[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 02:05:45 EDT --- Again, Thank you for the review Parag! Also thanks for the suggestions. I will do that change on the GenericName. The hicolor-icon-theme dependency is satisfied through gtk2 and it won't break. I'd like to keep things minimal. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jack-keyboard Short Description: Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #23 from srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com 2009-05-08 02:26:22 EDT --- Setting fedora-review flag to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986
--- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-05-08 02:37:16 EDT
---
It should be noted that the mysql version (5.1.x) in devel/F11 seems to require
these extension libs in a specific location %{_libdir}/mysql/plugin/ and does
not work if the library is only in the system linker path. This submission
remains on the stable branch for now.
* Fri May 8 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-8
- use a define for the plugin location,
it changes from mysql 5.0 [F10] to 5.1 [F11]
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-8.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nus...@fedoraproj ||ect.org) --- Comment #31 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-08 03:01:00 EDT --- Juan Manuel: ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED --- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-08 03:12:53 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rland...@redhat.com Flag||needinfo?(e...@christensenp ||lace.us) --- Comment #75 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 03:29:15 EDT --- Eric, Mike, Josh, Ryan, Rueddi, et al: can you please test the package in comment 74 to make sure it works for you so we can move forward with getting the fedora publican upstream into publican, thanks! It should be a drop in replacement for current publican-0.45 just with added fedora support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 03:38:41 EDT --- its because its looking into atomic/lffifoIntel.c on ppc64 whereas it should look into atomic/lffifoppc.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 04:35:51 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: febootstrap New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 04:33:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libguestfs Short Description: Access and modify virtual machine disk images Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 04:45:34
EDT ---
Your application is arch-specific , that means that it will be installed in
%{python_sitearch}, not in %{python_sitelib}.
Just change
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info
to
%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/
%{python_sitearch}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 04:48:54 EDT --- Regarding spec-file, I see the following issues: * use full path in Source0. * apply patch with saving original file with some descriptive suffix, e.g. change %patch0 to %patch0 -b .some_descriptive_suffix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 04:52:04 EDT --- I've just fedora-review to + again. third time, now, after two mid-air-collisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 04:53:31 EDT --- Please, don't raise fedora-review flags for packages submitted by you (this is a reviewer's work, not submitter's). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 04:25:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342596 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7a3406a936c7e224db0d85bda1e42de80e27dbfb DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=27, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.51 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.60 CPU) + Package perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.2-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(DBIx::Class::EncodedColumn) = 0.2 perl(DBIx::Class::EncodedColumn::Crypt::Eksblowfish::Bcrypt) = 0.1 perl(DBIx::Class::EncodedColumn::Digest) = 0.1 Requires: perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Bcrypt) perl(Digest) perl(Sub::Name) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 03:59:57 EDT --- qmforge-2.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qmforge-2.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-08 04:14:56 EDT --- Arthur: The review seems mostly ok. Please ensure you understand which packages are considered -devel (feel free to ask if the guidelines are unclear to you). Please add yourself to to packager group in the account system, I'll sponsor your account. It would also be awesome if you could do a couple more reviews, there's always something in the queue, and getting more familiar with RPM packaging won't hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #20 from Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 04:29:19 EDT --- Hi Rich, Those changes all look fine. Thanks. I've switched fedora-review to +. BTW, there are a couple of nits in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1341247name=build.log: Makefile:1097: warning: overriding commands for target `make-initramfs.sh' Makefile:400: warning: ignoring old commands for target `make-initramfs.sh' ... mv initramfs.fedora-12.x86_64.img initramfs.fedora-12.x86_64.img.bak ... mv: cannot stat `initramfs.fedora-12.x86_64.img': No such file or directory make[2]: [initramfs/fakeroot.log] Error 1 (ignored) mv vmlinuz.fedora-12.x86_64 vmlinuz.fedora-12.x86_64.bak mv: cannot stat `vmlinuz.fedora-12.x86_64': No such file or directory ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-08 04:21:22 EDT ---
Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just a
shared object.
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la}
Why do you call a recursive rm here?
Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
--disable-static to configure?
