[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |om) | --- Comment #32 from Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 05:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) protobuf-2.0.2-3: Build filed on my Fedora 9, x86_64 such as: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45. I have included the patch from svn to the package. Can you please check if it builds succesfully now? New SPEC: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec New SRPM: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: * Sat Nov 22 2008 Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.0.2-4 - Added patch from subversion r70 to workaround gcc 4.3.0 bug (see http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45 for more details). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #33 from John A. Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 06:07:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) New SPEC: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec New SRPM: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: * Sat Nov 22 2008 Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.0.2-4 - Added patch from subversion r70 to workaround gcc 4.3.0 bug (see http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=45 for more details). It builds and works fine, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] New: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 439630,464781,468797 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Scilab is a scientific software package for numerical computations providing a powerful open computing environment for engineering and scientific applications. rpmlint -iv output is empty. Notes: *Requires Javahelp2, which is only available in F10 (I believe). I cheated and used an RPM available here: (http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/devel/i386/javahelp2-2.0.05-5.fc10.noarch.html). Package review is bug 439263. *In-program help has not been built, we probably want this. *The makefile that is included seems to call gcc gfortran for the install target to perform some final linking operations -- this seems very very odd. What to do? Do I need to make gcc and gfortran Requires: of scilab? It also really slows down the %install target of rpmbuild. *I get a *lot* of file listed twice warnings from rpmbuild -- is * recursive in the %files section? Notes to other packagers/reviewers: *Scilab is fairly big. It takes a while to complete a build -- ~1hr on a 2.1 GHz machine. If you plan to rebuild more than once or twice, use ccache to speed it up a little (not all the time is spent on C/C++ compiling though). *I am having problems getting PVM to link correctly, as such I have disabled it -- if anyone wants to have a shot at patching this, please do. I have left the patches that fix a few problems with PVM in there for anyone looking at it. Probably just needs someone to correct the PVM_LIB value. *Need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find JVM (libjava, libjvm, libhpi) before running scilab-bin. It can't find it for some reason *I have not tested parallel building to see if it works, how do we test this? Finally my upload bandwidth is not terrible, but it isn't massive, so patience when getting the SRPM :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811
Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2 from Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 07:16:01 EDT
---
I'm not a sponsor, so this is not a formal review, but I hope this can
speed things up a bit.
- FAILED: rpmlint complaints:
php-pear-HTML-AJAX.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab:
line 50)
You shoud use spaces for indentation. Just expand all tabs.
php-pear-HTML-AJAX.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/php-pear-HTML-AJAX-0.5.2/examples/proxy_usage_server.php
php-pear-HTML-AJAX.noarch: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/php-pear-HTML-AJAX-0.5.2/examples/support/test.class.php
I see that you've tried to fix this issue in the %install script, but
you are iconv'ing wrong files. You should iconv files in
docdir/%{pear_name}/examples/
- PASSED: The package is named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
- PASSED: Spec file name is ok.
- FAILED: The package dos not meet the Packaging Guidelines for PHP.
Please check with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP
A PEAR package MUST have:
BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR)
Requires: php-pear(PEAR)
Requires(post): %{__pear}
Requires(postun): %{__pear}
Provides: php-pear(foo) = %{version}
post-scriptlets are fine.
- PASSED: The license is fedora-compatible.
- FAILED: The license specified on the project homepage is LGPL, the
license specified in spec file is LGPLv3.
- PASSED: The spec file is written in American English in legible.
- PASSED: The sources match the upstream source (md5 verified).
- PASSED: The package may be successfully built.
- FAILED: Not all build build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
You should add at least dos2unix.
- FAILED: The package does not build in mock due to missing BuildRequires.
- PASSED: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
- PASSED: Permissions are sane.
- PASSED: %clean section is fine.
- PASSED: macros usage is fine.
- PASSED: The package must contains code.
- PASSED: The package does not contain large documentation.
- PASSED: %doc contents is fine.
- FAILED: This package owns directory /usr/share/pear/HTML. It is
already owned by php-pear-HTML-Common, so this package must Require
it, and own only it's own subdirectory in /usr/share/pear/HTML.
- PASSED: There is rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the beginning of %install.
- PASSED: All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8.
