[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 arthurguru arthurg.w...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 02:14:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1362528 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b64421ef42d3b2c7852a09887057e54e17c748a9 DateTime-Calendar-Mayan-0.0601.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=124, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.03 sys + 2.57 cusr 0.19 csys = 2.89 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan-0.0601-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(DateTime::Calendar::Mayan) = 0.0601 Requires: perl(DateTime) perl(Params::Validate) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 02:37:43 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 02:37:38 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-19 02:43:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I went over this package. No major issues. I still have to see it building in koji in all archs and to check the resulting packages. Meanwhile I'd like to ask two questions. - rpmlints globus-gss-assist-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gss-assist-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored. ? globus-gss-assist-normalization.patch seems to be rejected by upstream without apparent explanation (closed WONTFIX). What might be wrong? There is nothing really wrong, it is just that upstream does not really care about certificate subject names that contain non-ascii characters. The recommended practice by upstream is to not use non-ascii characters in the certificate subject names, so it is a non-issue for them. ? For globus-gss-assist.patch, you say the GRIDMAPDIR patch from VDT. Who is this VDT, is it related to upstream globus? If not, would you consider submitting the patch to them? Globus is well aware of VDT (virtual data toolkit) - http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/ - and their patches. They are already submitted to globus bugzilla: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/globus/show_bug.cgi?id=6192 VDT it is one of the most commonly used distribution channels for the Globus Toolkit. Many users of globus use this patch since they get globus from VDT rather than from upstream directly, so it makes sense to include it. My suspicion is that if I don't include it, I will get a feature request to include it very soon anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 02:58:57 EDT --- Thanks. No further questions. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1362675 This package (globus-gss-assist) is APPROVED by oget -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #12 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 03:09:34 EDT --- (F-11) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-11/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-11/ibus-table-yong.spec = (F-10) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-10/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-10/ibus-table-yong.spec = Package Name: ibus-table-yong Short Description: Yong table data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #13 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 03:15:06 EDT --- (F-11) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-11/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-11/ibus-table-yong.spec = (F-10) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-10/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-10/ibus-table-yong.spec = Package Name: ibus-table-yong Short Description: Yong table data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-19 03:20:53 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gss-assist Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492778] Review Request: xwine - Graphic Interface for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492778 Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.e ||u --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu 2009-05-19 03:17:44 EDT --- Is it really sensible including an unmaintained package that saw it's last release in 2004? If the application is still useful, I would suggest that there should be some efforts getting a new, active upstream to have a central place where fixes can be collected. Christoph: The software has no real page, it can be found in the category 'Logiciels divers': http://darken33.free.fr/index.php?cat=4rub=20 fs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 03:26:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 03:31:39 EDT --- ping - original package submission is gone -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating .tar archive files in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 03:32:59 EDT --- Please always CC fedora-haskell-list for haskell package reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-05-19 03:39:59 EDT --- Well? Is there something I should be responding to? :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-19 04:26:32 EDT --- The package is APPROVED. Since you're sponsored now, please proceed requesting CVS and import your package. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-05-19 04:48:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks-1.17-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #5 from Balaji G balaji...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 04:53:59 EDT --- Hi Jochen Thanks for your replies. I have uploaded the Source RPM and the Spec files at the location http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st...