[Bug 472179] Review Request: perl-Test-Block - Specify fine granularity test plans
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472179 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:14:20 EDT --- Please answer to all your pending reviews, there are work todo in comments on each of them I will be able to end the reviews and to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438810] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438810 Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:20:58 EDT --- I must disagree with Lev. As this package run without HTML_Common (check all the require_once in the scripts), you don't have to Requires it. So you must also own the /usr/share/pear/HTML directory. But %file must be cleared -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472664] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: HTML::TokeParser is an excellent module that's often used for parsing HTML. However, the tokens returned are not exactly intuitive to parse. To simplify this, HTML::TokeParser::Simple allows the user ask more intuitive (read: more self-documenting) questions about the tokens returned. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472666] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: DateTime::Format::Natural takes a string with a human readable date/time and creates a machine readable one by applying natural parsing logic. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #4 from Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:34:39 EDT --- Agreed, I forgot to check the requires in the sorce code. BTW, may be this (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DirectoryOwnershipImprovement) is already should be included into the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:35:07 EDT --- Small question : Do you think it is a good idea to import a very old package which doesn't seem maintained upstream for quite a long time (june 2006). Small notes : Version 0.9 is available, so you cannot use a pre-release version number (0.9-0.xxx) but a post release (Official 0.9 will have a 0.9-1 number schema) Please add in comment the cvs export command with the revision or date retrieved. Also indicate where the patch come from. If they are needed to build against latest php version, you should file a bug upstream with your patch attached (but I see in CSV php 5.3.0 compatibility have been fixed for a few months). + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472668] New: Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Summary: Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: reCAPTCHA is a hybrid mechanical turk and captcha that allows visitors who complete the captcha to assist in the digitization of books. This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #3 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:43:17 EDT --- Building the documentation will require some things we don't currently have in the repository. Most notably the JEuclid project. This particular project is quite large and has a very large number of dependencies, this will probably in turn require some packages we don't have as well. A quick internet search turns up no current RPMs for that project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:46:34 EDT --- Also read the PHP Guidelines (and/or read other pecl spec file) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP You must have the requires for ABI version .hu should be removed from release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 03:54:10 EDT --- See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership See 2 (Animal example). ++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #4 from Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:24:18 EDT --- gluegen is a native library provided by JOGL (libgluegen-rt.so) To help Scilab finding it, update etc/librarypath.xml and add the path inside. About jeuclid, the Debian packaging is available: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/debian-science/packages/jeuclid/trunk/debian/ if it helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472673] New: Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 Summary: Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet-1.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: pyglet provides an object-oriented programming interface for developing games and other visually-rich applications for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Some of the features of pyglet are: * No external dependencies or installation requirements. For most application and game requirements, pyglet needs nothing else besides Python, simplifying distribution and installation. * Take advantage of multiple windows and multi-monitor desktops. pyglet allows you to use as many windows as you need, and is fully aware of multi-monitor setups for use with fullscreen games. * Load images, sound, music and video in almost any format. pyglet can optionally use AVbin to play back audio formats such as MP3, OGG/Vorbis and WMA, and video formats such as DivX, MPEG-2, H.264, WMV and Xvid. --- The package have a few issues: * It depends softly on avbin. Softly means, it uses it if it is present, otherwise it won't produce errors. avbin is a wrapper around ffmpeg, so it can't be packaged for Fedora. I am packaging avbin for rpmfusion. pyglet can do many other things hence I thought I should package it for Fedora. The question is: Should I remove the last paragraph from the description? * The source tarball has an examples directory, with bunch of code examples. I am packaging all these examples in a -examples subpackage. Among them is a game called astraea. Astraea contains a ttf font file. The Readme file says it is a free font by I don't think we can include it in Fedora. It is actually this font: http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/larabie/saved-by-zero/ Right now, I picked a font that is available in Fedora and made the -examples subpackage require that font package. Is this a good solution? What is the best procedure in such cases? Please share your opinions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:50:28 EDT --- Firstly - thank you for comment. (In reply to comment #3) Small question : Do you think it is a good idea to import a very old package which doesn't seem maintained upstream for quite a long time (june 2006). This is work now and have not major bugs which must be fixed by upstream. Furthermore, I do not known any alternatives by functionality yet. So, answer is yes, I think is it is a very good idea to import this package. Small notes : Version 0.9 is available, so you cannot use a pre-release version number (0.9-0.xxx) but a post release (Official 0.9 will have a 0.9-1 number schema) Hm. It is build from CVS. How I should number its versions - 0.9-1.CVS20080512, 0.9-2.CVS20080512, 0.9-3.CVS20080512? Or 0.9-1.1.CVS20080512, 0.9-1-2.CVS20080512, 0.9-1-3.CVS20080512? Please add in comment the cvs export command with the revision or date retrieved. Excuse me, I do not understand. Date of CVS retrieving present in version and in defined macros %define CVS 20080512 in spec file. For what and where more I should comment it? Also indicate where the patch come from. This is my patches. And it is reflected in spec changelog. If they are needed to build against latest php version, you should file a bug upstream with your patch attached (but I see in CSV php 5.3.0 compatibility have been fixed for a few months). Patch not for PHP, patch for this extension to make it compatible with new PHP ABI. So, if we speak about file bug to upstream of this pecl extension - this have not sense, because you said before what it is old and unmaintained. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #14 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:57:08 EDT --- I have modified the package binary and manpage as per your suggestions. Please assign it to yourself and review it. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mz.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mz-0.34.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:14:59 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build= http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946142 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 36b00fa37fd8a17367e1aa2f3b218f34 Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=45, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.69 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.77 CPU) + Package perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.92-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(Captcha::reCAPTCHA) = 0.92 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(HTML::Tiny) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] New: Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Summary: Review Request: partimage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.partimage.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/partimage.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/partimage-0.6.7-2.fc8.src.rpm Description of problem: Partimage is a Linux/UNIX partition imaging utility, which saves partitions, having a supported filesystem, to an image file. Partimage will only copy data from the used portions of the partition. The image file can be compressed with gzip or bzip2 to save space, and can be split into multiple files to be copied on CDs/DVDs. Partimage was compiled with login disabled, and supporting the following filesystems: ext2fs, ext3fs, fat, fat16, fat32, hfs, hpfs, jfs, ntfs, reiserfs, reiserfs-3.5, reiserfs-3.6, ufs, xfs. Additional Information: This request has been closed some time ago, and I would like to reopen it. I have been using partimage for years and have cloned dozens of computers with it. The spec I am submitting is based on Dag's, Ubuntu and Gentoo. I have tested all of its options and everything is working, except the pam usage via partimaged-passwd. Maybe someone can help me with this. Also, the buildarch is i386 and ppc, although I run it in x86_64 just fine. This is the original bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 06:26:37 EDT --- Kwizart also was working on a scilab rpm,. To my guess, he needed matio as well for scilab: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 The following is not a review blocker: Is it possible for you to setup a wiki page and file a simple table describing what are the options/plugins that your package is supporting ? Perhaps on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/Scilab Since scilab can be used by anyone from any field of application, it will be helpful for other packagers/maintainers to know the actual situation. It is my case, I'll recommend scilab for electronics on FEL, and will try to make my best so that fedora has the maximum compatibility with Matlab environment. Thus your wiki page(which I will help you to) will enable me to find other packagers and packages missing for the best scilab experience targeting electronic design with FEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 06:32:35 EDT --- This package requires a lot of work before approval. I'll rebuild and bring forward some review comments later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472683] New: Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Summary: Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap.spec SRPM URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/jpcap-0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Jpcap is a Java library for capturing and sending network packets from Java applications. This Jpcap package requires Java 1.6 or higher and libpcap 0.9 or higher. This is my first package, so I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Patrick Dignan [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Felix Kaechele [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:23:17 EDT --- Looks good so far. Only thing I see is that you didn't comment on the patches within the SPEC file. Could you please add a comment wether you filed a bug with upstream already or if this patches are Fedora specific. Also see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Also I'll be taking this bug for review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:30:21 EDT --- # # Copyright (c) 2008 Daniel Haley # # This file and all modifications and additions to the pristine # package are under the same license as the package itself. # # please send bugfixes or comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Hmm isn't this a blocker for review ? There should be no other copyright/license on any fedora spec file except fedora's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:37:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple Short Description: Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:42:00 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:39:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA Short Description: Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:38:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural Short Description: Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472684] New: Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Summary: Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/electric/electric.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/electric/electric-8.07-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Electric is a sophisticated electrical CAD system that can handle many forms of circuit design, including custom IC layout (ASICs), schematic drawing, hardware description language specifications, and electro-mechanical hybrid layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:42:59 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:48:08 EDT --- As for the F8 failed built, the log says: DEBUG util.py:250: No Package Found for java-devel = 1:1.6.0 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=945622name=root.log In accordance to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1165 F8 has java-devel-1.5.0 from java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0-17.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Return a new instance a component on each request. rpmlint shows two warnings, but there's not a lot I can do about long filenames. perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.src: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.src.rpm perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472668] Review Request: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA - Perl implementation of the reCAPTCHA API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472668 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 06:02:50 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build= http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946153 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2867824be9cbe3e86e94ca677d042ffe HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=188, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.50 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.59 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple-3.15-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple) = 3.15 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token) = 3.