[Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #25 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 02:25:27 EDT --- Thanks .. fixed all http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-6.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request === Package Name: Mayavi Short Description: The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 03:01:28
EDT ---
1) You should not use following
%ifnarch x86_64 # x86_64 does not have brp-compress
%define __spec_install_post %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress
%endif
remove this.
2) also I have fixed few more issues as per given in Changelog at
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/ayttm1.spec
Use this spec and resubmit SPEC and SRPM for review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #8 from Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 04:48:51 EDT --- The kernel should BuildRequire the dracut-generic package and deliver a generic initramfs image, which can be chosen as an alternative image to the special host generated image, which can/should be triggered with a kernel install. I think the kernel only Requires /sbin/new-kernel-pkg, which is part of grubby. new-kernel-pkg will be modified to use dracut to build an image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-26 04:50:46 EDT --- BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 05:19:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nbtk Short Description: A toolkit for moblin NetBooks Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-06-26 06:07:14
EDT ---
- Don't call libtool manually. Remove the last three lines in %install, add
instead BuildRequires: automake and
sed -i s|noinst_|bin_|g Makefile.am
automake
to %setup, this will make the build process install xyconv to %{_bindir}.
- Use SMP make flags. Change
make
to
make %{?_smp_mflags}
- Change
%{_bindir}/*
to
%{_bindir}/xyconv
and
%{_includedir}/*
to
%{_includedir}/xylib/
(no sense in using wildcards in these cases)
- The attributes
%defattr(-,root,root)
should be
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
SHOULD: Use a more recommended version of the BuildRoot tag
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508239] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash Koji Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436825 Note: This is needed to update perl-DBIx-Class in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 06:40:08 EDT --- + is ok - is Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436825 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. perl-Hash-Merge.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Hash/Merge.pm 0555 perl-Hash-Merge.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Hash/Merge.pm == This need to be fixed. + source files match upstream url 23c6a4c3b1f620e47c34c9c9afb962e71195f955 Hash-Merge-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=45, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.08 CPU) + Package perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(Hash::Merge) = 0.11 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) This package should own /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Hash please correct this before cvs import. 2) you missed to add to spec chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* 3) fix rpmlint output. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-06-26 06:45:59
EDT ---
Package must own %{perl_vendordir}/Hash
Revoking APPROVAL
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508254] New: Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 Summary: Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-namespace-clean.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-namespace-clean-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: When you define a function, or import one, into a Perl package, it will naturally also be available as a method. This does not per se cause problems, but it can complicate subclassing and, for example, plugin classes that are included via multiple inheritance by loading them as base classes. The namespace::clean pragma will remove all previously declared or imported symbols at the end of the current package's compile cycle. Functions called in the package itself will still be bound by their name, but they won't show up as methods on your class or instances. Koji Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436845 Note: This is needed to update perl-DBIx-Class in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 06:53:59 EDT --- Yeah, he pointed that out. Fixed along with the other issues in -2: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508254] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 07:05:26 EDT --- Ralf, I thought I have already pointed that and I see there is no need to block this review just for that change. Anyway as you are now reviewer for this package, feel free to check -2 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508254] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 07:15:09 EDT --- This package is already in Fedora. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461390] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keep your namespace tidy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461390 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 07:18:28 EDT --- *** Bug 508254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508254] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE AssignedTo|panem...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 07:18:28 EDT --- hmm. I forgot that it was me who reviewed this package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 461390 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720
Ivana Varekova varek...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(varek...@redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #9 from Ivana Varekova varek...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 07:49:58
EDT ---
Thanks fixed:
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/new/uClibc.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/new/uClibc-0.9.30.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
add notes
