[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||480154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #32 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-07-19 04:20:43 EDT --- Ops, yeah, I just came back from a vacation (forgot to put it in the wiki)...Jason, many thanks you looked into this and sorry for the delay. (In reply to comment #31) Will F-10/F-11 users (for instance: package reviewers) be able to open SRPMs made in rawhide? IMHO, at the least, xz could be held at the testing repos for some time. Maybe I missed the point but why they shouldn't be able to do so? This works just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #17 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-07-19 04:39:00 EDT --- Yes, it should be obvious and until the point you find a actual problem, there is nothing to discuss. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734
--- Comment #8 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-07-19 04:53:39
EDT ---
I've roughly scanned over the package
(http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-3.fc11.src.rpm ) and
before I do a complete review please fix the following issues:
- lots of rpmlint errors:
* README/AUTHORS not UTF-8, please convert them in the %prep section via iconv
(please make sure to preserve the timestamp, e.g. by using touch -c -r
old_file
* wrong permissions of some of the *.c files, please change the permission to
644 in the %prep section
- the indentation seems to be broken - just open the file with vim or gedit
- please delete the commented Packager: and Vendor: tags, it should be
sufficient to add to your first changelog entry that this spec file is based on
a version from Dag Wieers d...@...
- delete the old non-Fedora changelog entries
- correct the Source: line
* use Source0 for the primary source file
* for sf.net please use something like this:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libvncserver/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
* see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL for details
* verify via spectool -g x11vnc.spec whether the sources can be downloaded
using the provided URL
- does not build in rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1484978 - probably a
missing build requirement since X11/extensions/XInput.h can't be found
- check for spelling mistakes in the comments ;-) (pathc)
- the source as well as the built package contain some java clients:
* only the server components are mentioned in the %description
* if the clients should be shipped, then put them into separate sub-package
* it is not allowed to use the pre-built JARs
* preferably the pre-built JARs should not even be shipped in the sources (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java for details)
- Requires: minilzo is wrong, since there is no package minilzo. Since
x11vnc is linked against libminilzo.so.0, the dependency should be
automatically added to the binary rpm:
rpm --requires -qp ~rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/x11vnc-0.9.8-3.fc10.i386.rpm |grep lzo
libminilzo.so.0
- would it be an option to use the system's libvncserver library instead of the
internal one? (--use-system-libvncserver
- when you upload a new version, please also provide also a link to the spec
file - this makes it easier to just have a quick look at it
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Red Hat, Inc. 439772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511941] Review Request: chunkd - Data storage daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511941 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pbrobin...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 05:33:07 EDT --- I'll grab this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511944] Review Request: tabled - distributed data storage cloud service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511944 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pbrobin...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Garzik jgar...@redhat.com 2009-07-19 05:55:06 EDT --- Whoops, I missed the comment near the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Jeff Garzik jgar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgar...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jeff Garzik jgar...@redhat.com 2009-07-19 05:53:17 EDT --- I think ./autogen.sh invocation should be in %prep stage not %build. Maybe that's a matter of taste. And include a comment in the specfile, describing why the configure inside the tarball is insufficient, and must be regenerated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||c...@plauener.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@plauener.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-07-19 05:52:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) lilypond is fixed in F-10 :) New packages will hit the testing repo soon. Meanwhile this package still needs a reviewer :) If nobody objects, I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 06:00:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I think ./autogen.sh invocation should be in %prep stage not %build. Maybe that's a matter of taste. I've always seen it just above configure as it runs configure as part of it. Some suggest you drop the configure line as part of it but I tend to leave it for consistency and to ensure the exact results I was after (not sure if the rpm macro does anything special as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Jeff Garzik jgar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgar...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jeff Garzik jgar...@redhat.com 2009-07-19 05:59:06 EDT --- The description Moblin web services settings seems to imply to me a dataset of some sort, not an application. A better description, IMO, would indicate that this is an application. The specfile otherwise seems fine, and rpmlint doesn't seem to spew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:06:25 EDT --- znc-0.070-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update znc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7694 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:08:30 EDT --- javanotes-5.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:08:53 EDT --- libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.11-4.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510698] Review Request: klavaro - Typing tutor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510698 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:09:46 EDT --- klavaro-1.2.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update klavaro'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7711 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - advanced console based ip subnet calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:09:35 EDT --- sipcalc-1.1.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sipcalc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510698] Review Request: klavaro - Typing tutor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510698 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:07:47 EDT --- klavaro-1.2.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update klavaro'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7702 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:11:25 EDT --- mrepo-0.8.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:13:02 EDT --- python-decorator-3.0.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||5.1-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.8.6-3.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:12:22 EDT --- znc-0.070-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update znc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert font designer Michael Everson
