[Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-02-11 03:06:42
EDT ---
Now the package
Provides:homestead = 0.95-1
Obsoletes: homestead 0.95-1
but the current version in F10 is homestead-0.95-1, which won't be obsoleted.
Change this to
Provides:homestead = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: homestead %{version}-%{release}
or just remove the versioning from Provides Obsoletes?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 04:46:38 EDT --- Imported into CVS but not built yet because of dependencies on mingw32-pango, mingw32-jasper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 04:46:40 EDT --- Imported into CVS but not built yet because of dependencies on mingw32-gtk2 and mingw32-gnutls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-11
05:04:59 EDT ---
Quote from a testrun on F10, after I have installed like this:
yum -y install --nogpgcheck ./reviewtool-0.04-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
./perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
[r...@pc64 ~]# reviewtool setup
Could not load class (MooseX::App::Cmd) because : Can't locate
MooseX/App/Cmd.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin/../lib
/usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line
151.
at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line
133
Class::MOP::load_first_existing_class('MooseX::App::Cmd') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line 157
Class::MOP::load_class('MooseX::App::Cmd') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose.pm line 52
Moose::extends('Fedora::App::ReviewTool', 'MooseX::App::Cmd') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Exporter.pm line 201
Moose::extends('MooseX::App::Cmd') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm line 34
require Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm called at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 30
main::BEGIN() called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm line 0
eval {...} called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm line 0
Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 30.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 30.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 05:13:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331546) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331546) Just a test, please ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451582] Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(smparr...@shallow ||creek.net) --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-02-11 05:29:10 EDT --- [just setting NEEDINFO so the status becomes clear in the review queue] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-02-11 05:26:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-pgsql_perl5 Short Description: Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 05:35:01 EDT --- *** Bug 483390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |DUPLICATE --- Comment #16 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 05:35:01 EDT --- Marking as DUPLICATE rather then CLOSED RAWHIDE to better track that this BZ is indeed duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 461736 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #17 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 05:49:43 EDT --- I contacted upstream author to clarify this doubts and if possible release new version with LICENSE file. If possible track further discussion under BZ 461736. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|483205 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|483543 |177841 --- Comment #27 from Anithra anit...@linux.vnet.ibm.com 2009-02-11 05:54:31 EDT --- Thanks Andrew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 06:02:30 EDT --- that mean spec need Requires: perl (MooseX::App::Cmd) Even after adding that command failed need Requires: perl (RPC::XML::Client) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803
--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 06:12:58
EDT ---
you should have
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools
like we have in rpmdevtools
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-02-11
06:22:46 EDT ---
I'd like to see some fixes prior to further reviewing. It's not trivial to
review the current packaging:
BuildRequires: cmake = 2.4 libxml2-devel = 2.2.16 icu = 2.6 libicu-devel
It's highly recommended to put on BuildRequires per line and either sort them
alphabetically or group them appropriately.
icu is 2.6 for several years. Even in RHEL 5.
Please reconsider the decision to list the versions. Often packagers forget to
keep them up-to-date.
sh: ruby: command not found
BuildRequires: ruby is missing.
-- Warning: GNU Bison not available -- the parser will not be regenerated
-- Warning: GNU Flex not available -- the lexer will not be regenerated
-- PHP5 binding not generated because library and include file not installed.
-- Looking for doxygen... - NOT found
Just quoted for completeness.
-- Can't build Zorba with TIDY support because TIDY is not found.
BuildRequires: libtidy-devel makes it happy. If you don't want that, adding a
comment would be good.
-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.5
-- Could NOT find PythonLibs (missing: PYTHON_LIBRARIES PYTHON_INCLUDE_PATH)
-- Python binding not generated because library and include file not
installed.
BuildRequires: python-devel is missing.
%description devel
The %{name}-devel package contains headers for building applications
that use %{zorba}.
%{zorba} is undefined.
cmake
There are guidelines for proper cmake usage:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake
In particular, execute make VERBOSE=1 ... for increased verbosity in the
build log.
Then you will find that Fedora's global optimisation flags are not used. This
needs another look after the cmake related fixes.
