[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210
--- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2008-12-30 03:02:42
EDT ---
There are still several issues:
SHOULD:
- In dkg's %files, you are inconsistently using %name and dpkg.
Please only use one of them. I recommend to use dpkg, only.
- You are still using %packagename. Please stop it.
- The latin1-utf8 transformation of the man-pages should be performed
in %build.
MUSTFIX:
- There is a circular dependency between the dpkg and dpkg-dev, introduced by
the perl modules (dpkg can not be installed without dpkg-dev).
I see 3 alternatives to work around this issue:
a) package the perl modules as separate package (e.g. perl-Dpkg)
b) move all perl modules into dpkg
c) try to sort out the details of the perl module deps.
I for one would choose alternative a).
b) is almost equivalent to a), while c) is likely difficult to implement,
if possible at all.
- Several directories are unowned, e.g.
/etc/dpkg/origins
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Source
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Shlibs
- Files below %{_mandir} automatically receive %doc
= the %doc inside of your
%lang(xx) %doc %{_mandir} ...
lists are superfluous. Please remove them.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210
--- Comment #27 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2008-12-30 04:01:29
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
MUSTFIX:
- There is a circular dependency between the dpkg and dpkg-dev, introduced by
the perl modules (dpkg can not be installed without dpkg-dev).
I see 3 alternatives to work around this issue:
I missed something: The cause of this issue is you incorrectly
packaging the applications in %{_bindir}/.
Correctly stuffing those applications into dpkg rsp. dpkg-dev, like debian
does, automatically resolves this issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2008-12-30 04:23:40
EDT ---
Some remarks:
- Your patch is superfluous.
Overriding at make-time:
make install bindir=%{_bindir}
has the same effect without hacking the code.
- The Makefile doesn't honor INSTALL
= make INSTALL=install -p
is non-functional
Furthermore:
- I am having strong doubts if installing this tool to %{_bindir} is a good
idea.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478447] New: Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Summary: Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/qtgpsc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/qtgpsc-0.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.navlost.eu/survey/gpsd/ Description: qtGPSc connects to a GPS receiver via gpsd and displays position, speed, and time, as well as various precision indicators and satellite configuration. It can also show the raw GPS data in GPSD or NMEA format. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025837 rpmlint output: [...@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint qtgpsc* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint qtgpsc-0.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-30
05:12:59 EDT ---
Thanks Ralf for your inputs.
(In reply to comment #1)
- Your patch is superfluous.
Overriding at make-time:
make install bindir=%{_bindir}
has the same effect without hacking the code.
It's much smarter. Changed
- The Makefile doesn't honor INSTALL
= make INSTALL=install -p
is non-functional
fixed
Furthermore:
- I am having strong doubts if installing this tool to %{_bindir} is a good
idea.
What location do you have in mind?
Here are the updated files.
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478452] New: Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Summary: Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libxnm.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libxnm-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://xnm.sourceforge.net/ Description: XNM is a simple recursively defined serialization syntax for storing and communicating of complex data structure Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025884 rpmlint output: [...@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libxnm* libxnm.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxnm-1.0.so.0.0.0 e...@glibc_2.0 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint libxnm-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I reported to upstream about the rpmlint warning. But so far I have no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 08:19:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327960) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327960) log of build failure when using Fedora's CFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30
08:18:28 EDT ---
Unfortunately your attempt to override the default CFLAGS fails, in
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1024704name=build.log you
can see the following fragment:
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64
-mtune=generic -I/usr/kerberos/include'
+ DEBUG=
+ make -j4
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o mem.o mem.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o http.o http.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o io.o io.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o str.o str.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o error.o error.c
str.c:22: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strndup'
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o utils.o utils.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o main.o main.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o tcp.o tcp.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o mssl.o mssl.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\1.2.9\ -g-c -o res.o res.c
In file included from http.c:28:
The real fix is to use:
make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS=%{optflags} DEBUG=
Only that in this case the build fails due to something looking like a small
programming error (see the attached log).The presence or absence of
/usr/include/kerberos made no difference in my local build and I do not have
right now the time to dig further.
