[Bug 451925] Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-hal - Connection framework and dccm-implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451925 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 02:11 EST --- curl-7.18.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452078] New: Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 Summary: Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/node.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/node-0.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a simple node frontend for Linux kernel AX.25, NETROM, ROSE and TCP. It's based on pms.c by Alan Cox (GW4PTS) but has been heavily modified since. It's probably not very well tested, not pretty, not very flexible and it is certainly not ready! However I think it's already somewhat usable Few notes: This package is not under active development. We need to provide this package because all AX25-HOWTO refers it, and I think it would help users. rpmlint is silent with a few exceptions: E: zero-length /var/ax25/node/loggedin this is an empty file node cannot create on it's own W: non-standard-dir-in-var ax25 /var/ax25 this is the standard location directory for ax25 applications. I think we should get an exception for that in rpmlint. Package does not have a standard configure script, here configure is just a bash script. so sh configure was put to inhibit rpmlint warning of not using %configure macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445687] Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portreserve - TCP port reservation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445687 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 04:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) - Build on mock (x86_64) failed: I just tried a mock build of portreserve-0.0.1-2.fc8 for fedora-9-x86_64 and it built fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444257] Review Request: nted - Musical score editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 04:41 EST --- Ping? Michel, you can proceed now with the CVS stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452087] New: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~kzak/collectl.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~kzak/collectl-2.6.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A utility to collect linux performance data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 05:30 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: collectl Short Description: A utility to collect linux performance data Owners: kzak, sharkcz Branches: InitialCC: sharkcz Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 05:38 EST --- Build failure is limited to ppc64 architecture, potential fix for now would be an architecture exclusion, like with: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=670200 (That version was made with an altered SPEC file that just includes the line ExcludeArch ppc64.) Perhaps the problem is with OCaml support on ppc64? I remember reading that there were some difficulties about this in the recent past. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 05:24 EST --- OK source files match upstream: 4b90523b13cfb5f7c41bfa4fe07c542ed8150b67 collectl-2.6.4-1.src.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License texts are included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct initscript scriptlets are present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: perl-Lingua-|Review Request: perl-Lingua- |Preferred - Perl extension |Preferred - Pick a language |to choose a language|based on user's preferences --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 06:52 EST --- Thx for the review, I will update the Summary, but i didn't get what to with the URL. If I stay as it is, maybe it can get fixed later. But if I comment the URL, this suggest the problem in is the spec (missing URL field) whereas the problem seems releated to CPAN... This is my point of view. But I will follow advices. I have email cpan admin, but without answer yet. I will resent a mail to the owner of the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 06:54 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Lingua-Preferred Short Description: Pick a language based on user's preferences Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 07:58 EST --- I've got an answer from the upstream developer. perl-AnyEvent doesn't need need any dependencies (some will need to be filtered). So I guess perl-EV will BR perl-AnyEvent (or at least Requires at runtime). Once perl-EV is installed, perl-AnyEvent will elect this module (instead of perl(Glib) or others ,because it is the fastest. And I guess the dependent modules will only requires perl(AnyEvent), so i still need to sort this out, and submit perl-AnyEvent for review first... About the libev be built internally, here is the upstream answer: -- EV comes with it's own copy of libev and cannot possibly links against a preinstalled system libev (they are ABI-incompatible). Therefore, EV itself has no external dependencies (but of course it is arch-dependent). -- I don't know if it is how perl arch dependant modules will works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 08:45 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lazarus Short Description: Lazarus Component Library and IDE for Freepascal Owners: joost Branches: F-9 InitialCC: joost Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452105] New: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452105 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-RADIUS - Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Auth-RADIUS.spec SRPM URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Auth-RADIUS-1.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Wrapper Classes for the RADIUS PECL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Alias: php-pear-Auth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||452105 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 09:19 EST --- I can include them and remove that patch that disables the test suite at import-I can include them and remove that patch that disables the test suite at import-time, if needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 09:26 EST --- Uhm, sorry for the weird comment.. it seems that konqueror4 is not much usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452108] New: Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Summary: Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg-fe/cfdg-fe.