[Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #66 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 02:05:04 EDT --- This has now been fixed. The scripts to update descriptions were looking for certain yum repositories. Unfortunately, those repositories could not be reached from inside of PHX. I've updated the scripts to use the mirrorlist and added a specific host (archives.fedoraproject.org) to the /etc/hosts files so that this is no longer an issue. Confirmed that gromacs' summary and description were updated after the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 --- Comment #3 from David Carter dcar...@davidcarter.ca 2009-04-19 02:13:25 EDT --- Updated versions: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm These include the spec changes you suggested. Thanks for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 --- Comment #4 from David Carter dcar...@davidcarter.ca 2009-04-19 02:14:29 EDT --- Whoops! That's Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/1.1-2/python-arm4-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #28 from Feng Yu rainwood...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 02:21:31 EDT --- New spec and srpm files for pre0.7.5: http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/ http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/gnome-globalmenu-0.7.5-0.1.20080418svn2507.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] New: Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Summary: Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemen...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora There are some packages in Russian Fedora distribution (in Free section), that needs to be imported into main Fedora. This ticket is just for monitoring these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489751] Review Request: btanks - Funny battle game with tanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489751 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||488100, 489751, ||469514(debmirror), ||457210(dpkg), ||457211(debhelper), ||456756(alien) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 Bug 457211 depends on bug 457213, which changed state. Bug 457213 Summary: Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||492690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 03:05:12 EDT --- http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/development/source/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||480279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 03:10:37 EDT --- http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/updates/testing/10/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-04-19 03:10:04 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-5 - file EOL encoding for some docs http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 03:09:47 EDT --- http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/updates/10/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 03:12:06 EDT --- Keep in mind, that not all of packages from Russian Fedora are suitable for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-04-19 03:20:44 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.02-2 - remove trailing dot from summary http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl-0.02-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-04-19 03:39:30 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 0.21-2 - Remove executable bits from doc files http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP-0.21-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on||495882 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||495885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||firebird -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||RussianFedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Alias||gnome-globalmenu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492690] Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Alias||kvirc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 --- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-04-19 04:03:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #4) Erm... good question. Yanko, are you sponsored? Nope, sorry. This review submission as well as my recent others were more for documentation purposes. I happen to need rpms of these for work related reasons and now that I made them I might as well post them somewhere. The package review queue is the place I personally check first if something is not already packaged, so it seems like a good place to put these. I'll be happy if someone jumps in to maintain them... Do you want to be sponsored? If so, I'll take a look through your other submissions and if things look good, we can work on that... Ok. Let's try that. I've massaged my other submissions (listed below) and...ahem.. completed the CLA. bug 495888 perl-POE-Component-Log4perl bug 495885 perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP (depends on this one) bug 494986 mysqludf_xql Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #29 from Feng Yu rainwood...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 04:09:58 EDT --- Updated to svn2511; which is pretty close to 0.7.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 04:13:47 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 04:15:29 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-04-19 04:13:42 EDT --- * Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-6 - ldconfig also in postun - remove explicit gcc-c++ http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 04:14:46 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489751] Review Request: btanks - Funny battle game with tanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489751 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||btanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||483381, 469814, 252010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483381] Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C*.t tests to make them run faster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||iarn...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 04:47:09 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 495a0c853951d326df5322e97bcbc9c53a71eea9 Test-Aggregate-0.35.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307346 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Test-Aggregate.noarch: I: checking perl-Test-Aggregate.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Test::Aggregate) = 0.35 perl(Test::Aggregate::Builder) = 0.35 perl-Test-Aggregate = 0.35-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(File::Find) perl(Test::Aggregate) perl(Test::Aggregate::Builder) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Builder::Module) perl(Test::More) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=48, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.02 sys + 0.58 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.74 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||iarn...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|iarn...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 04:53:51 EDT --- + source files match upstream. c794aef1af95ef73a51835274431ae23f5b3467f B-Hooks-OP-Check-0.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307368 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has an acceptable warning: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.src: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.x86_64: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/B/Hooks/OP/Check/Install/hook_op_check.h perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-debuginfo.ppc: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.15 perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check::Install::Files) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check = 0.15-1.fc11 perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check(x86-64) = 0.15-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl = 0:5.008001 perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 05:06:24 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #2 from Fabien Georget fabien.geor...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 05:07:26 EDT --- Thanks a lot I modified the spec according to your advice : Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm For point 6, I only create a .desktop file for xcowfortune since the others need an argument (the message, or the image, to display) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #15 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 05:09:31 EDT --- One last remark. It would be nice to check (I guess repoquery would work for this) if other php projects we are packaging embeds the feedcreator class and file bugs against them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 05:06:19 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 05:06:28 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-04-19 06:14:26 EDT --- 4.0 was released apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #16 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-04-19 06:19:10 EDT --- After several tests, I can reproduce the errors only when I take rawhide's sqlite .src.rpm and rebuild it on F10 (and rebuilding perl-DBD-SQLite against that just in case). Using DBD::SQLite 1.14 or 1.21 gives the same result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-04-19 06:29:46
EDT ---
Please don't use %{version} in the patch filenames since it breaks when bumping
version.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-19 06:58:44
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Two solutions that I can think of:
Patch CMakeLists.txt and remove the 'else ...' statement or
sed -i 's!CMAKE_C_FLAGS -O2!CMAKE_C_FLAGS %{optflags}!' CMakeLists.txt
What do you think is better?
