[Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 03:33:33 EDT --- md5sum is cc3b56373ba2d380b19d9142e4173ec7 for both tar.gz package build cleanly APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #34 from D Haley my...@yahoo.com 2009-02-24 03:35:51 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-11.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1154545 rpmlint: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10.i386.rpm flexdock.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Please remove the jmf library from the original source archive Done. you could also remove the other binaries Done. The JMF has the nice side effect of reducing size of package. ;) Very nice, however... the %changelog entry you've just added contains an empty line: Removed. Thanks for bearing with me. Whatever makes for good packages is a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 03:35:54 EDT --- Looks good. Just one tiny rpmlint warning from the SRPM: simplyhtml.src: W: strange-permission simplyhtml.sh 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Since you have the %attr line in the %files section, I don't think that the source file needs any special permissions itself. This is APPROVED (but please change the permissions on that one source file before importing, just for neatness. :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-02-24 03:43:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish Short Description: Quick two-way blowfish encryption Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-02-24 03:56:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Just a brief look: 1. Don't forget to fix the version number in your changelog section. Currently it doesn't match with the version of the package itself. Good catch, will do. 2. I don't know why, but it doesn't run on my system (with an Intel graphic card!) and crashes with a segmentation fault :( This is probably not an error of this packages, since it's basically just a game data. What release of Fedora and blender package did you use? Are you able to launch/use blender? I'm wondering if the upstream binary version of the game engine runs for you? Would you mind trying to download the binary distribution from http://www.yofrankie.org/download/ [1] and trying it? http://download.blender.org/apricot/yofrankie_bge.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-02-24 04:16:58 EDT --- Your explicit Requires are version-less. They are no better than the automatic SONAME deps. They are fragile even, since they would break if a library were moved to another package or if a package were renamed. The point of adding the comment here is to make the reviewer aware of this, too, as this ought to have caught during the review. Doing so assumes that all the dependencies do proper SO versioning, which may be a dangerous assumption. It doesn't take much to verify that the SONAMEs include major versions. Multiple libraries using the same SONAME would be a bad conflict in the package collection [unless it's a special-case of alternative installations that is being treated appropriately]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 04:18:30 EDT --- mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 04:18:53 EDT --- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 04:18:18 EDT --- mingw32-nsis-2.43-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-nsis-2.43-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Bug 467385 depends on bug 467384, which changed state. Bug 467384 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483620] Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483620 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-02-24 04:28:28 EDT --- few final notes: - the bind-libbind* Provides/Obsoletes can be completely removed, because bind-libbind was present only in F = 7. - the bind-libs/bind-devel Obsolete should be removed too, because you are only moving one library into a separate package - freeciv, milter-greylist and dnscap should require an update of BuildRequires after importing libbind -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 05:11:19 EDT --- Copy of an email I sent on this subject to Michel - On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:50:05AM -0500, Michel Salim wrote: Almost ready with the review request, but there are some things I need to resolve regarding OCaml find-provides and find-requires first: http://yquem.inria.fr/pipermail/jocaml-list/2009-February/000107.html - JoCaml provides an almost-identical set of base libraries to OCaml, and so if I use ocaml-find-provides.sh and ocaml-find-requires.sh, it might erroneously cause JoCaml to be pulled in when a user installs an add-on OCaml library on a system without an installed ocaml. The situation sounds similar to the OCaml cross-compiler that we ship here: http://homes.merjis.com/~rich/mingw/fedora-rawhide/x86_64/RPMS/ http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/ocaml In that case the solution is to (a) have a separate library directory and (b) have a modified ocaml-find-provides/ocaml-find-requires which uses the alternate library directory and makes ocaml(jocaml,Module) = HASH dependencies. Step (b) is not actually implemented right now. In the case of the cross-compiler, we choose between them using findlib and an environment variable: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org/msg20208.html - When asking upstream about the modules that have different hashes, it was revealed that some of the dependencies discovered by ocaml-find-provides.sh might be internal modules, rather than exported libraries. I'm attaching the diff between the sorted lists provided by ocaml and jocaml: Yes, the scripts are a bit hit-and-miss, because the program we use (ocamlobjinfo) doesn't quite have the necessary output to do dependency analysis properly. To get around this we hard-code a few modules to ignore, and generally it works well, but possibly there are still a few bugs in this area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487114] New: Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Summary: Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ca...