%files
%{_libdir}/*.so.%{version}
This means that any version upgrade will break ABI compatibility with any
programs linked against this library. That's an indication of an unstable API,
ongoing heavy development, or developers who haven't got the versioning scheme
right.
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}
%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}
The %dir statement here is superfluous, because the second line already
includes the %name-%version directory and all its contents recursively. You're
advised to make them more explicit with a trailing slash. Like this:
%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/
%files devel
Here several directories are not included.
In particular:
%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}
%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name}
%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name}/util
%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/simplestore
%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/simplestore/msdom
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python/examples
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python/html
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby/examples
%dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby/html
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
You could shrink your %files list much by including entire trees recursively or
by increased usage of '*' wildcards where appropriate. Else the only option is
to add as many of the missing %dir statements as necessary.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com 2009-02-11 06:34:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) xx - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime + python_wifi.egg-info/SOURCES.txt contains docs/*, examples/* and tests/*. I do not know enough about Python Eggs to say whether that is a problem or not. Got to find out. According to http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EggFormats#sources-txt-source-files-manifest: In other words, SOURCES.txt has little or no runtime value for being included in distributed eggs... So I would say that this not a problem for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-02-11 06:44:16 EDT --- Just a comment, not a review: In your %files sections, you're advised to mark recursively included paths with a trailing slash. That makes it trivial to distinguish files and directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||berra...@redhat.com Alias||mingw32-crossreport -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485052] New: Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/crossreport SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-crossreport-1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows CrossReport is a tool to help you analyze the APIs used by a compiled Linux program, in order to work out the effort required to cross-compile that program for Windows, using the Fedora MinGW cross-compiler. The simplest way to use it is to point it at an existing Linux binary, and then read the generated report. What it does in more detail: It looks at the libraries and API calls used by the Linux binary, and compares them to the libraries and API calls that we currently support under the Fedora MinGW cross-compiler. It then works out what is missing, and produces a report suggesting the amount of work that needs to be done to port the program. For example, whether whole libraries need to be ported first, and/or how to substitute individual calls to work on Windows. Some example reports can be found here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-February/000457.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052
Levente Farkas lfar...@lfarkas.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lfar...@lfarkas.org
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lfar...@lfarkas.org
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas lfar...@lfarkas.org 2009-02-11 07:22:40
EDT ---
imho a version number 1.0 is better then 1, since it's very strange looking...
anyway the same apply to filesystem too:-(
rpmlint mingw32-crossreport-1-1.fc10.src.rpm
mingw32-crossreport.src: W: strange-permission crossreport.pl 0775
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
mode 0755 would be better here.
koji build ok:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1119335
+ OK
- Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
* Overridden by MinGW guidelines
[+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[/] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
[/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
[/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
[/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[/] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %i install for
details.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream,
[Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-02-11 07:29:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: html2text Short Description: HTML-to-text converter Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rjo...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 07:36:23 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 07:36:36 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rjo...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 07:56:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - source files match different upstream url d2f1934833c247b50088fd7999efee04 DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=77, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.34 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901-1.fc11- Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Excel) = 0.2901 Requires: perl = 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) = 0.1705 perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestion: 1) fix source url to http://cpan.perl.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 08:04:03 EDT --- gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/vm-applet.schemas gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvirt gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/vm_applet_wrapper gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/vm_applet_wrapper gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 08:04:05 EDT --- libvirt.src:143: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes libvir libvirt.src:160: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes libvir-devel libvirt.src:171: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes libvir-python libvirt.src:534: W: macro-in-%changelog fedora libvirt.src:719: W: macro-in-%changelog dist libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/images 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/libvirt 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/uml 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/lxc 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt/qemu 0700 libvirt.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libvirt-0.6.0/NEWS libvirt.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/iptables/filter 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/boot 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/network 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/libvirt/qemu 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/autostart 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/iptables/nat 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/iptables 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 libvirt.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libvir libvirt.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln libvirt.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig libvirt.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/libvirtd libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domstart.