@sandcat.nl --- Comment #29 from Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl 2009-05-19 04:56:13 EDT --- I just ran into the patch file apply error as well, apparently the patch from Fedora 10 / 11 is more picky about the contents of the patch because this spec file used to build on Fedora 8. Simply rediffing the ia64 part of the patch is enough to complete the build. I'll attach the patch file I used to build gpc for Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 --- Comment #30 from Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl 2009-05-19 04:57:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344592) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344592) Updated Patch0 that completes a build on F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #34 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 06:41:14 EDT --- Hmmm... So, I'll take it. If it is ok to you I'll use your spec since this is already approved. (In reply to comment #33) Heh. Well, i guess i wasnt quite clear enough... I dont have (or really wont have real-soon-now) access to Fedora(-ish) boxes so I wont be able to maintain this package. Sorry about that. ¡Back to you Henrique! You should be able to take that spec and patches and be able to build/import fine. It shouldnt require any further changes at the present. Have fun! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||henrique...@gmail.com --- Comment #22 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 06:57:52 EDT --- I'd like to see this package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #32 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 08:42:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) ...just forgot: Andrew, would you mind building and releasing json as an update for F9/10/11? It will enable doing the same with jbossweb2 later on, thanks. How would you like to be a co-maintainer? Then you can do it and help out when I suck at maintaining :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 08:45:48 EDT --- New revision. %changelog * Tue May 19 2009 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 0-0.3.git20090125 - Corrected 'License' field - Since now ssb_sprom honours optflags http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-tools.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1363009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|atork...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:02:31 EDT --- Pre-review accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:08:11 EDT --- I get a different SVN revision (776300) but there are no differences. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:13:40 EDT --- Odd that I get this the first time I try it: $ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@dumbster.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/dumbster export -r RELEASE_1_6 dumbster Unknown host dumbster.cvs.sourceforge.net. Yet the second time works. There are no differences between my checkout and the contents of SOURCE0. The license field is good. Thanks. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:10:52 EDT --- Your URLs are internal to Red Hat :) Please post external ones. (In reply to comment #5) - please add a URL for the POM file; is it acceptably licensed? A: according to http://www.saxpath.org/, SAXPath uses an Apache-style open source license., so I think it is acceptable. Spot has said on another bug that .pom files are like .spec files so we don't need to worry about their licenses. - the maven example in the packaging guidelines uses org.apache.maven as the first argument to %add_to_maven_depmap but this package uses saxpath. Should it be fully-qualified? A: according to pom file, the groupId is saxpath, so the first argument of %add_to_maven_depmap should be saxpath too. Okay (my maven ignorance is showing here :) - the license field will likely need to be updated. Spot can offer guidance here. A: updated to License: Saxpath Good. I'll do a full review when the SRPM and .spec have been posted in a public place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:14:47 EDT --- I don't think the license field should contain and Plexus, do you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 09:18:46 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 09:18:41 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 09:18:35 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:19:34 EDT --- Spot, can we assume the text regarding licensing being ASL 2.0 at: http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html applies to the whole project? The files in this package (569 lines in total among 4 files) have no license headers and there is no license text in SVN. Fernando: Thanks for fixing the steps to reproduce the source tarball. I'm not sure of the license field being ASL 2.0 and Plexus -- shouldn't it just be ASL 2.0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:26:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Spot, can we assume the text regarding licensing being ASL 2.0 at: http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html applies to the whole project? The files in this package (569 lines in total among 4 files) have no license headers and there is no license text in SVN. Given how divergent the licensing has been in the various plexus bits, I don't think we can safely make that assumption. We need upstream to clarify things, preferrably by fixing their file attribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 09:31:28 EDT --- *** Bug 486365 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|486365 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] New: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ultrafre...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: spec info here SRPM URL: srpm info here Dehttp://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.spechttp://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.specscription: description here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #1 from Federico Hernandez ultrafre...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 10:14:49 EDT --- OK it seems that my description got lost... Here is a new try: Spec URL: http://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task-1.7.