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:12:46 EDT --- conakry-fonts-20070829-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update conakry-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:14:12 EDT --- php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - advanced console based ip subnet calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:12:11 EDT --- sipcalc-1.1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sipcalc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7720 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:14:01 EDT --- zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zikula-module-MultiHook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7726 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:13:18 EDT --- apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7725 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511274] Review Request: wacomexpresskeys - Wacom ExpressKeys and Touch Strips configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511274 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:17:29 EDT --- wacomexpresskeys-0.4.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.5.2-3.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:14:40 EDT --- zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zikula-module-MultiHook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7728 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511191] Review Request: yokadi - Command line oriented todo list system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511191 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:18:13 EDT --- yokadi-0.10.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yokadi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7740 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511191] Review Request: yokadi - Command line oriented todo list system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511191 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:17:13 EDT --- yokadi-0.10.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yokadi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:17:40 EDT --- miredo-1.1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511274] Review Request: wacomexpresskeys - Wacom ExpressKeys and Touch Strips configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511274 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:17:07 EDT --- wacomexpresskeys-0.4.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:18:24 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.1.6-2.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511274] Review Request: wacomexpresskeys - Wacom ExpressKeys and Touch Strips configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511274 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4.2-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdamm - compat libs for libgdamm-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:15:27 EDT --- compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update compat-libgdamm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7733 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511081] Review Request: perl-accessors - Create accessor methods in caller's package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511081 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:21:46 EDT --- perl-accessors-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:21:57 EDT --- php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:20:10 EDT --- solang-0.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update solang'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7758 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:18:18 EDT --- dansguardian-2.10.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dansguardian'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.0.7-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.2.3-2.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:23:26 EDT --- miredo-1.1.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.8.6-3.fc11|0.8.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|5.1-2.fc11 |5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1.6-2.fc10|1.1.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501660] Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:24:13 EDT --- mrepo-0.8.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:24:39 EDT --- javanotes-5.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert font designer Michael Everson
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:27:25 EDT --- conakry-fonts-20070829-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update conakry-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7773 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #9 from Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net 2009-07-19 06:29:59 EDT --- (In reply to bug 439772 comment #21) I think the choice to make minilzo a shared lib is probably not really what the authors of lzo or the consumer software intended. The idea was to have a one file statically swallowed in build procedures w/o any further ties to the lzo project. Now if the API/ABI of minilzo changes the other software is dependent on being patched up to work with it. Just looking at how this issue is holding up a useful package for 6 months (!) and the amount of patching one needs to remove the internal minilzo. I hardly think that upstream will accept any of this patching (did anyone try to send them upstream). Next updates of libvncserver/x11vnc will probably need to adjust/extend the minilzo patching again. And all that for blindly adhering to guidelines? I'm sure if presented to the FPC they would probably ack the use of minilzo as is. Fedora is currently even more upstream closer than 6 months before, so chances are that upstream proximity will win over other guidelines. And yes, I did have a check on how to remove minilzo in x11vnc and just see the work involved. Trivial OTOH, but not a small workload to maintain on the other. (In reply to comment #3) And, if I am not mistaken, your package suffers from the same problem as described under https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772, it is built using the internal minilzo instead of the ones made available by lzo-minilzo H. Yes, you are right again. I'm fix it. Now used system variant. No, please don't. Check the discussion in the old bug. The embedded minilzo is a feature, not a bug. If you don't want the embedded *minilzo*, then you should use lzo, not the forced-shared-minilzo package. minilzo is by upstream's definition for embedded, statically linked applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:32:36 EDT --- php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510962] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510962 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:33:12 EDT --- pypoppler-0.10.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.5.2-3.fc10|1.5.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.10-3.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:32:48 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:34:12 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:35:11 EDT --- php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:32:28 EDT --- dansguardian-2.10.