[Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #9 from David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 03:02:34 EDT --- Is libvirt-qpid also missing on some architectures? If so, it should have an ExcludeArch bug of its own, blocking the FE-ExcludeArch-$ARCH trackers for the affected architectures. And that bug should by blocked by the qpid bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 04:33:42 EDT --- 1) you're missing desktop-file-utils in BuildRequires 2) gcc 4.3 problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=918010name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #4 from Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 05:20:11 EDT --- We have a release with the fix: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Analyze/Analyze-8.tar.bz2 Can you please update the spec/package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 05:59:18 EDT --- Okay. + This package itself is now okay + As written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored new packagers to be sponsored are required to either - submit another review request - or do a pre-review of other person's review request You have already other review requests. While there may be some issues to fix, they seems good to some extent. --- This package (libprojectM) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Orcan, thanks you for pre-review. If you want to review other libprojectM related packages, it is okay now and I would appreciate it. Also thanks to Jason for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #16 from Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 06:43:17 EDT --- I have applied for sponsorship. My Fedora account is ImNtReal. I verified with upstream that this entire package should be LGPL, so that must have been a typo in Parser.cpp. Patching the license in the source seems like it would be inappropriate for us, so unless you have any other advice about that, I'll leave it to be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 07:03:35 EDT --- Okay. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. (In reply to comment #16) Patching the license in the source seems like it would be inappropriate for us, so unless you have any other advice about that, I'll leave it to be fixed upstream. Yes, patching against license text is inappropriate. While I think I can ignore this for now, please ask the upstream to fix typo in the next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Dwayne Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 08:54:11 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-Levenshtein New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2 OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 07:48:51 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 09:46:21 EDT --- Thank you Mamoru, I will start reviewing the other projectM packages sometime this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958
--- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 05:23:29 EDT
---
Ok, it builds this time, so full review this time:
MUST FIX
* Do not uses tabs, only use spaces, rpmlint has a good reason to complain,
here is how the specfile looks in my editor (with standard 8 space tabs):
Source0:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar
Source1: %{name}.desktop
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* Put either the utils or the libs in a separate sub-package, with multilib (64
bit systems with 32 bit compatibility) both a 32 bit and a 64 bit version of
the sub-package containing the libs will get added to the repository, we don't
want to have both 32 and 64 bit utils in the 64 bit repository
* The license tag should be GPLv2+ not GPLv2, I so no license headers without
the or any later version language
* barry.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libbarry.so,
that file should really go the the -devel package, and no the utils don't need
it, the trick is to put the libbarry.so.* files in the libs package and
libbarry.so in the devel package
* Only documentation, not doc build scripts should be shipped as %doc:
barry-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh
barry-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh
barry-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/clean.sh R
barry-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/barry-devel-0.14/www/static.sh R
So you must not include static.sh and clean.sh here, there are 2 ways todo
this:
1) rm the scripts in %setup
2) make a copy of the www dir in %build and remove the files from the copy
(use this when the scripts are needed during build / make intall)
and then use the copy in %doc
* barry seems to out rpaths in its binaries when build on x86_64:
barry.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/bidentify
['/usr/lib64']
and lots more
Put the following 3 lines between each %{configure} and %{__make} (so put them
in 3 times):
# Disable rpath
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=|g' libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
* barry.spec has various directory ownership issues, all non standard dirs must
be owned either by barry itself, or by a package required by barry:
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/*
You should add a Requires: udev as that ownes the %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d
dir
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/*
Add a Requires: pam
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/blacklist-berry_charge
Add a Requires: module-init-tools
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ppp/peers/barry-rogers
Add a Requires initscripts
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/chatscripts/barry-rogers.chat
Hmm, no such directory exists on my system, better own it in the package, add
a:
%dir %{_sysconfdir}/chatscripts
To the %files list
%{_includedir}/barry/*
barry-devel should own %{_includedir}/barry, so instead write:
%{_includedir}/barry/
That will get you to own the dir and gets you all the files below it
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
Add a Requires: pkgconfig to the devel package
%{_datadir}/barry/glade/*.glade
barry should own %{_datadir}/barry and everything below it, so write:
%{_datadir}/barry/
%{_libdir}/opensync
You should add a Requires: for what ever package owns %{_libdir}/opensync
* Do not package .la files, instead remove them from the buildroot in %install
after the make install
Thats it, with the next iteration please increase Release one and add a
