[Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||perl-DBD-ODBC --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 02:47 EST --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=563988 Almost all tests are skipped. I'm not sure what can currently be done to enable them, aside from also packaging SQLiteODBC[1] and rigging a little test environment... I'd encourage this; we certainly already require (as a matter of course) the packaging of any additional cpan/perl deps required to fully enable a test suite. [1] http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/html/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 04:34 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 05:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) It's only used in building dialog. The generated header contains both symbols needed for building the program, as well as symbols needed to make applications build with the library. Can't those 2 sets be split apart? An API should be platform independent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 05:07 EST --- * Doesn't build with our global $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (or %optflags). Make sure you set CFLAGS in the Makefile, e.g. with a modification of the existing patch: --- makefile.patch~ 2008-03-08 19:41:21.0 +0100 +++ makefile.patch 2008-04-13 11:04:53.0 +0200 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ CPPFLAGS = -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -CFLAGS = -Wall -+CFLAGS = -Wall -g ++CFLAGS = -Wall $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) LDFLAGS = LIBS = -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 05:11 EST --- Plus, prefer install -p ... whenever installing prebuilt files. That preserves the timestamps (and aids the package user in seeing the age of files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio
sound server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 05:23 EST ---
%configure --disable-lynx \
--prefix=%{_prefix} \
--libdir=%{_libdir} \
--mandir=%{_mandir} \
The last three args are the default.
See rpm --eval %configure.
%dir %{_libdir}/xmms/Output/libxmms-pulse.la
Surely not a directory. It's a libtool archive file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442244] New: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/fotox.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/fotox-39-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Easy to use image editor with features like panoramas, high dynamic range (HDR) composites, change brightness distribution, intensify colors, reduce haze, resize, rotate (any angle), crop, red-eye removal, sharpen, reduce noise, thumbnail image browser and navigator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442219] Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442219 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 06:35 EST --- Sorry, my bad: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/bip-0.7.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libxml2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |medium
Priority|normal |medium
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
Version|devel |rawhide
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 07:06 EST ---
Prefix: %{_prefix}
This is wrong. The packages are not really relocatable.
For example, there are hardcoded paths in xml2-config,
the pkgconfig file, the libtool archive, and xml2Conf.sh
%{prefix}/include/*
%{prefix}/bin/xml2-config
%{prefix}/share/aclocal/libxml.m4
It should be %{_bindir}, %{_includedir} and %{_datadir} everywhere.
Docdir: %{_docdir}
Redundant.
-rw-r--r-- root root 1546914 /usr/lib/libxml2.a
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryPolicy
%post
/sbin/ldconfig
%postun
/sbin/ldconfig
Prefer
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
to execute ldconfig directly and not via /bin/sh
Patch0: multilib.patch
It is common practise to prefix such files with the name (and
preferably also the version) of the package, e.g.
libxml2-2.6.32-multilib.patch
make
If make %{_smp_mflags} causes problems, please add a comment.
%files devel
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.gz NEWS README Copyright TODO
%files python
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.gz NEWS README Copyright
Is it necessary to duplicate these files? They are already
in the main package, which is a strict requirement for these
two sub-packages.
* rpmlint gives lots of warnings when run on the binary rpms.
