[Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 02:03:36 EDT --- Umm, you're supposed to give him a month to reply, then ping, then close after a week. You didn't even give Luke a full week before your first ping, and now I see you've dropped the other tickets in the dependency chain back into the review queue. Is there some problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(panem...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 02:22:05 EDT --- I think Luke is very busy with his security work. I almost ping him daily on #fedora-devel and #fedora-python. But very few times I got reply like he will be going to work. So I thought instead of pinging him again and again I better move on and pick some other reviews. And if I am dropping first package in chain then it will be good to drop others also. As first package itself will take some more time to appear in rawhide repository. I hope there is no policy that prevents reviewer from leaving review at any point. If there is any please point me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 02:22:29 EDT --- Can you submit updated SRPM? Though, I am continuously in talk with you but still I think you should submit SRPM and check what upstream says on unfunctionality of some features in ayttm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 02:31:09 EDT --- Of course you're welcome to drop reviews at any time if you feel like you can't stick with it and wait a while for a busy person to respond. That just means that I or one of the other few reviewers will have to take care of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 02:44:42 EDT --- Did you consider a dependency on python-matplotlib? Without it you can't actually plot anything, and the description probably needs to account for that. Also, the message printed when you don't have python-matplotlib doesn't really help the user to figure out what package to install. (It references Matplotlib, which you can search for, but it would be better if it indicated the package name.) I don't think that's a blocker, but do think of the users. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 5b5dcecd570d2242663771f23d5d7679164fb04a82accf6a142b78bf485c1181 pondus-0.5.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pondus = 0.5.3-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop files valid and installed properly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 02:47:09 EDT --- and hey! I have not closed this review. Just moved back to New queue. Don't worry I will pick some more reviews to look queue count lower for you. I know you are very much worried about New Package Count. And if you are really, I will say first we should try to do something for Merge-reviews. I also see we have not very good but good amount of reviewers nowadays. I also know you got busy with fedora-cvs work that is not giving you much time on reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:07:45 EDT --- Well, that was a bust. At this point I'm of the opinion that yes, this is potentially problematic, but we aren't installing on everyone's system by default and if there's a problem we can deal with it. Honestly a review ticket shouldn't have to sit around for fourteen months anyway. So, I have some time so I'm going to go ahead and work on this. Here's the latest rpmlint output: dchroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dchroot 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/schroot 04755 dchroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/dchroot root 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/schroot root 04755 These are OK; being setuid is kind of necessary. schroot.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 schroot.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libboost_filesystem.so.5 schroot.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libboost_program_options.so.5 The indicated library is linked against those three libraries without actually calling anything in them. This is common with libtool-using packages. It's not an especially big deal, but you can find some info on making it go away at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency schroot.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 schroot.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libsbuild.so.1.0.0 You must call ldconfig when installing shared libraries into system locations. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries dchroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dchroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-listmounts ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-mount ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-releaselock ['/usr/lib64'] These need fixing, and unfortunately passing --disable-rpath to %configure didn't help. There's some info at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath Some other random comments: The description for the dchroot package could use a bit more elaboration. I think the license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3 only. Do you see some place where the version is limited to v3? Nothing owns /etc/schroot, /etc/schroot/exec.d, /etc/schroot/setup.d, /usr/libexec/schroot or /var/lib/schroot. That's enough for now. If you get those fixed up I'll do a complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510022] Review Request: compat-readline5 - A library for editing typed command lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510022 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-07-11 03:16:34 EDT --- APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:22:40 EDT --- There's actually an interesting problem with this package that I don't see mentioned above. The spec is under the same license as the package, which means you didn't have the right to make any of the changes you've been making. Now, it's incredibly dumb to try to license a spec file like that, and far dumber to put it under a license that does not permit modification. I would honestly argue that you can't even copyright the factual information present in a spec file. However, I don't think we can just remove the license, and since we've looked at the spec I'm not sure if we can just recreate it. What are we supposed to do now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:30:01 EDT --- It's getting less and less useful to have an i386-only package; I don't even try building anything on i386 these days. Is there no chance of getting this to work on x86_64 or any other 64-bit architecture? