[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 02:51 EST --- One note: Please remove unneeded autotool related BuildRequires (autoconf, automake). Also, BuildRequires: cairo-devel, gtk2-devel are somewhat redundant (always required by gtkmm24-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 02:55 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis|| Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |otmail.fr) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 02:57 EST --- Once closing If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please submit a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455221] New: Review Request: python-numdisplay - Visualice numpy array objects in ds9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455221 Summary: Review Request: python-numdisplay - Visualice numpy array objects in ds9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/python-numdisplay.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/python-numdisplay-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Numdisplay provides the capability to visualize numpy array objects using astronomical image display tools such as DS9 or XIMTOOL directly from the Python command line. This task can display any numpy object, whether it was created interactively or read in from a FITS file using PyFITS on any platform which supports Python and numpy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454960] Review Request: aubio - An audio labelling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aubio - An audio labelling library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454960 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 04:04 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: aubio New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 04:07 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pear-Net-IPv4 Short Description: Class used for calculating IPv4 address information Owners: moixs Branches: F-9 InitialCC: moixs, remi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 04:07 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pear-Net-DNS Short Description: A PHP resolver library used to communicate with a name servers. Owners: moixs Branches: F-9 InitialCC: moixs, remi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] New: Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-runkit/php-pecl-runkit.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-runkit/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-0.CVS20080512.fc8.Hu.5.src.rpm Description: Provides a userspace interpretation of the opcodes generated by the Zend engine compiler built into PHP. This extension is meant for development and debug purposes only and contains some code which is potentially non-threadsafe. Small note: I'm read naming guide and understand it, but in my own rpm-repository (http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm) all my packages with changes made have portion of my release like .Hu.number. This addon of release made to differ version from upstream packages. This is my 2nd (in Fedora package review, not in packaging history at all) package and I am looking for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455227] New: Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-parsekit/php-pecl-parsekit.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-parsekit/php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-0.CVS20080513.fc8.Hu.0.src.rpm Description: Provides a userspace interpretation of the opcodes generated by the Zend engine compiler built into PHP. This extension is meant for development and debug purposes only and contains some code which is potentially non-threadsafe. Small note: I'm read naming guide and understand it, but in my own rpm-repository (http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm) all my packages with changes made have portion of my release like .Hu.number. This addon of release made to differ version from upstream packages. This is my 3rd (in Fedora package review, not in packaging history at all) package and I am looking for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 04:36 EST --- I am very, very apologize. I mix with the description php-pecl-parsekit. Correct are: Short description: php-pecl-runkit - Extension to mangle with user defined functions and classes Long description: Replace, rename, and remove user defined functions and classes. Define customized superglobal variables for general purpose use. Execute code in restricted environment (sandboxing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455071] Review Request: xfce4-mpc-plugin - MPD client for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-mpc-plugin - MPD client for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455071 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 05:46 EST --- xfce4-mpc-plugin-0.3.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455071] Review Request: xfce4-mpc-plugin - MPD client for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-mpc-plugin - MPD client for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455071 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 05:48 EST --- xfce4-mpc-plugin-0.3.3-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455071] Review Request: xfce4-mpc-plugin - MPD client for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-mpc-plugin - MPD client for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455071 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 05:52 EST --- Thanks for the review, Kevin. If you want to do another bug #455083 is still left. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 398881] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 06:08 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libssh2 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated Fedora CC: djuran Updated EPEL Owners: djuran As discussed with Chris over email, I will take ownership of EPEL branches for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 06:22 EST --- Sure. I plan on making this *very* clear to the Packaging Committee tomorrow. There's always this amibguity of upstream vs. downstream. I think it's best we inform them, and then let the people who know best make the final decision. I will make sure they see this conversation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 06:41 EST --- Thanks Mamoru for pointing that out. Should be minor and I'll fix this before the initial import. Autotool is overleft from times where upstream had broken files there. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: beldi Short Description: Belug Linux Distribution Burner Owners: robert, cwickert Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: m4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-users - Adds NOCpulse user
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nocpulse-users - Adds NOCpulse user https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 07:34 EST --- I just created a spec file for spu-binutils based on the same source as the system binutils is. I used the avr-binutils as a reference for cross toolchain packages. Spec URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/spu-binutils.spec SRPM URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/spu-binutils-2.18.50.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 08:34 EST --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/almanah.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/almanah-0.4.0-2.fc9.src.rpm - Fix rpmlint warnings - Include ChangeLog - Fix icon name in desktop file Koji build task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=714157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 398881] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 08:38 EST --- hello. also is possible to packge php-pecl-ssh2 ? http://pecl.php.net/package/ssh2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 398881] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 08:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) hello. also is possible to packge php-pecl-ssh2 ? http://pecl.php.net/package/ssh2 Please submit another review request. Perhaps someone who knows about php much more than me will review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 09:09 EST --- 286c425227b1d271f88327cf3b023349 almanah-0.4.0-2.fc9.src.rpm fixes all issues, so this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455149] Review Request: latency-policy - Policy for system wide latency