I'd patch the cmake file. Whatever you think is best.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496454] Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496454 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||496453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 07:21:00 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496454] New: Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496454 Summary: Review Request: pwmd - A server for storing application data at a central location Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pwmd-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://bjk.sourceforge.net/pwmd/ Description: Password Manager Daemon is a server that provides a way for applications to securely store and retrieve data at a centralized location. The data is stored in an (optionally AES256 encrypted) XML file and clients connect and send commands to manipulate the data. Some of the features include: * Multi-threaded. More than one client may access the data at the same time. * A key cache so clients won't need to enter a key each time a file is opened or saved. * Key retrieval via pinentry(1). * Configuration file which supports file specific settings including: encryption iterations, cache expiration and encryption key or key file and more. * Compressed data file support. * Logging to file and/or syslog. * Secure memory usage. PWMD will zero out memory before freeing it and also has the option to lock the entire process in RAM to avoid swapping the data to virtual memory. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307797 rpmlint output: [...@laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint pwmd* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [...@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pwmd-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-19 07:19:54 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 07:50:31 EDT --- Ok, due to failure of attempts to create exact tarball, I'm continuing from where I stopped last time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-19 08:01:35 EDT --- I guess a patch is better because I can send it upstream. * Sun Apr 19 2009 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org - 2.3.3-2 - Add patch to honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Include INSTALL in %%doc since it contains some valuable information Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/sakura.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/sakura-2.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496067] Review Request: perl-Net-OAuth - OAuth protocol support library for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496067 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-19 08:15:45 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #8 from Jan Blazek appoli...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 08:28:24 EDT --- Updated to 4.0 and corrected the patch filename. New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm New mock log: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-19 08:35:46 EDT --- New branch please. Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pecl-runkit New Branches: F-11 Owners: hubbitus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #16 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-04-19 08:46:48 EDT --- Good point. It seems phpTodo is bundling this lib, but the phpTodo author added a feature to it and bumped the version to 1.7.3, I've also found another project on sourceforge (http://feedcreator.sourceforge.net) which ships a patched 1.7.2 version. I'll try to contact both the phpTodo author and the owner of the sourceforge project to see what can be done about this. Meanwhile, I've filed bug #496463 against phpTodo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 08:47:44
EDT ---
+ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.[1]
[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/gloox-*
gloox-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$
This warning is safe to ignore.
+ MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
+ MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
+ MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
+ MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
+ MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
+ MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Actually, we cannot simply use md5sum for verifying sources from VCS, but we
can diff -ru them.
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ tar xf gloox-1.0-SVNr4003.tar.bz2
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ svn export -r4003 svn://svn.camaya.net/gloox/trunk
gloox-1.0.svn /dev/null
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ diff -ru gloox-1.0 gloox-1.0.svn/
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
+ MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
+ MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. [13]
+ MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [14]
+ MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15]
+ MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
+ MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
+ MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19]
+ MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability). [21]
+ MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package. [19]
+ MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} [22]
+ MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.[20]
+ MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This
means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with
any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you
feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another
package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24]
+ MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25]
+ MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26]
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302
--- Comment #32 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-19 09:16:21 EDT
---
Uff, this seems to need a lot of work to be accepted. Sorry the review took so
long.