Also, please do some informal reviews to prove you're familiar with the
packaging guidelines so that your account can get sponsored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #24 from Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 2009-05-08 03:57:56 EDT --- Please, feel free to take over this package from me, I don't use dansguardian any longer and I don't have much time to maintain it. Sorry :-( You could reassign this bug to yourself rather than opening a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-08 04:04:57 EDT --- Did you actually get this to work? I updated the spec too to fix the packaging stuff, but was unable to do anything with unoconv, so I didn't submit the package for review.. For me it fails every time with the error: Error: Unable to connect or start own listener. Aborting. Funny, now that I tried it again it failed the first time but then worked after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2009-05-08 05:13:45 EDT --- SPEC URI: http://github.com/binaryhelix/specs/blob/ab62573a7843d1552daba06883ac52bd08dc6e49/wt/wt.spec SRPM URI: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/wt/wt-2.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm * Fri May 8 2009 Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net - 2.2.3-2 - Require dependencies in -devel subpackage - Drop redundant declarations in %%files - Add -doc subpackage - Fix License tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #13 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 05:50:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) Please, don't raise fedora-review flags for packages submitted by you (this is a reviewer's work, not submitter's). oups sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #6 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 06:13:36 EDT --- Thanks That better now ;) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342831 Updated : Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/kinterbasdb.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-05-08 07:39:42 EDT --- This package was completely broken. Poor/rushed review. :( None of the background images was installed correctly. All were copied to the same file with the name of the target directory instead. xml index file was installed as a directory, which created a conflict with all other background packages (bug 496905). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com 2009-05-08 08:07:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gpxe Short Description: A network boot loader Owners: mdomsch glommer Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986
--- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-05-08 08:06:37 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #7)
Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just
a
shared object.
Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig):
# service mysqld start
Starting MySQL:[ OK ]
[r...@f10test ~]# rpm -Uhv
/home/rpmbuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-8.fc10.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
1:mysqludf_xql ### [100%]
[r...@f10test ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS
STRING SONAME lib_mysqludf_xql.so;'
ERROR 1126 (HY000) at line 1: Can't open shared library 'lib_mysqludf_xql.so'
(errno: 22 lib_mysqludf_xql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory)
[r...@f10test ~]# ldconfig
[r...@f10test ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS
STRING SONAME lib_mysqludf_xql.so;'
[r...@f10test ~]#
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la}
Why do you call a recursive rm here?
Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r can be removed.
Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
--disable-static to configure?
not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage.
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749
--- Comment #2 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-08 08:53:34 EDT ---
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
[ke4...@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint unoconv.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ke4...@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/unoconv-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ke4...@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/unoconv-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
GPLv2 in both the COPYING file and the unoconv file
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
Spec file indicates GPLv2
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
[ke4...@nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum unoconv-0.3.tar.bz2*
e6b33a2041137d8ebae1b71396ec0641 unoconv-0.3.tar.bz2
e6b33a2041137d8ebae1b71396ec0641 unoconv-0.3.tar.bz2.1
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342449
NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
NA: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. (no real build)
NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden
NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a
blocker.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly
if it is not present.
NA: Header files must be in a -devel package.
NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
directory ownership and usability).
NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package
using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-05-08 09:06:01 EDT --- All I did in each case was attempt to build the latest rawhide koji srpm. This changed from 2008-09-19 to 2008-12-05. Something in that interval corrected whatever the problem was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-08 09:08:17 EDT --- This seems to work fine as long as OO.o has an instance started. I tried without an instance started and it failed (though the man page states that it will instantiate a session) I think the problem arose from OO.o, as when I manually launched it left me waiting for user interaction due to wanting to recover files. However after closing OO.o cleanly it started a session and performed the conversion without problem. Seems to work per the docs. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 09:23:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn Short Description: Automatically encode columns Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:55:13 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-usage-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:55:22 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:55:10 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:55:18 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:55:08 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:59:52 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 09:59:47 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499857] New: Review Request: python-pefile -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499857 Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile-1.2.10_63-1.src.rpm Description: description here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499856] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module combines WWW::Mechanize and HTML::TreeBuilder. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343426 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499859] New: Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile-1.2.10_63-1.src.rpm Description: pefile is a platform-independent Python module for reading and working with Portable Executable (aka PE) files, most commonly known as .exe and .dll files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 11:45:08 EDT --- *** Bug 499857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499857] Review Request: python-pefile -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499857 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 11:45:08 EDT --- (hit Enter by mistake before filling in all fields; closing as dup) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 499859 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-08 12:36:23 EDT --- For F-11/10, please visit bodhi system: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and submit requests to push rebuild packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 13:11:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343426 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0514a4a70b929361758f8a9c16705b53 WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=29, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.56 cusr 0.27 csys = 1.87 CPU) + Package perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.1-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder) = 1.1 Requires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized) Suggestions: 1) Are you sure you need BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #17 from David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org 2009-05-08 13:22:10 EDT --- I created my accounts, certificates, etc...but before I play with anything I will want to look over the existing wiki pages further :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 13:23:00 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, but I've been trying to reach the author for license clarification. No response yet, and I see other unanswered attempts on the message board to get a clear statement out of the author. I'm going to consider my options, but at this point I guess we have to consider this review dead in the water on legal grounds. :-( With regards to comment #1, the spec file link now works. Also, this package does not include a library of any kind. It is purely a header file that maps the C expat headers into C++ classes with inline code. And, finally, it's really old and doesn't include a bunch of stuff from newer versions of expat. Given all that, I'm really tempted to write my own and give it a real open source license. Give me a couple of days to think this over. If I decide to go with writing my own, I'll close this review bug. Thanks for the comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 13:22:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343552 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 68129579330a63296474101f0cd51dfb86f9f671 Daemon-Generic-0.51.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave No tests defined for Daemon::Generic extension. + Package perl-Daemon-Generic-0.51-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(Daemon::Generic) = 0.51 perl(Daemon::Generic::Event) = 0.3 perl(Daemon::Generic::While1) = 0.3 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Daemon::Generic) perl(Event) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Flock) perl(File::Slurp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-08 13:28:07 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wikin again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499875] New: Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 Summary: Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/libdasm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/libdasm-1.5-1.src.rpm Description: libdasm is a C-library that tries to provide simple and convenient way to disassemble x86 raw opcode bytes (machine code). It can parse and print out opcodes in ATT and Intel syntax. It also includes a Python module, which I believe is the only Python module that can directly disassemble machine code (pointers to others welcome) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-08 13:28:43 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137
--- Comment #5 from David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org 2009-05-08 13:34:20
EDT ---
I am going to look this over later tonight or maybe even over the weekend.
There are some aspects that I may wish to do a new upstream release for also...
In respect to init scripts, I usually like to keep the scripts themselves
simple because they are going to run on different platforms...but most of this
relates to the package part :).
One concern I find in this is I wish to make sure that the upstream source
picks the same directories as the packaging system :). For that, for things
like python_sitearch, etc, I think I should add to configure.ac some stuff so I
can do something like --with-python-sitearch=%{python_sitearch}...,
--with-python-sitelib=..., --with-initrd-dir=... in %configure rather than
simply depend on the upstream target directories happening to match :).
So I want to think about that aspect later today...