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:33:59 EDT --- Sorry, I also note that 0.27 seems to be out as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:33:18 EDT --- This fails to build for me in rawhide on x86_64: checking for png_create_read_struct in -lpng... no checking for png_create_read_struct in -lpng10... no checking for png_create_read_struct in -lpng12... no configure: error: cannot find required library png A missing build dependency, perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:39:27 EDT --- This does build, but the resulting package does not install. My build script catches this because it installs the built packages into the chroot. Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install /mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch.rpm php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch from /php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: dejavu-fonts is needed by package php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch (/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch) Error: Missing Dependency: dejavu-fonts is needed by package php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch (/php-captchaphp-2.0-2.fc12.noarch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:35:23 EDT --- Who are you pinging? Nobody is assigned to review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 03:44:17 EDT --- Thx for the review. About usability test: this package is part of the python-kaa framework which is made for the freevo multimedia center. As freevo will requires at least xine-ui for multimedia playback I will work on freevo for fedora ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 03:46:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-kaa-display Short Description: Python API providing Low level support for various displays Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-11 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:49:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:46:51 EDT --- This is a terribly ancient ticket. I believe I tried once to get Gnome-knowledgeable people interested in looking at it, but I failed. Still, it's worth asking: What relevance does this have to F-11? We never got an updated package with 0.8.1, which might explain part of why nobody ever took care of this review. What's the current version? Finally, is there still a reason to keep this ticket open? Does Pablo still wish to get this package into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:50:32 EDT --- You should post links to the new spec and src.rpm so that I can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 03:51:18 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 04:04:15 EDT --- Oh, I just noticed that this already blocks the relevant ghostscript bug. This package already has the appropriate license tag as indicated in bug 487510, so I'd say that we're good to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 04:06:05 EDT --- Time for my monthly ping. Did you have any luck with that updated package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 04:09:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: erlang-eradius Short Description: RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 04:14:15 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 04:27:18 EDT --- Ok, after reviewing, this package is now approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 04:01:57 EDT --- It seems that FESCo took up this issue, although it looks like there were talking about something different. See http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-10/fedora-meeting.2009-07-10-17.00.html (Adobe CMap files - code or content?) and https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/177. That seems to answer one question (the legal one) but begs another: is this package duplicating something that's already in ghostscript? Can the data be unified and shared between the two packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-11 04:36:43 EDT --- Ankur, each time when you make changes and new build preformed, you must change release number and write appropriate changelog. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-07-11 04:46:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Ankur, each time when you make changes and new build preformed, you must change release number and write appropriate changelog. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs hi, yeah.. i dint think it was necessary for these changes.. sorry.. Ill do it from now.. is the rest of the package okay? Ankur Sinha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk 2009-07-11 05:04:35 EDT --- Ok, this now builds in koji on F11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467017) and rawhide (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467026) as well. Updated SRPM and Spec: SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec Could this be reviewed now, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-11 05:14:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review, and for spotting the missing req! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pondus Short Description: A personal weight management program Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-11 05:15:21 EDT --- Actually, I think I want the EPEL 5 branch as well. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pondus Short Description: A personal weight management program Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 05:52:50 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 05:52:40 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 05:52:35 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 05:52:46 EDT --- erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-eradius-0-0.4.20070627cvs.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510839] New: Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Summary: Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qrupdate.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: qrupdate is a Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions. rpmlint output: qrupdate-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This package is needed for fast QR Cholesky in Octave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rpan...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-11 06:53:45 EDT --- Cc Rakesh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #6 from Julian Aloofi jul...