[Bug 455539] Review Request: yui - JavaScript library for building dynamic web sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455539 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 02:01:18 EDT --- @Dave Are you willing to continue ? Any updates? The ticket is stalled. It has been 1 month +, I am putting it 'need info'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 02:02:45 EDT --- +1 month now, Any updates here? needinfo ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 02:20:23 EDT
---
For 2.0.2-0:
* Release number
- The minimum number which can be used for Release number is 1.
0 is used only for pre-release tarballs:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release
(Of course, please change the Release number every time you modify
your spec file)
* License
- As far as I verified the source code, the license tag should
be GPLv2+.
* rpmlint issue
--
ferm.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.2 2.0.2-0.fc10
--
- The last entry of %changelog should contain full EVR
(epoch-version-release)
information like:
--
* Fri Aug 22 2008 Pavel Alexeev Pahan [ at ] Hubbitus [ DOT ] spb [ dOt.] su
- 2.0.2-1
--
* Macros usage consistency
- When using { on macros, please use { for all macros (except for some cases)
consistently. You use %{_mandir} and %_sbindir , for example.
* Documents
- Please also add the following files to %doc.
--
NEWS
--
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
- system/firewalls is not a standard Group (please refer to
$ rpmlint -I non-standard-group
Thanks. I'm change it to Applications/System.
But another question is why rpmlint was silent??
- On my system rpmlint warned about this.s
- Requires: perl is redundant. Usually perl (module) related dependencies
are
automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild.
I suppose that do not requires external perl modules. Requires: perl removed.
But I can't understand how it will be detected? It is based on standard
Makefile, nor perl buildsystem.
- This is detected by /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req. Try
--
$ rpm -ql ferm | /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req
--
For example when perl.req finds the line like:
--
use Data::Dumper;
--
(in /usr/sbin/import-ferm), rpmlint adds Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) to
binary rpms.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 02:22:26 EDT --- @robin @Polychronis You may like to inform upstream that if there intention is to move to GPLv3+ if yes then update whole source (LICENSE file, source code blocks)? That would be nice if you folks work upstream to get initscript fixed. It would be equally *cool* if user interaction is sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 02:21:42 EDT --- By the way: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] New: Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bisect is a code coverage tool for the Objective Caml language. It is a camlp4-based tool that allows to instrument your application before running tests. After application execution, it is possible to generate a report in HTML format that is the replica of the application source code annotated with code coverage information. On i386 this package is rpmlint clean. On x86-64 it gives a warning about executable stacks (see bug 450551). $ rpm -q --requires -p /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10.i386.rpm rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) ocaml(Arg) = 03e86a4154064ea900dc32c05f53e364 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(CamlinternalOO) = 6d0d5b328d6db88f403ca4393b4abd38 ocaml(Camlp4) = 1e46a133b8062d1571640f7fa36f32c4 ocaml(Camlp4_config) = cb716b4361f43326c6ad695c7a1bb5c0 ocaml(Camlp4_import) = 0134ca95282ef6821081c0c11802cea0 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Digest) = a5dd2d89492338578de12105e88c803f ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Parsing) = 62cca107e4e88af303516459a87c3e9a ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Queue) = caa3a209bfc63d23a30f573541a88fec ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.2 $ rpm -q --provides -p /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10.i386.rpm ocaml(Bisect) = 9f7bc6aea60758edb6f97e3a0a529077 ocaml(Instrument) = 4f693f068faf19423105eecb1d71ff12 ocaml-bisect = 1.0_alpha-1.fc10 ocaml-bisect(x86-32) = 1.0_alpha-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #21 from John Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 04:17:01 EDT --- Fixed license tag: Spec URL: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/python-tftpy/python-tftpy.spec SRPM URL: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/python-tftpy/python-tftpy-0.4.5-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902
Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 04:27:47 EDT
---
acceptable Fedora format for naming is %{name}-%{version}-%{release} so I
suppose
ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.1.alpha%{?dist} would be okay ?