This in many ways is a good package for use in training, as it covers so many
different aspects and issues.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 13:36:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343549 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dc4d4c8a17ae725791263161b1167b1b6a1fabde pefile-1.2.10-63.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 13:49:12 EDT --- Thanks; requesting CVS New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-pefile Short Description: Python module for working with Portable Executable files Owners: dmalcolm Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 14:03:13 EDT --- rpmlint output: libtalloc.i586: I: checking libtalloc.i586: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libtalloc.so.1.3.0 libtalloc.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libtalloc.so.1.3.0 e...@glibc_2.0 libtalloc.i586: W: no-documentation libtalloc.i586: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig libtalloc.i586: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig libtalloc-debuginfo.i586: I: checking libtalloc-devel.i586: I: checking libtalloc.src: I: checking libtalloc.src:53: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:54: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:55: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:56: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:58: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:59: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:61: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:62: E: files-attr-not-set Issues to resolve: - Missing Requires: pkgconfig. - devel files are missing a %defattr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 14:05:07 EDT --- Thanks David! I didn't have an issue with unoconv until I read your message. I just tried it with some documents I had. It works with most of them but it consistently fails with some others. I'll let you know if I find a solution. Would you like to comaintain? New Package CVS Request === Package Name: unoconv Short Description: Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #5 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-08 14:20:28 EDT --- I think you actually mean Jussi instead of me. The only problems I ran into were when I tried to swap types - ie, I tried to move ods to doc (as opposed to odt to doc which worked well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 14:03:10 EDT --- I got a build error with this: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tdb.so rpmlint output: libtdb.src: I: checking libtdb.src:58: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:59: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:60: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:63: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:64: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:65: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:68: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:69: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:71: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:72: E: files-attr-not-set Issues to resolve: - Missing Requires: pkgconfig. - devel and tdb-tools files are missing a %defattr. - Add missing Python library or disable Python bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 14:35:58 EDT --- Oops sorry, yes I meant Jussi. Jussi, would you like to comaintain? But I'm fine if you'd like to join too, David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #6 from David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org 2009-05-08 14:41:30 EDT --- It is safe for sipwitch-snmp to be separate because it may be separately installed on a network management station, for example to collect and decode traps. No sipwitch would be installed there :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #58 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 14:50:19 EDT --- /sarcasm --on Will this be over this year? /sarcasm --off I made a review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Is there so many review requests or the whole review system is badly made? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 15:15:28 EDT --- Ah, my stupidity. The upstream just made a new release including the previous patches right before I sent them the ppc64 patch. That one will go to the next release. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack_capture.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.9.33-1 - Update to 0.9.33 - Drop upstreamed patches - Fix the build failure on ppc64 koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1344058 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413
Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@christoph-wickert.de
Bug 498413 depends on bug 438588, which changed state.
Bug 438588 Summary: Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to
compressed files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-05-08
15:17:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Like this:
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/*
And even shorter to
%{_datadir}/%{name}/
(In reply to comment #5)
Yes I know I can use wildcards, however I'd like to get notified (by the
unpackaged files check) if something changes there, so I would like to keep
tne
enumeration of all files in that directory.
Well, IMO you just need to make sure you don't accidentally package unwanted
files like leftovers from svn or cvs. I would use
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}/*.png
%{_datadir}/%{name}/*.svg
%{_datadir}/%{name}/*.glade
But this is up to you. At least for desktop-file-validate I'd use wildcards
because you might forget to validate a file otherwise.
(In reply to comment #6)
Take a look at other desktop files. None of them has Encoding, Version,
X-WIndow-Icon, X-Osso-Type.
Encoding should not be in the file, this is correct, but the rest of the file
is acceptable. The version key is usually added during install by
desktop-file-install and the other keys starting with X- are ok. Whenever you
want to extend the freedesktop spec with custom keys you need to prefix them
with X-, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ and especially
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ar01s03.html
But there are other problems with the desktop files:
- /usr/bin is hardcoded in the Exec tag. Ether remove it or walk over it with
sed during %prep to make sure the path always works:
sed -i 's!/usr/bin!%{_bindir}!' data/*.desktop
- What is X-Osso-Type=application/x-executable meant for? Are these programs
supposed to open a mimetype? I guess not, at least not x-executable, but if so,
you need to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #44 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-05-08 15:39:55 EDT --- Ah, thanks. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/eclib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/eclib-20080310-7.p7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-05-08 15:50:20 EDT --- So nothing to fix except finish getting the dependencies in, it looks like? Thanks very much for the reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986
--- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-08 16:14:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library,
just a
shared object.
Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig):
Sorry, I did not notice it uses ld.so.conf.d.
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la}
Why do you call a recursive rm here?
Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r can be removed.
Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
--disable-static to configure?
not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage.