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Hi there! I have packaged task, an command-line TODO list manager. The Spec and SRPM are based on the latest release of the upstream package, that is 1.7.0. The rpmlint runs are error and warning free. It would be nice to get a review as well as sponsoring to get task into Fedora. As further information I want to mention that I have close contact to the upstream developer and contribute to the task project (having written the man pages and the bash completion script for the 1.7.0 release). /Federico -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Federico Hernandez ultrafre...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: task - an |package name here - short |open source, command-line, |summary here |TODO list manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Federico Hernandez ultrafre...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #23 from Ruben Kerkhof ru...@rubenkerkhof.com 2009-05-19 10:25:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) Hi David, Please note that I've sponsored Hubert, but if you are going to continue his work you'll have to apply for sponsorship as well. (In reply to comment #22) Peter, maybe we can start an Erlang SIG or something like that? There are a lot of erlang packages which would be nice to have in Fedora, and it would be easier to package them up if this is a joined effort. I'd like to tackle the rabbitmq-xmpp bridge next for instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #24 from David Wragg d...@lshift.net 2009-05-19 10:49:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) Hi David, Please note that I've sponsored Hubert, but if you are going to continue his work you'll have to apply for sponsorship as well. Hi Ruben, Thanks for the note. I was just keeping things moving while Hubert was busy with other commitments. Hubert is still around, and I expect he will continue the submission process, so my involvement is probably more or less over. If that situation changes, I will apply for sponsorship. David -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #68 from Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 10:52:08 EDT --- regarding #67 3. there are no shortcuts by default. has to be fixed upstream (source: upstream) other issues: 1. upstream also suggests to enable Ice else none of the web frontends there are will work out of the box. Can we enable Ice support? going to checkout the newest version of the package later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583
--- Comment #14 from steve st...@lonetwin.net 2009-05-19 11:02:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Bad:
1. The version in the changelog, should be 3.0-4, not 3.0.4.
Done. Also, updated version to 3.0-5 due to the changes below.
2. The sums don't match to upstream:
Upstream SHA1: aeb7887cb4935756cf77deb1ea86973dff0e32fb
Your tarball's SHA1: fb2476bf83cbd14f2030c7c66b7485e49e36671c
Fixed. (huh, don't quite remember why there was a difference in the first
place)
3. There is a static lib in the -devel package. Unless we have a good reason,
we don't package static libs:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
Done. Although note that the dynamic lib is included in the wordnet package
(rather than the -devel) because the wordnet binaries create a dependency on
it.
4. Devel packages should require the main package (Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release})
Done.
I'd also prefer if you didn't wildcard everything so broadly in %files. That
approach leads to extra files getting packaged upon updates without noticing
it.
Done. The binaries are no longer selected with a wildcard, and all the other
files are grouped into reasonably generic wildcards.
Clean up the bad items, and I'll give this another pass.
The newer spec and src rpm are at:
http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec
http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-5.fc10.src.rpm
Thanks for your time.
cheers,
- steve
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #25 from Hubert Plociniczak hub...@lshift.net 2009-05-19 11:57:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) Yes, I am back. Thanks for help, David. We should have a minor release pretty soon with all the changes included, so I will post it here as soon as it is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #15 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 12:04:17 EDT --- Well, if you're going to use a shared library here, you should do it properly, as a versioned .so, with proper packaging. libWN_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 3:0:0 will give you what you want, although, you might talk to upstream to be sure they're okay with the .so numbering starting there. Don't forget to delete the .la and .a file, your -devel wildcard is catching them. See why wildcards are tricky! :) Also, you need to change a few things to ensure that the autotooling happens cleanly, specifically: * BuildRequires: libtool * autoreconf -i instead of just autoreconf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #6 from Balaji G balaji...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 12:06:53 EDT --- Hi Jochen I have addressed your review comments and have placed the SPEC file and the SRPM at the following location http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Please review the same Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #33 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-05-19 12:08:05 EDT --- Heh...ok ;) Request done in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #7 from Balaji G balaji...