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg-fe/cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm A front end to cfdg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||452107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||452108 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452107] New: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg-2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Context Free is a program that generates images from written instructions called a grammar. The program follows the instructions in a few seconds to create images that can contain millions of shapes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 10:44 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 10:49 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444744] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Preferred - Pick a language based on user's preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 10:47 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:03 EST --- Created an attachment (id=309861) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309861action=view) removing two lines from doc/nl/index.docbook allows build in C4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:01 EST --- Quick and dirty patched spec which allows build for EL-4. Works for me in C4.6/i386. Explanation: build fails due to doxygen failing to understand something in doc/nl/docindex. I've just removed the offending two lines. I apologize towards .nl users and I would be happy to see a proper fix. I simply was in need of a functional C4 version, I have no idea about proper doxygen usage and this hack looked cleaner than removing the whole translation (in this language). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |net)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:04 EST --- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/beb4427ffcf1/pytrainer/pytrainer.sp SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/pytrainer/pytrainer-1.5.0.0.1-3.s %changelog * Thu Jun 19 2008 Douglas E. Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5.0.0.1-3 - updating to support xulrunner or firefox - removing empty doc line - added patch to use sqlite3 I've emailed the maintainer about adding a LICENSE or COPYING file; I'll let you know once that's in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448312] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-sounds - Lost Labyrinth sounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448312 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:21 EST --- Thanks for the review! Imported, build and pushed as F-8 and F-9 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448311] Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth - Lost Labyrinth is a coffeebreak dungeon crawling game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448311 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:23 EST --- Thanks for the review! Imported, build and pushed as F-8 and F-9 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448313] Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostlabyrinth-graphics - Lost Labyrinth graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448313 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:22 EST --- Thanks for the review! Imported, build and pushed as F-8 and F-9 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:49 EST --- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452150] New: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/swarp.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/swarp-2.17.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SWarp is a program that resamples and co-adds together FITS images using any arbitrary astrometric projection defined in the WCS standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 12:53 EST --- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 13:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) source files match upstream: ab74f8ed90b8ba9a1d3904892622fc80 (tarball matches tarball found in upstream SRPM) specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct license field matches the actual license. (though itrace.c has GPL v2.1 listed, which doesn't exist. That should probably be fixed upstream) license is open source-compatible. license text not included upstream. latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. rpmlint is silent. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. Needs fixing: package meets naming and versioning guidelines. package builds in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952name=build.log package installs properly. (couldn't check) debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run So, the only issue under the Needs fixing category is the build error you got in mock. I'll look into that one. Also, did you have any response to my questions (in previous comment) about how I should be referencing the source: tarball vs. CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448867] Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-parent - Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time Alias: perl-parent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448867 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 13:16 EST --- Imported and building. Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |ca) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 13:22 EST --- Sorry for being late again. I'm presently being stuck, waiting for my sys admin to resolve an issue on the machine hosting the Synopsis project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443469] Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 13:27 EST --- Recently changed my paths around a bit; new Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/file/beb4427ffcf1/pytrainer/pytrainer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 13:42 EST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450410] Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multiget - A multi-thread http/ftp file downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450410 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 14:05 EST --- From the reply of the upstream we can admit that this program is licensed under GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 14:40 EST --- Ok, some other points which I've not pointed out before : * qt4 is a Requires, not a BuildRequires. * Mock build perfectly without BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel xorg-x11-xtrans-devel, are they usefull ? * The software doesn't use make install, so you can remove this line : make INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can
be used to compute inter-package dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 14:50 EST ---
SPEC URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/sat-solver.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.0-3.fc9.src.rpm
* Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.0-3
- Using %%cmake properly
- Proper handling of %%{_includedir}/satsolver