Build successfully:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782339
Package looks sane to me, except this issue. May you update and it and in the
meantime I run my checklist ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Customer Facing||--- --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 04:46:34 EDT --- Wow, that was quick! I'm not sure I understood the naming issue entirely correctly. Is the following name better? Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect-1.0-1.alpha.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 04:47:13
EDT ---
First of all, sorry for the delay.
Second, I guess you meant
http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ksplice/ksplice-0.8.7-11.fc9.src.rpm,
used that for the following review.
[x] = ok, [~] = ok - see note, [!] = not ok, [-] = not applicable
[x] package meets naming guidelines
[x] specfile is encoded in ascii or utf-8
[x] specfile matches base package name
[x] specfile uses macros consistently
[x] specfile is written cleanly
[x] specfile is written in AE
[x] changelog is present and has correct format
[x] license matches actual license
[x] license is open source-compatible
[x] license text is included in package
[x] source tag has correct url
[x] source files match upstream
md5sum: 4e42c5a72f4734256db8b50290f1b7a1
[x] latest version is packaged
[x] summary is concise
[x] dist tag is present
[x] buildroot is correct
[x] buildroot is prepped
[x] %clean is present
[x] proper build requirements
[x] proper requirements
[x] uses %{?_smp_mflags}
[x] uses %{optflags}
[x] doesn't use %makeinstall
[x] package builds at least on one architecture
tested on: f9/x86_64
[!] packages installs and runs at least on one architecture
- Upon installation:
error: Failed dependencies:
rpmbuild is needed by fedora-ksplice-0.8.7-11.fc9.x86_64
- More problems running fedora-ksplice-prepare, see later.
[!] rpmlint is quiet
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/helper.h
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/helper.c
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/primary.c
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/modcommon.h
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/jumps.h
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/modcommon.c
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/primary.h
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/nops.h
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/allcommon.h
ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/allcommon.c
- This has been discussed before.
ksplice.src:95: E: files-attr-not-set
ksplice.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 37, tab: line 1)
ksplice.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ksplice-create 0775
ksplice.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ksplice-prepare 0775
- Please fix these.
[!] final provides/requires look sane
- ksplice misses a dependency on util-linux-ng (for /bin/dmesg)
- for fedora-ksplice, 'rpmbuild' cannot be satisfied
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
[x] code, not content
[x] file permissions are appropriate
[x] debuginfo package looks usable
[-] config files marked as %config(noreplace)
[x] owns all the directories it creates
[-] static libraries in -devel subpackage
[-] header files in -devel subpackage
[-] development .so files in -devel subpackage
[-] pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage, requires pkgconfig
[x] no .la files
[x] doesn't need a -docs subpackage
[x] relevant docs are included
[x] doc files are not needed at runtime
[-] provides a .desktop file, build-requires desktop-file-utils
[-] uses %find_lang, build-requires gettext
Problems running fedora-ksplice-prepare:
- /usr/bin/fedora-ksplice-prepare: line 73: trap: -: invalid signal
specification
- fedora-ksplice-prepare tries to cd into
BUILD/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.x86_64 here, correct dir would be
BUILD/kernel-2.6.25/linux-2.6.25.x86_64.
- fedora-ksplice-prepare always re-downloads the (40MB)
kernel.src.rpm, should probably be cached.
In my opinion, these (and probably more) problems of the scripts can
unnecessarily block approval of the ksplice package.
One solution would be to move them to another package (maybe creating
a tiny fedorhosted project) instead of a subpackage and adding a small
README instead, that describes how ksplice can be used in fedora. This
way (after fixing the minor problems shown in the review) ksplice
itself could be approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902
--- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 05:01:30 EDT
---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease
for release field
Release:0.1.%{subversion}%{?dist}
will be okay.