I also suggest to contact the author and ask for a clarification of the
license. Strictly speaking, everywhere in the source files he speaks about what
we call GPL+, only the reference on his website is GPLv2.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2008-12-30 09:05:51 EDT --- Who says it can't already be in the process of being reviewed? Just mention that it's practice and not binding. Pick something you feel somewhat confident in, maybe in a language you have some experience with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #16 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2008-12-30 09:44:17 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm We're finally getting there! # rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.13 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(/home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot INFO: enabled root cache INFO: root cache aged out! cache will be rebuilt INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: creating cache State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(/home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(default) 10 minutes 21 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-i386/result I think the time has arrived to find a sponsor for this project. Best wishes and a fruitful open source 2009 !! Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 09:55:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327965) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327965) disables the usage of the bundled strndup and teaches Makefile to use install with the new spec and the attached patch, everything seems fine. let me know if you are comfortable with the modifications that I suggest and I will do a full review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 09:54:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327964) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327964) new spec, fixes all issues that I am aware of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2008-12-30 11:52:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-30 12:39:02 EDT --- ok. Happy for any input on the 444 vs 644 issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #4 from Victor G. Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 2008-12-30 13:21:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Adel, thanks for review. The next release is prepared. Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform-6.5-3.fc11.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026772 Changes and comments: - [1] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. Do we really need the Distrubution tag? AFAIK nothing in Fedora makes use of it. Package groups are handled via comps. I absolutely agree. It is my fault. - The Distrubution tag is deleted Changelog: Please remove the 6.1 references because they are not really related to this package.(changelog entries from the former platform8 package) - The 6.1 references are removed from the changelog [3] final provides and requires are sane. OK. No any changes. [3] scriptlets are sane rpm -qp netbeans-platform-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides libnb-platform9 = 6.5 netbeans-platform = 6.5-2.fc11 rpm -qp netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides libnb-platform9-devel = 6.5 netbeans-platform-harness = 6.5-2.fc11 Any reason why they are called libnb-platform9 and libnb-platform9-devel ? Those should be renamed to libnb-plaform/-devel (other packages can use the version to require it). An idea was to support a relation between packages across various Linux distributions. I agree it has not much sense for the Fedora packages. So, to make the package spec more clear for Fedora I've removed it at all. - Specifications of providing non-Fedora packages are removed [2] rpmlint is silent. Its not see comments above. The only thing that can/should be fixed are the W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm warnings, see [4] ... [4] Whats the purpose of the noautoupdate scriptlets? Wouldn't it be better to just package those files (generate them in %install section and add entries in %files). This way rpm will handle the deletion/creation of this files and there would be no need for the scriptlets. By default all the NetBeans packages rely on the RPM facilities to complete updating. Nevertheless, the NetBeans has own update subsystem called as update center. A .noautoupdate file disables auto update of a NetBeans cluster via update center. An idea to create/delete the .noautoupdate files in %post/%preun scriptlets is giving a chance for a user with the root rights to choose an alternative way for updating of the NetBeans clusters. It may be reached if the user will use the RPM option --noscripts for installation of a package (i.e. cluster). Note, this feature won't be used by default. If you agree to save this feature of the netbeans-platform package then I won't change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #1 from Jose Luis joseluisblan...@gmail.com 2008-12-30 13:29:07 EDT --- This is my first package, so I'm seeking a sponsor. Any feedback will be appreciated! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] New: Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Summary: Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joseluisblan...