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latency-policy - Policy for system wide latency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455149 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 09:12 EST --- Note: I'm the upstream on this trivial project, and I hope to push this into Fedora 10 as it gives an admin a nice way to configure all the new kernel power management bits in a central way. I'll do a feature proposal, but need to get the rpm into rawhide for people to test and give feedback on first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 09:36 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: almanah Short Description: An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life Owners: lokthare Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452450] RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: Include Spacewalk (and dependencies) in Fedora Alias: F-Spacewalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||455266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455266] New: Review Request: perl-Frontier-RPC - Perl implementation of XML RPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455266 Summary: Review Request: perl-Frontier-RPC - Perl implementation of XML RPC Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Frontier-RPC/perl-Frontier-RPC.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Frontier-RPC/perl-Frontier-RPC-0.07b4p1-1.src.rpm Description: Frontier::RPC implements UserLand Software's XML RPC (Remote Procedure Calls using Extensible Markup Language). Frontier::RPC includes both a client module for making requests to a server and several server modules for implementing servers using CGI, Apache, and standalone with HTTP::Daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: rspam - |Review Request: evolution- |Report as Spam Evolution|rspam - Evolution Plugin for |Plugin |reporting spam Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:18 EST --- Yes, sorry I've been distracted with some other work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:20 EST ---
* Please consider to use
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} DESTDIR=install -p
to keep timestamps on installed files
* Calling /sbin/ldconfig on scriptlets is not needed for this package, as no
libraries
are installed under default ld search paths.
Other things seem okay.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226258] Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:24 EST --- *** Bug 455266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455266] Review Request: perl-Frontier-RPC - Perl implementation of XML RPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Frontier-RPC - Perl implementation of XML RPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455266 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:24 EST --- This is already in Fedora. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226258 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:32 EST --- Anyone, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:57 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:02 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:04 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454960] Review Request: aubio - An audio labelling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aubio - An audio labelling library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454960 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:07 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:05 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 398881] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:59 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:40 EST --- Hello Mamoru, thanks for doing this I've incorporated the modification and bump version. new files: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/evolution-rspam.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/evolution-rspam-0.0.6-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:42 EST --- Our aim when subpackaging is to help users. If Dennis Jang feels subpackaging and making possible to install only subsets of un-extras will make users happy, he should subpackage. OTOH if he thinks most users will always want the whole set, he can pass. Above all we want to avoid situations when users do not install un-extras at all because they feel it's too bulky for their usb key/livecd/micro-laptop/etc (while they would have installed a smaller subset happily). But this is something only a user of this language can decide on. I'll happily approve a guidelines-compliant un-extra package (subpackaged or not) as soon as you're done with un-core -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:51 EST --- Okay. This package (evolution-rspam) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454229] Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454229 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:59 EST --- Corrected links: Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnome/gnome-keyring-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnome/gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.0-0.2.87622svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454229] Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454229 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 12:57 EST --- Updated, with the following changes: - tarball renamed (I was using the name that wget and Firefox creates when downloading, with the HTTP GET option not removed) - -debuginfo package turned off The naming convention is because this is not a stable release yet, however, I just realized that the official recommendation is slightly different: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages so I've adjusted the package accordingly. Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnome/gnome-keyring-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnome/gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.0-2.87622svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: almanah - An application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:08 EST --- almanah-0.4.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454229] Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:10 EST --- Looks good to me. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:07 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: evolution-rspam Short Description: Evolution Plugin for reporting spam Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:28 EST --- Sorry but I messed up, I used the alias instead of the real package name to create the CVS access. Could you destroy pear-Net-DNS CVS and create the following instead: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-Net-DNS Short Description: A PHP resolver library used to communicate with a name servers. Owners: moixs Branches: F-9 InitialCC: moixs, remi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:29 EST --- Sorry but I messed up, I used the alias instead of the real package name to create the CVS access. Could you destroy pear-Net-IPv4 CVS and create the following instead: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-Net-IPv4 Short Description: Class used for calculating IPv4 address information Owners: moixs Branches: F-9 InitialCC: moixs, remi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:32 EST --- Corrected release number: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dnrd.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dnrd-2.20.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378331] Review Request: lrzip - Compression program optimised for large files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lrzip - Compression program optimised for large files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:44 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: lrzip Updated Fedora Owners: warren, spstarr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378331] Review Request: lrzip - Compression program optimised for large files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lrzip - Compression program optimised for large files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:45 EST --- Correct FAS name Package Change Request == Package Name: lrzip Updated Fedora Owners: wtogami, spstarr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop_package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 13:47 EST --- Corrected release number: SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ntop-3.3-4.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ntop.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:00 EST --- twinkle-1.2-3.fc9,libzrtpcpp-1.3.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:15 EST --- I was missing a BR on eclipse-pde. Added and updated at: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/sat4j.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/sat4j-2.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:21 EST --- I removed a Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/sat4j.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/sat4j-2.0.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:36 EST --- Hey Alan, I would be happy to sponsor you. Please continue the process at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner If you have any questions at all with processes and procedures, feel free to email me directly, or find me on irc.freenode.com (nickname: nirik). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:39 EST ---
Items with issues are prefixed with an X:
MUST:
* package is named appropriately
- match upstream tarball or project name
OK
- try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for
consistency
OK
- specfile should be %{name}.spec
OK
- non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or
something)
OK
- for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease
N/A
- if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be
not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name
N/A
- don't use non-Latin, non-numeric, non--,.,_,+ characters in the name
OK
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
* is it legal for Fedora to distribute this?
