[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 02:45 EST --- rpmlint on rpm gave = ucview.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ucview.schemas A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. can you mark this file as %config in spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 02:51 EST --- Here is Debian's discussion on the same topic http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=312552 It's not clear if the new v3 support mentioned near the bottom is something different than the encumbered implementation. The Debian version 1:0.0.1+cvs20071127-1 lists the following in the changelog remove RARv3 code from libclamav due to unclear license and patent issues so is it now clean again or is there some other issue? RE comment #32, Debian has switched to using /etc/alternatives for unrar, I assume fedora could do similar? If this enough to make it ok for Fedora as well or is there still something I'm missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447079] Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: perl-Parse- |Review Request: perl-Parse- |CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml |CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml |and other similar CPAN |and other similar CPAN |metadata files |metadata files Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 02:58 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=616785 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6085074818ee8242b15a099c0339defa Parse-CPAN-Meta-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/01_compile... ok t/02_basic. ok t/03_regression ok t/04_scalar ok t/11_meta_yml.. ok t/12_plagger... ok t/13_perl_smith ok t/14_yaml_org.. ok t/15_multibyte. ok t/16_nullrefs.. ok t/17_toolbar... ok t/97_meta.. skipped all skipped: Author tests not required for installation t/98_pod... skipped all skipped: Author tests not required for installation t/99_pmv... skipped all skipped: Author tests not required for installation All tests successful, 3 tests skipped. Files=14, Tests=221, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.83 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.89 CPU) + Package perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta-0.03-1.fc10 = Provides: perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta) = 0.03 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(strict) SHOULD: Change license to GPLv2+ or Artistic before cvs import. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: perl-Math- |Review Request: perl-Math- |BigInt-GMP -|BigInt-GMP - |Math::BigInt::GMP Perl |Math::BigInt::GMP Perl |module |module Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 03:04 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=616785 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url de5bb548f9e8e2254565926eec1d15b2 Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/01_compile... ok t/02_basic. ok t/03_regression ok t/04_scalar ok t/11_meta_yml.. ok t/12_plagger... ok t/13_perl_smith ok t/14_yaml_org.. ok t/15_multibyte. ok t/16_nullrefs.. ok t/17_toolbar... ok t/97_meta.. skipped all skipped: Author tests not required for installation t/98_pod... skipped all skipped: Author tests not required for installation t/99_pmv... skipped all skipped: Author tests not required for installation All tests successful, 3 tests skipped. Files=14, Tests=221, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.83 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.89 CPU) + Package perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta-0.03-1.fc10 = Provides: perl(Parse::CPAN::Meta) = 0.03 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 03:11 EST --- It's not clear if the new v3 support mentioned near the bottom is something different than the encumbered implementation. Oops, meant to trim that part, the v3 support mentioned _is_ from libclamav and is the stuff that was removed in the version mentioned. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 03:26 EST --- Manuel, Sorry, my free time is limited at the moment and I did not find a workaround about the minilzo yet. I'll check this hopefully by end of this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: awesfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 03:44 EST --- awesfx has been removed from distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 03:43 EST --- If this is *really* correct, I can do so. I spent a lot of time searching how to package GUI software correct and saw, that nearly every maintainer does this different. Looking e.g. to http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/ devel/gconf-editor/gconf-editor.spec, I can't see %config there. So really a %config, yes? Or maybe even %config(noreplace)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 03:53 EST --- If I recall well the files in /etc/gconf/schemas/ are not real config files, they should be in %_datadir, but for an unknwon reason they are in /etc instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 04:13 EST --- Thanks Patrice. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=616787 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But NOT for RPM. ucview.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ucview.schemas == Ok to ignore. + source files match upstream. e241951a418db9bd66d8da612af15328 ucview-0.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + scrollkeeper,Gconf2,gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 04:31 EST --- Parag, thank you very much for the fast review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ucview Short Description: Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit Owners: robert Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443588] Review Request: fig2sxd - fig to sxd converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fig2sxd - fig to sxd converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443588 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 05:09 EST --- Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/fig2sxd.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/fig2sxd-0.18-1.fc10.src.rpm Includes a fix for the padding problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 05:09 EST --- downgraded the spec srpm file http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17-3.20071102svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446411] Review Request: perl-Event-Lib - Perl wrapper around libevent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-Lib - Perl wrapper around libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446411 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 06:05 EST --- oups was here: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Event-Lib-1.03-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447285] New: Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447285 Summary: Review Request: libx86 - library for making real-mode x86 calls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/libx86/rpms/libx86.spec SRPM URL: http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/libx86/rpms/libx86-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A library to provide support for making real-mode x86 calls. On 32-bit x86 hardware, vm86 mode is used. x86 emulation is provided on other platforms. This library is primarily used by vbetool for reinitialising graphics hardware on resume from suspend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 07:23 EST --- Package built successfully. Closing the bugzilla entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447293] New: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447293 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/hunspell-ml.spec SRPM URL: http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/hunspell-ml-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Malayalam hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447080] Review Request: gmemusage - Graphical memory usage viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gmemusage - Graphical memory usage viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447080
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:08 EST ---
Also you need to remove -L/usr/X11R6/lib.