1.) Don't require perl modules by package name:
BuildRequires: perl-Test-Harness
Requires: perl-Pod-Simple
...
This would be better:
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Harness)
...
2.) Source1 is useless:
BuildRequires: ed
Source1:reduce_rpmlint_err.tar.gz
Do what the scripts do inline. It might be a lot easier to use sed instead of
ed.
3.) Subpackage buildrequire
%package docs
...
BuildRequires: perl
%package tools
...
BuildRequires: ed
Makes no sense. Please don't define BRs in subpackages.
Furthermore, perl is in default buildgroup, thus can be ommited.
4.) Why would tools require pkgconfig?
%package tools
...
Requires: pkgconfig
5.) This always evaluates to false
if test %{_vendor} = suse
please remove it
6.) No architecture independence
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64
...
%else
# PowerPC
...
%endif
Remove this, or explain.
7.) %{_smp_mflags} not used
make
make parrot_utils
make installable
make html
Either use them or explain why you don't.
8.) No useless comments please
#make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
...
#rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/parrot # for Solaris?
9.)
10.) Don't strip anything
%{__strip} %{RPM_PAR_LIB_DIR}dynext/*.so
Remove this
11.) Bad comment
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_usr}/share/doc/parrot# necessary for SuSE
Well, eh, SUSE?
12.) Use macros for directories where appropriate
--lex=/usr/bin/flex \
--yacc=/usr/bin/yacc \
...
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_usr}/share/doc/parrot# necessary for SuSE
%{_bindir}, %{_datadir}, etc...
13.) Compiler generates .so-s executable
# Force permissions on shared versioned libs so they get stripped.
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} -type f -name '*.so.*' -exec chmod 755 {} \;
Is this necessary? Explain if yes.
14.) Enable test suite
# make test /dev/null
# %{?_with_fulltest:make fulltest /dev/null}
# make test || :
# %{?_with_fulltest:make fulltest || :}
15.) Comment patches and submit them upstream?
Patch0: parrot-install_files.patch
What does this do? Was it submitted upstream?
16.) Provides not sane
parrot-tools:
perl(DB)
Perl debugger? I guess not.
perl(File::Which) = 0.05
You embed File::Which in /usr/lib/parrot/1.0.0/tools/lib/File/Which.pm
You should not. Depend on perl-File-Which package instead.
parrot-docs:
perl(A)
perl(B)
You should not provide these.
17.) Doc shouldn't depend on perl:
parrot-docs requires these:
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #33 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-19 09:20:24 EDT --- 18.) Don't use chrpaths to get rid of rpaths patch the build configuration instead. Comment the LD_LIBRARY_PATH hack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-19 10:08:51 EDT --- Peter Lemenkov, thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gloox Short Description: A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496473] New: Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest Alias: perl-Mixin-Linewise https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mixin-Linewise/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Mixin-Linewise.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: It's boring to deal with opening files for IO, converting strings to handle- like objects, and all that. With Mixin::Linewise::Readers and Mixin::Linewise::Writers, you can just write a method to handle handles, and methods for handling strings and filenames are added for you. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307860 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 469514, which changed state. Bug 469514 Summary: Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #42 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2009-04-19 10:26:19 EDT --- Packages have been build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496475] New: Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lexical-Persistence/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lexical-Persistence.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Lexical::Persistence does a few things, all related. Note that all the behaviors listed here are the defaults. Subclasses can override nearly every aspect of Lexical::Persistence's behavior. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307872 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496476] New: Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS Alias: perl-Clipboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Summary: Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Clipboard/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Clipboard.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Who doesn't remember the first time they learned to copy and paste, and generated an exponentially growing text document? Yes, that's right, clipboards are magical. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307884 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496477] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-C reate/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The module provides means of pasting large texts into http://pastebin.com pastebin site. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307887 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-19 10:44:44 EDT --- Patching the source is much nicer than my ugly symlink stuff. Thanks for that. No looping at the moment because I'm in contact with upstream about the embedded fonts. * Sun Apr 19 2009 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net - 0.2.3-1 - Removed symlink stuff - Changed the path of the fonts in Makefile - Updated to new upstream version 0.2.3 Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/xsw-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496478] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Creat e/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The module provides means to create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ paste site. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307894 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496486] New: Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Summary: Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/cclive.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/cclive-0.