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 06:58:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) You should increment the Release tag every time you make changes to the spec file. Otherwise it is really confusing. (Now you have even too much space! One empty line or two is enough in between sections of the spec file.) Once you have been sponsored you will be able to do formal package reviews of your own. I am willing to sponsor you, if you demonstrate your knowledge of the Fedora packaging guidelines by submitting at least one other package for review and perform informal reviews of packages of other people. Thank you! I'll start with that as soon as possible and then post the related links here. I adjusted the Release tag and deleted some whitespaces. The new SRPM is here: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap-0.4.4-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-11 07:06:49 EDT --- The release should have gone to 2 not 4 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-11 08:04:04 EDT --- Yes, almost other is done. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #8 from Julian Aloofi jul...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 08:56:49 EDT --- If I change it now I had to set release to 3. That would be confusing... Just changed to 4 because it is the 4th release :) Should I change it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 --- Comment #31 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net 2009-07-11 09:12:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) What relevance does this have to F-11? We never got an updated package with 0.8.1, which might explain part of why nobody ever took care of this review. What's the current version? Finally, is there still a reason to keep this ticket open? Does Pablo still wish to get this package into Fedora? I dislike the current mechanism so I'm trying to redevelop the program using the 'OnlyShowIn' feature from freedesktop.org and the 'applications-merged' directory. My first attempt breaks KDE and I'm quite busy with the translation to correct now this bug. So yes, I want to package this but rather in the medium terms. I think we can close this ticket and I will reopen it (or create a new one) once I found a solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-11 09:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) If I change it now I had to set release to 3. That would be confusing... Just changed to 4 because it is the 4th release :) Should I change it? Oh, that's right. You just need to fill in the changelog for the missing entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #10 from Julian Aloofi jul...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 10:03:20 EDT --- OK, that includes all fixes and changelogs: Spec URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap/sap.spec SRPM URL: http://julian.fedorapeople.org/sap/sap-0.4.4-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 10:17:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #32 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2009-07-11 10:18:40 EDT --- http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus-0-0.1.20090710svn4432.fc11.src.rpm http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus.spec I had mistakenly assumed you would be pulling those from the scratch builds once I started doing those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510843] New: Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Summary: Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: r...@ron.dk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools.spec SRPM URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools-0.1.5c-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: SAM (Sequence Alignment/Map) is a flexible generic format for storing nucleotide sequence alignment. SAM tools provide efficient utilities on manipulating alignments in the SAM format. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467349 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490
--- Comment #6 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com 2009-07-11 10:42:48
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
- file listed twice
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE
You can see this warning at the end of build.log [1].
I'm not sure what the issue is there. The spec file does not mention it more
than once, and the file only shows up once in the gem itself. Any
recommendation on how to proceed, and is this a blocker for review?
Yes, it is a blocker. According to [1][2] files can be listend only once. It's
quite easy fix. You should replace the %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
entry with dir %{geminstdir} and list all entries in that directory
separately. Just note that examples, tests, rdoc and so should be listed as
%doc.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_ref-12
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c7
Thanks for the advice. I've fixed the aforementioned bugs in the srpm and rpm,
and both check out clean for me:
Updated SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-3.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 11:03:27 EDT --- rpmlint output is actually: qrupdate-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation not a problem qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 The library is linked against other libraries that it does not use. You have to install the rpm and then do rpmlint qrupdate to see these. I don't think these are problematic; it's not as if those libraries won't be linked in for some other reason. I'm surprised there's nothing like a header, but I guess that's Fortan. You just call the functions and hope you get the arguments the right way 'round. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 45ba0b4e6b15236a219b5b380e15fc9acfe6760a9ca5e53484de9b534969ba0d qrupdate- 1.0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm libqrupdate.so.1()(64bit) qrupdate = 1.0.1-1.fc12 qrupdate(x86-64) = 1.0.1-1.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libblas.so.3()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3(GFORTRAN_1.0)(64bit) liblapack.so.3()(64bit) libqrupdate.so.1()(64bit) qrupdate-devel-1.0.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm qrupdate-devel = 1.0.1-1.fc12 qrupdate-devel(x86-64) = 1.0.1-1.fc12 = libqrupdate.so.1()(64bit) qrupdate = 1.0.1-1.fc12 * %check is present and all tests pass: TOTAL: PASSED 112 FAILED 0 * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #9 from Hicham HAOUARI funnylife...@yahoo.com 2009-07-11 11:05:52 EDT --- thanks Kevin for your help my Fedora Account System name is : hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 --- Comment #2 from Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info 2009-07-11 11:18:20 EDT --- Summary of review: X license text vs. spec file X noarch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421
Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch...@tylers.info
--- Comment #1 from Chris Tyler ch...@tylers.info 2009-07-11 11:15:49 EDT ---
Review results: [x] Bad [+] Good [na] Not applicable
[x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be
posted in the review.[1]
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines .
[x] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. ### GPLv2+ in spec file vs. GPL3 text included in source zip
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture. [7]
[na] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[na] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden.[9]
[na] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
[na] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [11]
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory. [12]
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. [13]
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line. [14]
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15]
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
[na] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present. [18]
[na] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19]
[na] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20]
[na] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21]
[na] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package. [19]
[na] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} [22]
[na] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la
[Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-11 11:29:16 EDT --- Thanks for the speedy review! (In reply to comment #2) qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 The library is linked against other libraries that it does not use. You have to install the rpm and then do rpmlint qrupdate to see these. I don't think these are problematic; it's not as if those libraries won't be linked in for some other reason. Oh, didn't notice that. I'm surprised there's nothing like a header, but I guess that's Fortan. You just call the functions and hope you get the arguments the right way 'round. So was I. I think this is a 'feature' of Fortran 77; Fortran 90 has module files that do this. I really don't know *why* anyone would still want to write in a language that lacks e.g. dynamic memory allocation and has an 8 character length limit in function names and so on. qrupdate seems to have been written in 2008-2009!!! (Not to mention that modern Fortran compilers often have lacking F77 capabilities..) ** New Package CVS Request === Package Name: qrupdate Short Description: A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 11:28:39 EDT
---
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.
The compiler is not called with the proper set of flags. You will need to find
some way to pass %{optflags} to the makefile. Sometimes setting CFLAGS does
it, but sometimes you have to patch the Makefile. At least -g is passed to the
compiler so the debuginfo package isn't broken.
I would suggest packaging the manpage as a manpage instead of leaving it with
the rest of the documentation.
Please consider using install -p to preserve the timestanps on the scripts you
install.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
54949e99009f8f4484609b136e46439ebaa54bc9760a35f10c714e169a36f9e3
samtools-0.1.5c.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
X compiler flags are not correct.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
samtools = 0.1.5c-1.fc12
samtools(x86-64) = 0.1.5c-1.fc12
=
/usr/bin/perl
libncurses.so.5()(64bit)
libtinfo.so.5()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
perl(Data::Dumper)
perl(Getopt::Std)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I've no idea how to test
this.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491992] Review Request: mod_falcon - An embedded Falcon interpreter for the Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491992 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 11:47:39 EDT --- The SRPM URL above does not seem to exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-11 11:49:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) just for the record, I am a big fan of x11vnc. I'm using it quite regularly since 2007 or so. So, may be you are review it? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 11:44:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487128] Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 11:59:25 EDT --- This builds but does not install: eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch from /eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: perl(NOCpulse::CF_DB) is needed by package eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch (/eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch) Error: Missing Dependency: perl(NOCpulse::CF_DB) is needed by package eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch (/eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.fc12.noarch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 12:13:38 EDT --- I cannot seem to make any text-mode browser download the rpms from that koji link so that I can look at them. They always fail due to certificate issues. Do you have a trick for doing that, or could you fix the certificate issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||sunda...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-11
12:26:05 EDT ---
Well, for 0.9-45:
* Tarball
- First of all, is the tarball used in the srpm formally
released 0.9 tarball or 0.9 tarball is not yet released
formally?
* License
- Now the license tag should be GPLv3+
* %description
==
%description
A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
%{!?log_dir:%define log_dir /%{_localstatedir}/log/slog}
%{!?sslogger_user:%define sslogger_user slogger}
%{!?sslogger_group:%define sslogger_group sloggers}
%if 0%{?rhel}
Requires(pre): shadow-utils util-linux
%else
Requires(pre): shadow-utils util-linux-ng
%endif
==
%pre
--
- These lines (before %pre like) are all in %description.