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dansguardian'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7781 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.10-3.fc10 |1.10-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510404] Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510404 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:37:44 EDT --- hunspell-kn-1.0.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:36:12 EDT --- wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.11-4.fc11 |0.11-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0.7-2.fc10|1.0.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.2.3-2.fc10|1.2.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510404] Review Request: hunspell-kn - Kannada Hunspell Dictionory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510404 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.0.3-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510962] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510962 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.10.0-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:37:00 EDT --- gnujump-1.0.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnujump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:36:29 EDT --- apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:36:35 EDT --- skanlite-0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:35:56 EDT --- libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19 06:35:45 EDT --- gnujump-1.0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnujump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7789 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511941] Review Request: chunkd - Data storage daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511941 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 06:41:15 EDT --- Because the source comes from revision control it needs to be documented how to recreate the tarfile so the source file can be verified using ms5sum etc to ensure its from upstream. Details here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511944] Review Request: tabled - distributed data storage cloud service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511944 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 06:41:31 EDT --- Because the source comes from revision control it needs to be documented how to recreate the tarfile so the source file can be verified using ms5sum etc to ensure its from upstream. Details here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-07-19 06:42:04 EDT --- autogen.sh generates source code. I.e. it's working principle is similar to applying patches. = If autogen/autoreconf is being used during rpm builts it should be run in %prep On a wider scale, only people, who don't understand the working principles of the autotools run any autotool when building rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||c...@plauener.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@plauener.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 06:48:35 EDT --- On a wider scale, only people, who don't understand the working principles of the autotools run any autotool when building rpms. I've seen the discussion on fedora-devel. please leave it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511941] Review Request: chunkd - Data storage daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511941
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 07:15:32
EDT ---
A couple of things. The main one is the documentation on how to recreate the
source file. Also the description could be fleshed out a little, a Data Storage
Daemon for what? The description in the review request isn't too bad at least
explains its for storing cloud data.
+ rpmlint output: OK
rpmlint chunkd-*.rpm chunkd.spec
chunkd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/chunkd $prog
chunkd-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
? upstream sources match sources in the srpm
needs to update to the revision control packaging guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
tested using koji scratch build, if there is an upstream bug report for the
PPC issues might be good to reference it.
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+
does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511944] Review Request: tabled - distributed data storage cloud service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511944 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 07:24:36 EDT --- I'm not sure the LICENSE file is relevant. It mentions ethtool and contains no LICENSE text which is contained in COPYING. Might be worth checking with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 07:29:19 EDT --- Shouldn't the spellcheck plugin also require an enchant backend eg. hunspell? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kle...@hp.com --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-07-19 07:32:16 EDT --- Hi Douglas, Is this your first package? I'm unable to find you in packager group nor any other package review request from you. If yes, please go ahead http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account and put FE-NEEDSPONSOR into Blocks field. if no, what is your FAS username? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kle...@hp.com --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-07-19 07:35:01 EDT --- Hi, Is this your first package? I'm unable to find you in packager group nor any other package review request from you. If yes, please go ahead http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account and put FE-NEEDSPONSOR into Blocks field. if no, what is your FAS username? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511944] Review Request: tabled - distributed data storage cloud service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511944
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 07:35:41
EDT ---
A couple of things. The main one is the documentation on how to recreate the
source file. Also the description could be fleshed out a little the one used in
the review request is quite good. I couldn't build it in koji due to dep on
chunkd.
+ rpmlint output
rpmlint tabled-0.3-0.1.g2783d260.fc10.src.rpm tabled.spec
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
? upstream sources match sources in the srpm
needs to update to the revision control packaging guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
n/a package successfully builds on at least one architecture
not tested in koji as it requires chunkd (should be a dep in the review bug)
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+
does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
n/a reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-07-19 08:23:07 EDT --- your sed is invalid there will be never /usr/share/webinject.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-07-19 08:06:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lxrandr Short Description: Simple monitor config tool Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482
Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-19
07:53:49 EDT ---
=== REVIEW lxrandr ===
template:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
O.K.
* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
O.K.
- No duplicated libs
- Cflags are honored
- BuildRoot tag is okay
-
* MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
O.K.
* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
O.K.
* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
O.K.
* MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
package: ab2c7f6be7e4fe6d1a26e324d836453e lxrandr-0.1.1.tar.gz
my dl: ab2c7f6be7e4fe6d1a26e324d836453e lxrandr-0.1.1.tar.gz
* MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
O.K.
* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
N/A
* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
O.K.
* MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A
* MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
N/A
* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
O.K.
* MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
O.K.
* MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
O.K.
* MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
O.K.
* MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
O.K.
* MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
O.K.
* MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
N/A
* MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
N/A
* MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
N/A
* MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
N/A
* MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
N/A
* MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
N/A
* MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package
[Bug 511895] Review Request: clutter-imcontext - IMContext Framework Library for Clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511895
--- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 08:15:27
EDT ---
Here is my review for this package. Most are minor things but there is a
license issue.
Thanks
* Package fails to build on F-11:
checking for CLUTTER... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0
clutter-0.9 = 0.9.3) were not met:
No package 'clutter-0.9' found
I think this BR on clutter-devel should contain the explicit version
requirement.
Is this package for rawhide only?
Yes. It requires the newer clutter. There was discusson on whether to put a
clutter09 package in F11 to allow for testing of various things that need it
but it was decided the amount of work required wasn't worth it. I've added an
explicit version requirement
! All relevant doc files should be packaged. It would be good to include the
AUTHORS and ChangeLog files in %doc
Added.
* The files clutter-imtext.{c,h} are LGPLv3. The rest is LGPLv2. AFAIK These
are incompatible. This needs to be clarified by upstream.
I've emailed upstream and if necessary will follow up with a clarification from
legal.
http://lists.moblin.org/pipermail/dev/2009-July/005515.html
! BR's automake, autoconf are unnecessary since these will always be dragged
in
by libtool. Similarly, BR's glib2-devel, pkgconfig will be dragged in by
clutter-devel. However, it is not a blocker to keep them.
Noted.
* It looks like the devel package should require clutter-devel. There are
other
dependencies as well such as glib2-devel, pango-devel. But these will be
dragged in by clutter-devel.
Added.
! The %{name} macro could be used more consistently.
From looking I couldn't see exactly what you meant by this. Further details
would be great.
? Do we need to package the Makefile* stuff in %doc? One last suggestion: You
could use %doc doc/* instead of just %doc doc/ to avoid an extra
subdirectory.
I'll look at why the Makefiles are there and if there's specific docs that can
be generated will look at getting that done during the build.
SPEC same as before. New SRPM:
http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/clutter-imcontext-0.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-07-19 08:20:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) No, please don't. Check the discussion in the old bug. The embedded minilzo is a feature, not a bug. If you don't want the embedded *minilzo*, then you should use lzo, not the forced-shared-minilzo package. minilzo is by upstream's definition for embedded, statically linked applications. Even if I also don't like the large patch to use the external (mini)lzo library, I still think it is the correct way: a) there are good reasons (security updates, ...) why the guidelines encourage not to embed system libraries: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries b) the work has already been done c) libvncserver also uses the system's libminilzo c) in other cases ( https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134 ) FESCO did not approve the use of embedded libraries Given these arguments I'm convinced that using the embedded minilzo is not acceptable (the same applied for the embedded libvncserver). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512500] Review Request: multimedia-menus - Categorization for the GNOME/KDE AudioVideo/Multimedia menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512500 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 07:51:14 EDT --- Anyhow, this is not the best place to discuss this. Shall we continue in the fedora-music list, where most people participated in this discussion? Should this review be held until that has been done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
D Haley my...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||my...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #1 from D Haley my...@yahoo.com 2009-07-19 07:58:34 EDT ---
I have made a few comments below:
Version:1607
*This is not the recommended way to do SVN revision numbering, and may cause a
problem if you ever switch to a release package (See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages),
so maybe use something like 0.1607svn%{?dist}. Also for your next build please
update to at least 1788, which is labelled as current tested build.
#sources construite avec la commande suivante
*Please only use english in spec file. I assume it means Source may be built
using the follwing commands
Summary:
written in Java 1.5.
*Please remove Java version number. It is incorrect and not required, the java
VM they use is not the same VM we use.
From LICENSE:
Earlier contributions to JOSM did not specifiy a version of that license,
but the license included in the distribution was version 2.