Some are valid, e.g. file-not-utf8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 07:26 EST --- This package shouldn't have passed review as it has Requires: that aren't actually in Fedora, e.g. php-pear-Auth-OpenID which is still in review (bug #227190) Broken deps for i386 -- mediawiki-openid-0.7.0-5.noarch requires php-pear-Auth-OpenID mediawiki-openid-0.7.0-5.noarch requires php-pear-Services-Yadis see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20080413/logs/depcheck This should probably be blocked from F-9 until such time as the dependencies are fully packaged and available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442249] New: Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442249 Summary: Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/uniXM.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/uniXM-beta2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: standalone qt-based player for XMradio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 09:08 EST --- Created an attachment (id=302266) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302266action=view) Install copy as symbolic links. Also add a patch for missing prototypes (unistd.h) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 09:06 EST --- The copyright is a BSD (like FreeBSD BSD Variant (2 clause BSD) in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD with an additional sentence about it not being GPL. When upstream is missing in such cases, I think the best is to become upstream, like what was done for vixie-cron - cronie. And I believe that the way to do that is to go through: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/ProjectHosting/RequestingNewProject -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 09:10 EST --- Created an attachment (id=302267) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302267action=view) add io.h in dos/win32, and unistd.h otherwise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 09:18 EST --- I have updated this package according to the newly approved guidelines. The spec and srpm are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-2.fc9.src.rpm Rpmlint on the source rpm is now silent. Rpmlint on the binary rpms gives the following output, which is the same as in my original post above: eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/brazil.jar /usr/share/java/brazil.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/brazil.jar /usr/share/java/brazil.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/jdom.jar /usr/share/java/jdom.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/jdom.jar /usr/share/java/jdom.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/antlr.jar /usr/share/java/antlr.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/antlr.jar /usr/share/java/antlr.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/gnu-regexp.jar /usr/share/java/gnu-regexp.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/gnu-regexp.jar /usr/share/java/gnu-regexp.jar These are symlinks to libraries provided by other Fedora packages. I still believe these can safely be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 09:22 EST ---
Hi Claudio, here's a more thorough review:
good:
+ rpmlint is silent
+ license is correctly included
+ specfile is legible and macros appear to be sane
+ source matches upstream sha1sum:
b9bd87453b30696cbc175158c4a74b5db42ae126 octaviz-0.4.7.tar.gz
b9bd87453b30696cbc175158c4a74b5db42ae126 octaviz-0.4.7.tar.gz.orig
+ builds in mock for F8 x86_64
+ works (with some demo path issues below) when installed on F8 x86_64
+ proper use of ldconfig
+ no duplicates in %files listing
+ no need for -devel
+ file permissions appear to be correct
+ spec has %clean and does rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' before install
+ no *.la
+ no need for %{name}.desktop since its an octave add-on
needswork / suggestions:
- According to the guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
octaviz is an addon package and should be named octave-octaviz.
I think this is a good idea but I don't consider it a blocker
(that is, if you have good reasons to keep the name as-is then
we can discuss/consider it).
- license is GPLv2+ (please note the +) per the COPYING and README
files
- VTK_DATA_ROOT should be set to %{_datadir}/vtkdata-5.0.4 not
%{_datadir}/vtkdata-5.0.3 on F8 -- and perhaps this can be fixed
more automatically within the spec-file using
BuildRequires: vtkdata
and then adding a macro such as $(find %{_datadir} -name vtkdata*)
or similar logic
- Should octaviz require vtkdata? I think it should since many
of the octaviz demo scripts depend upon data (images) provided by
vtkdata. The only downside to requiring it the ~20MB vtkdata
download which is big-ish. So please don't consider this a
blocker, its more of a judgment call.
I think the package is in good shape and the remaining changes are pretty
minor. Can you please comment on the above?
Also, I'm willing to sponsor you if you'll demonstrate an ability to review
packages by doing at least one pre-review as described above.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442254] New: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442254 Summary: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/imapsync.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/imapsync-1.249-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The command imapsync is a tool allowing incremental and recursive imap transfer from one mailbox to another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442254] Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442254 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 09:31 EST --- Inital spec from Steven Pritchard. Silent rpmlint and builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 10:25 EST --- *** Bug 442254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442254] Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442254 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 10:25 EST --- Already in Fedora since a few days ago. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 441805 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442263] New: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/quicksynergy.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/quicksynergy-0.7-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: QuickSynergy is a graphical interface (GUI) for easily configuring Synergy2, an application that allows the user to share his mouse and keyboard between two or more computers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 12:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) Hi, - Rewrote the SPEC using lib template - removed conditional builds http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-5.fc7.src.rpm http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442266] New: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/embryo.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/embryo-0.9.1.042-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Embryo is primarily a shared library that gives you an API to load and control interpreted programs compiled into an abstract machine bytecode that it understands. This abstract (or virtual) machine is similar to a real machine with a CPU, but it is emulated in software. The architecture is simple and is the same as the abstract machine (AMX) in the PAWN language (formerly called SMALL) as it is based on exactly the same code. Embryo has modified the code for the AMX extensively and has made it smaller and more portable. It is VERY small. The total size of the virtual machine code AND header files is less than 2500 lines of code. It includes the floating point library support by default as well. This makes it one of the smallest interpreters around, and thus makes is very efficient to use in code. RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom spot Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to build software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442268] New: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-0.