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/index.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domrestore.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domsave.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/dominfo.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libvir-devel libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/index.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/dominfo.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domrestore.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domsave.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domstart.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/dominfo.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/NEWS libvirt-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/libvirt.py 0644 libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domsave.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/error.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/uuid.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/basic.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domstart.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/node.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domrestore.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/create.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libvir-python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/basic.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/create.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/error.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/node.py
[Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 08:08:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-crossreport Short Description: Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 08:49:32 EDT --- Builded in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de 2009-02-11 09:42:43 EDT --- Ping? Brennan, are you still interested in maintaining this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 09:46:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) Jaroslav Just in case you missed this. Looks like Rex has given his OK. So then it's OK for me too. If you are willing to maintain it this patch or better should be ask upstream about flags issue. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #3 from Karel Zak k...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 09:56:25 EDT --- Frankly, I want to orphan this package... it means that we need upstream maintainer too. I have already asked on many places, but without any result ;-( Daniel, any idea? Maybe someone around virtualization in RH... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-11 10:04:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT Short Description: Reduce one's dependency on NEXT Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-11 10:04:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel Short Description: Convert between DateTime and Excel dates Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-11 10:05:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331571) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331571) Fix build error with g++44 (In reply to comment #14) Created an attachment (id=331461) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331461) [details] build.log of mock rebuild, on 'fedora-devel-i386' I ain't sure if my F10 compiler has anything effects on this, but mock has following compilation error: utils.cpp:95: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' (In reply to comment #16) gcc-4.4.0 is developing and is not released official by FSF. There are maybe some bugs that need to be fixed. I just watched these comments on fedora-package-review mailing list, so I have not checked the srpm of this package at all. However I guess this is a bug in source code, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg02248.html A suggestion patch attached (only tested on i386, note that I just checked if the compilation passes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #46 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2009-02-11 10:07:43 EDT --- SPEC: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US.spec SRPM: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US-1.0-12.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 10:40:32 EDT --- Good news -- looks like there's a newer version of ElementTreePanel included in the java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo package inside /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/demo/jfc/Notepad/src.zip. According to the fedora-devel-java mailing list (same thread as before), you should just be able to delete the included version and copy this one in instead. The license will have to become something like GPLv2+ and BSD (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 11:42:41 EDT --- kzak: If you want, orphan this I will take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #32 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-11 11:54:30 EDT --- Thanks for that... I really do not know what I need to ask regarding the patch. Regarding maintaining it, like I indicated, I am not a programmer. Will kompare handle the creation of patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-11 12:12:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1119899 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-11 12:12:21 EDT --- RPM doesn't yet pick up Moose syntax, sadly :\ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 12:23:11 EDT --- I've posted a patch upstream[1] which reduces the number of rpmlint problems. Now we are left with: libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/images 0700 (for various directories) I think rpmlint is wrong about these errors. The permissions on these directories is intended to be 0700. libvirt.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd Rpmlint's complaint is the logrotate file should have the same name as the package. In this case it has the same name as the daemon, which seems acceptable to me. libvirt.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln It's a fair warning, but in this case the use of 'ln' in %post is justified. libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domstart.py (and various other *.py files) For the examples, this seems OK, since people may wish to run the examples directly. For the python libraries, there is a mix of +x/-x permissions, and I don't know what is correct. libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/index.py /usr/bin/python (etc) This seems OK to me. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-February/msg00211.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 12:30:52
EDT ---
+ rpmlint output
See above. Depends on the patch being acceptable upstream.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
I changed: Requires: libvirt = %{version}-%{release}
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
+ review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 12:39:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331595) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331595) Proposed patch to gnome-applet-vm.spec With the attached patch, we are left with this single rpmlint warning: gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/vm-applet.schemas I think this is one we can ignore, since this looks like the place where gconf expects these schemata to be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 12:51:33
EDT ---
+ rpmlint output
See comment 5.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
GPL+ is an acceptable license, and was set by spot, so
assume this is correct.
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
+ ExcludeArch bugs filed
Originally had ExclusiveArch i386, x86-64, but should build
everywhere so I removed this.
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
Package called ldconfig, but contains no libraries, so I
removed that.