- Please consider setting PREFIX instead of DEVEL_PREFIX
for now I leave DEVEL_PREFIX, but if you want it then I will do the change
- CFLAGS do not use %{optflags}, it probably doesn't make sense in this case
I don't think tit has a sense
- The ExcludeArch: comment will have to be filed as a bug component creation
in
bugzilla
I plan to create the bz, thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 08:58:26 EDT --- 1.) Licensing README states License: Perl Artistic License (which sounds bad as it's not clear if GPL is permitted as well)m while XML::Parser::LiteCopy manual reads This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. (which is good). Please ask upstream for clarification. 2.) Please remove Require: perl(Test::More) dependency, the runtime does not depend on the testing framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:07:54 EDT --- * rpmlint is quiet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:07:34 EDT --- * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok Needs work: - sane provides/requires - license ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:03:58 EDT --- 1.) Licensing README states License: Perl Artistic License (which sounds bad as it's not clear if GPL is permitted as well)m while XML::Parser::LiteCopy manual reads This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. (which is good). Please ask upstream for clarification. 2.) Please remove useless requires. RPM generates the list for you and the runtime does not depend on the testing framework: Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) Requires: perl(HTTP::Response) Requires: perl(LWP::UserAgent) Requires: perl(Test::More) (Explicitly versioned ones are ok) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:08:06 EDT --- * rpmlint is quiet * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok Needs work: - sane provides/requires - license ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:19:18 EDT --- * rpmlint is quiet * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok * sane provides/requires * license ok APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||507805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||507804, 507801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||507805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 09:21:05 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #47 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:26:41 EDT --- 'nushio' has been sponsored removing NEEDSPONSOR now, the package can be APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #31 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 09:33:36 EDT --- No problem with that RPM, but like I said, Toshio's the one that provided the fix, I simply pointed out the error. This fix should let me compile gnome-do-plugins for x86_64, unless there's another similar bug on another of the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:34:20 EDT --- 1.) Please remove Require: perl(Test::More) dependency, the runtime does not depend on the testing framework. 2.) Licensing Proc/Simple.pm contains this: # This program is free software, you can redistribute it and/or # modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. Neither README nor POD documentation contains it -- please ask upstream to include the licensing conditions there. * rpmlint is quiet * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok Needs work: - sane provides/requires - license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #48 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 09:39:51 EDT --- Thanks Christian, Rajeesh and Lubomir for helping me get approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #32 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 09:42:07 EDT --- Paul, could you do a build-override with that package, so I can try to build gnome-do-plugins on x86_64 on koji? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #49 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 09:54:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: blueman Short Description: GTK+ Bluetooth Manager Owners: nushio Branches: devel, F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lkund...@v3.sk) | --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 09:56:37 EDT --- Sorry, Mamoru; I've been quite busy with rest of $daywork these day (which is quite a bad excuse for not responding). I've integrated your suggestions: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-term-ansicolor.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-term-ansicolor-1.0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703
--- Comment #3 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 10:08:04
EDT ---
Jan Klepek
1) In my opinion, you maybe need to correct %file section. Because
%{perl_vendorlib}/Proc would be owned by another packages like perl-Proc-*.
I think these are better.
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Proc/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
2) That BuildArch is noarch seems not to be suitable for it. As I see, building
package for various architectures may be better than noarch. So I advise that
BuildArch should be removed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 10:22:13 EDT --- So, Jeroen, if you want to be the maintainer of this package, I will be happy with it. Please set cvs flag again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703
--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 10:31:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Jan Klepek
1) In my opinion, you maybe need to correct %file section. Because
%{perl_vendorlib}/Proc would be owned by another packages like perl-Proc-*.
I think these are better.
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Proc/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
This is not right -- that would leave an unowned %{perl_vendorlib}/Proc upon
removal of the package, which violates the guidelines. Sharing directories is
completely fine. Jan, please don't change that.
2) That BuildArch is noarch seems not to be suitable for it. As I see,
building
package for various architectures may be better than noarch. So I advise that
BuildArch should be removed.