- OSI-approved
- not a kernel module
- not shareware
- is it covered by patents?
- it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator
- no binary firmware
OK
* license field matches the actual license.
OK
* no pre-built binaries (except for bootstrapping)
X: jmock jar exists in both SOURCE files, and the spec file doesn't try to
remove it. Since jmock is used only for testing, this is probably okay. But
please keep the file only if the tests actually use it..
* license is open source-compatible.
- use acronyms for licences where common
OK
* specfile name matches %{name}
OK
* verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
- if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on
how to generate the the source drop; ie.
# svn export blah/tag blah
# tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah
N/A
* skim the summary and description for typos, etc.
OK
* correct buildroot
- MUST be below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and
%{release}
- should be (in descending order of preference:
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
OK
* if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and %
locations)
OK
* license text included in package and marked with %doc
OK (no license text in tarballs)
* keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old?
useless?)
OK
* packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
OK
* rpmlint on this package.srpm gives no output
- justify warnings if you think they shouldn't be there
OK (one warning re: no-documentation, acceptable in this case)
* changelog should be in one of these formats:
* Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.6-4
- And fix the link syntax.
* Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.6-4
- And fix the link syntax.
* Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 0.6-4
- And fix the link syntax.
OK
* Packager tag should not be used
OK
* Vendor tag should not be used
OK
* Distribution tag should not be used
OK
* use License and not Copyright
OK
* Summary tag should not end in a period
OK
* if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post)
N/A
* specfile is legible
- this is largely subjective; use your judgement
OK
* package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
OK
* BuildRequires are proper
OK
* summary should be a short and concise description of the package
OK
* description expands upon summary (don't include installation
instructions)
OK
* make sure lines are = 80 characters
OK
* specfile written in American English
OK
* make a -doc sub-package if necessary
- see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b
N/A
* packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible
N/A
* don't use rpath
N/A
* config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace)
N/A
* GUI apps should contain .desktop files
N/A
* should the package contain a -devel sub-package?
OK (no)
* use macros appropriately and consistently
- ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
OK
* don't use %makeinstall
OK
* install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}
OK
* locale data handling correct (find_lang)
- if translations included, add BR: gettext and use
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:50 EST --- Looks good. Patches now have descriptions, jmock jar is removed, and tests are not run. Setting fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:54 EST --- Package: beldi-0.9.16-3.fc8 Tag: dist-f8-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: beldi-0.9.16-3.fc9 Tag: dist-f9-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: beldi-0.9.16-3.fc10 Tag: dist-f10 Status: complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454229] Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:55 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gnome-keyring-sharp Short Description: Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring Owners: salimma Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 14:55 EST --- beldi-0.9.16-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:08 EST --- twinkle-1.2-2.fc8,libzrtpcpp-1.3.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: xfmpc - A |Review Request: xfmpc - A |MPD client for the Xfce |MPD client for the Xfce |desktop environment |desktop environment Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:09 EST --- I would be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a few here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:15 EST --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License(GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 1d2edd3cfb950d61dc1fac8229ac828b xfmpc-0.0.6.tar.bz2 1d2edd3cfb950d61dc1fac8229ac828b xfmpc-0.0.6.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: None. I don't see any issues here, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:21 EST --- beldi-0.9.16-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:23 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xfmpc Short Description: A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment Owners: cwickert Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for
Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:25 EST ---
PSF = Python Software Foundation license, the same license as Python itself.