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 12:07:54 EDT --- Hi Jochen I have addressed your review comments and have placed the SPEC file and the SRPM at the following location for your review. http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-19 12:13:15 EDT --- For a beginner you have provide a nice well-suited package. There are only thwo minor issues which you may fix easily. So I tell you, that I want to sponsor you, after the package will be approved. Good: + Basename SPEC filename matches which package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent stable release of the software + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 4f6fe66dbd9fb3249dd201fd843b8319) + Package contains proper license tag + License tag states GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Consistently rpm macro usage in package + Package doesn't contains any subpackage + Proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Local build works fine + Package support SMP build + Build honours RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Rpmlint is silient on source rpm + Rpmlint is silent on binary rpm + Debuginfo package contains sources + Local install and uninstall works fine + Application doesn't crash on start + Koji build works fine + Files in the files stanza has proper files permission + All packaged files are owned by the pacakge + No packaged file is owned by another package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Patckage has prpoer %Changelog Bad: - Copyright notes in the source files haeaders state GPLv2+ as license for the package - You can remove the requires ncurses line, because rpm create automaticly a Require to the library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-19 12:21:04 EDT --- It look like, that you didn't upload a correct release of your package. Please keep in mind do increase the release number each time if you make a change on your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #14 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 12:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) ping? hello Jussi, latest files are here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-5.fc10.src.rpm Koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364002 I still dont understand how build could fail in mock while scratch building ok in koji, however things should be sorted right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-19 12:37:06 EDT --- After a discusion on fedora-Packaging, We have dicide no to use _initrddir or initddir in the funtere. In addition I have open BZ #501518 for creating a filesystem subpackage for heartbeate. So, after we have clarified this two topics, I'm able to APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-19 12:44:32 EDT --- Okay, everything should be fine now. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-19 12:49:12 EDT --- ok. I think the best way forward is to close this, and re-open the other submission for review. :) Thanks guys! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Summary|Review Request: FMIT - Free |Review Request: fmit - Free |Music Instrument Tuner |Music Instrument Tuner --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-19 12:49:54 EDT --- The old review is being closed in favor of this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #9 from Balaji G balaji...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 12:54:17 EDT --- Hi Jochen Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes i had uploaded the wrong file.I have updated the release tag in the Spec and uploaded the SRPM at the location for your review. http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kle...@hp.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jan.kle...@hp.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-05-19 13:07:43 EDT --- This package builds successfully in all branches. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #69 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-19 13:26:43 EDT --- For -12: * postun initscript scriptlets - Now Requires(postun): initscripts is also needed for murmur - And this postun scriptlet must be: * the part of %postun -n murmur, not in the part of mumble %postun scriptlets * And condrestart must be called in [ $1 -ge 1 ] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-19 13:26:14 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with packagename + Packagename fullfill naming guildelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent stable release of the application + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 8fb7540bf2a7a8e1fa0086708ed9b881) + Consistently rpm macro usage in this package + Package has no subpackages + Package has proper license tag + License tag exclaim GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package support SMP build + Local install and uninstall works fine + Call of the application works fine + Koji scratch build works fine + Package has small %doc stanza, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Files has proper file permission + All packaged files are owned by the package + %files stanza has no duplicated entries + No packaged file belong to another package Bad: - Copyright headers have only a refernce to the LICENSE/COPYING file. Please talk to upstream, that he should include a more clean copyright note on the source file - Please remove the Packager tag - You don't need to test the existance of the Buildroot before cleaning it. - build don't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Rpmlint has warning on source rpm: pmlint ascii-3.8-2.fc10.src.rpm ascii.src: W: summary-not-capitalized interactive ASCII name and synonym chart ascii.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII ascii.src: W: non-standard-group Utilities/Text ascii.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 72, tab: line 82) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - Rpmlint complaints binary package: rpmlint ascii-3.8-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm ascii.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized interactive ASCII name and synonym chart ascii.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII ascii.