[Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 03:04:35 EDT --- electric-8.07-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/electric-8.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 03:04:38 EDT --- electric-8.07-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/electric-8.07-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 03:28:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-B-Utils Short Description: Helper functions for op tree manipulation Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475065] New: Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Summary: Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/givaro.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.13-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Givaro is a C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations. Its main features are implementations of the basic arithmetic of many mathematical entities: Primes fields, Extensions Fields, Finite Fields, Finite Rings, Polynomials, Algebraic numbers, Arbitrary precision integers and rationals (C++ wrappers over gmp) It also provides data-structures and templated classes for the manipulation of basic algebraic objects, such as vectors, matrices (dense, sparse, structured), univariate polynomials (and therefore recursive multivariate). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 03:53:24 EDT --- Ok. And the Test::More requirement was wrong too (automatically picked up by cpanspec from pod, I guess). New SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc11.src.rpm New spec: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Signature.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 04:27:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-openoffice Short Description: Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 04:58:44 EDT --- Mental note - don't think before drinking coffee. Of course, cpanspec picked up the Test::More requirement from META.YML or Makefile.PL - nothing sinister with pod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Sergio Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Sergio Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 05:17:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gnuplot-py Short Description: Python interface to Gnuplot Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 06:02:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Thanks for doing that. It would be good to add a quick comment to the spec near the License: tag indicating which parts are GPLv2 and which are GPLv2+ so you don't have to look for the COPYRIGHT files. Fixed. I can't quite tell if the svxlink-server package needs a dependency on udev (for /etc/udev/rules.d) or whether the dependency chain includes it. Added udev dependency. I note that the .so files aren't executable. I was under the impression that they needed to be executable for things to work, and my systems don't seem to have any non-executable so files in _libdir. Fixed. Though I can find non-executable files in my _libdir. I guess it all depends on the loading method. Anyway this is seamless thing to do. Any reason for not using the standard user management scriptlet? As it is now, your system fails badly if the svxlink user is defined somewhere other than /etc/passwd (such as on my LDAP server). Check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for more info; it's basically just calling getent. Also, you will need Requries(pre): shadow-utils for that scriptlet. Fixed. new versions: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584
--- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 07:16:57
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Some further comments.
Please fix:
install -D -p -m 755 packages/rpm/mldonkey.sysconfig
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mldonkey
Change 755 to 644.
Done.
BuildRequires: m4
BuildRequires: autoconf
Why does it need these two?
Removed. Another one leftover.
Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function
independently?
Will investigate later. I, personally, don't use gui.
sed -i 's|\r||g' distrib/ed2k_submit/README.MLdonkeySubmit
sed -i 's|\r||g' docs/slavanap.txt
iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 docs/gnutella.txt docs/gnutella.utf8 mv
docs/gnutella.{utf8,txt}
iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 distrib/Authors.txt distrib/Authors.utf8 mv
distrib/Authors.{utf8,txt}
This doesn't preserve original file timestamps. Please use touch -r to do
that.
There are a lot of similar issues in this spec-file. Actually, I don't think
that we need to preserve timestamps in that case, because we do change file
contents.
# menu and pixmaps
install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-16.png -D -m 644
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/mldonkey.png
install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-32.png -D -m 644
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/mldonkey.png
install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-48.png -D -m 644
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/mldonkey.png
I suggest a loop:
for sz in 16 32 48 ; do
install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-${sz}.png -D -m 644
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/${sz}x${sz}/apps/mldonkey.png
done
Doesn't save any line (from 3 similar lines to the same 3, but completely
different :)
%files
...
%{_bindir}/copysources
%{_bindir}/get_range
%{_bindir}/make_torrent
...
%{_bindir}/subconv
%{_bindir}/svg_converter
These filenames seem a little too generic. Are they supposed to be run by the
user? Could you add a ml prefix to them?
Yes. Some of them (exept another one leftover - 'copysources' utility) may be
used even by user. For example, make_torrent can be used even w/o main mldonkey
package. Maybe we should package them in their own sub-packages?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 08:23:19
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Your Source0: URL is not correct. You can use spectool -g to make sure that
your sources are downloadable. I think you want:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wake-on-lan/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
instead.
fixed
Your license tag does not seem to be correct. At least the source files I
looked at are GPLv2+. Where do you see the restriction to GPLv2 only?