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Comment) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Declaration) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::ProcessInstruction) = 2.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag) = 1.2 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::End) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::Start) = 1.0 perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Text) = 1.0 Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::TokeParser) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Comment) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Declaration) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::ProcessInstruction) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::End) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Tag::Start) perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple::Token::Text) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:33:58 EDT --- #001: Missing BuildRequires: ant-commons-logging #002: Rpmlint issues; chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm flexdock.i386: W: no-documentation flexdock.i386: W: non-standard-group Development/Java flexdock.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-4 ['0.5.1-4.fc9', '0.5.1-4'] flexdock.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libRubberBand.so flexdock.i386: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libRubberBand.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/flexdock-debuginfo-0.5.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471
Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 08:00:09
EDT ---
#001: remove the copyright paragraph, else I won't review this package
#002: avoid renaming spec files : %{name}-X.spec. Always keep the spec filenme
as %{name}.spec. I have seen you did the same for all your packages.
#003: rpmlint issues
chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint
/home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/skinlf-6.7-2.fc9.i386.rpm
skinlf.i386: W: no-documentation
skinlf.i386: E: description-line-too-long Today many applications must be
skinnable: your CD player, your emailnotifier, even your operating system! Now
with Skin Look And Feel, your Java application is skinnable! Skin Look And Feel
is able to read GTK (The Gimp ToolKit) and KDE (The K Desktop Environment)
Skins to enhance your application GUI controls such as Buttons, Checks, Radios,
Scrollbars, Progress Bar, Lists, Tables, Internal Frames, Colors, Background
Textures, Regular Windows.
skinlf.i386: W: non-standard-group skinlf
skinlf.i386: W: invalid-license Apache
skinlf.i386: E: no-binary
Break the description paragraph into seperate lines.
004: Build errors, possible missing BuildRequires:
[javac] ^
[javac]
/home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/BUILD/skinlf-6.7/build/src/com/l2fprod/tools/msstyles/MsStylesToSkinLF.java:78:
warning: com.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.XPathAPI is Sun proprietary API and
may be removed in a future release
[javac] (Element)XPathAPI.
[javac]^
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:38:49 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472666] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural - Create machine readable date/time with natural parsing logic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472666 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:07:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build= http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946139 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d5ca703d49ee23e85741d2da1dceeb31 DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=248, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.00 sys + 3.93 cusr 0.07 csys = 4.07 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-0.73-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) = 0.73 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural::Base) = 1.15 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural::Lang::Base) = 0.9 perl(DateTime::Format::Natural::Lang::EN) = 1.12 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(Date::Calc) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Format::Natural) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(base) perl(boolean) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||472639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet filtering library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Dignan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 07:24:50 EDT --- I'd like to note that this library was written by Keita Fujii (see the URL in the spec file), and I repackaged it to conform with Fedora's standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||466737 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 08:04:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) (In reply to comment #22) The build fails for F8. I cannot determine why from the build logs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945616 Something to do with being unable to set up the noarch build architecture. I think. Any advice? java = 1:1.6 is not available on Fedora on Fedora 8, I mean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 08:02:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) The build fails for F8. I cannot determine why from the build logs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=945616 Something to do with being unable to set up the noarch build architecture. I think. Any advice? java = 1:1.6 is not available on Fedora. Fedora 8 uses java icedtea, which has a virtual Provides java = 1.7.0, which is lower than 1:1.6.0. On F-9+ Fedora uses java openjdk, which has a virtual Provides java = 1:1.6.0. So if this package can build with java icedtea you can use BR: java-devel = 1.7 instead (note: 1.7 is lower than 1:1.6.0), however another note that java icedtea (on Fedora 8) is not available on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 08:44:39 EDT --- I don't know if you are speaking about me, but to me the package name is still too short, si I wouldn't accept th epackage. Besides I have only jumped on the review because I try to avoid inflation of short and generic names in fedora, not because I am interested in doing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #7 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 09:00:08 EDT --- Is it possible for you to setup a wiki page and file a simple table describing what are the options/plugins that your package is supporting ? Perhaps on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/Scilab The wiki page has been created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #8 from Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 09:12:13 EDT --- Nice work. Just a short comment about this, jeuclid can be built with ant (get the build.xml from the Debian package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 09:32:44 EDT --- All fixed. http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd.spec http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd-0.1-2.gitaf42ec70f3.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build worked: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=946393 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #4 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 09:48:55 EDT --- *sigh* One more time... URLS: Spec: http://www.dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-3.spec SRPM: http://www.dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471
--- Comment #3 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 09:47:22 EDT ---
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
#001: remove the copyright paragraph, else I won't review this package
Done.