changelog entry what you changed, we always track changes even during review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 07:48:09 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-2.20081104cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 07:45:32 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 07:47:00 EDT --- Updated spec, now builds properly in mock and is rpmlint clean. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Nils Philippsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Nils Philippsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 09:58:51 EDT --- Good: - Re-added information about the copyright terms and holder to the source file. - No compiled executable found in the source tarball. - Uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT consistently. - Uses RPM optimization flags - Corrected grammar of description. APPROVED. Go ahead and request CVS to be set up now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 --- Comment #10 from James Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 08:55:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) James, what's up here? I can't find this package in any repo, could you please have a look? BTW: upstream version is 0.93. Ha, guess i forgot to submit it to bodhi. Anyways, it's there now. I'll update to a newer version shortly. Thanks Terje! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462296] Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296 Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:19:14 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:26:07 EDT --- There are needed requirements: perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class), perl(URI::FromHash). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:35:36 EDT --- Looks like this got dropped somehow. I am still seeing a test skipped due to missing Compress::Zlib. I read comment #2 to say that you were going to include it, but I don't see it there and I can verify that it is not pulled into the build environment by any other package. I'm also getting an rpmlint complaint: perl-Cache-FastMmap.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.28-1 ['1.28-2.fc10', '1.28-2'] and indeed the spec in the src.rpm linked above has a changelog entry with version 2.28-1 instead of 1.28-2. But the spec file linked above does not seem to have the above issues, so I'm a bit confused. Did you build the src.rpm and then modify the spec further? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:39:08 EDT --- It's been quite some time since there was any movement here. This ticket will be closed soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 394941] Review Request: tpm-tools - TPM management utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394941 Bug 394941 depends on bug 426152, which changed state. Bug 426152 Summary: Review Request: openCryptoki - An open-source PKCS#11 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426152 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426152] Review Request: openCryptoki - An open-source PKCS#11 implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426152 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:43:27 EDT --- Well, its been another four months and nobody has stepped up to clear up the confusion. I'm just going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:50:59 EDT --- Once closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:49:12 EDT --- (Closing as the last message is only new branch request. cvs flags can set set as ? even if the bug is left closed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470066] New: Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Summary: Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl.spec SRPM URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl-1.09-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Analysis of experimental crosses to identify genes (called quantitative trait loci, QTLs) contributing to variation in quantitative traits. Specfile based on template in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #2 from Andy Cress [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:52:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322599) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322599) A comparison of common IPMI open source packages A good question that I have been asked before. There is significant overlap between the two, with the key difference being the architectural approach: ipmiutil is more top-down with the focus being to optimize common management tasks, while ipmitool is more bottom-up with the focus being to expose granular IPMI features. ipmiutil was started in 2001, while ipmitool was started in 2003. Attached is my assessment of a feature comparison, including the relative advantages of each. There are precedents for making more than one choice available in the same space, and given that ipmiutil currently has a significant installed base, it makes sense to include it in Fedora, since SLES, MontaVista, and RedFlag have also included it. ipmiutil project stats, avg over last 60 days: (as of 11/04/08) 325 Hits/day 134 Pages/day 28.3 MB/day 9.4 Downloads/day -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:52:51 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 10:56:46 EDT --- Do you already have a sponsor? I see that you've applied for membership in the packager group but it hasn't been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:06:07 EDT --- I wouldn't worry about the non-standard-dir-perm thing; I believe it simply has to do with your umask. I don't see it here. I have to ask, though, where does zfstream-autotools.tar.gz come from? It seems to contain several additional source files and such. What is the upstream status of all that code? We strongly discourage significantly forking upstream source within a package; if you want to fork, do it properly and set up some kind of project hosting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:07:32 EDT --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:10:36 EDT --- Any update? It's been... a really long time. I guess I'll close this soon if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Andy Theuninck [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |) | --- Comment #20 from Andy Theuninck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:03:58 EDT --- Sorry for the lapses; I really do intend to finish packaging this. I've got koji installed but I haven't had time to do anything else with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470070] New: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters Alias: perl-URI-FromHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/URI-FromHash OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 1 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-URI-FromHash.