@stone-it.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec SRPM URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: gvrpcd implements end-node GVRP functionality as a user-space daemon. It generates periodically GVRP JOIN packets with information about VLANs that server has defined on given NIC, or more generically - that it wants to be able to connect to. The patch contains a small Makefile modification, a sysconfig-file for specifying the interface it operates on, and an init-script. I've sent this patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Jasper Capel ca...@stone-it.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Jasper Capel ca...@stone-it.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487115] New: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk Alias: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msu...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.4-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package provides throttled email notification for Spacewalk. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1155887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 06:17:41 EDT --- cvs admin done BTW no need to initcc yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 06:17:25 EDT --- cvs done But in future please include the main review conversation in bugzilla so there is some record of the review proper preserved for others to see: this is important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 06:24:07 EDT --- Any progress on this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||msu...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 06:22:04 EDT --- I will look on this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-02-24 06:46:13 EDT --- Okay, I've removed the shebangs, and the package still works. rpmlint output is now clean. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 07:08:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cabal2spec Short Description: RPM packaging tool for Haskell Cabal Packages Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||cabal2spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 07:28:18 EDT --- I've got no response from my email about vala packaging guidelines to fedora-devel so not quite sure where to take it from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202
Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 07:32:46 EDT
---
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1156435
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
9d8f4c2e724f67e66317f06efaa53e03 for both Test-JSON-0.06.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
not tested - package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
N/A no headers or static libraries.
N/A no .pc file present.
N/A no -devel subpackage
N/A no .la files.
N/A no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test gave
t/00-load.# Testing Test::JSON 0.06, Perl 5.01, /usr/bin/perl
ok
t/10testjson..ok
t/pod-coverageok
t/pod.ok
All tests successful.
Files=4, Tests=39, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.21 cusr 0.05
csys = 0.29 CPU)
Result: PASS
+ Package perl-Test-JSON:
Provides: perl(Test::JSON) = 0.06
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) =
4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies)
= 3.0.3-1
Requires: perl(Carp) perl(JSON::Any) perl(Test::Builder)
perl(Test::Differences) perl(strict)
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 07:54:30 EDT --- 1157024 build (dist-f11, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/resource-agents/devel:resource-agents-3_0_0-4_alpha5_fc11) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 07:52:43 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff output looks good. You might want to replace %define by %global eventually to keep up with the latest fedora packaging recommendations. (cabal2spec-0.7 does that.) Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1156937 rpmlint output: ghc-haskell-src-exts.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8/libHShaskell-src-exts-0.4.8.a ghc-haskell-src-exts-doc.i386: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-haskell-src-exts ghc-haskell-src-exts-prof.i386: W: no-documentation ghc-haskell-src-exts-prof.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8/libHShaskell-src-exts-0.4.8_p.a Probably good to fix the error above. cpphs is needed by ghc-haskell-src-exts.i386? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto fdini...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 07:55:15 EDT --- 1157018 build (dist-f11, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/fence-agents/devel:fence-agents-3_0_0-4_alpha5_fc11) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 08:14:30
EDT ---
Here is the review:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
modulo above rpmlint description error
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
BSD 3 Clause without advertising
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
a8bbb3de67480cfd2e3c4d7ad553a11d
/home/petersen/tmp/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8.tar.gz
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[waived for haskell] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora, but consider/take care of the