Wrong. There's nothing arch-specific in the package; it's definitely noarch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508316] New: Review Request: emacs-jabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Summary: Review Request: emacs-jabber Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/emacs-jabber.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/emacs-jabber-0.7.93-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Emacs plugin for jabber protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |emacs-jabber|emacs-jabber - Jabber ||plugin for emacs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] New: Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Summary: Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-2.27.0-0.1.20090626gita13dec3.fc11.src.rpm A window manager based on metacity and clutter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484548] Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484548 Bug 484548 depends on bug 484547, which changed state. Bug 484547 Summary: Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 10:46:32 EDT --- OK. That makes the transition a little messy, but doesn't actually affect the current packaging. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 10:48:51 EDT --- - This package (rubygem-term-ansicolor) is APPROVED by mtasaka - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 10:53:48 EDT --- Just as a drive-by, that URL in the spec isn't right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-26 11:28:03 EDT --- Much thanks! I'm currently in the process of fixing the duplicate file listing in other rubygem packages as well. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-term-ansicolor Short Description: Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences Owners: hpejakle lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otay...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 11:32:50 EDT --- Owen, what do you reckon with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||praveen_palad...@dell.com Bug 470293 depends on bug 501812, which changed state. Bug 501812 Summary: sblim-cmpi-base file permissions incorrect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501812 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com 2009-06-26 11:33:43 EDT --- I couldn't download the source rpm. Could you please check the link or provide with the above mentioned changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 11:36:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Just as a drive-by, that URL in the spec isn't right. How right you are. I've set it to moblin.org at the moment as I can't find a page on gnome.org or in google. Other suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #33 from Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de 2009-06-26 11:49:13 EDT --- Juan, package is built and update submitted: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickrnet-2.1.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581
--- Comment #1 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-06-26 12:07:50
EDT ---
Hi,
I've reviewed the package and it looks quite good. There are only minor TODOs:
- clarification about the license (I've sent a mail to fedora-legal.)
- description formatting
- functional test
- if possible it would be great if the package would compile in F10, too...
Here is the detailed review:
* rpmlint: OK
rpmlint SPECS/xscope.spec RPMS/i586/xscope-*
SRPMS/xscope-1.1-1.gitfccbbd6.fc11.src.rpm
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* naming: OK
- name matches upstream
- spec file name matches package name
- snapshot release tag OK according:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
* License: TODO
- Although the meaning of the license seems to match the BSD license, I'm not
100% sure its a real BSD license since the wording is different. Just to
confirm I've asked on the fedora-legal list for confirmation.
- COPYING file packaged
* specfile in American English and legible: OK
* %description: TODO (minor)
- I would reformat the last sentence in the %description section to use up the
available space of 80 charaters.
* Sources: OK
- Source0 URL ok
- spectool -g xscope.spec works
- sources matches upstream - md5sum:
c37ec177b56d5909584c1672b6beabd5 xscope-1.1.tar.bz2
* Patch0: OK
- patch file can be regenerated by the supplied git diff command
- upstream status of the patch is obvious
fce6e9df7881061013f4acd43742585b xscope-1.1-diff_to_git.patch
* Compilation: OK
- mock build works
- package builds correctly in koji for F12 and F11, but failed for F10
- RPMOPTFLAGS used
- parallel build supported via _smp_mflags
* debuginfo sub-package: OK
- non-empty
- debuginfo file works together with gdb
* BuildRequires: OK
* Locales handling: OK (n/a)
* shared/static libs, pkgconfig/header/*.la files: OK (n/a)
* packages must own all directories: OK
* files not listed twice: OK
* permissions of files: OK
- %defattr used
- final file permissions OK
* %clean section: OK
* macro usage: OK
* code vs. content: OK (only code)
* large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a)
* GUI application needs %{name}.desktop: OK (n/a)
* no directories owned which are already owned by other packages: OK
* rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %{install}: OK
* all filenames UTF8: OK
* functional test: TODO
- running it on the same machine as the X server did not work well:
- started xscope -v1
- started DISPLAY=:1 gedit in another console
- xscope displays some X11 protocol communication
- but gedit doesn't start up completly, X server + xscope + gedit hangs, it
is necessary to kill xscope by logging in via ssh...