#002: avoid renaming spec files : %{name}-X.spec. Always keep the spec filenme
as %{name}.spec. I have seen you did the same for all your packages.
I'm going to do it again, just to be difficult -- my local copy is always
blahblah.spec, only the bugzilla copies are blahblah-rev.spec. Sorry. How do I
make sure other people on the 'net can see the changes in the spec files after
I have made them? Is there a good way to do this?
#003: rpmlint issues
skinlf.i386: W: no-documentation
Fixed.
skinlf.i386: E: description-line-too-long
Fixed.
skinlf.i386: W: non-standard-group skinlf
Fixed.
004: Build errors, possible missing BuildRequires:
...
warning: com.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.
XPathAPI is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
Not technically errors, these warnings arise due to my usage of the sun xpath
api as a substitute for the org.apache.xpath api (patch #3), which was removed
as of sun JRE1.5 [1]. I can look at this again to see if I can make it work
without the patch, but that will have to wait. The package itself will still
work with the sun API, it just means that I may have to revisit and update
later. I'd rather continue with the current sun API if no-one knows how to
solve this properly, and doesn't object to doing so. Just so we can lift the
block on other bugs
skinlf.i386: W: invalid-license Apache
Not fixed -- I am unsure how to proceed here. If you examine the LICENSE file
in the source, it isn't Apache, contrary to what's on their website [2]. Its a
redistributable with attribution licence, which doesn't appear up in the
rpmlint -iv output. Which licence should I select??
Current RPMlint output:
$ rpmlint -i skinlf-6.7-3.fc9.src.rpm
skinlf.src: W: invalid-license Apache 2.0
Thanks for taking a look at the package!
[1]
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/xml/jaxp/JAXP-Compatibility_150.html#New
[2] https://skinlf.dev.java.net/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #5 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 09:54:08 EDT --- *sigh* again. There is no www prefix. URLS: Spec: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-3.spec SRPM: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 10:36:22 EDT --- Please move your discussion of the Release tag to fedora-packaging mailing list. Peter's usage is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23
10:40:19 EDT ---
I've got a spec ready for 5.0.2 and was waiting for 5.0.3 to fix some problem
I've reported upstream. For example, we shouldn't need to patch configure.ac
for the jhall to javahelp2 jar detection (as the problem was reported upstream
by me).
I've also reported a problem with the default search path for the java machine
using alternatives. I will upload a 5.0.3 spec/srpm once I'm back home.
@D Haley
About this:
---
#Scilab installs lots of stuff to /usr/lib/debug and /usr/src/debug/ for some
reason
rm -rf /%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/debug
---
Those are debuginfo extracted by rpm. If you have a problem with them , then I
would suggest that you review how your builsystem is done... thoses are
expected to build fine and ends in %{name}-debuginfo rpm package.