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la
1.) .la is not a static library
2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no
reason at all
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-05-08 16:37:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing --disable-static to configure? not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage. error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la 1.) .la is not a static library 2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no reason at all What I meant was that between having both a --disable-static and a rm line and having just a rm line I'd prefer the latter. Seems like less clutter to me. Of course a few cycles and disk accesses making the static lib could be spared but imho its hardly worth it. Anyway, if this ever gets to the repo I'll put in the --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-05-08 16:40:36 EDT --- Thanks, Parag! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Daemon-Generic Short Description: Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon Owners: eseyman Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 16:42:32 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 16:42:28 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #7 from David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org 2009-05-08 16:46:49 EDT --- I decided to try and complete all changes on the current upstream release. Updated spec: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec Updated srpm: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Updated patch: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.patch And I will shift some changes upstream after this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-08 16:59:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Oops sorry, yes I meant Jussi. Jussi, would you like to comaintain? Sure, I can help, although from a packaging point of view this package is really simple.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #11 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-05-08 17:00:27 EDT --- * Fri May 8 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-9 - use --disable-static http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-9.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ant Bryan anthonybr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Ant Bryan anthonybr...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 17:04:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libmetalink Short Description: A Metalink C library Owners: ant Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 17:07:50 EDT --- abby-0.2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abby-0.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499913] New: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913
Summary: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat
XML parser library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: loganje...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/expatmm/expatmm.spec
SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/expatmm/expatmm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: ExpatMM is a C++ library that uses the efficient expat XML parser
to create a C++ class base for the development of C++ event-driver parser
objects. This library provides the developer with two C++ classes:
- ExpatXMLParser: a generic parser where the developer must supply
event methods for parse tokens, as well as supply the event method
for reading input data into a local buffer.
- ExpatXMLFileParser: a parser where the event method for reading
input data is implemented as a file reader, with the filename being
specified at instance construction.
I see that rpmlint is complaining about an unused direct shlib dependency on
libm. Libtool is generating a link command including -lm. So I tried
relinking in the spec file, like so:
cd src/.libs
g++ -shared ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} ExpatXMLParser.o ExpatXMLFileParser.o
ExpatMM-version.o -Xlinker -soname -Xlinker libexpatmm.so.1 -o
libexpatmm.so.%{version} -lexpat
... and rpmlint still complains about the unused direct shlib dependency. It
appears that libstdc++ is linked against libm, which may be the source of the
problem. In any case, I don't know how to satisfy rpmlint.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX --- Comment #6 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 17:17:51 EDT --- Forget this package. There's a much better, more up-to-date, and definitely free C++ wrapper for expat. I'll port the application I'm working with over to that wrapper. See bug #499913 for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 17:36:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder Short Description: WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-08 17:37:48 EDT --- You can try where https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency gets you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225668 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 18:00:24 EDT --- Package is fine in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 --- Comment #2 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 18:59:13 EDT --- Ok uploaded new spec and srpm The python bindings are not normally built in mock/koji as python devel stuff is not listed in devel dependencies but I removed the file as a convenience for people that rebuilds on their machine. Fixed Requires Fixed %defattr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 --- Comment #2 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 19:01:00 EDT --- Fixed symlink Fixed Requires Fixed %defattr Unless Warnings are critical it should be fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nus...@fedoraproj | |ect.org)| --- Comment #32 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 19:18:15 EDT --- Hi there, sorry for the late reply. [Excuse] Fedora 11 left one laptop and one desktop completely out of service, which left me with no room to develop. I just grabbed my bro's F10 laptop and am finishing the packages. [/Excuse] I'll update this message as soon as I repackage the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||da...@gnsa.us AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|da...@gnsa.us Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-08 21:33:56 EDT --- Glad to see Ampache being packaged for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(pro...@gmail.com) --- Comment #2 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-08 22:02:23 EDT --- Receiving 404 for the src rpm - let me know when it is up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(pro...@gmail.com) | --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2009-05-08 22:08:19 EDT --- Sorry. It has just changed the directory: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/atrpms/ampache-3.5-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 22:35:51 EDT --- Looks okay to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2009-05-08 22:36:57 EDT --- Nah, the warnings can be ignored. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:54:11 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4308 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:54:51 EDT --- perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:54:16 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.0.0-6.fc10|3.0.0-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.09-1.fc10 |0.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:56:37 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.0.1-3.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:54:25 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update powwow'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:56:50 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wavemon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4334 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:59:26 EDT --- polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