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: cclive is a command line video extraction utility similar to clive but with lower requirements. Its features are few and essential. Supports Youtube, Googlevideo, Break, Liveleak, Sevenload, Evisortv and Dailymotion. rpmlint is silent. srpm builds under mock, and on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-19 12:00:53 EDT --- Thanks Felix for the patch. Are you able to do a scratch build on koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496489] New: Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Summary: Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/abby.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/abby-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: abby is a front-end for clive and cclive, allowing users unfamiliar with command-line interfaces to make most of cclive using a graphical user-interface. abby is written in C++. Note that clive is already in Fedora repositories, and I asked a review for cclive (bug #496486). Rpmlint is silent. SRPM builds under mock and on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307961 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Bug 492810 depends on bug 495411, which changed state. Bug 495411 Summary: Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496492] New: Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496492 Summary: Review Request: sing - Sends fully customized ICMP packets from command line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/sing.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/sing-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Sing is a little tool that sends ICMP packets fully customized from command line. The main purpose is to replace/complement the nice ping command with certain enhancements as: - Send fragmented and monster packets 65534 bytes - Send/read spoofed packets - Send many ICMP Information types in addition to the echo request type, sent by default as address mask request, timestamp, information request, router solicitation and router advertisement - Send many ICMP error types: redirect, source quench, time exceeded, destination unreach and parameter problem - Send to host with loose or strict source routing - Use little fingerprinting techniques to discover Windows or Solaris boxes - Send ICMP packets emulating certain OS: Cisco, Solaris, Linux, Shiva, Unix and Windows at the moment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pa...@hubbitus.info Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-19 12:23:58 EDT --- I'll [try] (it will be my first review) review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #7 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-04-19 12:23:31 EDT --- There you go: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308030 However I changed the patch to already include the changes autoreconf -f -i generates. Because autoreconf depends on much more than just autoconf. As it would add a lot of additional BuildReqs I chose to patch the whole thing. Unfortunately the patch is 1.6M in size. So it would probably be the best to upstream it if possible (although I think that the problem might be Fedora specific). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519
--- Comment #11 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-04-19 12:31:05 EDT
---
I tried to package grfcodec but it's a total mess. They mix C and ASM stuff and
totally ignore that there are other arches than ix86. I hacked at the SPEC to
at least build on x86_64 but due to my not so leet skills I'm probably unable
to bring it to build on ppc{64}.
Here's the task:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1308035
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519
--- Comment #12 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 13:11:16
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I tried to package grfcodec but it's a total mess. They mix C and ASM stuff
and
totally ignore that there are other arches than ix86. I hacked at the SPEC to
at least build on x86_64 but due to my not so leet skills I'm probably unable
to bring it to build on ppc{64}.
They use ASM for stuff like self-decompressing-files. This part could be
omitted either for all arches or only for non-x86.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-19 13:21:59 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-19 13:22:31 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-4.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-19 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream f9ca5b67f6c551ea98790ab5f21c19d0 libglademm-2.6.7.tar.bz2 f9ca5b67f6c551ea98790ab5f21c19d0 SRPM/libglademm-2.6.7.tar.bz2 * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ! The package contains documentation already present in the native Fedora package * BuildRequires look sane ! But is there a reason for having the BuildArch: noarch listed in the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-19 13:35:06
EDT ---
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSFIX
- License is GPLv3 not GPLv3+.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX
- Time stamps are not preserved, e.g.
/bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/xsw-0.2.3/install-sh -c -m 644 'intro/bloc.bmp'
'/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xsw-0.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/xsw/intro/bloc.bmp'
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
- No GUI, needs arguments to work.
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-19 13:55:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check Short Description: Wrap OP check callbacks Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-19 13:52:22
EDT ---
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
- You're missing an 'f' in %patch0 -p1 -b .clags
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
The package has been APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C*.t tests to make them run faster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C*.t tests to make them run faster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-19 13:55:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Test-Aggregate Short Description: Aggregate C*.t tests to make them run faster Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2009-04-19 14:05:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-hash_ring Short Description: Python implementation of consistent hashing Owners: silas Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