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.5svn714-1.src.rpm Description: The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) is an extensive, cross-platform, and open source C++ library aimed to help robotics researchers to design and implement algorithms in the fields of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), computer vision, and motion planning (obstacle avoidance). The libraries include classes for easily managing 3D(6D) geometry, probability density functions (pdfs) over many predefined variables (points and poses, landmarks, maps), Bayesian inference (Kalman filters, particle filters), image processing, path planning and obstacle avoidance, 3D visualization of all kind of maps (points, occupancy grids, landmarks,...), etc. Gathering, manipulating and inspecting very large robotic datasets (Rawlogs) efficiently is another goal of MRPT, supported by several classes and applications. The MRPT is free software and is released under the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Jose Luis joseluisblan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #8 from Nicoleau Fabien nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com 2008-12-30 14:59:48 EDT --- Update for new release (1.8.3.0) : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm I'll open a specific bug for the -spec option needed. Builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026840 Rpmlint output : [buil...@fedobox SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/monkeystudio-debuginfo-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Plugin/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Gui/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Dll/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Main File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Main/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/QWidget Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Console/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/C++ Hello World/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/Qt Form/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Dll/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/XUP Project/$Project Name$.xup monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Gui/$Project Name$.xphpqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Project Name$.pro
[Bug 478316] Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30
15:07:59 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM:
farsight2.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 15)
= not a big deal, but would be nice to have this fixed before commit
binary RPM:
farsight2-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
= not a problem, docs are in -devel
farsight2-devel: empty
farsight2:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:LGPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: a031937091ab40be75d8a154f01de081c9fc8615
farsight2-0.0.6.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if
present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[?] Package functions as described.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[x] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Issues ===
1. cosmetic problems with the source rpm:
- Duplicate BuildRequires: glib2-devel (by gstreamer-devel)
- farsight2.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 15)
2. adding INSTALL=install -p to the make install line will preserve the
timestamps of the docs; I've verified that in a local mock build, you get for
instance:
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2320 Dec 12 00:35
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/pt02.html
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 472 Dec 12 00:35
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/right.png
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2331 Dec 12 00:35
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/style.css
-rw-r--r--1
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 15:34:16 EDT --- Source 0 is not available (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rear/rear-1.7.11.tar.gz). According to http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835 the latest stable version is 1.6 and the latest devel is 1.7.9. Time to update the SF page (and maybe freshmeat, too) ? Source RPM: rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 = please chmod 644 the file before doing rpmbuild -bs The following directories are left unowned: /etc/rear/ /etc/rear/templates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 15:37:59 EDT --- Uhm, I see that both /bin/sh and /bin/bash are needed: [wo...@wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires rear-1.7.11-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /bin/bash /bin/sh binutils config(rear) = 1.7.11-1.fc11 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 It's a bit unusual, since /bin/bash is a superset of /bin/sh. Is it really intended to bring in botth or you have just not been constant in using either one or the other in the scripts that you have packaged ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Bug 457219 depends on bug 450227, which changed state. Bug 450227 Summary: Updated Twisted packages please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450227 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210
--- Comment #28 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2008-12-30
15:47:31 EDT ---
Spec: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg.spec
SRPM: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg-1.14.23-3.fc10.src.rpm
- Several directories are unowned, e.g.