All contributions made on or after 15 April 2008 are explicitly GPL
v2 or later
*Please contact upstream and see if this has been resolved. Otherwise you must
set the licence to GPLv2.
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/josm-1607-1.fc11.src.rpm
josm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
*Personally, I don't care about this, but policy and rpmlint says you need to
fix this.
$ rpmlint josm-javadoc-1607-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
josm-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
*Again, please fix.
*Make sure that you run rpmlint on the .spec file, the .srpm file, all .rpm
files (debug, subpackages, etc) and on the installed rpm, prior to sumitting to
review. This output should be posted to the review page.
find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
*Break this into two lines, as your find command does not remove the jar files,
shown below.
$ find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
$ find ./ -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class'
./lib/jfcunit.jar
./lib/gettext-commons-0.9.6.jar
./lib/josm-translation.jar
./lib/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-nosun.jar
*If you are going to use a source build, it might be an idea to remove these
prior to construction of the Source0 file. You can include a bash script for
generating the tarball from the subversion repository, and use it as a SOURCEx,
isntead, as in
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code).
You could also remove the .svn file and other uneeded stuff (./macosx) if you
choose to do so.
As you are providing an SVN checkout, I am unable to confirm the md5 without
the removal of the .svn entries. Please remove .svn directories in svn
checkout, using SOURCEx method noted above.
$ mkdir josm-1607 cd josm-1607 svn -r 1607 co
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk/ . cd ../ tar zcvf
josm-1607.tar.gz josm-1607
...
$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/josm-1607.tar.gz
8909c0b2bbf13cebad0e47c39e1adafa rpmbuild/SOURCES/josm-1607.tar.gz
$ md5sum josm-1607.tar.gz
45de92c7984c6873b8c9702ea2006c4a josm-1607.tar.gz
Looking at this source1 I note:
#!/bin/sh
LIBXCB_ALLOW_SLOPPY_LOCK=1 java -Xms32M -Xmx512M -XX:+UseParallelGC
-XX:+UseAdaptiveSizePolicy -jar /usr/share/java/josm-tested.jar $@
*Which is not going to work without josm-tested.jar, use %{javadir}/%{name}.jar
instead (with substitution obviously :) ).
Source3: %{name}.png
*Use images/logo.png in preference to Source3 (same file).
%doc README
%doc LICENSE
This can go on one line (%doc README LICENSE)
cedric.oliv...@free.fr
*Set your email as : cedric.oliv...@free.fr
%package manual
*Are there any files for this subpackage?
install %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}
*Please preserve timestamps during copy and install (see install(1) manpage).
Its not as critical for SVN checkouts, but it is nice :)
*Please provide a koji scratch build for both F-10 and F-11 if possible.
[exec] Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program svn:
java.io.IOException: error=13, Permission denied
*Why is ant calling SVN during build? You do not have network access during the
build. Please patch out this behaviour from build.xml.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
[Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960
--- Comment #13 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2009-07-19
08:37:56 EDT ---
I fix wrong sed :
sed -i 's|./webinject.pl|/usr/share/webinject/webinject.pl|g'
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/webinjectgui.pl
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511212] Review Request: cluster-glue - reusable clustering components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511212 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net 2009-07-19 08:47:01 EDT --- I noticed some other review requests include koji builds, so here is the one for cluster-glue: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1485160 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(david.hanneq...@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #11 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2009-07-19 07:51:20 EDT --- Hi, 1] If the file path is not complete the GUI does not work. I added your patch in new srpm. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-6.fc10.src.rpm Best regard ps : sorry but i do not speak English fluently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512574] New: Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512574 Summary: Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Titanium/perl-Titanium.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Titanium/perl-Titanium-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Titanium is a more user-friendly packaging of the mature CGI::Application framework and some useful plugins, with the intention of creating a strong but lightweight web application framework. It runs well in a plain CGI environment and provides excellent performance in a persistent environment such as FastCGI or mod_perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512500] Review Request: multimedia-menus - Categorization for the GNOME/KDE AudioVideo/Multimedia menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512500 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-07-19 08:05:11 EDT --- No need(In reply to comment #4) Should this review be held until that has been done? No need to. If it has already been discussed by a wider audience, who am I to disagree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