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
Originally tried to own /usr/share/pixmaps, but I fixed that.
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
I think this is not applicable because although this is a GUI
app, it is a Gnome panel plugin so doesn't need a desktop file.
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
+ if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #331595|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 12:52:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331596) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331596) Proposed patch to gnome-applet-vm.spec Updated specfile patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(crobi...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 12:53:56 EDT --- Cole, can you take a quick look at the proposed changes to the specfile in comment 7, and if you approve, say yea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-11 13:13:48 EDT --- ( Sorry it may take a little more time for me to check your latest srpm. But I will review your latest srpm by Sunday ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org 2009-02-11 13:23:22 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: htmldoc New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: agoode pertusus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #33 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 13:22:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) Thanks for that... I really do not know what I need to ask regarding the patch. Regarding maintaining it, like I indicated, I am not a programmer. Will kompare handle the creation of patches. Ask them to replace flags with country codes or let user choose. The patch is really easy, so you don't have to be programmer to take care about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #34 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 13:40:37 EDT --- And of course I can help you as comaintainer - just add me to CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Bug 484598 depends on bug 484597, which changed state. Bug 484597 Summary: Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-02-11 13:38:35 EDT --- Imported, built and and pending in bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ru...@rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #6 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-02-11 13:44:24 EDT --- *** Bug 462505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462505] Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462505 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-02-11 13:44:24 EDT --- Hi Ruben, sorry, I did a mistake here, I need python-argparse for grin ( #484598 ) and did a review request without searching bugzilla. Now the package is approved and imported. If you want I can transfer the package to you, if not I will maintain it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484597 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|b...@serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||b...@serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #7 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-02-11 14:08:56 EDT --- I tried building the above SRPM on F10 using the following packages: ghc-6.10.1-8.fc11.i386 ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-5.fc11.i386 ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.i386 The build failed per the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #8 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-02-11 14:09:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331608) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331608) Log of failed build attempt Failed build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(rkhad...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-02-11 14:19:05 EDT --- It's been many months since the last comment from the submitter of this ticket; I will close this out in a week if progress isn't made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #35 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-11 14:38:57 EDT --- OK. What I'm going to ask is that the developer add a flag for cmake so that a package maintainer can throw the --without-countryflags. equivalent in cmake. Do you concur? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 Summary|Clanship 1.0.5f rpm |Review Request: clanship - ||Battleship clone --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-02-11 14:37:14 EDT --- I believe Battleship is a registered mark belonging to Hasbro. TESS shows several marks; I am not really sure if any of them relate to generic, unstylized usage involving board games, since the game has existed long before it was published in any commercial form. Blocking FE-Legal for an opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Eli Wapniarski e...@orbsky.homelinux.org 2009-02-11 14:44:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kde-plasma-translatoid Short Description: Translator plasmoid using Google Translator Owners: eliwap jreznik Branches: f-9 f-10 InitialCC: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(crobi...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 14:49:27 EDT --- All the changes look good. What is the remaining process here? Do I need to apply the patch for all supported branches or is rawhide sufficient? Can the bug be closed after the patch is applied? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #19 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 14:53:33 EDT --- Thank you Mamoru Tasaka Kaio and Mamoru Tasaka I have built a SPRM with iptux-0.4.4-g++44.patch. Here is the URL: SPEC file:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux.spec SRPM：http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.4-2.fc10.src.rpm To Mamoru Tasaka May I add your e-mail address into CC list? If you don't want, I will remove your e-mail address in CC list. Could you do the primary review for me? I hope iptux can be put into Fedora repository to help more people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462505] Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462505 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2009-02-11 15:51:40 EDT --- Hi Terje, No problem, you can keep it ;-) I needed it for allmydata-tahoe, but it's one of the many dependencies needed, so thanks for getting this one in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-02-11
15:47:28 EDT ---
Spec URL:
http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp-1.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #1)
A few minor things:
- please set the fedora-review flag to ?
- change the Requires: on java to be = (or maybe '='?) 1.5.0
Fixed.