It's GPL-compatible so it's also LGPL-compatible (see
/usr/share/doc/python-2.5.1/LICENSE)
As for the copyright-assignment, that's the same rule used by the Free Software
Foundation; I believe it only applies to contributions that is to be
incorporated into upstream.
I'll ask upstream about the missing copyright; the commit log for that file
shows that Gustavo Niemeyer, who writes the rest of Storm, committed it, so
unless we hear otherwise it should probably be OK.
Unit tests are now run (need to probably ask the maintainer of rpmdevtools to
add it to the skeleton specs)
I've now included only %{python_sitelib}/storm* -- this includes the egginfo
automatically, and lets us avoid having to use an %if test -- the test will get
annoying once RHEL's python supports eggs as well
The last thing is the exclusion of files -- it achieves the same result as using
rm, and is safer as you can't accidentally clobber files outside the buildroot.
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-storm-0.12-2.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:34 EST --- (Deepak: I was told that reviews need to remain assigned to the reviewer even after the review is finished) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378331] Review Request: lrzip - Compression program optimised for large files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lrzip - Compression program optimised for large files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:32 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431683] Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rspam - Evolution Plugin for reporting spam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:34 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:34 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sat4j Short Description: A library of SAT solvers written in Java Owners: overholt Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454229] Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-keyring-sharp - Mono implementation of GNOME Keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:39 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:40 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 15:54 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: coq Short Description: Coq proof management system Owners: amdunn Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:06 EST --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:06 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:06 EST --- Made changes. Please review. Source RPM: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts-2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Spec File: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:14 EST --- I might be able to get a 0.10 SRPM tomorrow -- there are some compilation issues with it. Will go ahead and split the frontends out, but I'll just keep a single -devel package (developers can bite the hard drive space bullet!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:12 EST --- Updated spec SRPM: Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/games/typespeed.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/games/typespeed-0.6.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Thanks for the review -- sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:21 EST --- Maxime: --enable-gcc-opts is enabled in the version I committed -- I did not turn it on in the version reviewed, and did not update it after the review was approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:54 EST --- The package 9ad47f3cc9af37116e7c4c47e54e55e1 typespeed-0.6.4-2.fc9.src.rpm fixes all blockers: OK - MUST: %files section fixed OK - MUST: desktop file is valid OK - SHOULD: ChangeLog is UTF-8 OK - SHOULD: Description was reworked Two more suggestions: - Please remove INSTALL from %doc. It's generic and not needed when installing from rpm - Consider adding an icon to the desktop file. I suggest ether keyboard or simply terminal since this is a console application. Anyway: None of these is a blocker, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448215] Review Request: mozvoikko - Finnish Voikko spell-checker extension for Mozilla programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozvoikko - Finnish Voikko spell-checker extension for Mozilla programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 17:15 EST --- Thanks for the review. I think you have made some important points here and I probably won't build the package until I have at least some sort of answers for those questions. Unfortunately I've been a bit busy lately, I will try to make time to work on this package this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450054] Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 17:11 EST --- One thing to note is that you should include info about checking out the actual version that you're packaging. Since upstream doesn't even bother to tag anything, you should probably use -D and pass the checkout date. Will do that when committing, thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: liblinebreak Short Description: A Unicode line-breaking library Owners: salimma Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 17:38 EST --- xfmpc-0.0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 17:39 EST --- xfmpc-0.0.6-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455083] Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfmpc - A MPD client for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455083 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 17:56 EST --- Thanks for reviewing this so fast. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 20:06 EST --- Hey Alan. Is the spec link in comment #21 the current one? I can't seem to get it from the koji links. (Side note: it's best to bump the spec version and add a changelog entry for changes in review, then everyone can be sure they have the latest version and there is a history of changes). I would like to take a quick look before you import and see if I can suggest any solutions to anything. In particular it sounds like you are disabling debuginfo, but there may be some ways to get around that. Also, perhaps we can track down the ppc64 issue real quick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 20:17 EST --- I would be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 21:25 EST --- Yep, agreed: I was just trying to make the point that I consider subpackaging a blocker for un-core but optional (ie up to the maintainer) for un-extra. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455210] Review Request: odfpy - Python library for manipulating OpenDocument files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odfpy - Python library for manipulating OpenDocument files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455210 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 21:35 EST --- I realize this in retrospect (re: versions during review), though I originally thought that was only after the original version was committed. The links in 21 are current, though it seems to me that there is still a link in the Koji build (here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=699678name=coq-8.1pl3-1.fc9.src.rpm however, oddly enough, it seems that the system only stores a link to the source rpm in one of the build branches each time, I believe the one that is listed first.) It is true that I'm disabling debuginfo, as otherwise bytecode OCaml executables are stripped and rendered inoperable. If there's a better way to do that, like finding a way to selectively disable stripping from the debuginfo scripts, then I can certainly change things to get that to work. The ppc64 build error was pretty odd - the build logs were not much help at all in figuring out the problem - I think one would really need access to a ppc64 system (which I don't have) to make progress on that front. (In reply to comment #32) Hey Alan. Is the spec link in comment #21 the current one? I can't seem to get it from the koji links. (Side note: it's best to bump the spec version and add a changelog entry for changes in review, then everyone can be sure they have the latest version and there is a history of changes). I would like to take a quick look before you import and see if I can suggest any solutions to anything. In particular it sounds like you are disabling debuginfo, but there may be some ways to get around that. Also, perhaps we can track down the ppc64 issue real quick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for
Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 21:48 EST ---
OK, thanks for the update, the changes take into account my previous concerns.