Some other general notes:
You are packaging version 0.5.2 of the package which is a beta. There
is a newer upstream beta available. Could you please justify why are
you packaging an older release, or please upgrade to the newer
upstream version.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 07:12:45 EDT --- No comment from the package submitter. I'm giving up for now. Also withdrawing the offer for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #34 from Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 07:33:19 EDT --- I've made a pre-review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 07:45:36
EDT ---
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc LICENSE AUTHORS BUGS ReleaseNotes.html
%{_sysconfdir}/wt/wt_config.xml
%{_datadir}/Wt/resources/
The following directories are not included:
%{_sysconfdir}/wt
%{_datadir}/Wt
Include the right directories recursively
or use %dir attributes as appropriate.
This is one of the MUST items you've quoted.
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc LICENSE AUTHORS BUGS
Even if harddisk space is cheap, why duplicate these files,
which are already found in the main pkg?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457761] Review Request: dt - Generic data test program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Resolution||INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag||fedora-review- --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 08:03:12 EDT --- 404: Not Found. everywhere + no reply on Patrice' comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508 Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 08:18:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jussi. Package build and imported into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 08:29:26 EDT --- these are not blocking issues These are format string buffer overflows and ought to get fixed. Run-time parameters (url, host, range) can cause a crash. Do a grep GETREQ * in the source tree and notice that during allocation of the buffer, the size is reduced by 2: Aget.c: fmt = (char *)calloc(GETREQSIZ - 2, sizeof(char)); The snprintf size, however, is not reduced by 2: Aget.c: snprintf(fmt, GETREQSIZ, GETREQ, req-url, req-host, PROGVERSION, soffset); Defs.h: GETREQSIZ = 256, Defs.h:#define GETREQ GET %s HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: %s\r\nUser-Agent: %s\r\nRange: bytes=%ld-\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 Hayden James [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #20 from Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 09:34:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) I don't have any branch as F-8 in cvs ? what do do ? You don't have a branch for F-8 because you did not ask for it. Since Fedora 8 is nearing its EOL it is anyway good not to introduce new packages in it. So just ignore F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #1 from Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 10:09:52 EDT --- The parallel build of Scilab is working. I am using it nearly every day ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 10:14:21 EDT --- The package name of this should be snmp++ , not snmp_pp, I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 10:23:41 EDT --- It seems that you have not imported your srpm into F-10/9/8 branches yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #20 from Hayden James [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 10:24:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: snmp++ Short Description: SNMP++ is a C++ development library for SNMP Owners: hjames Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:25:53 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
A couple of comments:
If you're going to, for whatever reason, use macros like %__make and %{__mv},
you need to be consistent: either use the brackets or don't, and then you
need
to use %{__rm} instead of just rm. Or just drop the macros entirely and
save
the typing.
I do not see this so much sense to pay attention. But ok, I fix it.
rpmlint complains about the .packlist file. Honestly I'm not sure why you
would even need to package it, and if you check the perl package template
you'll see that it deletes .packlist files and then goes through and deletes
empty directory trees. In fact, perhaps you might want to take a look at the
template; it might give you some hints for better ways to do some things.
Install the rpmdevtools package and look at
/etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-perl.spec.
I have long thought about it file...
Very thanks for this hints. I get few lines fronm this spec template (see spec
changelog for more details).
In any case, it's always useful to run rpmlint on your packages (both the
source RPM and the final built packages).
Off course!
Now it is produce only 1 warning, but it is too erroneously:
$ rpmlint -i xls2csv-1.06-1.fc9.src.rpm
xls2csv.src:32: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL
INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will
break short circuiting.
so, it is wrong, because usage of %{buildroot} there is not touch this dir!!!
This is needed only for configuration build.