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 14:53 EST --- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/libs/libzypp.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/libzypp-5.0.0.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 5.0.0.0-3 - Using %%cmake properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 14:54 EST --- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SPECS/system/zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/SRPMS/zypper-0.12.0-2.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Jun 19 2008 Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.12.0-2 - Using %%cmake to build - Using %%find_lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 15:15 EST --- trickle-1.07-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450408] Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trickle - Portable lightweight userspace bandwidth shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450408 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 15:17 EST --- trickle-1.07-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226309] Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226309 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449339] Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-doors - One-click Windows application installer / Wine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Flag||fedora-review- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 15:56 EST --- As Nicolas said, the package : - have to download scripts to works, it's quite dangerous and a sign that the method is not mature (well, it's a choice) - conduce the user to keep Windows' software and don't search open sourced alternatives which could be considered as against the Fedora's philosophy so, I decided to drop the review and send the package upstream for people who really want it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452172] New: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172
Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance
tuning script
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/mysqltuner.spec
http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/mysqltuner-0.9.1-1.src.rpm
MySQLTuner is a MySQL high performance tuning script written in perl
that will provide you with a snapshot of a MySQL server's health.
Based on the statistics gathered, specific recommendations will be
provided that will increase a MySQL server's efficiency and
performance. The script gives you automated MySQL tuning that is on
the level of what you would receive from a MySQL DBA.
Note: intentionally not using %{?dist} as there's nothing really to build in
the package that would change between rebuilds on different distros.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452087] Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectl - utility to collect performace data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 16:35 EST --- tex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 16:44 EST --- I built, installed, and tested this package on an F8 x86_64 system and it seems to work correctly. I do *not* understand udev well enough to say whether the rules are correct but they do look reasonable -- esp. compared the the OFED docs. Here is a quick review: GOOD: + rpmlint reports a few ignorable warnings and an error: rdma.noarch: W: no-documentation rdma.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rdma/fixup-mtrr.awk rdma.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/90-rdma.rules rdma.noarch: W: no-url-tag rdma.noarch: E: malformed-line-in-lsb-comment-block # + naming looks OK + license is OK and correctly not included + spec is legible, macros look sane + compiles and installs on F8 x86_64 + dir ownership looks OK NEEDSWORK: + please remove the blank line which fixes the rpmlint error: === trivial patch === --- rdma.ORIG 2008-06-19 16:29:58.0 -0400 +++ rdma2008-06-19 16:30:18.0 -0400 @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ # Required-Stop: $network $srpd $opensm # Short-Description: Loads and unloads the InfiniBand and iWARP kernel modules # Description: Loads and unloads the InfiniBand and iWARP kernel modules -# ### END INIT INFO CONFIG=/etc/rdma/rdma.conf === trivial patch === -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 17:03 EST --- ./common/cvs-import.sh /tmp/libpst-0.6.14-1.src.rpm cd devel; make build That worked, but trying to import into the F-10 branch does not: ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-10 /tmp/libpst-0.6.14-1.src.rpm Checking out module: 'libpst' ERROR: libpst/F-10 does not exist! Is that supposed to work, or is there some other requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 17:13 EST --- There is no F-10 branch because there is no F-10 release. devel is a magic branch because it is always there, but right now, it is what will become F-10. F-8 and F-9 are the other active branches right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 17:22 EST --- Here is a quick review: GOOD: + source matches upstream (SHA1SUM): bd18cd1c105275feb25461f659a3ad94e7c5db8c libibcm-1.0.2.tar.gz bd18cd1c105275feb25461f659a3ad94e7c5db8c libibcm-1.0.2.tar.gz.UP + license is correct and correctly included + builds in mock for F8 x86_64 + rpmlint output is just some ignore-able warnings: libibcm.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libibcm-1.0.2/ChangeLog libibcm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libibcm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation + naming OK + spec legible and macros look sane + shared libs (ldconfig) looks good + permissions OK + dir ownership OK + static libs are correctly in *-static I don't see any blockers here so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 17:25 EST --- Ooops, I overlooked the empty ChangeLog file! Please just remove it from the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 18:46 EST --- Thanks for all the help, especially to Jason Tibbitts, offcourse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 18:50 EST --- lazarus-0.9.24-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 19:28 EST --- OK! I've updated my package to the latest CVS code. It doesn't have any NVidia licensed files anymore, so the legal problem is resolved now! So, FE-Legal should not be needed anymore (?!). SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dOrnuopLqr3BySab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dC7Shyoh0r3z6aab7jnrAJ/download/rcssserver3d.spec ( OR SRPM: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/1_rcssserver3d-0.6-0.1.20080620cvs.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://assembla.com/file/hedayat/2_rcssserver3d.spec ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for
Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 19:36 EST ---
! needs work.