Actually $ rpm -qi shows that Requires(pre) _comment_
is included in %description
! By the way on Fedora util-linux-ng provides util-linux
so this conditional requires is not strictly needed.
* Macros
- Use %_sysconfdir instead of /etc.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
* Parallel make
- Support parallel make if possible. If not possible, write
some comments that parallel make is disabled on the
spec file:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make
* Timestamps
- When using install or cp commands, add -p option
to keep timestamps on installed files:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
* Permission
- Please check the permissions of installed files and set them
properly.
* Usually normal files should have 0644 permission
* From rpmlint:
---
sslogger.i586: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/sslogger_rotate
---
- It seems that this logrote file should be named as
%_sysconfdir/logrotate.d/%{name}
* %changelog format
- It is useful in Fedora CVS system that one line is inserted
between each %changelog entry like:
---
%changelog
* Sun Jul 05 2009 Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com - 09-40
- Split man files into slog, sslogger and sreplay
- Chmod 775 $log_dir to allow normal user access
- Add check to slog to disallowe passing '-' when -c option is used
* Tue May 18 2009 Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com - 0.9-32
- removed $global
* Sun Mar 29 2009 Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com - 0.9-30
- Change Licence to GPLv3
- Misc. spec file fixes
---
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-11 12:29:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-11 12:28:33 EDT --- Please rebuild this package also on devel (F-12). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(lxt...@gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-11 12:29:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510584] Review Request: openssl-ibmca - A dynamic OpenSSL engine for IBMCA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510584 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-07-11 12:32:41 EDT --- Can you try http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83198 (s/https/http/)? The downloads work for me from elinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-11 12:36:01 EDT --- Hi! Patrice, would you still want to import this package into Fedora? If so, please post your newest spec/srpm again and I will try to review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2-1.fc11|2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 12:54:13 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:09:28 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-notcouriersans-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||5-1.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:00:26 EDT --- b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-openfwwf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:05:05 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:02:12 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:04:12 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wmfire'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:00:05 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xorriso'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 12:58:24 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xorriso'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510856] New: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510856 Summary: Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s...@sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ascii.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The ascii utility provides easy conversion between various byte representations and the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) character table. It knows about a wide variety of hex, binary, octal, Teletype mnemonic, ISO/ECMA code point, slang names, XML entity names, and other representations. Given any one on the command line, it will try to display all others. Called with no arguments it displays a handy small ASCII chart. $ rpmlint SPECS/ascii.spec SRPMS/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/i586/ascii-* ascii.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII ascii.i586: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. mock rebuild for fedora-11-i386 was successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:02:06 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update efte'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 12:59:59 EDT --- slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slashem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509537] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM - Help validate CGI::Application run modes using Data::FormValidator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509537 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:02:38 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM-2.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ValidateRM'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:12:10 EDT --- slashem-0.0.8-0.3.E0F1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update slashem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7464 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:11:49 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update frinika'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-07-11 12:56:25 EDT --- 4] missing dependency (rubygem-hoe) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:16:19 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 13:13:39 EDT --- *** Bug 510856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.99-4.r3.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:17:01 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wmfire'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510856] Review Request: ascii - Prints all equivalents of the naming of an ASCII character
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510856 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-11 13:13:39 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 501353 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:16:48 EDT --- tremfusion-0.99-4.r3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.2.1-8.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509315] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward - Pass control from one run mode to another in CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509315 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:20:12 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward-1.06-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Forward'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509521] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT - Add Template Toolkit support to CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:30:01 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT-1.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-TT'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:33:55 EDT --- php-hkit-0.5-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.1-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 --- Comment #2 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen r...@ron.dk 2009-07-11 13:32:00 EDT --- Thank you for your quick response. Here's the updated files with all your recommendations: Spec URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools.spec SRPM URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/samtools-0.1.5c-2.fc10.src.rpm Updated scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1467848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509313] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm - Integrate CGI::Application with HTML::FillInForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:28:42 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm-1.14-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FillInForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc10 |1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