The best way to fix Mfkefile params is to use conditional assignment. For
example
CFLAGS ?= -Wall
This means if no CFLAGS specified, then assign -Wall, instead use specified
value.
After that invoke 'make' as following:
CFLAGS=%{optflags} -DWHATEVER_YOU_NEED make %{smp_flags}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447293] Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447293 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:13 EST --- Almost all of the files that are available in the wild is compressed using the new v3 format which is not under a free and open software license. The free portions are unfortunately pretty much useless as a result and would probably just serve to cause confusion. If anybody else disagrees, they are free to submit the non-encumbered portions as a package to Fedora but I won't likely be taking that effort myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447293] Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447293 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:19 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build= http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=617294 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 5444fd474c248be4c0ab57d15583ca0b ooo-hunspell-ml-0.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438156] Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438156 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:24 EST --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235929] Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235929 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:30 EST --- rpmlint on SRPM clean. On RPMS, postgresql-odbcng-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. md5 still differs: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ md5sum odbcng-0.90.101.tar.gz cb90deb161b55161e473c5fc0dd420dc odbcng-0.90.101.tar.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/odbcng-0.90.101.tar.gz 17f167a13e360c3f0a02c695fe22574f ../SOURCES/odbcng-0.90.101.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:35 EST --- I think I have addressed everything now. Here is the latest src rpm and spec: Spec URL: http://music.nuim.ie/vlazzarini/tmp/olpcsound.spec SRPM URL: http://music.nuim.ie/vlazzarini/tmp/olpcsound-5.08.92-0.fc7.src.rpm Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447293] Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447293 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:33 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hunspell-ml Short Description: Malayalam hunspell dictionaries Owners: rajeeshknambiar Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: paragn Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:49 EST --- Frank, this isn't really the right bug for that. This has to do with a completely different package. In fact this one should probably just be closed, as this package is not likely to ever be accepted into Fedora... It looks like do not have a successful firmware extraction on your box. Where did you get the firmware you are using? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|CANTFIX |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 383281] Review Request: b43legacy-firmware - V3 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43legacy-firmware - V3 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383281 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client
for the Jabber instant messaging system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 08:54 EST ---
Initial remarks:
* Requires tktray. Do you plan to submit it for review?
* desktop-file-install - wrong vendor
* Wrong versioning scheme - should be
Version: 0.10.1
Release: 0.1.beta2%{?dist}
where Release consists of 0 (which means prerelease) ++ buildnum ++ beta2
(prerelease version) ++ %{dist}
Using this naming scheme we may ensure that application will be updated then it
will be released ( 0.10.1-[1-9] 0.10.1-0.anything, but 0.10.1.beta2
0.10.1-anything)
Consider to change your spec-file according to these suggestions.