OK no problemo
?? can't say/don't understand.
[OK] rpmlint .src.rpm = quiet
$ rpmbuild -ba:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/davidt/src/redhat/BUILD/storm-0.12
find: debug: No such file or directory
from what others have indicated, this is normal for no-arch python.
[OK] rpmlint /home/davidt/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/python-storm*.rpm
python-storm-mysql.noarch: W: no-documentation
python-storm-postgresql.noarch: W: no-documentation
python-storm-sqlite.noarch: W: no-documentation
[OK] included source matches upstream: md5sum storm*bz*
python-storm-0.12-1.fc9.src/storm-0.12.tar.bz2
976a332dadd214612c359df63360fc51 storm-0.12.tar.bz2.from_www
976a332dadd214612c359df63360fc51 python-storm-0.12-1.fc9.src/storm-0.12.tar.bz2
[OK] package name proceeded with python since it;s a python library.
[OK] spec named %name.spec
[OK] source tarball contains no prebuilt binaries/libraries.
[OK] files placed into FHS locations {x4 rpms}
[OK] changelog in standard format
[OK] correctly omits Packager, vendor, copyright, prereq
, includes license tag.
[OK] summary 80 chars, no ending period
[OK] source0 is correct:
http://launchpad.net/storm/trunk/0.12/+download/storm-0.12.tar.bz2
[OK] buildroot set at second most proferred location.
[OK] %install correctly erases buildroot before build
[OK] mock build succeeds.
[OK] rpmdiff between default build and mock build shows only time
{T} differences for folders and the pre-compiled .py[co] files
[OK] description is column limited to 80 chars, no manual/doc info.
[OK] charset is ascii
[OK] docs {license, readme, todo} included. readme points to web for docs.
[OK] debuginfo not expected in noarch application.
[OK] no static libraries, rpath, self copies of already packaged libaries
etc, since pure python project.
[OK] no config, initscripts, desktop files since it's a db devel library.
[OK] variable style is used consistently
[OK] not multilingual
[OK] timestamps are kept
[OK] make is python based, so smp_flags not required.
[OK] no scriptlets, no conditional dependencies
[OK] is library code not content
[OK] provides backend for each of the backend subpackages seems to make sense.
[OK] dirs/files owned by main package, except the individual backend
files {whose directory is created by the main package}.
[OK] not a web app, shoudln't conflict with other packages.
[OK] python sitelib is correctly included at top of spec.
[OK] eggs are build
[OK] no files in %{_bindir} and %{_sbindir}.
[OK] %install setup.py install -O1 --skip-build. as requested for python
packages.
=
[? ] license indication matches upstream web site
Storm is licensed under the [WWW] LGPL 2.1. Contributions must
have copyright assigned to Canonical.
- copyright assigned seems to infer additional requirements ?
- ... Lesser General Public License as
# published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of
# the License, or (at your option) any later version
so LGPLv2+ seems correct.
- eg: cache.py has no licence header - should it be requested ?