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-URI-FromHash-0.03-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides a simple one-subroutine named parameters style interface for creating URIs. Underneath the hood it uses 'URI.pm', though because of the simplified interface it may not support all possible options for all types of URIs. It was created for the common case where you simply want to have a simple interface for creating syntactically correct URIs from known components (like a path and query string). Doing this using the native 'URI.pm' interface is rather tedious, requiring a number of method calls, which is particularly ugly when done inside a templating system such as Mason or TT2. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918240 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:13:43 EDT --- It's been quite some time without response to commentary and this has been set NEEDINFO for a couple of weeks now; I'm going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:17:25 EDT --- Is anything happening with these tickets? I recall that someone was supposed to be sponsoring David, but I still see nothing in the account system. David, are you still interested in submitting these packages? Do you need someone else to sponsor you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||469993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||469993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||470070, 469627 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:18:58 EDT --- Hmm, I don't seem to be setting dependson/blocked right via xmlrpc since 3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:21:22 EDT --- Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this soon if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:19:35 EDT --- Any updates here? Things seem to have been waiting on a response from Colin for a few months now. Setting needinfo; I guess I'll close this if there's no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Chris St. Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |eyan.edu) | --- Comment #4 from Chris St. Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:24:52 EDT --- Yes, I intend to fix all of these issues in the next version of Fedora DS Graph, but release of that has been held up by some unrelated issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:23:22 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:27:14 EDT --- zfstream-autotools.tar.gz has been written by me. Yes, it has been sent upstream, but the author won't take it, as he is also the author of toc, the original build system. I tried half a day to get toc working, without success. Even if I got it to work, it would unlikely have worked and picked the correct compiler flags etc. for any architecture I don't own (i.e. everything but x86). So it seemed far less work to just drop in autotools scripts. And autotool is working and maintained for pretty much all architectures fedora supports, so it seems to me that with autotools build scripts, I will have a better chance of getting the packages to compile and run on other architectures as well. See the similar discussion on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 BTW: I do not intend to actually fork the project source code, just replace the build system, as it proved unworkable for me. I will send source code changes upstream, and the author will apply them. He's just not keen on replacing the build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:46:18 EDT --- gstreamer-java-0.9-0.3.20081023hg.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-java-0.9-0.3.20081023hg.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:53:08 EDT --- So you're saying that all of the .c, .cpp and .h files in zfstream-autotools.tar.gz are part of the build system? That seems difficult to believe. Obviously if toc doesn't work we have to do something. I'm surprised that someone thinks autotools is an improvement over anything, but so be it. Still, adding new source goes beyond a simple buildsystem change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:51:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) 1) you're missing desktop-file-utils in BuildRequires Right, fixed. 2) gcc 4.3 problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=918010name=build.log Also fixed. Thanks for the suggestions! New package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/nightview.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/nightview-0.3.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 11:59:07 EDT --- I'm confused too - I certainly never modify spec files without automatically rebuilding and testing corresponding rpms. I can't rule out copying the wrong src.rpm to the server though - I've replaced it with a fresh rebuild (and redownloaded and rechecked that I've really uploaded the correct thing this time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Sailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 12:14:44 EDT --- autotools may be crap, but at least it's known crap 8-) If you have an example of a Makefile, that builds a shared library and works on all supported/soon to be supported architectures (including mingw), then I'd be interested! The archive also contains the source code for supporting zip files (in addition to gz and bz2). This code has been sent upstream, and the author agreed (on Jan 2008) to include it, but apparently hasn't gotten around it. I will ping again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Stefan Posdzich [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Stefan Posdzich [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 12:37:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kcirbshooter Short Description: A small puzzle game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 12:54:07 EDT --- [I'm traveling again...] (In reply to comment #17) *now=not, updated=update, funde=files *tpyo erorr, I am durnck ;-) Not a good to refer to kajo data, it gets removed at ta short while. I didn't see it. Re the documentation: I added some more files but they really are not necessary. As I said before, it's stupid on rpmlint's part to insist on doc files for all these packages. The -libs subpackage still doesn't have any but this is just fine. There is nothing to say. Anybody who needs to know more will find the main package, pfstools, and read the docs there. Find the latest srpm and spec file here: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-4.