- probably it is just wrong usage - any hints welcome ;-)
Best regards,
Christian
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #4 from Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 12:53:50 EDT --- For the URL, I'd suggest just using the cgit URL for now: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/mutter (I don't think the moblin URL is appropriate.) Some more drive-by comments: BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-devel [...] --without-introspection Those two conflict. We'll definitely need an introspection-enabled package of Mutter for F12, so we can package gnome-shell. That will mean making sure that the Clutter package is introspection enabled as well, and that we have up-to-date versions of gobject-introspection and gir-repository packaged. BuildRequires: fontconfig-devel BuildRequires: libglade2-devel BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel These seem extraneous. BuildRequires: zenity This should be a Requires: along with a BuildRequires. --disable-xinerama Why? At a high level, getting to packaging the gnome-shell stack for Fedora: gobject-introspection [already old version packaged, I think] gir-repository [there's a review request] clutter-0.9 gjs mutter gnome-shell Is something that I want the gnome-shell team to get to soon (though probably not until after GUADEC); and to do that, we'll definitely push out tarball releases rather than packaging git snapshots. We're happy to have co-maintainers and people helping out with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||che...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 12:56:50 EDT --- src rpm is broken (check size). probably half upload. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508349] New: Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 Summary: Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/rawhide/kdepim-runtime.spec SRPM URL http://than.fedorapeople.org/rawhide/http://than.fedorapeople.org/rawhide/kdepim-runtime-4.2.95-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: KDE PIM Runtime Environment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #27 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-06-26 13:07:42 EDT --- No problem, I've hardly been handling this at the speed I'd like either. Work/Life are going to continue to essentially dominate my time for the next couple weeks, so I'm going to mark this on the whiteboard as NotReady and come back to it in a little bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #8 from Jim Radford radf...@blackbean.org 2009-06-26 13:08:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging Thanks for the reminder. I was waiting for the package it be added to F11 or at least to hit the rawhide mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #6 from Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 13:12:03 EDT --- One more comment - the Summary should be : Window and compositing manager based on Clutter (That's what I used in mutter.doap and GNOME bugzilla) I don't have a %description handy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-06-26 13:16:27 EDT --- The build has completed in all requested releases. Closing this review request out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] New: Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Summary: Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cedric.oliv...@free.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec SRPM URL: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1607-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Hi, I just finished packaging josm, and I would appreciate a review. It's my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. JOSM is an editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java 1.5. Currently it supports loading stand alone GPX track data from the OSM database, loading and editing existing nodes, ways, metadata tags and relations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 Ed Swierk eswi...@aristanetworks.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508352] New: Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 Summary: Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eswi...@aristanetworks.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~eswierk/misc/pxe-kexec/pxe-kexec.spec SRPM URL: http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~eswierk/misc/pxe-kexec/pxe-kexec-0.1.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: pxe-kexec reads a PXELINUX configuration file, prompts the user for an entry like the PXELINUX program would do and finally boots that entry using Kexec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 13:40:01 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-26 13:40:06 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 Ed Swierk eswi...@aristanetworks.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||pxe-kexec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #4 from Marcin Wojdyr woj...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 14:05:47 EDT --- I made all the changes you suggested above, with one exception: I kept gcc-g++ in BuildRequires, I hope it's not a problem. Thank you both. Spec URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-06-26 14:19:10 EDT --- As you're a new packager you should learn to run rpmlint on your packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Use_rpmlint You've written %defattr in the changelog, which may be expanded. rpmlint complains from this among other things. In the changelog you should use %% to prevent the macro from being expanded. rpmlint does sometimes generate noise, for instance it will comlain about the -devel package having no documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #9 from Pascal pascal...@parois.net 2009-06-26 14:27:07 EDT --- Upstream answer: The conditions of use are at the beginning of the main documentation file. You can make that change, if you like. Put a note in the code that you have made this change as I want to look a little more closely as to what should be done in my version before I make any change. Effectively, in nm11.htm: 1.1 Conditions of use I place no restrictions on the use of newmat except that I take no liability for any problems that may arise from its use, distribution or other dealings with it. You can use it in your commercial projects (as well as your non-commercial projects). You can make and distribute modified or merged versions. You can include parts of it in your own software. If you distribute modified or merged versions, please make it clear which parts are mine and which parts are modified. [...] Is it not enough ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #6 from Marcin Wojdyr woj...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 14:41:48 EDT --- Yes, I know about rpmlint, but the last time I checked only RPMs, not the spec. Updated spec and SRPM are in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508373] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-SQLite OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module understands the formats used by SQLite for its 'date', 'datetime' and 'time' functions. It can be used to parse these formats in order to create the DateTime manpage objects, and it can take a DateTime object and produce a timestring accepted by SQLite.