[Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:00 EST --- Updated per comment #4: SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-CPAN-Mini-0.571-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-CPAN-Mini.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #31) This time your srpm does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=635125 Sorry I built this not for the target olpc-3 but for the target dist-f10. Actually on i386 (i.e. on olpc-3) build succeeds. Will check later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:44 EST --- Okay, good -- This package (olpcsound) is APPROVED by me -- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 03:07 EST --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=635914 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Session/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.19-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec Description: This plugin is the base of two related parts of functionality required for session management in web applications. The first part, the State, is getting the browser to repeat back a session key, so that the web application can identify the client and logically string several requests together into a session. The second part, the Store, deals with the actual storage of information about the client. This data is stored so that the it may be revived for every request made by the same client. This plugin links the two pieces together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 03:30 EST --- new source md5sum (matches upstream) : 0fcaa2f7ee4872c51ae62620ec04f221 Still requires perl = 0:5.006 sed -i -e '/use 5.006;/d' Makefile.PL fixes it, but this is harmless. Looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 03:46 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=635914 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url eb7e9679234cd4f4269b5b1869141082 Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.19.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test All tests successful, 3 tests skipped. Files=8, Tests=33, 1 wallclock secs ( 1.01 cusr + 0.07 csys = 1.08 CPU) + package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-0.19-1.fc9 = Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) = 0.19 perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::State) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::Dummy) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Test::Store) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::SessionStateTest) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Catalyst) perl(Catalyst::Exception) perl(Catalyst::Test) perl(Digest) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(NEXT) perl(Object::Signature) perl(Test::More) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(warnings) I don't know why some tests got skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Plugin::Session::State::Cookie version 0.03 or higher is required for this test See build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 04:00 EST --- Sorry for the confusion. I'm at the LinuxTag and I have only limited access to the internet. I'll upload the files to the link mentioned in comment #1 as soon as possible. Some of the point mentioned by Robert are already addressed. I just had a talk with Robert. Thanks for your interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hylafax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 04:13 EST ---
You want proof? No problem. ;) The spec file contains
%{_libdir}/*
which also includes /usr/lib/debug recursively.
Instead, you want the more explicit
%{_libdir}/libfax*
or
%{_libdir}/*.so.*
That your own build does not include debuginfo files means that
you don't have the redhat-rpm-config installed. Packagers should
yum install rpmdevtools.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 04:16 EST --- ghostscript-fonts $ rpm -q ghostscript-fonts hylafax ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8 hylafax-5.2.5-1.fc8 It was installed already. It doesn't add /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts but /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript: $ rpmls ghostscript-fonts|grep ^d drwxr-xr-x /etc/X11/fontpath.d drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/fonts/default drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448582] Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 05:08 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: automoc Short Description: KDE4 Automoc Owners: arbiter,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 05:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) One final, last minute issue: Where is the upstream of this package? AFAIU, the original tarballs are those in http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~keb/cldoc/downloads/ while ftp://ftp.bioxray.au.dk/pub/mok/src/ hosts repackaged tarballs w/ autotool-support having been added. This wouldn't be much of a problem, if the original upstream was dead, but it apparently isn't. It released an update a couple of days ago. See: http://www.bioxray.dk/~mok/mmdb.php quote: This distribution is based on the last free version of mmdb, namely 1.09. Eugene's latest version of mmdb (1.10) is licensed under the non-free CCP4 license. The licensing, however, seems to have switched back to the LGPL: http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/ccp4license.php I can bring this issue up with those involved and see what the current status is. My hope is that the current fork will only be temporary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448582] Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448582 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 05:19 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: automoc Short Description: KDE4 Automoc Owners: arbiter,rdieter,kkofler,tuxbrewr Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 05:19 EST --- The spec file and the src.rpm are available again on: Spec URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/libspe2.spec SRPM URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/libspe2-2.2.80-95.src.rpm I'll reply to your comments as soon as possible. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 06:04 EST --- Two brief notes: 1) You define %pyver but you never use it. 2) The srpm spec file still has the exclusion part while the spec you present in the entry above does not have it. Of course the spec without the exclusion is the right one. These points are minor and can be fixed later when importing. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 07:07 EST --- Thanks! My FAS name is veplaini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448702] Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SndObj - The Sound Object Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 07:17 EST --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR, I am sponsoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 07:17 EST --- Now I should be sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 07:46 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: olpcsound Short Description: olpc subset of csound 5 Owners: veplaini Branches: olpc-3 InitialCC: veplaini Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445105] Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milkytracker - SDL clone of the Fasttracker II module tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445105 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 07:48 EST --- Sorry for delay... (In reply to comment #5) * Mon May 26 2008 Joonas Sarajärvi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.90.80-2 - Modified a Makefile.am to not compile the included static zlib library. The included Zlib isn't compiled in this release, Well, I reviewed your patch, however in fact patching against Makefile.am does not do anything, because configure created Makefile from Makefile.in, not from Makefile.am and Makefile.in is not automatically regenerated from Makefile.am. but the zziplib library in Milkytracker seems quite modified to me, and I haven't got MT to build with Fedora-provided zziplib. Would you check the following? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=636231 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_636231/ I applied a patch to use system-wide zziplib. milkytracter does not use zlib directly. Now I will wait for your another review request submit or pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448531] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 08:09 EST --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/pyrenamer.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/pyrenamer-0.5.0-4.fc9.src.rpm - Fix Requires : Add gnome-python2-gconf and pygtk2-libglade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 08:14 EST --- Good plan. I am going to resubmit this next week as prover9 to FC9 with a local patch (as far as I know the upstream developer has not produced a new release including this patch), hopefully then someone will sponsor it going into the Extras repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libxml2-2.6.32-3.fc10 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 08:35 EST --- I think I have done most of this. The most annoying point is the static lib because I know some people use that to shave 2% of extra performance on parsing speed. But by separating as a -static package that's reasonable. For the file-not-utf8, sorry can't fix here, report upstream if you believe it's worth it. Ah the patch is not dependent on the version of the libxml2 package but on multiarch crazyness, so just renamed libxml2-multilib.patch Considered done from my POV, Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448531] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448531 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 09:21 EST --- Okay. This package (pyrenamer) is APPROVED by me Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess from step 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 09:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) [...] For the file-not-utf8, sorry can't fix here, Sure you can. What's stopping you? report upstream if you believe it's worth it. I believe it's the maintainer's job to do that. Upstream might not want to convert to UTF-8, but it is a Fedora requirement for all text documents in a package to be encoded in UTF-8, so it is your responsibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 09:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) Finally, can someone please comment on the copyright notice at the bottom of /usr/share/doc/xxdiff-3.2/doc/screenshots/allindex.html (and other files in that directory). It says: All images and material are Copyright © 2001 Martin Blais, Montreal, Canada. All Rights Reserved. Images may not be used without written permission. If you would like to license or use an image, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does that cause any problems for us? Yes. Either get written permission to freely redistribute and modify or pull out these docs/images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 10:07 EST --- Technically, you can consider this package approved, however ... this package needs a legal review - Spot this pumpkin is yours. In my understanding, this package, using the tarball Tim is using (an apparent fork from it's original upstream), is licenced under a LGPLv2+ with exceptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 10:36 EST --- What's stopping me ? ... maybe realizing this exercise is just about dogmatic rules, and as you proved, I should rather spend 30 mn of my time as the libxml2/libxslt upstream maintainer on patch review than just getting annoyed by people who insist on changing package content at the distro level. I was about to conver libsxlt along those lines, but right I'm better off checking the patches from Huawei on the xml list. Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448531] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448531 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 10:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pyrenamer Short Description: A mass file renamer written in PyGTK Owners: lokthare Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 10:49 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 11:14 EST --- Can you please take care on all points mentioned in the review before closing this bug report? And please don't close this bug report until you got an approval for your package - thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 11:31 EST --- I do it tonight, sorry for being late... lot of works lasts weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 11:34 EST --- Including ::Cookie as a BR would create a circular buildloop, as ::Cookie has ::Session as a mandatory BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 11:36 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-CPAN-Mini Short Description: Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Owners: cweyl Branches: F-7, F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 11:47 EST --- ping? Is there anything you see needing to be updated to move this review forward? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 11:51 EST --- Blocking FE-Legal until I get a chance to do a proper review of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 12:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Including ::Cookie as a BR would create a circular buildloop, as ::Cookie has ::Session as a mandatory BR. OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 12:10 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session Short Description: Catalyst generic session plugin Owners: cweyl Branches: F-7, F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 12:25 EST --- I did take care/checked everything and, NO I won't change files coming from upstream unless i have a clear valid and checked with upstream reason for doing so. Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 12:33 EST --- Scratch build passed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=636762 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 12:45 EST --- One minor issue: Please don't use %makeinstall, use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:01 EST --- Maybe you want to focus on upstream work, in that case you could consider having somebody else follow the dogmatic rules. Those dogmatic rules are not only dogmatic, for instance the NEWS file has strange characters when seen in less. (I would personally prefer that writer.xml is not changed since it has the encoding specified in the file). Maybe you could search for a co-maintainer, I think that it is better in most cases to separate upstream from the primary maintainer (though upstream as co-maintainer is very nice) such that when there is conflict between the packaging rules and what upstream want, the maintainer can decide what is best (which could be what upstream want, but not necessarily). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:08 EST --- Daniel, all packages in Fedora have to follow the MUSTS of the Fedora Packaging Rules and Guidelines, libxml2 is there no exception. As you're upstream and also downstream you can change it where you want; at least it has to be solved in the end. Why do I have to explain a Red Hat guy how the Fedora Packaging works? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:06 EST --- Created an attachment (id=307216) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=307216action=view) spec patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:18 EST --- Not for the next weeks, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:28 EST --- /opt/cell/bin/ppu-gcc -O2 -Wall -I. -fPIC -I./include -fexceptions -std=gnu99 -Wformat -Wdisabled-optimization -Wundef -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-noreturn -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wformat -m32 -mabi=altivec -I./spebase -I./speevent -c -o libspe2.o libspe2.c make: /opt/cell/bin/ppu-gcc: Command not found Well, /opt/cell/bin/ppu-gcc doesn't seem to be part of Fedora/RHEL at all. Can't we use the regular gcc delivered with Fedora for that? If we need a special gcc, we have to get this one into Fedora first. Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:37 EST --- I tagged and built the devel branch yesterday, but I haven't seen the packages show up in Rawhide yet. I know that for I need to submit the FC-? branches via Bodhi, but is there anything special I need to do to submit to devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 13:52 EST --- All you need to do is build for rawhide and it will show up in the next push, but it's possible that you just missed the cutoff. It takes several hours to compose the rawhide tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449135] New: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge-4.5-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: GForge is a web-based Collaborative Development Environment offering easy access to CVS, mailing lists, bug tracking, message boards/forums, task management, permanent file archival, and total web-based administration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 14:51 EST --- Dan, thanks for the build results Tom, I've updated the spec file at the same location as mentioned earlier. In case you see an older version of the spec file (still), sf.net does not update all its mirrors immediately and hence the older file might still be around as stale data. I've replace %makeinstall with make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install as suggested. The file sizes are -rw-r--r-- 1 balbir balbir 1638 2008-05-30 23:29 libcgroup.spec -rw-r--r-- 1 balbir balbir 64201 2008-05-30 23:30 libcgroup-0.1b-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] New: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],pjon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/plymouth/plymouth.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/plymouth/plymouth-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Plymouth provides an attractive graphical boot animation in place of the text messages that normally get shown. Text messages are instead redirected to a log file for viewing after boot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:14 EST --- So I'd like to get this in rawhide soon rather than later. We shouldn't turn it on by default until it's actually ready though. Note, these packages won't do anything until we make the necessary mkinitrd changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:19 EST --- Random note: generic-logos doesn't have the logo mentioned here ATM. Any size/colormap/format considerations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:24 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:22 EST --- Picking up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:22 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449151] New: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449151 Summary: Review Request: pyodbc - Python DB API 2.0 Module for ODBC Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/pyodbc/pyodbc-2.0.58-1.src.rpm Description: A Python DB API 2 module for ODBC. This project provides an up-to-date, convenient interface to ODBC using native data types like datetime and decimal. Questions: - Should I included text of the MIT license even though source package doesn't include it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:27 EST --- no, not really. It should be white or light colored and a png file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:26 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:28 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:30 EST --- cvs done, except for F-7 branch (We are no longer doing F-7 branches) do you really need one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444426] Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:33 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444511] Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:35 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444755] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate - Perl functions for giving the ordinal form of a number given its cardinal value