BTW This wonderful app was in my TODO-list for a long time and I'm glad to see
that now it's on the way to Fedora, finally :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 09:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Short Description: Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module Owners: steve Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447079] Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 09:37 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta Short Description: Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files Owners: steve Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447079] Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 09:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) SHOULD: Change license to GPLv2+ or Artistic before cvs import. According to the wiki (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing), the standard Perl license should be GPL+ or Artistic. If you look at http://search.cpan.org/src/ADAMK/Parse-CPAN-Meta-0.03/LICENSE, the author even references GPLv1. (Granted, he then quotes GPLv2.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446653] Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 10:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) I've already solved this by creating /coda if it doesn't exit in %post, and owning it through %ghost. This IMHO is better, because even a coda-filesystem package might need an update one day, and then you still have a problem. Ok, that sounds good. * Use coda-client as the service name for the client, this is more intuitive and follows how the Debian packages are. This deviates from upstream, and makes it harder to use things like the coda howto and other documents together with the packages. This is true, but isn't /usr/coda really ugly? Also, when I say Debian packages, I don't mean official packages (there aren't any), but the Debian packages that upstream makes for download. If you look at debian/ in the standard tarball, you will see the initscript and other files that use the FHS-style paths and the coda-client named service. More importantly, Coda predates Linux and the FHS. The config file allows for the customization of directories to fit a particular system. The defaults are generic, and not really correct for a modern Linux system. The defaults given in the debian directory should be closer to what a Linux system today should have. * Split out gcodacon Why? This is optional, but useful for avoiding dependences on Gtk. * Ship a venus.conf that sets the coda directories to places in /var/log, /var/run, etc I've moved the entire venus cache, logs etc to /var/lib/coda by adding a /usr/coda symlink which points to /var/lib/coda See above. I don't think /usr/coda should exist on Fedora. /coda is bad enough! (But unavoidable.) Something needed but have not done yet: * Add /etc/udev/makedev.d/99-coda.nodes with contents cfs0 This is not necessary the venus initscript loads the coda kernel module and then the nodes get created automatically by udev This is a race condition, yes? Or are you calling udev-settle? makedev.d avoids the race condition, and is what fuse does (which is similar to coda in some ways). p.s. As you may have seen I've written new sysv style initscript scripts for these packages which fully follow the Fedora / RH initscript conventions. I would like to share these with upstream, what would be the best place to submit these? http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/trac Pull from git and file some tickets! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 10:37 EST ---
+ rpmlint output
Clean, according to bug submitter.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
? package should satisfy packaging guidelines
? license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
? license matches the actual package license
? %doc includes license file
? spec file written in American English
? spec file is legible
? upstream sources match sources in the srpm
? package successfully builds on at least one architecture
? ExcludeArch bugs filed
? BuildRequires list all build dependencies
? %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
? binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
? does not use Prefix: /usr
? package owns all directories it creates
? no duplicate files in %files
? %defattr line
? %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
? consistent use of macros
? package must contain code or permissible content
? large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
? files marked %doc should not affect package
? header files should be in -devel
? static libraries should be in -static
? packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
? libfoo.so must go in -devel
? -devel must require the fully versioned base
? packages should not contain libtool .la files
? packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
? packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
? %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
? filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
? translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
? reviewer should build the package in mock
? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
? review should test the package functions as described
? scriptlets should be sane
? pkgconfig files should go in -devel
? shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 10:39 EST --- Sorry about that last commentI meant to delete it, but I forgot. I'll update with a more complete review. Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 10:45 EST --- When trying to build this package on F-9 with ocaml packages update to F-10, I seem to be running into a build failure: + make depend for d in lib virt-df diskzip; do \ make -C $d depend; \ if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then exit 1; fi; \ done make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/virt-df-2.1.1/lib' rm -f .depend ocamlfind ocamldep -package unix,extlib -I +bitmatch -pp camlp4o -I`ocamlc -where`/bitmatch pa_bitmatch.cmo diskimage_ext2.mli diskimage_fat.mli diskimage_impl.mli diskimage_linux_swap.mli diskimage_linux_swsuspend.mli diskimage_lvm2_metadata.mli diskimage_lvm2.mli diskimage_mbr.mli diskimage.mli diskimage_ntfs.mli int63_on_32.mli int63_on_64.mli diskimage_ext2.ml diskimage_fat.ml diskimage_impl.ml diskimage_linux_swap.ml diskimage_linux_swsuspend.ml diskimage_lvm2_metadata.ml diskimage_lvm2.ml diskimage_mbr.ml diskimage.ml diskimage_ntfs.ml int63_on_32.ml int63_on_64.ml test_int63.ml .depend Camlp4: Uncaught exception: DynLoader.Error (/usr/lib/ocaml/bitmatch/pa_bitmatch.cmo, error while linking /usr/lib/ocaml/bitmatch/pa_bitmatch.cmo.\nReference to undefined global `Bitmatch') (and then there are a bunch more build failures). Rich points out that this patch is probably needed: http://hg.et.redhat.com/virt/applications/virt-df--devel?cs=00a35ad4c881 Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 10:51 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-df.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-df-2.1.1-6.fc10.src.rpm * Sun May 18 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.1.1-6 - Include upstream cset 00a35ad4c881 which fixes build with latest bitmatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 10:57 EST --- $ LANG=C rpm -K olpcsound-5.08.92-0.fc7.src.rpm error: olpcsound-5.08.92-0.fc7.src.rpm: headerRead failed It seems that your srpm itself is broken... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 11:24 EST --- sorry, something went wrong in the upload. It seems to be fixed now, same links as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 11:38 EST ---