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LXSession is a standard-compliant X11 session manager with shutdown/reboot/suspend support via HAL and gdm. It is derived from XSM and is developed as default X11 session manager of LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. Though being part of LXDE, it's totally desktop-independent and only has few dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442270] New: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common-0.3.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the default artwork and configuration files for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442269] New: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxappearance.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxappearance-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LXAppearance is a new GTK+ theme switcher developed for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. It is able to change GTK+ themes, icon themes, and fonts used by applications. All changes done by the users can be seen immediately in the preview area. After clicking the Apply button, the settings will be written to gtkrc, and all running programs will be asked to reload their themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|442269 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|442270 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||442270 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||442270 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 13:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=563988 Almost all tests are skipped. I'm not sure what can currently be done to enable them, aside from also packaging SQLiteODBC[1] and rigging a little test environment... I'd encourage this; we certainly already require (as a matter of course) the packaging of any additional cpan/perl deps required to fully enable a test suite. [1] http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/html/ Thanks for the suggestion Chris. I've packaged sqliteodbc and will submit it for review once perl-DBD-ODBC is properly modified to use it. http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/sqliteodbc.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/sqliteodbc-0.77-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 13:22 EST --- Woops, forgot to include: i386 and x86_64 RPMs built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||chemnitz.de --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 13:38 EST --- 'Requires(Pre): setup' in filesystem is necessary because filesystem ships objects owned by non-root users. These users are defined in /etc/passwd provided by 'setup'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 13:50 EST --- pyPdf imported into CVS, builds well (and should be pushed to F-8 soon, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/pyPdf-1.10-4.fc8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 14:54 EST --- RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom spot Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/ msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to built software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442276] New: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/evas.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/evas-0.9.9.042-1.fc9.src.rpm i386 and x86_64 RPMs built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/ Description: Evas is a clean display canvas API for several target display systems that can draw anti-aliased text, smooth super and sub-sampled scaled images, alpha-blend objects much and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 14:59 EST --- Woops, i should double-check what i'm pasting ;) RPMLint gives warning on evas-directfb and evas-gl: W: no-documentation But i think it's ok, because these packages contain only one .so file and are split out just to make base evas package less dependant on various stuff like directfb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||441965 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||442276 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] New: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel-2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Squirrel is a high level imperative/OO programming language, designed to be a powerful scripting tool that fits in the size, memory bandwidth, and real-time requirements of applications like games. output from rpmlint: squirrel-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on squirrel can be ignored as -devel depends on -libs scratch build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 15:29 EST --- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/network/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/bip-0.7.2-2.fc8.src.rpm * Sun Apr 13 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.7.2-2 - Added AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, INSTALL, README, TODO to docdir - added --enable-ssl to %configure, just to make sure that bip is built with SSL support using OpenSSL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 16:03 EST --- I've updated this package according to the newly approved Java guidelines. The spec also now builds a demo rpm containing sample brazil projects. The spec and srpm are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/brazil.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/brazil-2.3-2.fc9.src.rpm Rpmlint is now silent on all packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 16:41 EST --- Hello; not to press anyone, but I see the situation is blocked. Is there any other problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 16:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) Hello; not to press anyone, but I see the situation is blocked. Is there any other problem? Nope, I'm / we are waiting for Michel, the submitter and future maintainer of the Falcon package for Fedora. ping Michel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and
compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 16:52 EST ---
Some small comments:
o add -p to install to preserve timestamps
o find has a nice option -delete:
find . -exec rm -f {} ';' - find . -delete
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 Bug 440681 depends on bug 440680, which changed state. Bug 440680 Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 17:43 EST --- Thank you very much for your notes. Fixed these two bugs in this package, and also in embryo and evas (also submitted for review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 17:40 EST --- I have added an explicit provide lua = 5.1 to the lua package. This way add-ons can depend on the exact base version that is required to have the proper package paths in place. This way we also do not have to have something like lua = 5.1; lua = 5.2 which looks hackish. Since in the Lua world the base version is anyway what is looked at we should be fine with this solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442219] Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442219 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 18:10 EST --- Darryl, bip has already been submitted for review, see bug #437694 maybe you should try to review that one, or even offer to become co-maintainer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 18:17 EST --- Please do not package INSTALL. It is only useful for people building from source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Alias: x11vnc-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 18:47 EST ---
Now I am sure. Using
%setup -q
find . -name minilzo\* -exec rm -f {} \;
makes the build fail.