/etc/dpkg/origins
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Source
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Shlibs
dpkg does own these files
%dir %{_sysconfdir}/dpkg
%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Dpkg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #21 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net 2008-12-30 15:52:39 EDT --- Michel : Could you please check the latest package and resume the review? Now that web2 has been approved, the new plugins packages should be able to go in easily. http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-good/elisa-plugins-good.spec http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-good/elisa-plugins-good-0.5.22-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net 2008-12-30 15:56:04 EDT --- All requirements are now in devel (python-twisted-web2 has not been rebuilt yet, but it will be as soon as its CVS request is taken care of), so the review can be picked up by anyone wanting to see elisa get into at least devel, and hopefully backported to stable Fedora : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-bad/elisa-plugins-bad.spec http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-bad/elisa-plugins-bad-0.5.22-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478316] Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316 Brian Pepple bdpep...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple bdpep...@gmail.com 2008-12-30 17:34:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: farsight2 Short Description: Libraries for videoconferencing Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2008-12-30 17:46:39 EDT --- BTW we already have http_ping [0] in Fedora which seems very similar - I don't think that's a problem but I thought I'd mention it in case someone wants to compare features. And http_ping's maintainership is up for grabs in any case if someone wants it... [0] http://www.acme.com/software/http_ping/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 17:54:29 EDT --- You must add awk and screen as Requires, rpmbuild does not pick them and without them screenie bails out. sort is also a required program, but it is provided by coreutils and I guess it's safe enough to assume that coreutils is installed on any system where screenie would be used Everything else seems fine, package is too simple (it's just a shell script) to include a full review. - RPM name is OK - rpmlint is empty - license is OK (GPLv2+) - source screenie_1.30.0.orig.tar.gz is the same as upstream 1f04b055c30f5f8e4f35160bf50cfa060472a61a screenie_1.30.0.orig.tar.gz - builds fine in mock (devel/x86_64)) and being a simple shell script it's safe to assume it will work on any arch - file list is OK, even timestamps are preserved - works OK (when awk and screen are installed!) == Package APPROVED but please add manual requires for awk and screen == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 18:14:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327981) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327981) failed build log when using the spec file from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327687 I've given a try with the new spec. On PPC it fails due to some missing BR: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1027119name=root.log On my local system, mock build for devel/x86_64 failed as in the attached log. as a sidenote, the presence of the po directory make me think that gettext is also a BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:40:56 EDT --- stun-0.96-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:42:05 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10, perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10, perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:42:40 EDT --- gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:45:01 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:41:59 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10, perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10, perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:42:02 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10, perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10, perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:44:22 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fswebcam'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:43:04 EDT --- stun-0.96-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:46:33 EDT --- gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:42:50 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:43:33 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:44:00 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:43:28 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update phatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11859 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:42:37 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update fswebcam'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11852 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:47:08 EDT --- trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update trac-privateticketsplugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11881 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:47:20 EDT --- wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:50:03 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:50:18 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update phatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:51:36 EDT --- mitter-0.4.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:48:17 EDT --- trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update trac-privateticketsplugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:47:47 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yersinia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11889 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30
18:48:26 EDT ---
BuildRoot ( %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root ) is not one of the values accepted in the
packaging guidelines.
License seems to be GPLv2+ (not GPLv2) and the file COPYING should be included
in %docs. I suggest to also add AUTHORS.
Source0 should be
http://xdelta.googlecode.com/files/xdelta-1.1.4.tar.gz
Latest version is xdelta3.0u
(http://xdelta.googlecode.com/files/xdelta3.0u.tar.gz), I had to dig below
deprecated to locate the source0 URL for 1.1.4.
Current URL is http://xdelta.org/.
There are duplicate BRs: pkgconfig (by glib2-devel), automake (by libtool),
autoconf (by libtool). however this is mostly cosmetic .
rpmlint is unhappy, most notably is the rpath signaled in the binary rpm:
Source RPM:
xdelta.src:223: W: macro-in-%changelog doc
xdelta.src:225: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr
xdelta.src:235: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr
xdelta.src:240: W: macro-in-%changelog setup
xdelta.src:250: W: macro-in-%changelog doc
xdelta.src:251: W: macro-in-%changelog post
xdelta.src:254: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr
xdelta.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A binary file delta generator and an RCS
replacement library.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
rpmlint of xdelta-debuginfo:
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/generic.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/getopt.h
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/sha.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdeltapriv.h
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/md5c.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/library.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/simple.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio_edsio.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio_edsio.h
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/default.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdmain.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/partime.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/base64.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/partime.h
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio.h
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdapply.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/maketime.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/fh.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xd_edsio.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdelta.c
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdelta.h
xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xd_edsio.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings.