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/xls2csv/xls2csv-1.06-1.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:45:44 EDT --- R-bigmemory-2.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:43:13 EDT --- apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:46:40 EDT --- lensfun-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:47:00 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpuid'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:43:49 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-suds'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:50:32 EDT --- bam-0.0.0.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network tee program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:51:05 EDT --- nettee-0.1.9-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:49:37 EDT --- shed-1.13-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:51:44 EDT --- cpuid-20060917-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467764] Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:51:34 EDT --- python-twitter-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:48:20 EDT --- perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.28-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470140] Review Request: nettee - Network tee program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469590] Review Request: cpuid - Dumps information about the CPU(s)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469590 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:48:38 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xmp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:49:17 EDT --- balance-3.42-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update balance'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-9975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:50:59 EDT --- pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pympdtouchgui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:49:21 EDT --- sip-redirect-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:47:42 EDT --- cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:49:29 EDT --- python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:57:25 EDT --- barry-0.14-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:59:59 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unikurd-web-font'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:59:11 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:59:30 EDT --- php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-ssh2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:57:35 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:54:38 EDT --- libprojectM-1.2.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:53:52 EDT --- vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:53:19 EDT --- gnome-gmail-notifier-0.9.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:54:24 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libev'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:58:59 EDT --- rubygem-rspec-1.1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-rspec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:53:27 EDT --- ufiformat-0.9.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:54:53 EDT --- rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:52:52 EDT --- ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 12:00:21 EDT --- basket-1.0.3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:56:28 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469952] Review Request: dopewars - a drug dealing game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469952 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:59:52 EDT --- dopewars-1.5.12-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 11:59:09 EDT --- xlcrack-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xlcrack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/f10/FEDORA-2008-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:21:20 EDT --- - license of this package should pe GPLv2+ - this is a GUI application without .desktop file. - what's the purpose of edb-plugins ? As I can see edb main package cannot run without debugger core plugin. I you're going to provide a separate edb plugins package shouldn't that be optional ? I think you should separate in-core plugins from optional plugins (if it's even the case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:37:30 EDT --- pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:38:48 EDT --- pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:40:31 EDT --- python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 13:40:27 EDT --- python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465646] Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 14:21:15 EDT --- I reviewed this package. Here are my notes : * The package must obey python modules naming guidelines: Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 And the spec file will need to be renamed accordingly. * Latest version is not packaged. Please update to the latest version. * You should probably make a %check section and run the tests given in the test_doc.py * There is a doc directory in the tarball. Should (at least, some of) the contents of that directory be packaged? * You must have BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 14:27:27 EDT --- This is not a blocker but... as this is a network application (binds specific port, logs data to specific dir) will you consider providing sysvinit script, default logdir, logrotation, etc...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 14:33:40 EDT --- MD5Sum: 42390b31187a6ac5f06b5148af661f97 ropevim-0.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly. Minor: * could look at making summary a bit less verbose. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 15:01:21 EDT --- I'm inclined to say let's make this a test update at least. It works better and doesn't crash as easily as before. Issues I've run into (and which may cause users to submit problem reports: * Music became loud noise after the first fight. Pulse Audio was still working fine (i.e. I could start a music player as a test), but in lordsawar it needed several attempts to make the music return. * At the end of a test game (the remaining two enemies surrendered), confirming Quit did not close the game window. I could choose and confirm Quit again and again, but that didn't help. Killing the process worked. The build log contains a few interesting warnings that are worth an investigation: gtksdl.c:218: warning: the address of 'SDL_windowhack' will always evaluate as ' true' playerlist.cpp:367: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char *' player.cpp:862: warning: suggest parentheses around within || Packaging-wise it's fine. * A desktop menu icon could be added. * You could use --vendor= instead of --vendor=fedora when installing the .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Ian Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 19:02:43 EDT --- oh ok! Thanks, Michael. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lordsawar Short Description: Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting Owners: ianweller Branches: F-10 InitialCC: (if you can do email addresses...) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 19:44:21 EDT --- I'm updating clipper and ssm to fix the mmdb related build errors, they should be in soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472658] New: Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Summary: Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/shmpps/shmpps.spec SRPM URL: http://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/shmpps/shmpps-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SHM driver to allow PPS time sources to work without a PPS kernel. The PPS pin must be connected to the declared signal pin on a serial or parallel port. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 20:38:31 EDT --- Thank you for your comment. Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/edb.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog : - Licence fix - Add desktop file - Removed separate plugin package I removed edb-plugins as there is no real interest. Rebuild under mock is OK. Build on koji ij OK : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945577 Rpmlint output : [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ rpmlint edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.i386.rpm edb-debuginfo-0.9.6-2.fc9.i386.rpm edb-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 21:34:02 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 21:34:05 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #22 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 21:36:44 EDT --- The build fails for F8. I cannot determine why from the build logs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945616 Something to do with being unable to set up the noarch build architecture. I think. Any advice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 22:50:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 22:55:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 22:53:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 22:57:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 22:58:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 22:59:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:01:27 EDT --- sadly, no, we can't do arbitrary email addresses in InitialCC. ;( If they get a fas account we can easily add them however. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:03:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:05:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471026] Review Request: chrony - An NTP client/server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471026 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:08:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:06:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:20:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:16:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:18:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:22:26 EDT --- no summary found ? The spec seems to have 'Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage' is that not ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472167] Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:23:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:26:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:28:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:30:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:34:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:32:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-22 23:33:23 EDT --- cvs done (also with F-10 branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 00:41:53 EDT --- snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snmp++-3.2.23-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