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 13:17:40 EDT --- I don't feel competent to fully review this package but I can make a few comments: You shouldn't duplicate all of those %doc files between the various subpackages. I'm curious as to which guideline you believe mandates that you split off the libsbuild package. Generally library splits are only required to prevent multilib conflicts, but I don't believe this is a multilib package. (For one thing, it has no -devel subpackage.) There are a few rpmlint complaints: dchroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/dchroot root 04755 dchroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dchroot 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/schroot root 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/schroot 04755 Obviously these are intended. dchroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dchroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-releaselock ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-mount ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-listmounts ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot ['/usr/lib64'] These are problematic. The tarball seems to include a large amount of doxygen-generated documentation. Is that of any use to end-users? If so it should probably be packaged, although a subpackage might be useful. I agree that a security review would be useful, but I'm certainly not the one to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #19 from Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 14:56:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libprojectM Short Description: music visualization library Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Jameson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #7 from Casey Dahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 14:59:23 EDT --- Looks all right to me. Do you need sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 16:12:00 EDT --- Robert and I agreed to switch primary ownership. Package Change Request == Package Name: beldi Owners: cwickert, robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 16:11:48 EDT --- I have a few other packages that I have submitted that are actively being reviewed, but not any approved package yet. I did add the NEED SPONSOR tag to the first package I submitted. As far as I have understood I can not become a member of the packager group until my first package is approved. It might well be that this package will be the one approved first, since it is less complicated than the others, has no patches applied, and very closely follows the template in the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||perl-Math-BigInt-GMP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 16:46:16 EDT --- Is there some reason you can't make this change in the packagedb yourselves? There's no CVS admin action involved here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470140] New: Review Request: nettee - Network tee program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nettee - Network tee program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Summary: Review Request: nettee - Network tee program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee-0.1.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://saf.bio.caltech.edu/nettee.html Description: nettee is a network tee program. It can typically transfer data between N nodes at (nearly) the full bandwidth provided by the switch which connects them. It is handy for cloning nodes or moving large database files Koji scratch builds: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918707 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918700 rpmlint output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint -i nett* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i nettee* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994
Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:06:40
EDT ---
The %files section of this package is broken:
%{_datadir}/*
does not work, because now liveusb-creator also owns
%{_datadir}/applications and
%{_datadir}/pixmaps
Kushal, please use something like
%{_bindir}/*
%{_sbindir}/*
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/*.png
%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop
or even better:
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_sbindir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/fedorausb.png
%{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop
This way you make sure you don't accidentally package unwanted files.
Nigel, please review more carefully next time, No duplicate directory
ownerships should really mean No duplicate directory ownerships. ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:27:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:28:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:28:11 EDT --- How can I do this in packagedb? I have been an owner right from the beginning and have all privileges, still packagedb lists Robert as owner, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/beldi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:30:32 EDT --- Note that if it fails to build on ppc64, you MUST file a bug against the ppc64 blocker. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:35:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:34:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:39:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:38:00 EDT --- The description seems very generic here. Let me know in a new request if you would like to update it to something more descriptive. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:41:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469564] Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:44:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:43:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469565] Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:45:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469563] Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:43:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:48:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:47:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:50:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:51:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 17:57:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #31 from Robert Scheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 18:00:44 EDT --- Theoretically packagedb works, in fact when I'm using it, only the flavor broken is available. Anyway solved