1.e ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.1.alpha.fc10.src.rpm
for each bump you can increment x in
ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.x.alpha.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 05:14:37 EDT --- OK, I think I've got it now. Try this one: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.1.alpha.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 05:38:25 EDT --- APPROVED rpmlint is clean except the warning message I have i686 m/c [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rp ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-bisect.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/bisect-report 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings warning is being taken care: #450551 You may like to update this bug now!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rp ocaml-bisect-devel-1.0_alpha-1.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rp ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Required: [x] Name (in accordance with ocaml guidelines) [x] License -- okay src files have (or later) so GPLv3+ is correct [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782339 [x] BuildRequires [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [x] gui [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines [x] md5sum [EMAIL PROTECTED] ocaml]$ md5sum bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz 2285c0af8d0e7503fbd0283a48cba944 bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ocaml]$ md5sum ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10/bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz 2285c0af8d0e7503fbd0283a48cba944 ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10/bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz [x] unnecessary files excluded [x] native compiler test [x] devel package contains right files [x] ocaml guidelines Optional suggestions: -Nil- Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] New: Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Summary: Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora (This is my first package and I need a sponsor.) GNU FreeDink is composed of 3 packages: - game engine - game data - front-end Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink-1.08.20080823-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Adventure and role-playing game (engine) Dink Smallwood is an adventure/role-playing game, similar to Zelda, made by RTsoft. Besides twisted humour, it includes the actual game editor, allowing players to create hundreds of new adventures called Dink Modules or D-Mods for short. GNU FreeDink is a new and portable version of the game engine, which runs the original game as well as its D-Mods, with close compatibility, under multiple platforms. Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data-1.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Adventure and role-playing game (game data) Dink Smallwood is an adventure/role-playing game, similar to Zelda, made by RTsoft. Besides twisted humour, it includes the actual game editor, allowing players to create hundreds of new adventures called Dink Modules or D-Mods for short. This package contains architecture-independent data for the original game (except for non-free sounds). Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc-2.99.20080823-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink DFArc2 makes it easy to play and manage the Dink Smallwood game and it's numerous Dink Modules (or D-Mods). I'd like to get feedback about the packaging and eventally upload them! Legal: the Contribution is the following files: - freedink.spec - dfarc.spec - dink-data.spec - dink-data_README.Fedora Any other file is not part of the Contribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:05:36 EDT --- F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782459 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:10:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-bisect Short Description: OCaml code coverage tool Owners: rjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:12:40 EDT --- Thanks Roy, New Package CVS Request === Package Name: whatsup Short Description: Node up/down detection utility Owners: ruben Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:19:20 EDT --- Devrim, can you have a look at Jason's comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:16:26 EDT --- Changelog format seems a bit off to me, see [0]. Builds in Koji [1]. Spec looks good to me but I havn't done a formal review. [0]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:20:21 EDT --- tqsllib-2.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tqsllib-2.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:21:29 EDT --- tqsllib-2.0-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tqsllib-2.0-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Bug 455396 depends on bug 455380, which changed state. Bug 455380 Summary: Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:43:45 EDT --- Hi: Please create new review requests for each srpm and add proper Depends on/Blocks dependency checker on the bug. Also, as you need sponsors, please make the submitted review requests block FE-NEEDSPONSOR blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Comment #16 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:54:45 EDT --- Hi Odel, Now that 0.11 is distributed in a normal zip file, is it possible to just use %setup -q to extract it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #7 from John Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:51:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gitosis Short Description: Git repository hosting application Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #43 from Christopher Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 06:52:08 EDT --- Thanks for this Mamoru. As Balint Cristian has done the heavy lifting on this one, what is the best way to import this? As owner of this bug do I have to do the import then pass it on to him or can he do the initial import? I am away for one week so won't be able to do much until then anyway however I am happy for whoever to take ownership to get the ball rolling sooner. Cheers Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841
--- Comment #8 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:12:38 EDT
---
Hi Dave,
A few comments:
- You could probably remove the conditional %if 0%{?fedora} = 8 since older
versions are not supported anymore
- Permissions on SPARQLParserc.so are 0775 but should be 0755.