(In reply to comment #9)
Unit tests are now run
...
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
OK
(tests=0, failures=0, errors=0)
Running doctests...
[tests/tutorial.txt]
(tests=124, failures=0, errors=0)
Total test cases: 1809
Total doctests: 124
Total failures: 0
Total errors: 0
...
I can see that the unit tests are now run, and succeed. The following questions
are more for my own learning, rather than highlighting any particular issue:
- Is it normal for the unit test outputs to be echoed ?
- In the fedora build system, does that mean the unit test results will appear
in the build.log ?
- If a test fails, does that stop the build process automatically {ie at the end
of the unit tests}, so that a test failing means the package build wont
complete ?
- Or does a packager have to manually check the build.log to confirm %check
succeeded ?
The last thing is the exclusion of files -- it achieves the same result as
using rm, and is safer as you can't accidentally clobber files outside the
buildroot.
That's a good tip {that should be in PackagingGuidelines ?}.
* new: When it's in the repo proper, it seems that yum install python-storm
would also install one of the backends, to satisfy Requires:
python-storm-backend
I guess yum will choose either the alphabetically lowest or highest of the
3 backends, apparently randomly ? I think this would be normal for rpm packages
though, wouldn't it ?
* new: tutorial.txt - do you think it should be placed with docs {although it is
easy to find if user goes to the package's url} ?
* I ran through the tutorial itself, and found only one issue: the last part of
the tutorial - Debugging
1 import sys
2 from storm.tracer import debug
This gives me:
import sys
from storm.tracer import debug
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
ImportError: No module named tracer
I searched for debug and tracer in the storm source, and it doesn't get
mentioned. Perhaps this is a separate source, incomplete upstream, or did the
packaging miss something ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 21:53 EST ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
See below - License
See below - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
41c9b070aae8ed403fc8c2aac7ab157c dnrd-2.20.3.tar.gz
41c9b070aae8ed403fc8c2aac7ab157c dnrd-2.20.3.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
See below - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. There looks to be a slight license issue.
The qid.h file appears to be under just the GPLv2, while everything else is
either
GPLv2+ or Public domain. So, the entire package looks like it will be under
GPLv2.
You might however talk to upstream about this and see thats what the intend.
They might have just missed a file in a relicense.
2. You have a file listed twice in %files:
warning: File listed twice: /etc/dnrd/dnrd.conf
You probibly want to make the %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} just use a %dir to only
include
the directory there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455358] New: Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 Summary: Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl.spec SRPM URL: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl-1.3-2jpp.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is an implementation of syntax highlighting as an extension module for XSLT processors, so if you have e.g. article about programming written in DocBook, code examples can be automatically syntax highlighted during the XSLT processing phase. This package is the JPP package with gcj_support disabled. There is an xmllint complain about _libdir, however since gcj_support is disabled this warning is incorrect. I disabled it because the gcj support is broken and there is no need for it since we open_jdk is tha bomb. I left the gcj code in the spec file so that if someone wants to re-enable gcj support they can do so. This package will be used by the next version of publican to allow syntax highlighting of code embedded in documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 22:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) ping? I'm back with some updates: http://kaylor.info/fedora/SPEC/tasque.spec http://kaylor.info/fedora/SRPM/tasque-0.1.6-2.fc9.src.rpm The only concern that might not be fully addressed are the Mono deps in Requires. I've added gtk-sharp2 to fix your error but there could be others. When I get a chance, I'll test this on a machine that doesn't have Mono yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