above point/question. Thank you for your patience.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487128] New: Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers Alias: eventReceivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 Summary: Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msu...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/eventReceivers/eventReceivers.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/eventReceivers/eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package contains handler, which receive events from scouts. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1157330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-24
08:27:27 EDT ---
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output: empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 01911cb8fa06595d221f073c3c06d1b6f1b901a5
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.4.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:koji scratch build
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456783] Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456783 David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnomeu...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 09:15:22 EDT --- Are you still interested in this package? I ask because I have submitted the same one but I see yours predates mine. I will be happy to review your work if you still want to maintain this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jwbo...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 10:03:17 EDT --- Review: source files match upstream: [jwbo...@yoda SOURCES]$ sha256sum ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 c44a84da3cf37ecc69b36f6079a814e680cf37c74cb7d55f457635adb8209351 ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 [jwbo...@yoda ~]$ wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/geoff/cell/ps3-utils/ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 [jwbo...@yoda ~]$ sha256sum ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 c44a84da3cf37ecc69b36f6079a814e680cf37c74cb7d55f457635adb8209351 ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 package meets naming and versioning guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. GPLv2 license text included in package. latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. package builds in mock. package installs properly. debuginfo package looks complete. rpmlint is silent. [jwbo...@yoda ~]$ rpmlint -i ps3-utils.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jwbo...@yoda ~]$ rpmlint -i ps3-utils-2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. I consider this APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487148] New: Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Summary: Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ru...@rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Gearman provides a generic framework to farm out work to other machines or dispatch function calls to machines that are better suited to do the work. It allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport for database replication. In other words, it is the nervous system for how distributed processing communicates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485
--- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-24
10:14:15 EDT ---
Still no go :(
[r...@pc64 ~]# reviewtool status
Retrieving status from bugzilla
What's your bugzilla login email addy? [nob...@fedoraproject.org]
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Thanks, wo...@nobugconsulting.ro. You can set this permanently by running
setup.
Please enter your bugzilla password: ***
1 bugs found.
Fetching bugzilla data: 0% [
]Attribute(reporter) does not pass
the type constraint (Fedora::Bugzilla::Types::EmailAddress) with undef at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool/Command/status.pm line
97
Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa0668ec)',
'HASH(0x89538dc)', 'ARRAY(0x8aa3034)') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 360
App::Cmd::execute_command('Fedora::App::ReviewTool=HASH(0x89f68e4)',
'Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa0668ec)', 'HASH(0x89538dc)')
called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 256
App::Cmd::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool') called at /usr/bin/reviewtool
line 32
quote from tail /var/log/yum.log
Feb 19 20:45:05 Installed: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg-0.01-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 19 20:45:05 Updated: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch
Feb 19 20:45:05 Updated: reviewtool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch
[r...@pc64 ~]# rpm -qa \*Bugz\*
perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.04-1.fc10.noarch
[r...@pc64 ~]# yum update perl*
Setting up Update Process
Examining perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-2.fc10.noarch.rpm:
perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-2.fc10.noarch
Package perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool not installed, cannot update it. Run yum
install to install it instead.
Examining perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch.rpm:
perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch
Package perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool not installed, cannot update it. Run yum
install to install it instead.
No Packages marked for Update
should I try in rawhide ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485
--- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-24
10:20:13 EDT ---
scratch the yum update perl* from above, I've done it correctly now. but the
behaviour is the same
and it does not matter if I use the correct password or not, I have the exact
same output...
[r...@pc64 ~]# reviewtool status
Retrieving status from bugzilla
What's your bugzilla login email addy? [nob...@fedoraproject.org]
wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Thanks, wo...@nobugconsulting.ro. You can set this permanently by running
setup.
Please enter your bugzilla password: *** WRONG PASSWORD HERE
1 bugs found.