BTW, you have to replace
%configure --with-system-libvncserver=%{_libdir}
with
%configure --with-system-libvncserver
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 19:11 EST --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564701 I don't see any issue? Sorry my computer died and I'm now using my laptop instead of my other box. Well PSU died and I haven't fixed it as of yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 19:13 EST --- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm-0.13.2d-36.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Apr 14 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.13.2d-36 - Fix URL - Cherry pick changes made by TeXLive 2007 - Build dvi and pdf docs - Add Requires for tex(tex) - Add security fix patches for temp file creation As well as dealing with all of the comments you (Patrice) raised, I carefully audited the changes between texlive 2007's version of dvipdfm (which is derived from dvipdfm 0.13.2c) and upstream 0.13.2c and 0.13.2d, and applied what I think are the few necessary changes to the packaged version (0.13.2d). I also reviewed all related patches from Jindrich's texlive package (I hope i didn't miss any). (In reply to comment #1) The base page is http://gaspra.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/ you used the dvipdfmx one... Fixed. There is a security issue in dvipdft since it generates files in tmp with predictible names. In texlive dvipdfm the script comes from another place and is furthermore patched. Fixed. A dot is missing at the end of %description. Fixed. the doc shipped should be the dvi version or even better the pdf version. To have the dvi, you should have a BuildRequires: tex(tex) and during build do something along pushd doc tex dvipdfm popd Fixed. and add %docs doc/dvipdfm.dvi To have a pdf it is less obvious since the preferred way seems to be using dvipdfm itself, but since it is not installed it is not obvious that it will succeed. You can try anyway pushd doc tex dvipdfm ../dvipdfm dvipdfm popd and verify that it builds in mock, with an updated texlive that doesn't contain the dvipdfm files that should be in dvipdfm. Fixed and works. Last issue regards the differences between config files and corresponding map files. Differences are: D zcat -f %i | gs -q -sPAPERSIZE=a0 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dCompatibilityLevel=1.2 -dUseFlateCompression=true -sOutputFile=%o - -c quit versus (-dSAFER added in texlive): D zcat -f %i | gs -q -sPAPERSIZE=a0 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dCompatibilityLevel=1.2 -dUseFlateCompression=true -dSAFER -sOutputFile=%o - -c quit a4 in texlive -p letter +p a4 Fixed - now packaging the texlive config (with the original config shipped as a doc as it contains helpful commentary). The maps are, in dvipdfm the shipped maps: f cmr.map f psbase14.map f lw35urw.map I still include these, but they're not used. In texlive, the font map created by updmap (and another map) are used: f cm-dvipdfm-fix.map f dvipdfm.map yes - the texlive config file will ensure these are used, I believe. It seems to me that the dvipdfm config file in texlive is better, but I am far from being an expert in this matter. Yes, I think so too. It seems to me that the config file in texlive-texmf can be kept instead of using the one in dvipdfm. The map and enc files of dvipdfm should still be shipped, though unused in the default fedora config. Agreed. A Requires: tex(tex) is also certainly missing, I don't think that dvipdfm will be ok without fonts. These fonts should be brought in by kpathsea, but I think that it is better not to count on it. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 20:04 EST --- Oops! I posted the wrong spec file. It also had the wrong source package, license and group! Here is the correct one, now revision 2 to avoid confusion: http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xmms-pulse.spec http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xmms-pulse-0.9.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 20:56 EST --- LingNing, could you please update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442295] New: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/thunar-shares.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/thunar-shares-0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba. The backend is based on nautilus-share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439163] Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439163 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439240] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache Alias: perl-Cache-FastMmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442297] New: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: TBD SRPM URL: TBD Description: lft - display the route packets take to a network host/socket using one of several layer-4 protocols and methods; optionally show heuristic network information in transit whob - display whois-type information of interest to Internet operators blocking FE-LEGAL for review of the license, as it's not listed on OSI or FSF's lists of acceptable licenses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-13 22:10 EST --- Created an attachment (id=302296) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302296action=view) COPYING VOSTROM Public License for Open Source Copyright (c) 2007 VOSTROM Holdings, Inc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| Summary|Review Request: lft - Layer |Review Request: lft - Layer |Four Traceroute |Four Traceroute -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442299] New: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: A Python interface to the GtkExtra2 widget set for GTK2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 00:39 EST --- Added missing BR on python-setuptools: Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-sphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-sphinx-0.1.61950-1.fc9.src.rpm Koji build (F-9): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 01:40 EST --- Well the version number is a little funny: dunno if they really mean 0.4, but maybe it is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-14 01:38 EST --- Thanks. The install directory should be just %fontsdir: ie please remove the -fonts suffix from the dir in %install and %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