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Utilities/Text 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - Debuginfo package doesn't contains sources - Please remove the old Changelog and beginning with a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-05-19 13:30:47 EDT --- Hi Johan, 1] I think we shouldn't ignore this easy-to-fix issue. 2] SPEC doesn't match provided SRPM, could you give us link to latest SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xja...@fi.muni.cz Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-05-19 13:45:40 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: json New Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 Owners: overholt mjakubicek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 13:57:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496639 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Flag||fedora-review+ Bug 499306 depends on bug 498862, which changed state. Bug 498862 Summary: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-19 13:58:13 EDT --- Fedora review jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-19 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output is OK: [ell...@ellert jconv]$ rpmlint *.rpm jconv.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Package is named according to guidlines * Specfile is named after the package * The package license tag (GPLv2+) is Fedora approved * The package license tag matches the license statements in the sources * The license file (COPYING) is installed as %doc * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream, and are the latest version: 7c194e36ecc59fd443ad08405cb40d73 SRPM/jconv-0.8.1.tar.bz2 7c194e36ecc59fd443ad08405cb40d73 jconv-0.8.1.tar.bz2 a33ec6a97fac039400f7674f3bde4ca9 SRPM/jconv-reverbs.tar.bz2 a33ec6a97fac039400f7674f3bde4ca9 jconv-reverbs.tar.bz2 * Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) * Build requires are sane and reflect the libraries that are linked to during the build * Package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Macros are used consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||tcall...@redhat.com Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-19 14:08:04 EDT --- For 0.8.12-3: * License - Well, actually COPYING is GPLv3 text, but as far as I checked the source code, the license tag should be GPLv2+ (Note that just putting GPLv3 license text in the tarball does not specify the version of GPL). * Directory ownership issue - This package should own the directory %_datadir/%name. ! Note that I cannot test this application because I don't have the necessary device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #2 from Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be 2009-05-19 14:10:33 EDT --- Hi Jan, Ok, I'll fox the end-of-line issue and will upload the new SPEC/SRPM Sorry, I've uploaded the wrong SRPM :/ Here's the correct one : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 --- Comment #4 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 14:16:56 EDT --- Something weird is happening. When trying to build new versions of fmit I'm getting this messages: ===Making all in ui make[2]: Entrando no diretório `/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7/ui' /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic ConfigForm.ui ConfigForm.h /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic InstrumentTunerForm.ui InstrumentTunerForm.h /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl ConfigForm.h ConfigForm.ui ConfigForm.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc ConfigForm.h ConfigForm_moc.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl InstrumentTunerForm.h InstrumentTunerForm.ui InstrumentTunerForm.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc InstrumentTunerForm.h InstrumentTunerForm_moc.cpp /bin/sh: line 1: 14836 Falha de segmentação /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl ConfigForm.h ConfigForm.ui ConfigForm.cpp make[2]: ** [ConfigForm.cpp] Erro 139 make[2]: ** Esperando que outros processos terminem. /bin/sh: line 1: 14840 Falha de segmentação /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl InstrumentTunerForm.h InstrumentTunerForm.ui InstrumentTunerForm.cpp make[2]: ** [InstrumentTunerForm.cpp] Erro 139 make[2]: Saindo do diretório `/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7/ui' make[1]: ** [all-recursive] Erro 1 make[1]: Saindo do diretório `/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7' make: ** [all] Erro 2 erro: Status de saída de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mg3AX7 inválido (%build) Erros na construção do RPM: Status de saída de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mg3AX7 inválido (%build) === But, just a few days ago this problem is not happening as we can see in the first attempt to make this rpm (Comment #0). Working on jebbas's RPM gets the same result: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/fmit/0.97.7-6/fmit.spec http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/fmit/0.97.7-6/fmit-0.97.7-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #3 from Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be 2009-05-19 14:19:44 EDT --- Ok, I've corrected the rpmlint issue. rpmlint output is now completely clean for both SRPM and RPM. Here's updated links : SRPM : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SPECS/tuxmath.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 14:38:03 EDT --- libmemcached-0.29-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.29-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 14:42:02 EDT --- libmemcached-0.29-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.29-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 14:41:23 EDT --- ... and a BuildRequires: python-sqlalchemy, python-coverage, python-nose, python-repoze.who Look at tests_require= in setup.py. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130
Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de 2009-05-19 14:48:40
EDT ---
Does that now mean, that I can/should/must revert my %{_initrddir} usage?