- I prefer to add a short name after dropins:
%files
%{eclipse_dropin} = %{eclipse_dropin}/dtp
Fixed.
- please add a comment above the sed line getting rid of the sun.misc.Compare
Fixed.
- should we add some comment(s) stating why we're only building the features
we
are?
Fixed.
And the rest of the review (lines beginning with X need attention; those
beginning with * are okay):
X verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs
- other than the java one, things look good
Fixed.
X make sure lines are = 80 characters
- could you add some line continuations to fix this?
Fixed wherever possible some paths are just too long.
X package successfully compiles and builds
- is this expected?
[javac] 4. ERROR in
/home/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/dtp-1.6.1/build/plugins/org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.design/src/org/eclipse/datatools/connectivity/oda/design/impl/InputElementUIHintsImpl.java
[javac] (at line 112)
[javac] assert (eContainer() instanceof InputElementAttributes);
[javac] ^^
[javac] The method assert(boolean) is undefined for the type
InputElementUIHintsImpl
Fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #10 from Jon Levell fed...@coralbark.net 2009-02-11 15:54:38 EDT --- Another update: Spec URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse.spec SRPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10.noarch.rpm I've addressed the points from comment #9. I can see that I was very naive when I initially submitted the spec file on the grounds that it seemed to work fine on the systems I installed it on. Thanks Michael (and everyone else) for the helpful comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-11
16:10:19 EDT ---
Ok, some feedback (awesome work BTW)
1. minor: since consensus seems to be that multiple directory ownership is ok
in some conditions, %_font_pkg now does it automatically, so you don't need the
%dir %{_fontdir} in common anymore (though it's probably harmless). Will need
to update the wiki templates to reflect this
2. it does not build in mock, but does build in koji, so your package is
probably fine and that's a mock bug (bug #485146)
3. major: the font files declare font family names like BPG Courier S
GPLGNU. Since fontconfig works with whatever the font files declare, you need
to use those names in your fontconfig files in you want them to work (how to
pass the safely is an interesting problem to discuss with Behdad)
4. I'd have used a fontconfig priority of 63-64 to make sure the latin glyphs
in those fonts do not override the ones in more mainstream fonts
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931
Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de
--- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-02-11
16:20:17 EDT ---
I think, you should wrote
Provides:homestead = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: homestead 0.95-1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931
--- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-11
16:29:30 EDT ---
-
Provides:homestead = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: homestead 0.95-1
-
Perhaps THIS way?! This looks correct and make sense (to me)!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-02-11 16:41:20 EDT --- Review will be done tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pala...@gmx.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-11
16:45:18 EDT ---
1. This bit is not strictly necessary
# Repeat for every font family -- Sans Mono
2. This one isn't either now that multiple ownership of font dirs was approved;
%_font_pkg will now auto-own this dir
%dir %{_fontdir}
3. having upstream publish an official sfd version and build from it would be
preferred (not a blocker)
4. You need to add a
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} to the main package or
it won't pull common in (and it's necessary for fontconfig-filesystem)
The last one is the only real problem and it's a minor one
✎✎✎ APPROVED ✎✎✎
Please do not forget to fix those little problems, and continue from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485154] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allis...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MooseX::Role::Cmd is a Moose role intended to ease the task of building command-line wrapper modules. It automatically maps Moose objects into command strings which are passed to IPC::Cmd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 17:10:44 EDT --- Thanks for the updates. The only thing I'd like to see is a comment at the beginning of the specfile stating which features we're building and which ones we're not and reasons for that. Please add that, but since it's not a huge issue, I'll approve this now. I've started a wiki page that we can use to track features/plugins we'd like and their dependencies. We can add bug links to the wiki page as we file bugs. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse#Plug-ins_We.27d_Like_To_Ship -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485159] New: Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Summary: Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: c...@plauener.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki.spec SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki-0.9.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Anki is a program designed to help you remember facts (such as words and phrases in a foreign language) as easily, quickly and efficiently as possible. Anki is based on a theory called spaced repetition. This is my first package and so I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #5 from Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com 2009-02-11 17:57:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Hmm okay. I can see how to fix that. I clearly need to read the rpmbuild output more clearly. Fixed, new scratch build here: https://koji.fedoraproject.or/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120493 new SRPM and SPEC file at: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libbsr/ rpmlint is still clear: [t...