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Ordinate - Perl functions for giving the ordinal form of a number given its cardinal value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444755 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:38 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:36 EST ---
MUST items:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- License - GPLv2+
- License field in spec matches - ***
Spec says GPLv2. Code says GPLv2+.
- License file included in package - OK
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum: - ***
Can't find an upstream tarball. Also, URL tag redirects to nowhere.
- Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
- BuildRequires correct - OK
- Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package has correct buildroot - OK
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - ***
It installs shared libraries but doesn't call ldconfig.
- .so files in -devel subpackage. - ***
Ships %{_libdir}/libply.so - probably should be removed
- .la files are removed. - OK
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested x86_64)
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output. - ***
plymouth-plugin-fade-in.x86_64: W: no-documentation
plymouth-plugin-spinfinity.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Ignorable.
plymouth.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libply.so.1.0.0
plymouth.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libply.so.1.0.0
plymouth.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libply.so
See above notes.
- final provides and requires are sane: - ***
What's the Requires: on mkinitrd for? (I understand logically that it's for use
in the initrd, but I don't see that it calls anything from it, for example.)
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. - OK (tested x86_64)
- Should build on all supported archs - don't see why it wouldn't
- Should function as described. - Not tested
- Should have sane scriptlets. - ***
See above re: ldconfig
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - OK
- Should have dist tag - OK
Assorted Other Issues:
- Conflicts: rhgb should possibly also have Obsoletes and Provides associated
with it
- You don't ship a development package. If you expect other packages to build
their own plugins, you may want to
- What happens if you have plymouth but no plugins installed and try to use it?
Should it require a plugin?
- --with-background-color=hex is ugly. Can't that be specified in the plugin
package as part of the theming?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445020] Review Request: python-mako - The Mako template system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mako - The Mako template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445020 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:41 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445021] Review Request: python-routes - A RoR-like routes library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-routes - A RoR-like routes library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445021 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:42 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445024] Review Request: python-webhelpers - Helper routines for writing web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-webhelpers - Helper routines for writing web applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445024 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:45 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445347] Review Request: python-shout - python binding for libshout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-shout - python binding for libshout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:49 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445142] Review Request: libcapseo - Realtime encoding/decoding library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcapseo - Realtime encoding/decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445142 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:47 EST --- Ideally, we will get pkgdb to just have a form/web ui for requesting things... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:49 EST ---
Hi Chris,
Just a few items to clean up:
- md5sums don't match:
b3257a99cb113d57eb621a3144d9dfe9
http://cdot.senecac.on.ca/software/nled/nled_2_52_src.tgz
8862849778bc3fd8c71bbf550e9f9aaf rpmbuild/SOURCES/nled_2_52_src.tgz
- consider using install -p to preserve timestamps
- should we add %{?_smp_mflags} to the make line to do parallel builds? it
worked for me