OK, review with updated package:
+ rpmlint output
Clean, according to bug submitter.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
It actually starts with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but I believe that is valid as
part of the guidelines, and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is used consistently throughout the
specfile.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
+ if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
- translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
Translations of these don't seem to be available
- reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin
This package looks fine.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 11:43 EST --- * Requires tktray. Do you plan to submit it for review? yes. already submitted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 * desktop-file-install - wrong vendor Maybe. But I don't know right value of this parameter. Any tips or suggest for this bug? At this time, I simple removed --vendor from desktop-file-install. * Wrong versioning scheme - should be fixed ftp://srv.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SPECS/tkabber.spec ftp://srv.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SRPMS/tkabber-0.10.1-0.1.beta2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: tktray -|Review Request: tktray - |System Tray Icon Support for|System Tray Icon Support for |Tk on X11 |Tk on X11 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 11:48 EST --- This library Requires by tkabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447338] New: Review Request: email2trac - Utilities for converting emails to trac tickets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447338 Summary: Review Request: email2trac - Utilities for converting emails to trac tickets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/email2trac.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/email2trac-0.13-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a release of the SARA package email2trac that contains utilities that we use to convert emails to trac tickets. The initial setup was made by Daniel Lundin from Edgewall Software. SARA has extend the initial setup, with the following extensions: * HTML messages * Attachments * Use commandline options * Use config file to change the behaviour of the email2trac.py program * Some unicode support for special characters in the headers of an email message -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 11:50 EST --- Excellent news, thanks for looking at this Chris. CVS request coming up ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 11:51 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: virt-df Short Description: Utility like 'df' for virtual guests Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446978] Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktray - System Tray Icon Support for Tk on X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||446976 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||446978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447159] Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447159 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:04 EST --- All rpmlint warnings look ok, except this one : ocsinventory-server.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/ocsinventory-server 0750 The /var/lib/ocsinventory-server directory owned by the ocsinventory-reports package should be renamed to /var/lib/ocsinventory-reports, but this has been requested upstream. It would be better to get this fixed before importing the package as the rename would require some tweaking to the conf and mysql database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439453] Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439453 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:04 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:07 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446390] Review Request: cluster - RedHat Cluster Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluster - RedHat Cluster Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446390 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:13 EST --- The 'devel' branch (which is default) will much later in this development cycle be branched off to become the F-10 branch. You are of course free to change cvsextras commits later. It's quite rare for anyone non closely associated with a particular package to change it however. Allowing cvsextras commits does allow other maintainers to make changes in cases where there is a simple bug, or where there is something like a broken dependency where the package simply needs to be rebuilt. Do consider opening it up as soon as you are comfortable. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446508] Review Request: cflow - Analyzes C files charting control flow within the program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cflow - Analyzes C files charting control flow within the program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446508 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:16 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447079] Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta - Parse META.yml and other similar CPAN metadata files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:18 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:20 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: clustermon Short Description: Monitoring and management of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Cluster Suite Owners: rmccabe Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:21 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ricci Short Description: Cluster and systems management agent Owners: rmccabe Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:21 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447293] Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ml - Malayalam Hunspell Dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447293 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:27 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:25 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438195] Review Request: wgrib2 - Wgrib for GRIB-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib2 - Wgrib for GRIB-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438195 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) I did a package too, very similar with yours (strange isn't it ;-) I guess we both work in the earth sciences area? but with a makefile patch different and correspondingly a make call slightly different. I've reworked mine again. Otherwise I think that the first paragraph of the %description would be enough. Agreed. Also I have a libpng-devel BuildRequires g2clib-devel requires libpng-devel. And this for the license: # most files are public domain, geo.c and Netcdf.c are GPL+, gribtab.c is GPLv2+ License:GPLv2+ Fixed. and summary Summary:Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB2 files Fixed. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib2.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib2-1.7.2b-1.fc8.src.rpm * Mon May 19 2008 Orion Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.7.2b-1 - Update to 1.7.2b - Update makefile patch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=617750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444722] Review Request: phplogcon - A syslog data viewer for the web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phplogcon - A syslog data viewer for the web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444722 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:31 EST --- http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/phplogcon.spec http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/phplogcon-2.3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm All points from comment #4 are fixed. install.php is not removed anymore. If it's empty, it will be considered as not configured. README.fedora is provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447338] Review Request: email2trac - Utilities for converting emails to trac tickets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: email2trac - Utilities for converting emails to trac tickets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447338 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:33 EST --- taking review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:33 EST ---
You don't need to gzip the man page, that is done automatically.
-- figtoipe.spec 2008-05-17 11:12:35.0 -0600
+++ figtoipe.spec.new 2008-05-19 10:31:09.0 -0600
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Source0:
http://luaforge.net/frs/download.php/3343/figtoipe-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildRequires: zlib-devel, gzip, perl
+BuildRequires: zlib-devel, perl
%description
Figtoipe is a program that reads FIG files (as generated by
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
install -m 755 figtoipe $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
install -m 644 figtoipe.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
-gzip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/figtoipe.1
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -49,7 +48,7 @@
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README CHANGES gpl-2.0.txt LICENSE
%{_bindir}/figtoipe
-%{_mandir}/man1/figtoipe.1.gz
+%{_mandir}/man1/figtoipe.1*
%changelog
* Sat May 17 2008 Laurent Rineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
20080505-1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:00 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445036] Review Request: vagalume - Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vagalume - Last.fm client for GNOME and Maemo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445036 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 12:59 EST --- Updated to 0.6; can now update status message. Will submit to Livna if the package is not considered proper for Fedora. Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/vagalume.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/vagalume-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445388] Review Request: parcellite - Lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - Lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445388 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:11 EST --- You need to use desktop-file-install to install the desktop file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:17 EST --- The latest version is 2.12.01: -safer memory, with program abort on allocation error -language strings file default location override parameter -unchecked pointers, checked -- had core dump if setlocale returned null; though a rare instance, now effectively paranoid, I can say, to my knowledge, all pointers not tracable to a hard coded value, or constant are checked -fixed program version parameter output Shortly, a new release will change program executible name from inadyn to inadyn-mt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439453] Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439453 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 Bug 429006 depends on bug 439453, which changed state. Bug 439453 Summary: Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439453 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:30 EST --- Built for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=617922 F8/F9 have to wait until the latest ocaml-bitmatch is pushed to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446390] Review Request: cluster - RedHat Cluster Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cluster - RedHat Cluster Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446390 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:36 EST --- Hi Kevin, thanks a lot for your work. Very much appreciated. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447366] New: Review Request: python-virtkey
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447366 Summary: Review Request: python-virtkey Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/python-virtkey.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/python-virtkey-0.50-1.fc9.src.rpm This is a dependency for the onboard virtual keyboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:36 EST --- Good work! == This package is APPROVED by me == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442871] Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:40 EST --- Here's a new version which uses ocaml-gettext. Thanks for your patience and persistence. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-top.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-top-1.