*NOTE:* SQLite does not have real date/time types but stores everything as strings. This module deals with the date/time strings as understood/returned by SQLite's 'date', 'time', 'datetime', 'julianday' and 'strftime' SQL functions. You will usually want to store your dates in one of these formats. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437534 Additional Comment: This is an additional optional testing dep for the latest GA DBIx::Class. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #34 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 15:25:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349593) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349593) SourceFucker Please note that that type of issue is exactly why SourceFucker was developed. It can create patches for these type of issues for your Mono packages. I would recommend running it against any current packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 15:36:40 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 15:37:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have should be read as Fedora 10/11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 15:36:16 EDT --- Well, * This package itself can be approved (actually most issues are already discussed in the previous review request) * As mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored We request those who want to get sponsored to either submit another review request or do pre-review of other person's review request to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines. Now you have another review request bug 507110 and from a very quick glance at the spec file it is well-packaged ! Note: For openal-soft review request, please change the release number every time you modify your spec file/srpm to avoid confusion (even during review request). This package (bullet) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Install the Client Tools (Koji). Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||poppler-data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-06-26 16:04:54 EDT --- I am not a legal expert, but as stated here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses , all software in Fedora MUST be under licenses in the Fedora licensing list. This list is based on the licenses approved by the Free Software Foundation , OSI and consultation with Red Hat Legal. Debian packagers raised the same type of concerns about licensing of that package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335185 , but they became eventually fine with the re-worded version of the license. It is a custom license, and the author does not appear to be ready to switch to a standard, OSI-approved, license. So, Fedora legal people may not accept that license. I prefer to let them have a look at it and decide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de 2009-06-26 17:18:44 EDT --- Fixed spec file because i had forget to add informations about my changes in the spec file http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de 2009-06-26 18:32:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bullet Short Description: 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library Owners: linuxdonald Branches: devel, F-10, F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||508417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508417] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 508416 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-ruby-oepngl/rubygem-ruby-opengl.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-ruby-oepngl/rubygem-ruby-opengl-0.60.1-2.fc.src.rpm Description: ruby-opengl consists of Ruby extension modules that are bindings for the OpenGL, GLU, and GLUT libraries. It is intended to be a replacement for -- and uses the code from -- Yoshi's ruby-opengl. Koji sratch build: - Not available yet because this depends on bug 508416 - However mock build results for dist-f12 i586/x86_64 are available on: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-ruby-oepngl/Results/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508416] New: Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf-0.2.3-1.fc.src.rpm Description: mkrf is a library for generating Rakefiles to build Ruby extension modules written in C. It is intended as a replacement for mkmf. The major difference between the two is that mkrf builds you a Rakefile instead of a Makefile. koji scratch build: For F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437438 For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437830 There are many rpmlint warining/errors on -doc subpackage, however these are on examples and I think they are safe to ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-26 18:50:43 EDT --- By the way the naming seems a bit strange, however gem name is actually called as ruby-opengl so I think rubygem-ruby-opengl is proper for srpm name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2009-06-26 19:31:45 EDT --- FYI, I already pushed clutter 0.9 packages for F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smparr...@gmail.com Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 20:24:25 EDT --- Fabian, where do we stand on this? Per the above ticket it looks like they spun up a tarball. Do you have a version of this that will work on F11 or F12? Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smparr...@gmail.com Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #10 from Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 20:28:00 EDT --- Fabian, Where do we stand on this one? Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||smparr...@gmail.com Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 20:25:29 EDT --- Package currently in Fedora closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smparr...@gmail.com Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com 2009-06-26 20:26:58 EDT --- Bryan where do we stand on this. Do you have a working version for F11? Do you need help or someone to take over? Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #16 from Wesley S. Hearn gr33nn1...@gr33nn1nj4.com 2009-06-26 20:34:11 EDT --- Upstream bug, about dialog says beta3 and the sources still have the name for beta3. So the package needs to be beta3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:34:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:34:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:38:49 EDT --- CVS done, except that I think you intended to make yourself the owner, not Orcan, so that's what I set up. Otherwise, Orcan approved his own package, which is not appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #50 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:40:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:39:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:42:03 EDT --- Oops, unfortunately I can't do CVS because of: blueman: PackageDB returned an error creating blueman: Email address nus...@gmail.com is not a valid bugzilla email address. Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email address in the Fedora Account System https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ to a valid bugzilla email address and try again. Could you fix that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-26 20:44:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