@mango fedora]$ rpmlint -vi SRPMS/libbsr*3.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/ppc64/libbsr*3.fc10.ppc64.rpm SPECS/libbsr.spec libbsr.src: I: checking libbsr.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-debuginfo.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-devel.ppc64: I: checking 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d ||e --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-02-11 18:37:56 EDT --- Orcan, it would be useful, if you would accept input from packagers, even if you don't like them e.g. on personal base or caused by their input. From my point of view of being a provenpackager (ueberpackager), comment #2 is is useful and should be followed (the Epoch thing can be discussed maybe). With respect to all what happened unil now: Valid input needs to be taken, handled and/or discussed. If such things are refused without a valid reason, rejecting a package review request seems to be pretty okay for me. Packaging is not that easy as it maybe seems or some people want to have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485164] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485164 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-XML-Generator.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-XML-Generator-1.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perl module for generating XML by calling methods named for each XML tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Ian Burrell ianburr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ian Burrell ianburr...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 19:55:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-KinoSearch Short Description: Search engine library Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||cabal-install Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-11 20:39:31 EDT --- The .spec file in comment 6 does not use %cabal_build: you trying another older package perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org 2009-02-11 20:54:24 EDT --- Package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@flyn.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 --- Comment #4 from W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org 2009-02-11 20:57:35 EDT --- rpmlint asterisk-sounds-core.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 21:08:45 EDT --- Dear Robert, I would like you to analyze the progression of this situation rather than looking at it as a whole. Please go ahead and have a look at my SPEC file, and comment #1. I properly stated why I used Epoch:1 and AutoReqProv:no. I accept that I may have made a wrong choice to handle them. Then, please read comment #2. I do NOT consider it useful to explain what I did wrong. Saying this and this is not useful and disregarding my comments about both issues do not help me correct myself. If you want a useful comment, have a look at comment #11 and bug #484591's comment #3. Then, please read my answer, comment #3 on this bug. Do you think that I am refusing things without a valid reason? Again, please read comment #3 once more and explain me how you arrive at this conclusion. This is the point where the disordered person closed my bug. Once, I nicely told this person to not follow me around and post on my bugs. He does nothing but gets in my nerves. If you want to know where this happened, please have a look at this link (comments #2 and #3): https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195 Otherwise, please proceed to the next paragraph. I apologize to bring over a conversation that has nothing to do with Fedora, to Fedora. Now, knowing that I do NOT want him around me (since the information he provides has been wrong in certain cases if you saw that in the above link, plus his repulsive attitude that has been confirmed by many people in Fedora, is offensive), he picks my bug among 750+ other open review requests and posts here. This has no other purpose than blowing my fuse. I'm cutting this here. If majority of our community thinks that my behavior is unacceptable while his is appropriate (including closing my bug), then perhaps Fedora is not the place where I belong. Regards, Orcan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ianburr...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 21:14:05 EDT --- *** Bug 485164 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485164] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485164 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||panem...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 21:14:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 482965 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #9 from Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com 2009-02-11 21:19:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Accordingly, we should treat this code as GPLv3+ only, and ignore the EXCEPTIONS. Should the EXCEPTIONS file be left in the %doc section or left out completely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-02-11 21:26:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-XML-Generator Short Description: perl module for generating XML documents Owners: ausil Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-02-11 21:26:39 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #6 from Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com 2009-02-11 21:49:01 EDT --- Upstream have released v0.2 including the patch from the RPM. I've respun with 0.2 New scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120621 new SRPM and SPEC file at: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libbsr/ rpmlint is still clear: [t...@mango fedora]$ rpmlint -vi SRPMS/libbsr*0.2*rpm RPMS/ppc64/libbsr*0.2*rpm SPECS/libbsr.spec libbsr.src: I: checking libbsr.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-debuginfo.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-devel.ppc64: I: checking 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 22:49:41 EDT --- This has been in for a long time, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