You are right, the license is GPLv2+. The headers in the source point to
GPLv2+.
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wol.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wol-0.7.1-2.fc9.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985187
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jens Liebchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||K Desktop Environment 16667 --- Comment #18 from Jens Liebchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 09:40:23 EDT --- The problem may be related to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166673 It is mentioned, that GPG encrypted messages are ignored silently by kopete, if no kopete-cryptography is available. So maybe kopete is not correctly aware of the kopete-cryptography module? That may be a kopete or a kopete-cryptography issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||K Desktop Environment ||166673 External Bug ID|K Desktop Environment 16667 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 09:42:54 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 09:42:50 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 09:43:11 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:16:07 EDT --- Sorry for delay... Seems good, however as I wrote in my comment 10 (and as you wondered) since Clock.java must be removed from source zip file, the zip file must be re-packaged. Please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972
--- Comment #2 from Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:29:49 EDT ---
So first round of issues found during the review
- wrong Group tags are used - check /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS for valid group
names, I suggest to use System Environment/Daemons (nufw, nuauth) , System
Environment/Libraries (client library, pam), Applications/Internet (utils),
Development/Libraries (for -devel), Development/Languages (for the python
bindings)
- drop the %{epoch} from the Provides/Requires/... as it is not defined/used
- preserve timestamps on manually installed files - use cp -p or install -p
- license is GPLv2 only, there is no or any later version clause in the
sources
- license text included in the source archive, but not included in any package
as %doc
- %{_sysconfdir}/nufw/ is owned by multiple packages (nufw, nufw-utils,
nuauth), only one should really own it, other packages get it through the
dependencies
- wrong initscript scriplets and package dependencies
- wrong shared library scriptlets (%postun is missing)
- %defattr(-,root,root,-) should be used
- no need to specify --localstatedir when running %configure, it is set to /var
automatically
- static library and *.la archive are packaged in -devel (use %exclude in
%files or rm in %install)
- including the whole doc directory as %doc is not necessary, grab only the
README.* and the non-manpages (acls, cache_system and debug)
- the included initscript are not compliant with Fedora - LSB header is
missing, service is enabled by default, ...
- the auth and log modules are linked as shared libs (including the version
info), so they install *.so, *.so.0 and *.so.0.0.0 - they should use
-avoid-version in the link command
- don't use /var/... in %file, use %{_localstatedir} instead
- the %description for -utils talks about nutcpc, but it is stored in its own
sub-package
- split the Provides for nuauth to multiple lines
- there is no need for the Obsoletes for nuauth
- the Requires for nuauth are wrong, there are no such packages like
sasl-plug-*, you want probably cyrus-sasl-*
- the pam module contains rpath and the BuildRequire: chrpath is not used
- the library subpackage is usually called foo-libs with headers in foo-devel,
you can Provide: libnuclient for compatibility
- why not to rename the nufw-nuauth-* packages only to nuath-*
Please read the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and linked
pages for details.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #21 from Peter Scheie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:34:43 EDT --- xdg-open arguably may be reliable, but then gnome-open is not. gnome-open tries to open the file in abiword, rather than firefox. Abiword balks saying it can't handle the file. The bottom line is that using xdg-open to launch file the file does not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:38:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) You have Patch0: but call %patch instead of %patch0. rpm these days doesn't permit that. Fixed. You can probably drop the BuildRequires conditional for Fedora 8; new branches for that release aren't accepted any longer so you only have to consider F-9 and newer. Actually, I can't - I plan to submit this package for EPEL as well. If I fix the %patch problem, the package builds and rpmlint says: python-sippy.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides sippy You should essentially never use an unversioned Provides: like that, because it makes it impossible to bring back a package with that name. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages for more information on how to rename packages. Fixed. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-3.20081202cvs.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #47 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:50:50 EDT --- Any news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||org) --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:49:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:51:37 EDT --- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:53:14 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thebridge-1.06-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:52:05 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thebridge-1.06-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475082] New: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Summary: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader-2.12.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/ Description: GuiLoader is a high-performance and compact GuiXml loader library. This library allows GTK+ applications to create GUI widgets and objects at run-time from GuiXml resource files. GuiLoader is written in C language as a GObject subclass and has a trivial language-independent API. GuiLoader was designed to be easily wrapped for any language that has GTK+ bindings. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985300 rpmlint output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint guiloader* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint guiloader* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This Review Request based on an old Review Request. - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206122 As in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 suggested from the original owner of the Review Request of guiloader, this is the new Review Request to bring this into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:57:11 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ssbd-0.10-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:58:18 EDT --- Umm... Sorry for delay... Perhaps I missed the mail from this bug. I will check it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:59:51 EDT --- Would you rebuilt this package for older branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 10:58:14 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ssbd-0.10-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 11:04:34 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 11:05:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 11:02:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 11:09:10 EDT --- Any news from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 11:08:27 EDT --- For F-10/9 please submit push requests on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #16 from Oleg Girko [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 12:00:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function independently? Will investigate later. I, personally, don't use gui. No need to investigate. I use mldonkey-gui separately on my laptop. It doesn't require other mldonkey* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 12:25:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function independently? Will investigate later. I, personally, don't use gui. No need to investigate. I use mldonkey-gui separately on my laptop. It doesn't require other mldonkey* packages. Thanks for info! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 12:33:16 EDT --- Ver. 2.9.6-2 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey-2.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #26 from François Kooman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 12:45:49 EDT --- Yes, I'll look at uploading/pushing them to F9/F10 tomorrow (Monday), I wanted to wait for everything to show up in Rawhide, which it did. Thanks for your assistance and patience with everything! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077
Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 12:48:52 EDT
---
Okay, now for 2.8.1-2:
* Duplicate file entry
---
129 %files
142 %{_datadir}/%{name}/
143 %attr(0755, root, root) %{_datadir}/%{name}/tv_grab_ttx.pl
---
- This causes the warning like
---
276 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/nxtvepg/tv_grab_ttx.pl
---
because the %files entry %{_datadir}/%{name} contains
the directory %_datadir/%name itself and all files/directores/etc
under this directory.
For this package it is better that you explicitly modify
the permission of this script at %install like
---
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
make %{?_smp_mflags} \
.
install
.
.
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/*.pl
---
and remove %attr( tv_grah_ttx.pl line.
Now
- This package itself is okay (but please fix above)
- Now I will sponsor you (if you are still seeking for sponsors)
-
This package (nxtvepg) is APPROVED by mtasaka
-
Please follow the procedure written on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from Get a Fedora Account.
After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor
members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies
that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on
this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and
your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you.
If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/9, you also have
to look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT
(after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system).
If you have questions, please ask me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 13:10:25 EDT --- The latest seems 2.13.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 13:27:01 EDT --- Looks good; thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 13:29:51 EDT --- Thanks; the dependencies look good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 13:41:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) DO you know what it is used for in this program? Can it be removed or renamed? Upstream hasn't decided whether to rename of remove this program. I decided to rename this to tucnak2-soundwrapper meanwhile. Also updated to the latest version. new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2-2.21-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Fabian Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475097] New: Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Summary: Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A simple plug-in to do fourier transform on you image. The major advantage of this plugin is to be able to work with the transformed image inside GIMP. You can so draw or apply filters in fourier space, and get the modified image with an inverse FFT. This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] New: Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Summary: Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-Traits.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-Traits-3.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm The traits package developed by Enthought provides a special type definition called a trait. Although they can be used as normal Python object attributes, traits also have several additional characteristics: * Initialization: A trait can be assigned a default value. * Validation: A trait attribute's type can be explicitly declared. * Delegation: The value of a trait attribute can be contained either in another object. * Notification: Setting the value of a trait attribute can trigger notification of other parts of the program. * Visualization: User interfaces that permit the interactive modification of a trait's value can be automatically constructed using the trait's definition. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #31 from Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:16:29 EDT --- OK, the last flaw is fixed in Spec URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Dec 07 2008 Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.8.1-3 - The script permissions are better handled in the install section (This removes the File listed twice warning during the package build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:19:47 EDT --- Looks good: license note is there, udev dependency is added, so files are executable (and I should check to see if this is really necessary), scriptlets and their dependencies are OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #32 from Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:21:48 EDT --- === Requested sponsorship === FAS account name: trausche -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:22:16 EDT --- Thanks. The license tag is OK now and the Source0: URL is correct. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:29:35 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: svxlink Short Description: Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:51:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: constantine Short Description: Platform Constants for Java Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 15:00:29 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 14:58:02 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 15:08:12 EDT --- I know, but 2.13.0 needs newer libraries than are available for Fedora 9. Requested 'glib-2.0 = 2.18' but version of GLib is 2.16.6 Requested 'gtk+-2.0 = 2.14' but version of GTK+ is 2.12.12 Per example, glib2 in Fedora 10 is 2.19.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 470179 depends on bug 470178, which changed state. Bug 470178 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 15:54:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) * I added necessary BR (and SDL-devel as a temporary solution). * Also correct java-related BR were added. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.3.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 16:04:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: supybot-fedora Short Description: Supybot plugin to interact with Fedora services Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 16:12:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Test-Signature Short Description: Automated SIGNATURE testing Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Uwe Kubosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475107] New: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Summary: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader-c++.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader-c++-2.12.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/ Description: GuiLoader/C++ is a C++ binding to GuiLoader library. It is a convenience layer that simplifies development of GuiLoader based applications written in C++ language by introducing exception safety, binding GTK+ objects defined in GuiXml to C++ variables and type-safe dynamic connection to signals. rpmlint output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint guiloader-c++* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint guiloader-c++* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The old Review Request - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||475107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||475082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 16:51:46 EDT --- I've submitted the builds, and they have all built successfully. Closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475110] New: Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Summary: Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.src.rpm Description: MonkeyStudio is a crossplatform Integrated Development Environment ( IDE ) aiming to become a Rapid Application Development ( RAD ) environment. MonkeyStudio runs everywhere Qt 4.4.0 ( minimum required to build it ) is available as a shared library. It is extensible via a great and powerful plugin system which help make it do nearly anything you want and support virtually any kind of project type for which a plugin exists or is created. The primary goal of MonkeyStudio was to manage Qt4 projects as best as possible, it directly uses .pro files and does not create intrusive or unsightly configuration files. MonkyStudio is also a multi language code editor too ( javascript, xml, ... ). This package builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985783 Rebuild under mock is OK. Rpmlint output : [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ rpmlint monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.src.rpm monkeystudio-debuginfo-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/$Main File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Plugin/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Dll/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Main File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Main/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/C++ Hello World/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Dll/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/XUP Project/$Project Name$.xup monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang
[Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 16:55:56 EDT --- Thanks Jason for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 16:55:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: supybot-koji Short Description: Supybot plugin to intercat with Koji instances Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 17:15:30 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 17:16:38 EDT --- Successfully built and pushed on all platforms. Thanks for the review! :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 17:12:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: wol Short Description: Wake On Lan client Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 17:14:37 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 17:41:36 EDT --- Hmm, not sure what's wrong there. That Makefile is included in python-devel, which is a BR. It builds fine in mock on rawhide for me. I've been trying to do a scratchbuild but Koji seems to be having an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065
--- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:14:04 EDT
---
New URLs:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/givaro.spec
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.13-2.fc9.src.rpm
Fixed a multilibs conflict (%{_includedir}/givaro-config.h).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475116] New: Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Summary: Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/python-ldaphelper.spec SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/python-ldaphelper-1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A simple library that provides a convenience class around search results from python-ldap. NOTE: I'm aware of the discontinuity in licensing between upstream's website, the actual python file, and the COPYRIGHT file. The first two state MIT, the latter states GPLv2+. I have an email out to the author to clarify this, and consider this package blocked until such clarification is received. But please do review the rest of it since no matter which license it ends up being, it's acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:26:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:27:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:30:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:29:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:31:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:35:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:34:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:37:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:38:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:38:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222552 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 19:42:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 20:51:36 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 20:53:39 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 21:17:03 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 21:18:38 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - |k12linux-quick-start-guide |Doc describing how to |- Doc describing how to |enable LTSP on Fedora Live |enable LTSP on Fedora Live |LTSP. |LTSP. Alias|ltsp-server-livesetu| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 22:01:06 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=986525 Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475132] New: Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Summary: Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/usbmon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/usbmon-5.2-1.src.rpm Description: The usbmon program collects and prints a trace of USB transactions as they occur between the USB core and HCDs. Analyzing the trace helps to debug the kernel USB stack, device firmware, and applications. This is the submitter's first package and a sponsor is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