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm * Mon May 19 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.0.1-2 - Use RPM percent-configure. - Add list of BRs for gettext. - Use find_lang to find PO files. - Comment out the OCaml dependency generator. Not a library so not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447365] New: Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - ImageMagick, perl-Image-Size, perl-gettext, perl-URI, perl-Image-ExifTool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 Summary: Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - ImageMagick, perl-Image- Size, perl-gettext, perl-URI, perl-Image-ExifTool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.nerux.org/pdf/llgal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nerux.org/pdf/llgal-0.13.15-1.fc9.i386.rpm Description: llgal is an easy and fast on-line gallery generator based on iGal. Its primary goal is to NOT require any boring useless expensive feature in your webserver, such as PHP, JavaScript, SQL, ... Thus, llgal generates static web-pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447367] New: Review Request: onboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 Summary: Review Request: onboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/onboard.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/onboard-0.91.2-1.fc9.src.rpm onboard is a simple virtual keyboard that is simpler and more useful than GOK in some cases (eg. tablet PC). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:50 EST --- Given the pam and suid components of the package, it would probably be wise for a security SME to review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447368] New: Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Summary: Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot-1.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: schroot allows users to execute commands or interactive shells in different chroots. Any number of named chroots may be created, and access permissions given to each, including root access for normal users, on a per-user or per-group basis. Additionally, schroot can switch to a different user in the chroot, using PAM for authentication and authorisation. All operations are logged for security. Several different types of chroot are supported, including normal directories in the filesystem, and also block devices. Sessions, persistent chroots created on the fly from files (tar with optional compression and zip) and LVM snapshots are also supported. schroot supports kernel personalities, allowing the programs run inside the chroot to have a different personality. For example, running 32-bit chroots on 64-bit systems, or even running binaries from alternative operating systems such as SVR4 or Xenix. schroot also integrates with sbuild, to allow building packages with all supported chroot types, including session-managed chroot types such as LVM snapshots. schroot shares most of its options with dchroot, but offers vastly more functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:48 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gnome-subtitles Short Description: Subtitle editor for gnome Owners: belegdol Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442871] Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:53 EST --- Koji scratch build of this package: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=618014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - llgal generates static web-pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - llgal generates static web-pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441899] Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:54 EST --- New Upload: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/inadyn-mt/inadyn-mt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/inadyn-mt/inydyn-mt-2.12.01-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 13:55 EST --- Update: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/figtoipe.spec http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/figtoipe-20080505-2.fc10.src.rpm You are right. I forgot to have a look at the rpm scripts. New release, with your patch, but the last line (I avoid glob in %files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - llgal generates static web-pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - llgal generates static web-pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: llgal- |Review Request: llgal- |0.13.15 - ImageMagick, perl-|0.13.15 - llgal generates |Image-Size, perl-gettext, |static web-pages |perl-URI, perl-Image- | |ExifTool| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:01 EST --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:07 EST --- For 5.08.92-0: * License Opcodes/Loris/ GPLv2+ examples/cscore/GPLv2+ - Now libstdutil.so is also under LGPLv2+ (also checked 2008-05-08 on ChangeLog) License tag can be LGPLv2+ now. * Compiler flags 164 gcc -o Engine/auxfd.os -c -O3 -mtune=k6 -DGNU_GETTEXT -DUSE_LRINT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fomit-frame-pointer -DLINUX -DPIPES -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -DHAVE_LIBSNDFILE=1016 -DBETA -DENABLE_OPCODEDIR_WARNINGS=0 -DOLPC -DHAVE_SOCKETS -DHAVE_FCNTL_H -DHAVE_UNISTD_H -DHAVE_STDINT_H -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H -DHAVE_TERMIOS_H -DHAVE_SOCKETS -DHAVE_DIRENT_H -D__BUILDING_LIBCSOUND -I. -IH -I/usr/include/fltk-1.1 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include Engine/auxfd.c - -fomit-frame-pointer is strictly forbidden for Fedora as this makes debugging almost impossible. * Directory ownership issue - %_includedir/csound is not owned by any packages. * rpmlint issue olpcsound.i386: E: description-line-too-long olpcsound is a subset of the Csound sound and music synthesis system, tailored specifically for XO platform. - Please check $ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long Then: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:10 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-ctrl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-ctrl-1.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm * Mon May 19 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.0.0-3 - Use RPM percent-configure. - Fix po/Makefile.in and po/POTFILES. - Add list of BRs for ocaml-gettext. - Use find_lang to find PO files. - Comment out OCaml dependency generator (not a lib, not needed). - Check it builds in Koji. This is rpmlint-clean. Koji scratch build of this version: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=618049 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444426] Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:18 EST --- Sorry, I had serious problems with email for my domain for the last week or so. http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/gabedit.spec http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/gabedit-2.1.4-2.src.rpm Fixed all issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445980] Review Request: odpdom - Oversized Document Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: odpdom - Oversized Document Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445980
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:26 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
If you're going to use the macro forms of commands line %{__make}, you should
use %{__rm} as well. Also, if you prefer %{buildroot} over $RPM_BUILD_ROOT,
you should use %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Just try to be
consistent in your usage of macro forms.
