be used at 8pt. multiples (8pt., 16pt., 24pt., etc.) with anti-aliasing turned off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 15:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Ok, I tried it build in koji from srpm from deadbabylone and result is here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=285037 extragear-plasma-3.97.0 is building fine on all archs. Updated version: Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/extragear-plasma/extragear-plasma.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/extragear-plasma/extragear-plasma-3.97.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: - package language files properly (by RexDieter) - Obsolete: kdeaddons - kde 3.97.0 - removed some BRs which are in kdelibs4-devel now - BR: gettext Small note about a rpmlint error: extragear-plasma.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kdeaddons This was added because of comment #8. A versioned obsolete is not needed here because kdeaddons won't be included in F9 at all (and doesn't exist upstream anymore) Second note: KDE will release 3.97.0 tomorrow. Until then you could download a tarball mirrored by Rex: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kde4/extragear/extragear-plasma-3.97.0.tar.bz2 This one is pre-released to packagers by the KDE-Project and should fit the normal tarball directly from ftp.kde.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 15:49 EST --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=288334 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 415211] Review Request: WebKit - Web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WebKit - Web content engine library Alias: WebKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=415211 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 16:21 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 16:26 EST --- imo, keep the Obsoletes versioned regardless, to be on the safe side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 16:39 EST --- Updated to fix the three things mentioned. Thanks. Spec URL is the same. New SRPM is here: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/python-bugzilla/python-bugzilla-0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 16:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) imo, keep the Obsoletes versioned regardless, to be on the safe side. So like this one to don't conflict with kde3? Obsoletes: kdeaddons 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 17:11 EST --- Obsoletes: kdeaddons 4 looks good, yeah. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 17:58 EST --- Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/extragear-plasma/extragear-plasma.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/extragear-plasma/extragear-plasma-3.97.0-3.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: - add versioned obsolete kdeaddons -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|182235 |201449 nThis|| Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 18:14 EST --- So I'm told that in bug 248013, which I cannot access but which I see has now been closed, Neil indicated that he would not make the change and that he would rather abandon this package than make the change. For my part, I simply cannot approve the package with an incorrect License: tag. So I guess this ticket should be closed. If someone comes along that doesn't object to the single '+' and wishes to take over this submission, I will be happy to approve it with that change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 18:43 EST --- you were told wrong. I closed the bug you reference as wonfix, because I won't change the license without more authority than that which tom represents. I'll happily reopen it in the event that Tom comes around on this issue, or a legal authority indicates that its ok to change (which I've sent a private email off to request). I specifically left this bug open to handle that resolution. Your assumption that the License tag is currently incorrect is in question, and waiting for a legal opinion to resolve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 395051] Review Request: pyJigdo - Python Based Jigdo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyJigdo - Python Based Jigdo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=395051 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 19:05 EST --- SPEC: http://files.pyjigdo.fedoraunity.org/pyjigdo.spec SRPM: http://files.pyjigdo.fedoraunity.org/pyjigdo-0.2-2.20071211git.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 21:18 EST --- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.15-3.fc9.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/development/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.15-3.fc9.src.rpm * Tue Dec 11 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.4.15-3 - Really get rid of zero length map files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 21:27 EST --- Looks good now Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 419141] Review Request: cellwriter - handwriting input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cellwriter - handwriting input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419141 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 21:45 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 811c221ad070ea389c18feea7819472c cellwriter-1.3.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226372] Merge Review: rhpl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: rhpl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226372
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:02 EST ---
still rpmlint is not silent
rhpl.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rhpl/iwlib.so 0775
rhpl.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rhpl/iconv.so 0775
rhpl.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/rhpl/ethtool.so 0775
Also,
you can use make %{?_smp_mflags} in %build
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:00 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: asterisk Short Description: The Open Source PBX Owners: jcollie Branches: development F-8 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:22 EST --- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs We need to package eggs for those packages that provide them but if upstream does not provide eggs we should only provide them if necessary to support another package. So I think we don't need to use eggs as upstream does not provide them. Also, man page or some kind of documentation should be added on how to use bugzilla command line tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:24 EST --- Else packaging looks ok. rpmlint is silent. Package installed correctly. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226372] Merge Review: rhpl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rhpl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226372 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:14 EST --- I'm not seeing that here with the package built by koji. Do you have a weird umask? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint rhpl-0.212-1.i386.rpm rhpl.i386: W: no-url-tag And make -j can cause weirdness with rhpl from what I vaguely remember (we used to do it, but then stopped) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 419141] Review Request: cellwriter - handwriting input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cellwriter - handwriting input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419141 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:01 EST --- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cellwriter Short Description: Handwriting input method Owners: katzj Branches: devel F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250468] Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250468 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:20 EST --- This package is not needed for OLPC at this time so we're no longer able to maintain it. If it becomes relevant again, we can reopen the bug. [Anyone else who's interested should feel free to pick this up if they want it!] Anyway, thanks very much for the reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting
with Bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:46 EST ---
argh, I missed this
SHOULD:
/usr/bin/bugzilla be changed to use macros as %{_bindir}/bugzilla
before you will import this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:53 EST --- You're welcome to wait for a lawyer to talk with you on this issue, but the Fedora licensing policies are very clear on this issue. COPYING is trumped by what the code says. Alternately, you might consider asking Ingo Molnar what the license should be, since he wrote that code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226372] Merge Review: rhpl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rhpl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226372 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 22:31 EST --- Strange dunno what happened, I guess its problem with build user that I used to build locally package in mock When package build using rpmbuild I saw no issues of rpmlint. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 1cf6842afd763b6aa16ea4a3e326a4af rhpl-0.212.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct but can be used as %defattr(-,root,root,-) + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package rhpl-0.212-1 Provides: _diskutil.so _translate.so ethtool.so iconv.so iwlib.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libiw.so.29 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 420931] New: Review Request: libertas-usb8388-firmware - firmware for libertas usb8388 wireless adapter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420931 Summary: Review Request: libertas-usb8388-firmware - firmware for libertas usb8388 wireless adapter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/libertas-usb8388-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/libertas-usb8388-firmware-5.110.20.p47-1.olpc2.src.rpm Description: Firmware for Marvell Libertas USB 8388 Network Adapter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 419141] Review Request: cellwriter - handwriting input method
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cellwriter - handwriting input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419141 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 23:44 EST --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-11 23:44 EST --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://www.vergenet.net/~con ||rad/software/xsel/ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-12 00:26 EST --- That file was old. I don't know how it got in there. Rebuilt from svn. Got sources from here svn co http://svn.kfish.org/xsel/trunk/ This test spec uses GNU Autoconf. See changelog. http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xsel-0.9.6-1.svn20071211.fc8.src.rpm http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xsel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 413451] Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaider - Computer-aided translation system focusing on productivity and performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413451 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