with help of abadger1999 on #fedora-admin: [23:35:05] rsc who broke packagedb? [23:35:11] abadger1999 rsc: I did. [23:35:12] rsc I'm not able to release an ownership. [23:35:23] abadger1999 rsc: Which page? [23:35:26] rsc abadger1999: I knew that ;) [23:35:31] abadger1999 heh [23:35:32] rsc abadger1999: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/beldi [23:35:47] rsc cwickert shall get owner and I as co-maintainer (so just vice versa change) [23:36:35] abadger1999 rsc: Do you get an error message? [23:36:59] rsc abadger1999: that would made me lucky. Just nothing happens. Even no ajax animation. [23:38:24] abadger1999 rsc: can you try refreshing the page for me and hitting it again. [23:38:31] rsc of course. Hang on. [23:38:44] rsc Refreshed, will click now. [23:38:57] abadger1999 If I'm lucky, you hit the page while I was restarting the servers and they lost the session information. [23:39:00] rsc Clicked to all three butons. [23:39:09] rsc *buttons [23:40:22] rsc abadger1999: anything nice found? [23:41:20] abadger1999 rsc: Nope. I see the request that you put in before but not the one you're putting in now. [23:41:45] abadger1999 Ah hah [23:41:46] rsc maybe the buttons itself are broken? [23:41:47] abadger1999 There it is [23:42:13] abadger1999 Oh wait... That's the login URL [23:42:24] abadger1999 1 minute ago [23:42:43] rsc hmpf. [23:42:57] rsc re-login now. [23:43:13] rsc clicked released ownership again, nothing happend [23:43:53] abadger1999 Let me try... I'm in cvsadmin which sometimes means I can't reproduce the error but worth a shot. [23:44:47] abadger1999 Yeah. Something's broken. [23:45:09] abadger1999 Ah... I updated some of the javascript... since that's static it gets cached. [23:45:17] abadger1999 Let me clear mod_cache on the proxies [23:50:34] abadger1999 rsc: Okay, try again [23:51:26] rsc abadger1999: works. [23:51:28] rsc cwickert: take it. [23:51:39] cwickert rsc: mom... [23:51:41] rsc abadger1999: thank you. So you really broke it? ;) [23:52:36] cwickert abadger1999: I can't take the package from rsc, the button does nothing for me ether [23:52:52] abadger1999 rsc: heh :-) Somewhat [23:52:52] rsc cwickert: haha! [23:53:13] rsc abadger1999: okay, now you've to switch back, that he can take it. Looks like this is maybe the old JavaScript? ;) [23:53:19] abadger1999 cwickert: Refresh the page and try again. I needed to flush the cache on the web servers when I upgraded. [23:54:02] abadger1999 rsc: yeah. The old javascript was in the cache. But it referenced things that are no longer in the new server. So things broke. [23:54:12] cwickert abadger1999: I did reload the page... [23:54:12] abadger1999 after flushing the cache, the new javascript should be being saved. [23:54:23] cwickert let me restart my browser [23:54:53] abadger1999 Hmmm... yeah if it's still broken after that, there's something fishy going on... it's being cached somewhere. [23:55:41] cwickert abadger1999: works now [23:55:54] cwickert rsc: ok, now re-add the permissions you need [23:56:05] abadger1999 cwickert: Cool. [23:56:36] abadger1999 rsc, cwickert: Thanks for letting me know about that. I need to add flush the cache to the TurboGears SOP. [23:57:03] rsc cwickert: done, you've to approve the spam flooding now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469564] Review Request: hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request:hunspell-fj |Review Request: hunspell-fj |- Fijian hunspell |- Fijian hunspell |dictionaries|dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 18:49:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 18:54:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 19:00:58 EDT --- pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 19:08:57 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 19:10:54 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 19:11:54 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |.com) | --- Comment #3 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 19:33:00 EDT --- Sorry, I've been a bit busy as of late. I'll put this on hold for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] New: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Summary: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword.spec SRPM URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Xword is a GTK program that works well for doing crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format used by The New York Times and others. As well as a clock, it supports printing. It also auto-saves puzzles as you solve them so that you can return to partially completed puzzles. This package is based on the debian/ubuntu package. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #29 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:35:38 EDT --- Any new comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:44:44 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #20 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:53:54 EDT --- I never did a complete review. It failed at that time, to build. Reason: + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/pfstools-mDATA.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .mDATA --fuzz=0 + aclocal /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1: line 41: aclocal: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1 (%prep) RPM build errors: Misses buildrequire automake. I will do a complete review shortly. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 20:56:38 EDT --- Yes, that's better, thanks. This package looks fine. Please go ahead and get your account set up, accept the CLA and apply for membership in the packager group. I will sponsor you. * source files match upstream: aa819d16345b537a88b539f5afe9a90b3ddf208a21ea5f89f0bc0850fe0a05d5 Cache-FastMmap-1.28.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: CImpl.so()(64bit) perl(Cache::FastMmap) = 1.28 perl(Cache::FastMmap::CImpl) = 1.28 perl-Cache-FastMmap = 1.28-2.fc10 perl-Cache-FastMmap(x86-64) = 1.28-2.fc10 = perl = 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Cache::FastMmap::CImpl) perl(XSLoader) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=315, 23 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 4.30 cusr 0.67 csys = 5.05 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445208] Review Request: rubygem-rapt - Rails Plugin Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445208 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-05 21:25:21 EDT --- I've no idea why nobody has commented on this yet, but I went to take a look and found the above links invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