I note you're not using the dist tag. I guess you maintain enough packages
that you can handle the version juggling required when you don't use the dist
tag.
I will add the dist tag (omitted by accident) and make macro usage consistent.
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, as far as I checked this package
- the original tarball does not provide any shared libraries, only
static archives are provided
- odpdom-p4v.patch is applied to provide a shared library for Fedora
Actually that's odpdom-rpm.patch that does that. The -p4v patch comes from
p4vasp, which includes a modified odpdom. So in order to build p4vasp against
shared odpdom, I decided to patch odpdom in the same way, because p4vasp seems
to call that method.
(In reply to comment #5)
Well, it certainly doesn't hurt to discuss things with the upstream
developers.
Rathann, do you know their opinions on the topic?
Not yet, but I will contact them.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:47 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:51 EST --- Humm... why do you HUP/kill dbus in post/postun? Thats very much a no no. dbus can't be killed without messing up the system and requiring a reboot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 14:53 EST --- killing/HUPing dbus is bad... can you come up with an alternative? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445143] Review Request: libcaptury - A library for X11/OpenGL video capturing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcaptury - A library for X11/OpenGL video capturing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445143 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 15:05 EST --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=618188 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445143] Review Request: libcaptury - A library for X11/OpenGL video capturing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcaptury - A library for X11/OpenGL video capturing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445143 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 15:12 EST --- $ rpmlint *.rpm libcaptury.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.0-1.20080323gitcca4e3c 0.3.0-0.1.20080323gitcca4e3c.fc10 libcaptury.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 14, tab: line 32) libcaptury-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet libcaptury-debuginfo-0.3.0-0.1.20080323gitcca4e3c.fc10.x86_64.rpm libcaptury-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mostly harmless. builds: ok naming: ok scriptlets: ok source: ok license: ok APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442871] Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 15:20 EST --- Good: - rpmlint checks return... nothing! :) - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines (general, ocaml) - license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (89eeae9afe0c86b262c7adf2d693110050de0f22) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales ok - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving
license information in media files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 15:26 EST ---
Builds fine in mock
rpmlint output
liblicense.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/liblicense.so
liblicense.i386: E: description-line-too-long The liblicense package contains
the library, bindings, CLI utilities and license files.
liblicense.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
liblicense.src:40: W: unversioned-explicit-provides python-liblicense
liblicense.src: E: description-line-too-long The liblicense package contains the
library, bindings, CLI utilities and license files.
liblicense.src: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
liblicense-cli.i386: W: no-documentation
liblicense-cli.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin
liblicense-cli.i386: E: summary-too-long Simple command-line utility for
examining the license in a file or setting a user preference for a default
license
liblicense-cli.i386: E: description-line-too-long Simple command-line utility
for examining the license in a file or setting a user preference for a default
license
liblicense-cli.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
liblicense-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
liblicense-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
liblicense-devel.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
liblicense-modules.i386: W: no-documentation
liblicense-modules.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Input/output modules for
accessing license metadata in various file foramts.
liblicense-modules.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
liblicense-python.i386: W: no-documentation
liblicense-python.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1
license should be LGPLv2 per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-489bc5bbf14ecdb808316674e9fc465243c
liblicense.so should be in the devel package
you should use %{_bindir}/* not %{_bindir}
the description lines needs to be shorter missing documentation is ok for the
sub packages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447219] Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ucview - Image and video capture application using unicap toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 15:33 EST --- 39027 (unicap): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Package: unicap-0.2.23-1.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: unicap-0.2.23-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: unicap-0.2.23-1.fc9 Tag: dist-f9-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: unicap-0.2.23-1.fc10 Tag: dist-f10 Status: complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