- Rpm adds SPARQLParserc.so to its provides list, but that library is not in a
standard library location, and never meant to be used by other software. It
probably can't do much harm, but it might be nice to override rpm's provide
script for that, to avoid issues when another package decides to name a library
SPARQLParserc.so
- For the other rpmlint warnings, you could either make those files executable
or strip out the shebang line during install.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #44 from Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:28:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mapnik Short Description: a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications Owners: rezso Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #45 from Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:34:45 EDT --- I would add Chris Brown too as Owner, but we must know his fedoraid, so far i added him as watcher CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #5 from Ismael Olea [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:35:26 EDT --- I've follow your recomendations. I remade the package using the supposed last stable version for MediaWiki 1.13. Updated info http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-MW1.13-0.1.r37906.olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-MW1.13-0.1.r37906.olea.noarch.rpm Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/mediawiki-imagemap.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:41:00 EDT --- Updated to 0.91 SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ctemplate.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ctemplate-0.91-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #46 from Christopher Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:47:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) I would add Chris Brown too as Owner, but we must know his fedoraid, so far i added him as watcher CC. Fedoraid is snecker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569
--- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 07:53:42 EDT
---
The libmirage.spec that you posted and the one in the SRPM are not the same.
The difference is trivial, but still:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ diff -uNp libmirage.spec ../SPECS/libmirage.spec
--- libmirage.spec 2008-08-11 14:33:55.0 +0530
+++ ../SPECS/libmirage.spec 2008-08-11 14:18:21.0 +0530
@@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime
%changelog
* Mon Aug 11 2008 Jiri Moskovcak [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.1.0-2
- more spec file fixes:
-- added INSTALL=%{__install} -p to preserve timestamps
+- added INSTALL=%{__install} -p to preserve timestamp
- removed shared-mime-info from Requires since it's not needed
-- added zlib-devel do BuildRequires
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Terje Røsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 08:04:37 EDT --- Built and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 08:08:41 EDT
---
I remade the package using the supposed last stable version for MediaWiki
1.13.
OK. BTW Axel Thimm right now rebuilding MediaWiki 1.13 for F-8 and F-9.
REVIEW:
MUST Items:
- rpmlint warns aboun incoherent version in changelog. Easy to fix - just add
notes about latest changes under actual version (MW1.13-0.1.r37906).
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/ImageMap-MW1.13-r37906.tar.gz*
39e7f7fceb125cf6a707d4c057b15f57 ../SOURCES/ImageMap-MW1.13-r37906.tar.gz
39e7f7fceb125cf6a707d4c057b15f57 ../SOURCES/ImageMap-MW1.13-r37906.tar.gz.orig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture (ppc).
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
+ The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of
Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
- SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
So, finally
* please add entry to %changelog to make rpmlint happy
* consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to
download latest version (we should provide such support)
* find a minute to drop email to ustream about LICENSE inclusion
and this package is
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569
--- Comment #11 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 08:13:19 EDT
---
Rpmlint errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] x86_64]$ rpmlint -i libmirage-1.1.0-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm
libmirage.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.1.0.0
This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig.
libmirage.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.1.0.0
This package contains a library and its %postun doesn't call ldconfig.
libmirage.x86_64: E: non-empty-%post /sbin/ldconfig
libmirage.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] x86_64]$
Since your %post and %postun stanzas contain more than one command, you need to
change them to:
%post
/sbin/ldconfig
update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime /dev/null || :
%postun
/sbin/ldconfig
update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime /dev/null || :
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:03:56 EDT --- I'd say it's a mistake to add support for a bootloader that's not packaged into grubby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:08:50 EDT --- qsstv-5.3c-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qsstv-5.3c-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:09:37 EDT --- qsstv-5.3c-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qsstv-5.3c-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:34:01 EDT --- php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:31:44 EDT --- php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:35:48 EDT --- gridloc-0.6-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridloc-0.6-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:38:04 EDT --- gridloc-0.6-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridloc-0.6-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:49:37 EDT --- php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459915] Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:49:56 EDT --- php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459916] New: Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Summary: Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc-2.99.20080823-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink DFArc2 makes it easy to play and manage the Dink Smallwood game and it's numerous Dink Modules (or D-Mods). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459915] New: Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Summary: Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data-1.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Adventure and role-playing game (game data) Dink Smallwood is an adventure/role-playing game, similar to Zelda, made by RTsoft. Besides twisted humour, it includes the actual game editor, allowing players to create hundreds of new adventures called Dink Modules or D-Mods for short. This package contains architecture-independent data for the original game (except for non-free sounds). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459915] Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||459908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459916] Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #2 from Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 09:53:34 EDT --- Please create new review requests for each srpm and add proper Depends on/Blocks dependency checker on the bug. Also, as you need sponsors, please make the submitted review requests block FE-NEEDSPONSOR blockers. All done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||459915 Summary|Review Request: freedink - |Review Request: freedink - |Adventure and role-playing |Adventure and role-playing |game|game (engine) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459916] Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||459908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||459916 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204
--- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:04:47 EDT
---
MUST Items:
OK - rpmlint is clean
OK - follows Naming Guidelines
OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec
xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines
+ Why does the -devel subpackage have 'Requires: automake'? The sample Spec
included in the upstream tarball (packages/rpm/rpm.spec) does not have it
too.