rpmlint of xdelta:
xdelta.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/xdelta-1.1.4/xdelta.magic
xdelta.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xdelta-1.1.4/NEWS
xdelta.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xdelta-1.1.4/README
xdelta.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A binary file delta generator and an
RCS replacement library.
xdelta.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/xdelta ['/usr/lib64']
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
rpmlint of xdelta-devel:
xdelta-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xdelta-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Static library and header files
for Xdelta development.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
I also notice that the devel package includes two static libs
(/usr/lib64/libedsio.a, /usr/lib64/libxdelta.a). If including them is
[Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:49:11 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:52:24 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:50:26 EDT --- remoot-0.9-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:49:03 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:52:12 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:51:24 EDT --- mitter-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:51:42 EDT --- remoot-0.9-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:54:08 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:54:50 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:55:40 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:53:12 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update yersinia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:53:45 EDT --- glog-0.1.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-30 18:53:21 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #327984|application/text|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #327984|application/octet-stream|application/text mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 20:08:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327984) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327984) fixed spec, silences rpmlint (modulo xdelta-devel: W: no-documentation ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #327984|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 20:13:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327985) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327985) fixed my mail address in changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #15 from Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com 2008-12-30 20:47:16 EDT --- Why did 444 happen? It seems completely unimportant? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #10 from Philip Heron p...@sanslogic.co.uk 2008-12-30 20:58:11 EDT --- I've tested the x86_64 and ppc packages, both work as expected. I'm getting a 500 Internal error on the fedoraproject.org site when I try to submit feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475055] Review Request: gfan - Software for Compu ting Gröbner Fans and Tropical Varieties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-30 21:38:22 EDT --- Fixed; see: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gfan.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gfan-0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. However, LICENSE only says this: The manual for Gfan is NOT distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. The manual may be freely redistributed but is not allowed to be changed. The manual may be removed from the software package. Does that violate Fedora guidelines? I don't think so. (But I have removed doc/ from the srpm as per your advice anyways.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478502] New: Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478502 Summary: Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmac...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xdotool.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xdotool-20080720-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: xdotool lets you programatically (or manually) simulate keyboard input and mouse activity, move and resize windows, etc. It does this using X11's XTEST extension and other Xlib functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445455] Review Request: xdotool - Fake keyboard/mouse input
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445455 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lmac...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-30 23:00:26 EDT --- *** Bug 478502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478502] Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478502 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||panem...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-30 23:00:26 EDT --- already in Fedora. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6258 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 445455 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] New: Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Summary: Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anthonybr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1296899 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GGet is a Download Manager for the GNOME desktop, developed during Google Summer of Code 2008. http://live.gnome.org/GGet This, along with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 are my first packages and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Ant Bryan anthonybr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478506] New: Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Summary: Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstan...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-customfieldsadminplugin.spec SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin-0.1-0.1.svn5073.el5.src.rpm Description: Trac plugin to expose custom fields via web admin interface rather than directly editing trac.ini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476623] Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-31 00:00:57 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 --- Comment #6 from Jeremy Hinegardner jer...@hinegardner.org 2008-12-31 00:27:01 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: beanstalkd New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jjh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Jeremy Hinegardner jer...@hinegardner.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-31 00:31:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026687 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ef6155cc8a9723e0e9614508aa1c592d Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=18, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.50 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.56 CPU) + Package perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.04-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(Directory::Scratch::Structured) = 0.04 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Directory::Scratch) perl(English) perl(Readonly) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Install) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:46:13 EDT --- Does this really need a OLPC-2 and OLPC-3 branch? Is OLPC-2 accepting new builds? And is this package going to be different in the OLPC-3 branch from F-9 (which OLPC uses unless there are differences). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:46:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:48:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:50:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:51:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #45 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:54:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-31 00:57:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Jeremy Hinegardner jer...@hinegardner.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Jeremy Hinegardner jer...@hinegardner.org 2008-12-31 00:58:17 EDT --- builds and updates submitted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