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: drbdlinks
Short Description: A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition
Owners: robert
Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11
InitialCC:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 14:56:41 EDT --- Please update this to 1.0rc1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 14:40:24 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jconv Short Description: Jack Convolution Engine Owners: oget nando Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-19 14:38:00 EDT --- BuildRequires: python-elixir is needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130
--- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-19
15:01:25 EDT ---
You should convert to %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d in the futere.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #70 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 14:59:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #67) I just compiled this on my fedora 11 system and I'd like to mention 3 things. I guess this package is being targeted for f10 but f11 is just about here . 8 days. 1. First is that mumble-overlay complains 32-bit libmumble.so.1 not found in . To fix this I did a ln -s /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 /usr/lib/mumble/libmumble.so.1 . Fixed. 2. In plugins shouldn't 'link' plugin be in there by default because it doesn't show up. Settings | Plugins is empty. No solution for this. Tried many different configurations, made some symlinks and still same problem. Looks like mumble cant find liblink.so. btw, works fine if you start mumble from BUILD directory. Suggestions are welcome. 3. In Settings | Shortcuts. There aren't any shortcut entries visible. The only one there is push to talk because that one was set with the audio wizard. Other than that the defaults are not there. Even clicking 'restore defaults' does nothing. I'm very happy about this package making it into the repo. Fixed scriptlets pointed by Mamoru. Comment #67 To enable Ice I would have to change murmur.ini and php.ini. After that I would have to make another sub-package with php and perl scripts for registering users. This is no problem(except changing php and murmur ini's) but it would be stupid(from my point of view) to do all of this for half complete scripts. I would suggest we wait for complete solution for administering murmur server before doing any of these. One is already out (http://hiddenservers.org/murmurcp) but its license is not compatible with Fedora. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501566 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501566] New: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-who-friendlyform.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11.src.rpm Description: repoze.who-friendlyform is a repoze.who plugin which provides a collection of developer-friendly form plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 15:16:45 EDT --- lmms-0.4.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lmms-0.4.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638
Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:21:08
EDT ---
Pretty simple and clean package. Here is full review:
+ rpmlint output clean
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in
%doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one primary architecture (x86_64).
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ No need to deal with locales.
+ Does not contain shared libraries.
+ The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not list a file more than once in the spec %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Does not contain large documentation files.
+ Includes only doc files in %doc.
+ No headers.
+ No static libraries.
+ The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ The package does not contain library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1).
+ No devel packages.
+ The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
+ Does not contain GUI applications.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501573] New: Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 Summary: Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: st...@traylen.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/ndoutils-rpm/ndoutils.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/ndoutils-rpm/ndoutils-1.4b7-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: The NDOUTILS addon is designed to store all configuration and event data from Nagios in a database. This is my first package for Fedora and as such I require a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-05-19 15:47:45 EDT --- what's your fedora username in FAS[1] ? [1] - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:45:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: b43-tools Short Description: Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501576] New: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-quickstart.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin allows you to take advantage of a rather simple, and usual, authentication and authorization setup, in which the users’ data, the groups and the permissions used in the application are all stored in a SQLAlchemy or Elixir-managed database. Put simply, it configures repoze.who and repoze.what in one go so that you can have an authentication and authorization system working quickly – hence the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||501566, 476789, 479021, ||479020, 468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #2 from david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:49:39 EDT --- Hello, I fix build require and i sent an email to the author of the module to seek clarification on the license. I have read http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361022 but don't understand. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-19 15:59:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Hello, I fix build require and i sent an email to the author of the module to seek clarification on the license. OK, Please upload a new release for review. I have read http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361022 but don't understand. The issue is, that the 'make chech' command in the %check stanza need a running X-Server. Unfortunately on a build server we don't have a GUI.To selve this issue it may be nice, if you remove the %check stanza completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