+ Please add a %check stanza as:
%check
make check
According to the README, a 'BuildRequires: binutils gdb' will be needed
to run the tests.
+ Moving the library headers from %{_includedir}/google to
%{_includedir}/%{name} will break the builds of programs which contain
'#include google/coredumper.h'. If similar Google projects are also
using %{_includedir}/google, then you might not need to move the files.
Otherwise, if you want to move them there are a few options:
- Provide a README.Fedora in %doc as mentioned in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description
to document this.
- Provide a pkgconfig file which has 'Cflags: -I${includedir}/coredumper'
- Initiate a discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- It is better to pass --includedir=DIR to %configure instead of using
the mkdir mv dance to change the location of the headers.
+ No need to 'find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name *.a -delete' in
%install since --enable-static=no was passed to %configure.
+ You could consider shipping ChangeLog under %doc, and putting README in
the -devel subpackage since it talks about the examples and manual pages.
README also mentions 'src/coredump_unittest.c' so it might be a good idea
to ship this single file under %doc in the -devel subpackage.
OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines
OK - License field meets actual license
OK - upstream license file included in %doc
OK - spec file uses American English
OK - spec file is legible
OK - sources match upstream sources
OK - package builds successfully
xx - ExcludeArch is needed
This library has been tested only on %{ix86} x86_64 and arm (see README),
and it has been specifically mentioned that it does not work on ppc (see
ChangeLog). You MUST ExcludeArch atleast ia64, ppc and ppc64. Work is on
to port Fedora to arm and sparc, so you might want to exclude them as
well. Once the package is approved please file a bug each for ia64, ppc
and ppc64, and make them block the following trackers respectively:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ia64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ppc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64
Also add a comment in the Spec above the ExcludeArch line mentioning the
bug numbers for ia64, ppc and ppc64.
OK - build dependencies correctly listed
OK - no locales
OK - %post and %postun invoke ldconfig
OK - package is not relocatable
xx - file and directory ownership
+ The %files stanza for the -devel subpackage is broken. It should be
fixed to have '%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}'. Otherwise the
%{_includedir}/coredumper directory will not be owned by the package:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/coredumper
file /usr/include/coredumper is not owned by any package
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$
+ It might be better not to mention the compression suffix (ie. .gz) for
the manual pages.
OK - no duplicates in %file
OK - file permissions set properly
OK - %clean present
OK - macros used consistently
OK - contains code and permissable content
OK - -doc is not needed
OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime
OK - header files in -devel
OK - no static libraries
OK - no pkgconfig files
OK - library files without suffix in -devel
OK - -devel requires base package
OK - no libtool archives
OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed
OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages
OK - buildroot correctly prepped
OK - all file names valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - upstream provides license text
xx - no translations for description and summary
OK - package builds in mock successfully
OK - package builds on all supported architectures
xx - package functions as expected
+ Only works on %{ix86}, x86_64 and arm. Other architectures should be,
especially ia64, ppc and ppc64, should be excluded.