- tz.py: PSF License not sure what that is ?
not in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
[??] %files: perhaps should own only it's python-storm dir and below,
according to:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python
%{python_sitelib}/modulename/*.py
[??] python eggs: do we need to do anything with them ?
[??] are/should the unit tests be run as part of the package build ?
upstream suggests these as important, but is that something fedora packages
usually do ?
[??] %files: %exclude %{python_sitelib}/storm/cextensions.c
is this the accepted way to do this ?
[ !] the main package includes the same files that are in the 3 backend sub
packages
[ !] description missed a 't' in 'erm maintainability'.
[??] no time yet to test built package installation functionality aka:
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
A package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
Michel: pretty close, just a fwe minor tweaks, I think.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450470] RDMA kernel stack initializing package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RDMA kernel stack initializing package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450470 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 21:18 EST --- New rpm uploaded over the top of the old rpm (meaning you might need to flush your web cache/proxy to get the new rpm) that solves the rpmlint error (empty line removed from rdma.init). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 21:20 EST --- ChangeLog file removed from %doc list. New packages uploaded over top of the old packages, so you might need to refresh your web/proxy cache to get the new files from the site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452172] Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysqltuner - MySQL high performance tuning script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452172 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 21:44 EST --- This package is about as simple as you can get; a single file. I guess you know that's not what the dist tag is about, but I assume you can keep the versioning straight. Only one observation: The applied patch seems to be a good idea, except that if you actually pass the --skipversion option you are warned about it. Perhaps it would be better to accept and ignore it. I don't think this is a blocker, though, since things still run. * source files match upstream: 6d13fdfda710c5d1ef777a31177f31fb691af11a4f953e9fed07a6cdceff7a32 mysqltuner.pl.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: mysqltuner = 0.9.1-1 = /usr/bin/perl mysql perl(Getopt::Long) perl(diagnostics) perl(strict) perl(warnings) which * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Seems to run OK, but I didn't let it mess with my database server. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS
images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 22:03 EST ---
Two observations:
The pdf file is 1.5MB and three times the size of the rest of the package. Did
you consider putting it in a separate package? I don't think it's a
requirement but you know best how this package will be used.
%{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} at the end of %install seems to be
superfluous, as that directory is created (and swarp.xsl is installed there) by
the install process. It seems to be harmless, though.
I don't think either of these are blockers, though.
* source files match upstream:
34e815d44f3b1c3c7bfdeb01bbdcf32d1eac239527a0937c3ed2b6f7be34bcee
swarp-2.17.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
build root is OK.
license field matches the actual license.
license is open source-compatible.
license text not included upstream.
license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none).
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
swarp = 2.17.1-1.fc10
=
(no non-glibc dependencies)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. There is a test directory
containing one fits file, but it's not immediately clear what should be done
with it. I ran the executable and gave it the test file and it did...
something, without crashing, and didn't complain about it.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
? documentation is 3x the rest of the package.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] New: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Presto is a general-use tilemap engine coded in C that uses Allegro for graphics rendering, and therefore is intended for use in games using Allegro. It can handle rectangular tiles of any height and width (and different height from width), loading tilemaps from files, tile blending, and the capability to change most of these elements on the fly. This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 23:21 EST --- I forgot to mention that I'm the upstream developer for this package. I have a project page on my website for the library, found here: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/showproject.php?id=29. I'm an experienced C programmer, and I definitely appreciate anyone who is willing to help me with this first package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-19 23:59 EST --- - Descriptions should be wrapped at 79 characters - Examples, README, and COPYING should be in %doc - Changelog entries should be separated by a newline - Fails to build in mock on F8/i386 and F9/i386 - -devel is missing a Requires of allegro-devel, and should have no BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis|| Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 00:01 EST --- Why on earth is this ticket private? In any case, it's been way too long without any response. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450476] InfiniBand Connection Management library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: InfiniBand Connection Management library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450476 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 01:11 EST --- Thank you -- its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