Fetching bugzilla data: 0% [
]Attribute(reporter) does not pass
the type constraint (Fedora::Bugzilla::Types::EmailAddress) with undef at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool/Command/status.pm line
97
Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa2952d4)',
'HASH(0x8b788ac)', 'ARRAY(0x8cc806c)') called at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 360
App::Cmd::execute_command('Fedora::App::ReviewTool=HASH(0x8c22bb4)',
'Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa2952d4)', 'HASH(0x8b788ac)')
called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 256
App::Cmd::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool') called at /usr/bin/reviewtool
line 32
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-02-24 10:43:54 EDT --- + Final Requires OK /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-common = 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) = 1.6 + Final Provides OK php-pear(components.ez.no/ConsoleTools) = 1.5 php-ezc-ConsoleTools = 1.5-1.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 10:54:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ConsoleTools Short Description: A set of classes to do different actions with the console Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-02-24 11:00:18 EDT --- Thanks for the update. Package fails to build under mock for rawhide (gcc 4.4). Mainly because of gcc headers cleanup some headers now are not included by default or indirectly through some other headers. please consider the following patch: --- slim-2.6.1b/include/slim.h 2008-11-07 00:46:47.0 +0200 +++ slim-2.6.1b-mod/include/slim.h 2009-02-24 15:22:57.0 +0200 @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@ #define SLIM_H #include iostream +#include cstdio #include cstdlib #include cassert #include cstring // for strlen, strcpy +#include stdint.h #define SLIM_VERSION v2_6_0 --- slim-2.6.1b/src/slim_control.cpp2008-11-07 00:46:48.0 +0200 +++ slim-2.6.1b-mod/src/slim_control.cpp2009-02-24 15:51:01.0 +0200 @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ // Normally, this means stripping any trailing dot-suffix. // But if we have --preserve, then append a .raw suffix instead. char *rawname; - char *last_suffix = strrchr(compname,'.'); + const char *last_suffix = strrchr(compname,'.'); size_t baselen; if (last_suffix) baselen = (last_suffix-compname); it would be nice to send it upstream too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226
--- Comment #11 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-02-24
11:13:36 EDT ---
Why do you use
install modules/%{peclName}.so %{buildroot}%{php_extdir}
Rather than (which also create the destination dir)
make install INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Doesn't build for me :
- %doc %{peclName}-%{version}/README
+ %doc %{peclName}/README
rpmlint :
php-pecl-runkit.src: I: checking
php-pecl-runkit.src:39: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes php-pear-%{peclName}
php-pecl-runkit.src: W: summary-not-capitalized runkit - mangle with user
defined functions and classes
php-pecl-runkit.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Languages/PHP
php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: I: checking
php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized runkit - mangle with user
defined functions and classes
php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Languages/PHP
php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided php-pear-runkit
php-pecl-runkit-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
php-pecl-runkit.spec:39: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes php-pear-%{peclName}
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
Most of them can be fixed easily
- stuff php-pear-%{peclName} is not usefull in Fedora (php-pear-runkit don't
exists AFAIK)
- %{peclName} could be removed from desc and first word capitalized.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 11:22:31 EDT --- qbittorrent-0.9.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qbittorrent-0.9.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456783] Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456783 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu BONIFACE mathieu.bonif...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 11:22:51 EDT --- I'm not particularly interested to maintain this package now, consequently you can take it. In fact I've proposed it because it was a dependence for « galaxium messenger », but the project seems dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 11:23:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Test-JSON Short Description: Test JSON data Owners: allisson Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226607] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-microtouch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226607 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-02-24 11:30:50 EDT --- This has been dropped from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Truch m...@truch.net 2009-02-24 11:32:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Thanks for the update. Package fails to build under mock for rawhide (gcc 4.4). Mainly because of gcc headers cleanup some headers now are not included by default or indirectly through some other headers. please consider the following patch: Excellent. Thanks for the patch. I've sent it upstream. New spec, srpm, and koji scratch build: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-4.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1159533 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #26 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-02-24 11:32:04 EDT --- It is worth noting that I strongly disagree with Koen's perception. It is incredibly unlikely that we will ever include afio due to its licensing issues. We have zero visibility on the intentions of the initial copyright holder, nor do we know who that is anymore. Koen's assumptions seriously stretch the bounds of existant copyright case law. Leaving this as CLOSED, CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Geoff Levand geoffrey.lev...@am.sony.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Geoff Levand geoffrey.lev...