OK - scriptlets are sane
OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed
OK - no pkgconfig files
OK - no file dependencies
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Comment #18 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:19:21 EDT --- I am very sorry for the long absence, but I just stepped out from a very annoying health problem. The old package didn't build for ppc and ppc64, so here is a new revision: New SPEC URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/octaviz.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/octaviz-0.4.7-5.fc9.src.rpm If the package is still approved, I will build and submit it as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #32 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:19:27 EDT --- I am very sorry for the long absence, but I just stepped out from a very annoying health problem. If I can still contribute to the project, here is a new version of SPEC and SRPM file that builds in f10 too (the previous versions didn't build): Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.5-1.svn20080823.fc9.src.rpm This package builds in koji for dist-f8, dist-f9 and dist-f10. Please, let me know if I can still work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:23:57 EDT --- cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:25:13 EDT --- cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:24:47 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) + current rpmlint output: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1/NEWS -- harmless. Remove the empty file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445094] Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445094 Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 10:51:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Probably should, but I have no idea how to do that... I'm not sure if it has anything to do with HAL, but I know it has it's own policy and dbus configuration. HAL does take care of the volume up/down/mute keys on my Macbook out of the box on Fedora. I don't use the other keys too much so I am not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #32 from Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 11:07:07 EDT --- Bump to RC4: dhcp-lab-192 newman # rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/awesome.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-doc-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Builds OK in mock with xcb-util, libev and enhanced cairo. * Sun Aug 24 2008 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.0-0.6.rc4 - bump to RC4 - rejecting awesome-3.0-rc3-enhance-wallpaper-cmd.patch -- solved upstream via awsetbg script - using imlib2 instead of GTK+ pixbuf http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604
--- Comment #7 from Claudio Tomasoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 11:11:15
EDT ---
Hello, I'm still interested in importing this package into Fedora.
As already written I had some health trouble in the last months, that was the
reason of my absence.
Anyway, the package doesn't build in koji for dist-f10 with make
%{?_smp_mflags} in the build section (see
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782837).
In the new SPEC and SRPM the only correction is the name of the desktop file:
Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/tennix.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/tennix-0.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 11:47:24 EDT --- For 1.0.0-2 * %changelog - As Rakesh says, please keep previous changelog entries. - Other things are okay for this package. - Your another review request (bug 459871) seems good to some extent. - This package (teseq) is APPROVED by mtasaka - Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459925] New: Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Summary: Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libowfat-0.27-1/libowfat.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libowfat-0.27-1/libowfat-0.27-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: his library is a reimplementation of libdjb, which means that it provides Daniel Bernstein's interfaces (with some extensions). It contains wrappers around memory allocation, buffered I/O, routines for formatting and scanning, a full DNS resolver, several socket routines, wrappers for socket functions, mkfifo, opendir, wait, and an abstraction around errno. It also includes wrappers for Unix signal functions and a layer of mmap and sendfile. The library is available for use with the diet libc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459924] New: Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Summary: Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.81-1/homestead.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.81-1/homestead-0.81-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Homestead is a 3D real-time network visualizer, displaying hosts and packet traffic. Features include support for multiple sensors, analysis of packets to gather hostnames and services, configurable layout of subnetworks, recording/replaying of packet traffic, and the ability to filter packets by host, protocol or port. hsen (Homestead Sensor) is a packet capture daemon which reads and sends packet header information to Homestead, locally or remotely. hsen also equates hostname to IP by reading DNS packets (UDP type A class IN standard query response). The relationship between hsen to Homestead can be one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one or many-to-many (many Homesteads would be on multiple computers on the same subnet, receiving packet header information from hsen via broadcast). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459926] New: Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459926 Summary: Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/swing-worker-1.2-1/swing-worker.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/swing-worker-1.2-1/swing-worker-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: When writing a multi-threaded application using Swing, there are two constraints to keep in mind: (refer to How to Use Threads for more details): * Time-consuming tasks should not be run on the Event Dispatch Thread. Otherwise the application becomes unresponsive. * Swing components should be accessed on the Event Dispatch Thread only. These constraints mean that a GUI application with time intensive computing needs at least two threads: 1) a thread to perform the lengthy task and 2) the Event Dispatch Thread (EDT) for all GUI-related activities. This involves inter-thread communication which can be tricky to implement. SwingWorker is designed for situations where you need to have a long running task run in a background thread and provide updates to the UI either when done, or while processing. This project is a backport of SwingWorker included into 1.