Thanks to Deepak Bhole for helping me review this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445454] Review Request: python-virtkey - Python extension for emulating keypresses and getting current keyboard layout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-virtkey - Python extension for emulating keypresses and getting current keyboard layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445454 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:50 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445455] Review Request: xdotool - Fake keyboard/mouse input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdotool - Fake keyboard/mouse input https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445455 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:53 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446410] Review Request: perl-BDB - Asynchronous Berkeley DB access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-BDB - Asynchronous Berkeley DB access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446410 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 15:58 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446412] Review Request: perl-Event-RPC - Event based transparent Client/Server RPC framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-RPC - Event based transparent Client/Server RPC framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446412 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:00 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446414] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory - Framework for Gtk2 perl applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory - Framework for Gtk2 perl applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446414 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:04 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448497] Review Request: ca-certificates - Mozilla CA root bundle package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ca-certificates - Mozilla CA root bundle package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448497 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:08 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448531] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448531 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:13 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:13 EST --- Fixed license. added upstream url. remove libply.so add ldconfig mkinitrd was for grubby used by the sample script. the script really shouldn't be used though, so i dropped the requires. add obsoletes and provides i haven't sorted out the plugin situation yet. right now the plugins require intree files to build, and there's no way to switch which one gets used by the daemon. it's something i'm going to fix soon. the base package ships two plugins. One of them, text will run if there aren't any other plugins installed (or if they fail to work). --with-background-color is a hint to the plugins which color to use to fit in with the configured logo. plugins are free to ignore it and do their own thing just like they're free to ignore the configured logo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448582] Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automoc - KDE4 Automoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:16 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448606] Review Request: subtitleeditor - GTK+2 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subtitleeditor - GTK+2 tool to edit subtitles for GNU/Linux/*BSD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:21 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:21 EST --- Thanks Andrew, fixed all (not sure what happened with the md5sums!)-- Spec URL: http://chris.tylers.info/rpm/nled.spec SRPM URL: http://chris.tylers.info/rpm/nled-2.52-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448650] Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmm - C++ library for sparse, dense and skyline matrices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448745] Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ext3grep - Recovery tool for ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448745 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:24 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:27 EST --- Awesome, thanks, Chris. APPROVED. Don't forget to do the CVS Admin procedure now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448871] Review Request: perl-Template-Provider-Encoding - Explicitly declare encodings of your templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Provider-Encoding - Explicitly declare encodings of your templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:27 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448491] Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to control and monitor control groups the associated controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cgroup-lib - A collection of tools and libraries to
control and monitor control groups the associated controllers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448491
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:28 EST ---
In general, any time you make a change to the spec file, you need to increment
the release, and add a new entry to the %changelog section. I'll ignore that for
now, but please be sure to do it in the future.
In the spec, you've got:
URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcg/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Source0: libcgroup-0.1b.tar.bz2
URL is intended to point to the libcgroup website.
Source0 should be the URL path to download the tarball.
So, you need to change it to:
URL: http://libcg.sourceforge.net/
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcg/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Please make a new SRPM, and I'll finish this review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:29 EST --- cvs done (except for F-7, as we are no longer doing F-7 branches). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:41 EST --- If you're both obsoleting and providing rhgb, you need to version the obsoletes so it doesn't obsolete itself. New URL still gets a 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:54 EST --- okay should be good to go now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:54 EST --- Looks good. Might want to add the url to the source download, but that's just a style thing. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 16:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) cvs done, except for F-7 branch (We are no longer doing F-7 branches) do you really need one? Not really -- just part of my request branch script. I wasn't aware we'd stopped doing F-7 branches; I'll drop that from the script... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444426] Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 17:09 EST --- Imported and built for devel and F-9, others will follow. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449149] Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Plymouth - Graphical Boot Animation and Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 17:09 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: plymouth Short Description: Plymouth Graphical Boot Animation and Logger Owners: rstrode,krh InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