@am.sony.com 2009-02-24 11:41:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ps3-utils Short Description: Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 Owners: geofflevand Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 475146, which changed state. Bug 475146 Summary: import vtk fails - selinux issue I guess https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475146 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 12:38:17 EDT --- Cool. Jay, please apply for the 'packager' group in FAS and I'll sponsor you. Thanks for everything, and it was great meeting you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #15 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-02-24 12:40:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) I've tried to use the package (both with and without the libXpm-devel BR) in a I'll add the BR as soon as there will be new sources with fixing the very last licensing problem (BSD with ad.) F-10 guest and results were... strange: - if run from a GUI (direct access from the VM GUI), I can see the message press PAUSE or mouse right button for menu on the topmost line of the screen. The rest of the screen is filled with an ugly backgroun, vaguely similar to a text screen (the aspect from the turbo vision GUI from the '90s ) full of stars (one star per cell). The only way to interact is to press the right button of the mouse, keep it pressed while moving over the desired menu entry and release the button only after the mouse is over the desired entry. Not the most intuitive interface... I've never seen that before on any system that I've worked with, since the era of SFDX Yes, me too, and I'm afraid this was intended (but I'll ask upstream to make sure it is not just misconfiguration or something like that). - if run from a text console (ssh from the host text console), the mouse is not detected at all (I am offered the choice RETURN to start the app without mouse support or CTRL-C to kill it). After starting without mouse support, I failed to identify the right keyboard combination to trigger any menu action. The screen is once again filled with some blue-ish sort of background Please make sure that gpm is running (service gpm start) -- ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #1 from Dan Young dyo...@mesd.k12.or.us 2009-02-24 13:34:55 EDT --- Examining the output of rpmlint run against your SRPM/RPMs is always a good place to start. Are you a Fedora Contributor and member of the packager group, or are you seeking sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-02-24 13:54:10 EDT --- Added tests directory. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Also, I've contacted upstream about the shebangs; they will be removed in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456783] Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456783 David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pala...@gmx.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pala...@gmx.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pala...@gmx.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pala...@gmx.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #5 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-02-24 15:04:47 EDT --- Hello Jess, good: - all mentioned issues solved - content of the binary packages is now ok very minor issue - just for completeness: - omit the macro in the changelog of the spec file, otherwise rpmlint will complain: SPECS/argtable2.spec:66: W: macro-in-%changelog _defaultdocdir - you've added the spec file to the sources, so the sources in the provided src.rpm are slightly different from the ones on sf.net Besides these two little minor issues I think the package looks very good. Since I'm not an offical reviewer I could only help you up to this point and so somebody with that status has to do the final formal review to give you the approval for the new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-02-24 15:14:47 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #16 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-02-24 15:18:47 EDT --- rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/kde-plasma-networkmanagement-*0.5* [...] kde-plasma-networkmanagement-devel.x86_64: W: tag-in-description Obsoletes: Something that looks like a tag was found in the package's description. This may indicate a problem where the tag was not actually parsed as a tag but just textual description content, thus being a no-op. Verify if this is the case, and move the tag to a place in the specfile where %description won't fool the specfile parser, and rebuild the package. [...] The P/O for subpackages are wrong placed, they must be before the %description otherwise they're taken as part of the %description as described in the rpmlint warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:41:10 EDT --- cgit-0.8.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.8.2-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:44:08 EDT --- mrpt-0.6.5-0.3.20090213svn807.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:42:53 EDT --- php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:44:54 EDT --- cutecom-0.20.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.8.2-1.fc9 |0.8.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:44:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:46:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.3-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.20.0-3.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.2.1-3.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.6.5-0.3.20090213svn807.fc ||10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:44:29 EDT --- asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.14-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update asterisk-sounds-core'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:42:07 EDT --- sugar-clock-0-0.2.20090207.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-clock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:42:19 EDT --- cgit-0.8.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:43:56 EDT --- pdumpfs-1.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:43:26 EDT --- sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.3-4.fc9 Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:45:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:42:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:43:51 EDT --- php-channel-ezc-1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-channel-ezc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1948 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:46:26 EDT --- python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:42:44 EDT --- python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-wifi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:48:08 EDT --- mono-nat-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:48:34 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 15:50:59 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding-0.05-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:49:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:47:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.2.1-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-24 15:50:09 EDT --- Glauber: Any reply to comment #16? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