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 12:11:29 EDT --- -- This package (python-tftpy) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 12:39:37 EDT --- itaka-0.2.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 12:40:34 EDT --- itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 13:02:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314885) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314885) Screen shot of PHP5 running a php-gtk enabled script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 13:00:03 EDT --- My problem appears I was trying to use the same /etc/php.ini for my apache web server as well as for the CLI version of PHP. I made another php.ini file, and used that for loading and running the php_gtk2.so extension. Then used the following C/L to run a php-gtk test script: [EMAIL PROTECTED] demos]# php -c /etc/php-cli/php.ini -f phpgtk2-demo.php This works OK now, as you can see by the enclosed attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #23 from John Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 13:10:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-tftpy Short Description: A Pure-Python library for TFTP Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459880] Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459880 --- Comment #2 from anyremote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 13:38:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Is this your first package? Are you sponsored? This is my 4th package. Yes, i'm sponsored. anyremote2html.src:19: W: setup-not-quiet Fixed. anyremote2html.src:32: E: files-attr-not-set Fixed. anyremote2html.src: E: description-line-too-long WEB interface for anyRemote - Fixed anyremote2html.src: E: no-changelogname-tag Umm... Fixed. anyremote2html.src: W: strange-permission anyremote2html-0.5.2.tar.gz 0755 Fixed anyremote2html.noarch: W: no-documentation Fixed Soory for inconvinience. Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html-0.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #7 from Ismael Olea [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 13:46:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) MUST Items: - rpmlint warns aboun incoherent version in changelog. Easy to fix - just add notes about latest changes under actual version (MW1.13-0.1.r37906). Strange: I'm rpmlinting my packages and get zero comments :-m I'm using this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.84-2.fc9.noarch [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint -ivv mediawiki-imagemap.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. aha. So, finally * please add entry to %changelog to make rpmlint happy done. * consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to download latest version (we should provide such support) Well, I'm confused here since you suggested to explain the way to get the sources (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540#c4). You mean to write it in comments inside the spec file or to remove it since the sources are created through an upstream service? * find a minute to drop email to ustream about LICENSE inclusion done Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 13:56:20 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #7)
* consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to
download latest version (we should provide such support)
Well, I'm confused here since you suggested to explain the way to get the
sources (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540#c4).
You mean to write it in comments inside the spec file or to remove it since
the
sources are created through an upstream service?
I thought that you use custom made svn snapshot. In such cases instructions how
to build such snapshot should be supplied in spec-file. See this one, as a
reference:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flashrom/devel/flashrom.spec?view=markup
Thanks :-)
And one lastminute fix - please change versioning scheme again! I don't think
that using MW1.13 as Version is a good idea. As its just a svn-snapshot and
no official release was made so far, you should use 0, e.g.
Version: 0
Release: 0.1.%{revision}%{?dist}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #3 from Hedayat Vatankhah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:08:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rcssmonitor Short Description: RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor Owners: hedayat Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204
--- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:14:46 EDT
---
The file %{_includedir}/linux/dirent.h was dropped from kernel-headers on
rawhide. So, package fails on koji. So, this package wouldn't build on rawhide.
I have fixed other issues.
SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/coredumper.spec
SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/coredumper-1.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm
For linux/dirent.h I will contact upstream.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459873] Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459873 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:48:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:49:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:55:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #47 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:53:23 EDT --- cvs done. I added snecker as co-maintainer. Feel free to adjust via the pkgdb web interface or reset the fedora-cvs flag if you need further changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:57:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459856] Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:58:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:56:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459858] Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 14:59:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 15:02:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 15:03:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 15:05:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
