[Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-03 02:05:50 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-flexmock Short Description: Mock object library for ruby Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 02:18:39 EDT --- Sorry for delay, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-03 02:30:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-03 02:31:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-03 02:31:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515090] Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 02:38:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Why are you running /sbin/ldconfig in %post and %postun? This package conflicts with redhat-menus. You should prefix the files with moblin- to avoid this. Forgive me this question, buf is this package really needed? Why not stick with redhat-menus and have a consistent menu layout through all desktops? I'll review the differences and re-assess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 02:50:24 EDT --- Peter Robinson, Please fix the issues noted by Christopher Wickert and then import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #30 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 02:48:31 EDT --- Just missed one point ... do clean the SPEC file before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 03:55:21 EDT --- Please fix the issues noted by Christopher Wickert and then import I will when I actually get the time to read what's written :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #20 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 04:23:57 EDT --- Updated to r6834: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.14.r6834.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-03 04:26:34 EDT --- Rebuild done, push request submitted on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515147] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515147 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 05:15:07 EDT --- Excellent! I did a quick search but obv not quite good enough :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515147] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515147 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 05:13:24 EDT --- Already included https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gstreamer-rtsp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 05:17:16 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #61 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 05:32:04 EDT --- Ben: Correct awesome-2 does not need XCB aware cairo. 2.3 was released 14 months ago, but having small fixes till now, and is called deprecated in favor of v3. Problem with your approach is that awesome v2 is really old, upstream support might end anytime, and thus is far from Fedora's close-to-upstream. Note that cairo-xcb is far from being soon-supported upstream (still experimental), that means we would have awesome-2 for months, if not even years. That's waste of time, from my POV. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 05:40:52
EDT ---
REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is silent
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec .
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum vifir-0.4.tar.gz*
340db9360c8f3710192fd8b773736e11c992cd3dad855ba848887a15f7d06607
vifir-0.4.tar.gz
340db9360c8f3710192fd8b773736e11c992cd3dad855ba848887a15f7d06607
vifir-0.4.tar.gz.1
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture. See link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code or permissible content.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ The packages includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly
installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
Don't forget to add it to the list of GIS-related applications on the dedicated
wiki-page.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490
--- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 05:45:12
EDT ---
Thanks for the update.
1)I think we should rename file ayttm_streamer_wrapper.sh to
ayttm_streamer_wrapper
This can be done in %install as
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ayttm_streamer_wrapper.sh
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ayttm_streamer_wrapper
2)To use webcam we need
Requires: xawtv
as /usr/bin/webcam path used in above script is provided by xawtv package
3) You can remove
BuildRequires: libtool-ltdl
4) should follow only one type of macros
either use everywhere $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-08-03 05:52:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: vifir Short Description: A viewer for electronic aviation charts units Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-08-03 05:50:56 EDT --- Thanks Peter for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 05:51:28 EDT --- I think that we may close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 06:24:27
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec
SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
Thanks for all your comments and support.
I've updated the spec file and added the GPL v2 LICENSE file to the tarball.
However, I'm not quite sure about the license constraints because the sources
contain some unmodified, third-party files that are licensed under GPL v2+.
Even if I'd like to publish my own code under GPL v3, do the bundled files
affect the license of the complete package, e.g. force it to be GPL v2+ too
(which wouldn't be a problem for me)? For now, I stay with GPL v2+.
You can license your own files as GPLv3+. Then the binary will be formed out of
GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ parts, so the License: tag would be either GPLv2+ and
GPLv3+ or just GPLv3+ since that's the license of the binary that's
produced.
I didn't change the headers of the third-party files, so some of them still
don't mention their GPL version.
If they don't mention a version, they're GPL+.
**
Drop
gzip -9 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/*/*
as RPM will do this for you automatically.
**
I am willing to sponsor you if you show me your knowing of the Fedora
guidelines, most importantly
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
This you can do by making at least one other submission and performing a couple
of informal reviews of packages of other people. Please review only packages
*not* marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as I will have to do the full formal review
after you to check that you have got everything correctly. Once I have
sponsored you you will be able to do formal reviews of your own.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480
--- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 06:35:04
EDT ---
I've updated the spec file using 'cp -p' as per the above guidelines it looks
like from my reading and testing install is only usable for individual files
rather than directory structure like in an icon theme.
I've also removed the Makefile.am files that are copied as well.
A side point I'm not sure how this script from the packaging guidelines works
%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
fi
As post uninstall the theme.index wouldn't exist. I think it needs a -t option.