@Sylvestre
According to our packaging standard. gluegen should be built separately from
jogl, as we need jogl to be 'buildable' without using 'custom' Jar files at
built time. (every jar file should be removed in prep). For some reason,
separating the gluegen build from jogl isn't that trivial.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Bug 469471 depends on bug 461407, which changed state. Bug 461407 Summary: Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 10:45:26 EDT --- By the way if you don't want you don't have to rebuild laf-plugin on F-8 as F-8 support is near end. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. When you think F-9/10 laf-plugin packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi and edit (modify) your push requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471527] Review Request: snmp++ - SNMP C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 10:50:11 EDT --- Okay, now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 10:51:49 EDT --- Okay, now Closing as NEXTRELEASE. When you think F-9/10 packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi and edit (modify) your push requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 10:52:38 EDT --- Okay, now Closing as NEXTRELEASE. When you think F-9/10 packages can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi and edit (modify) your push requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 Bug 462813 depends on bug 459010, which changed state. Bug 459010 Summary: Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 11:49:10 EDT --- Then why does this package have to install files under %_datadir/pear/HTML ?? By the way currently on koji-11: # repoquery --repoid=koji-11 --whatprovides '/usr/share/pear/HTML/*' php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect-0:1.4.1-1.fc10.noarch php-pear-HTML-Common-0:1.2.4-2.fc10.noarch php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-0:3.2.10-1.fc9.noarch php-pear-HTML-Table-0:1.8.2-1.fc9.noarch php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid-0:0.1.1-2.fc10.noarch which all Requires php-pear-HTML-Common directly or indirectly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:01:59 EDT --- Okay + Now this package itself is good + Your pre-review seems good for initial comments - This package (protobuf) is APPROVED by mtasaka - Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811
Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:04:20
EDT ---
I would recommend removing dos2unix entirely, and just sed which is part of the
core build environment.
Untested:
find docdir -type f -exec sed -i 's/\r//' {} \;
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #36 from Lev Shamardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:09:26 EDT --- I have filed an application to the packagers group, my FAS login name is 'abbot'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:15:14 EDT --- In PEAR extension, the tree is a thematic classification (not a dependency one) It's an upstream choice that packager cannot change. Requires must be taken from the PEAR documentation or (best) from the source In QuickForm.php = require_once 'HTML/Common.php'; So php-pear-HTML-QuickForm must requires php-pear-HTML-Common In Table.php = require_once 'HTML/Common.php'; So php-pear-HTML-Table must requires php-pear-HTML-Common In all the script from HTML_AJAX, there is no require/include outside of HTML/AJAX. So no need to require php-pear-HTML-Common ++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:13:47 EDT --- Confirmed. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472696] New: Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Summary: Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora A simple daemon which manages a directory of vcards reflecting the contents of a address book in evolution data server. On user level, it's related to bug 471575 - this part makes vcards available for the extension. However, there are no technical dependencies. Source RPM:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/vcards-evo-daemon-0.2-1.61.src.rpm?use_mirror= Spec: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/vcards-evo-daemon.spec?use_mirror= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Alec Leamas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 --- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:54:36 EDT --- This is my second submission for approval; I need s sponsor. My attempts to make what's required for being sponsored are documented in bug 471575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 --- Comment #1 from Alec Leamas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:54:14 EDT --- This is my second aubmission for approval; I need s sponsor. My attempts to make what's required for being sponsored are documented in bug 471575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472673] Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 13:40:48 EDT --- I found out that the font (saved-by-zero) is not free, hence it cannot be packaged in Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/LarabieFontsLicense -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 14:21:09 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qle-0.0.10-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 14:16:44 EDT --- ibp-0.21-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibp-0.21-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 14:18:16 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibp-0.21-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 14:22:00 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qle-0.0.10-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 14:17:31 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibp-0.21-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 14:23:11 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qle-0.0.10-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 15:38:52 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: bf13f4ec695dd37bd01c4eff2db63ef9 debugger-0.9.6.tgz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: libAnalyzer.so()(64bit) libBinarySearcher.so()(64bit) libBookmarks.so()(64bit) libBreakpointManager.so()(64bit) libCheckVersion.so()(64bit) libDebuggerCore.so()(64bit) libDumpState.so()(64bit) libELFBinaryInfo.so()(64bit) libEnvironment.so()(64bit) libFunctionDB.so()(64bit) libFunctionFinder.so()(64bit) libHardwareBreakpoints.so()(64bit) libHeapAnalyzer.so()(64bit) libOpcodeSearcher.so()(64bit) libOpenFiles.so()(64bit) libReferences.so()(64bit) libStringSearcher.so()(64bit) libSymbolViewer.so()(64bit) edb = 0.9.6-2.fc10 edb(x86-64) = 0.9.6-2.fc10 = /bin/sh libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) OK %check is not present. I was able to run application and debug a binary file N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. N/A scriptlets present look OK N/A initscript looks OK. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. OK this is a GUI application, desktop file OK Suggestion: please see if you can provide an icon file for this package. (try upstream, or try to find a default one) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472274] Review Request: atari++ - Unix based emulator of the Atari eight bit computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472274 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 16:06:39 EDT --- Imported and built, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 Nicoleau Fabien [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Nicoleau Fabien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 16:12:05 EDT --- Thank you for the review Lucian. I'll ask upstream for an icon file. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: edb Short Description: A debugger based on the ptrace API and Qt4 Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472713] New: Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472713 Summary: Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/smokeping/smokeping.spec SRPM URL: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/smokeping/smokeping-2.4.2-0.1.src.rpm Description: SmokePing is a deluxe latency measurement tool. It can measure, store and display latency, latency distribution and packet loss. SmokePing uses RRDtool to maintain a longterm data-store and to draw pretty graphs, giving up to the minute information on the state of each network connection. This is my second package and I have no sponsor. I have based it on a old spec-file used inhouse at our company. But I still have some troubles with SELinux-enabled installations since the httpd needs to read and write outside its normal locations. Reference: My first package (Rancid): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Åge Olai Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |org)| --- Comment #24 from Åge Olai Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 19:31:30 EDT --- Sorry for the enormous delay! I've submited a second review request: Bug 472713 - Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472713] Review Request: Smokeping - keeps track of your network latency
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472713 Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 19:36:14 EDT --- this package alrealy exists in fedora. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472673] Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 20:20:00 EDT --- New files: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pyglet-1.1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog - Removed the extra font dependency (reverting to the default system font). - Added Requires. I thought the dependency on a totally irrelevant fonts package is not that necessary, so I made the script fall back to the default system font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||unhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||tcping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Rudolf Kastl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Rudolf Kastl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 21:13:58 EDT --- build seems to error out aswell without laf-plugin installed so shouldnt that also have a BuildRequires on it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #16 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 23:40:00 EDT --- Now this becomes a bit misleading and confusing, if you see my comments above I had raised the same question about renaming the binaries and manpage without renaming the package name and was suggested to rename the binaries and manpage and get done with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Bug 472170 depends on bug 472167, which changed state. Bug 472167 Summary: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 00:00:21 EDT --- Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843
manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 00:08:54
EDT ---
I've just taken a look at the project page and as far as I see, upstream is a
bit inconsistent with the name of the source. First version was unhide.tgz,
followed by unhide02112007.tgz while the current version seems to be
unhide20080519.tgz (note the change from day-month-year to year-month-date).
I suggest to follow
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages in
naming your package (i.e. change
Version:20080519
Release:2%{?dist}
to
Version:1.0
Release:2%{?dist}.20080519
thus avoiding problems in the future.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 00:14:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947321 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. dab12f79c6ccc9b92b23733bb29fc234 no_NO-pack2-2.0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472170] Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 00:16:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947323 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7d118aadd4069b4287f309482776a2bd Check-ISA-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=83, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.31 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.36 CPU) + Package perl-Check-ISA-0.04-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(Check::ISA) = 0.04 Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(warnings::register) APRPOVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 00:25:39 EDT --- Everything looks good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947334 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test passes cleanly. Source tarball matches upstream: dd3e9c804cb7f8d6755132d92b26a80a Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001.tar.gz dd3e9c804cb7f8d6755132d92b26a80a Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001.tar.gz.srpm Provides, requires and rpmlint looks sane: = perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rpmlint perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. provides for perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(Catalyst::Component::InstancePerContext) = 0.001001 perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext = 0.001001-1.fc9 requires for perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472724] New: Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Summary: Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The xjparse tool is a simple command-line wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator. It accepts several options, notably one which specifies the set of schemas to be used during validation. I have scratch-built it for fedora 9 with koji on all arch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=947352 This is my first package so I need a sponsorship. More packages are on the way once this happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Brennan Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||472726 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||472335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