Thanks for the pointers.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 06:36:58 EDT --- As post uninstall the theme.index wouldn't exist. I think it needs a -t option. I meant index.theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-08-03 06:38:37 EDT --- BTW, your spec file is hard to read because it doesn't follow the 'standard' conventions. Of course, is your way not wrong, just unusual. Most packager follows more or less the template that can be created with 'rpmdev-newspec blablabla' (looks a bit like this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Creating_a_blank_spec_file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462176] Review Request: hybserv - Hybrid IRC Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462176 Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(mma...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 06:43:22 EDT --- Sorry, I don't wish to maintain this package anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 06:45:17 EDT --- Also, you are using the potrace library which needs to be packaged separately. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nphil...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|guido.grazi...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 06:52:56 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575074 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 06:51:04 EDT --- ok then, i'm working on the package review right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 06:57:20 EDT --- Thanks :-) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jana Short Description: An interface library for time-related PIM Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||515206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] New: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://potrace.sourceforge.net Description: Potrace(TM) is a utility for tracing a bitmap, which means, transforming a bitmap into a smooth, scalable image. The input is a bitmap (PBM, PGM, PPM, or BMP format), and the default output is an encapsulated PostScript file (EPS). A typical use is to create EPS files from scanned data, such as company or university logos, handwritten notes, etc. The resulting image is not jaggy like a bitmap, but smooth. It can then be rendered at any resolution. Potrace can currently produce the following output formats: EPS, PostScript, PDF, SVG (scalable vector graphics), Xfig, Gimppath, and PGM (for easy antialiasing). Additional backends might be added in the future. Mkbitmap is a program distributed with Potrace which can be used to pre-process the input for better tracing behavior on greyscale and color images. See the mkbitmap examples page. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||dvisvgm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502699] Review Request: crosstool-ng - A toolchain building utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502699 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-08-03 07:01:25 EDT --- Version 1.4.1 was released a while ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbal...@redhat.com Blocks||515049 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 07:02:52 EDT --- *** Bug 251710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 07:02:52 EDT --- This bug hasn't moved in almost a year. Repackaged at bug #515206. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 515206 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Rindt dan...@rindt.name 2009-08-03 07:04:26 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
Notes:
* Url should point to its new home, at SF.
* Ver. 0.8 is out. Please, update.
* Field Release must not contain .fc10 postfix. Use %{?dist} macro instead.
* No such group Hardware/Mobile. Take a look at the
/usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS for the ull list of allowed values.
* Use full path to the source.
* Field License should contain GPLv2+
Other things looks sane. Please update your srpm, and I'll continue.
Please recheck it at:
http://www.rindt.name/fileadmin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm
http://www.rindt.name/fileadmin/rpmbuild/SPECS/mtkbabel.spec
changes executed as you mentioned. the 0.8 is the latest release peter.
My ID is drindt yes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||potrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||131850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 07:07:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Also, you are using the potrace library which needs to be packaged separately. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries I have packaged potrace in bug #515206, you need to make this package use that version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001
Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fab...@bernewireless.net
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-08-03
07:07:38 EDT ---
Some comment after a quick look at your spec file.
- Don't mix '$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' and '%{buildroot}'
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
- README is missing in %doc
- Is there any note about the license in the source?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guido.grazi...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 07:21:50 EDT --- Hello Jussi, you specfile seems to be in a very good shape; you only need to adjust main package comment: Packagers should be careful how they use trademarks in Summary or Description. There are a few rules to follow: * Never use (TM) or (R) (or the unicode equivalents, ™/®). It is incredibly complicated to use these properly, so it is actually safer for us to not use them at all. Maybe the last line about examples page could go away too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 07:35:46
EDT ---
I just found some more issues - seems, that these are the last remaining
issues:
* You don't need to explicitly add Requires: perl-Some-Extension since
rpmbuild can find them automatically (it scans sources for use Some::Thing
directives and for shebangs, and adds them as Requires: perl(Some::Thing). So,
I advise you to remove all explicit Requires directives.
* No need to add perl as BuildRequires.
* Please, don't mark man-files ad %doc, e.g. remove %doc directive before
%{_mandir}/man1/*.* in the %files section.
* Blocker issue. You must add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to the head of your
install section.
* I advice you to shorten %install section by exploiting the magic power of
install utility - it can create necessary directories by user's demand, while
installing. E.g. instead of
install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
install mtkbabel $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/
install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
install -m0644 mtkbabel.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/
you may simply write (note -D switch added):
install -D -m 0755 mtkbabel $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/mtkbabel
install -D -m 0644 mtkbabel.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/mtkbabel.1
I'm sorry, for not to pointing you to all these issues before - seems that I
looked to your first srpm very inattentively.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829
--- Comment #5 from Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 07:39:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
- you can drop setting the CFLAGS for the make commands in %build, there is
no C/C++ code built, if I see it right
Yep.
- are the INSTALLSITELIB and INSTALLSITEARCH really required for the make
commands in %install? They looks like some pythonic paths.
No, removed.
- what is the upstream versioning scheme? Does the version in the included
archive mean that it is a snapshot made 20081124 after the 3.0 release? Then
you should apply post-release package guideline -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages
(version=3.0, release=1.20081124)
It's daily snapshots and very infrequent version releases. I've switch to the
post-release scheme now.
- according to the README in foomatic-db, there should be files licensed under
MIT too, please recheck and update the License tag to GPLv2+ and MIT
Fixed (new sub-package carries MIT license).
- using only rm -rf %{buildroot} is sufficient for the %clean section
Fixed.
- is the database useful for other purpose then for cups?
No.
I've updated the package to match the current devel foomatic package (newer
snapshot, oki4linux obsoleted, etc), and also split out a 'ppds' sub-package
for bug #461234.
Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db.spec
SRPM URL:
http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db-4.0-1.20090702.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 07:40:42 EDT --- Right, thanks. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace-1.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 07:54:38 EDT --- Items marked GOOD or PASS fulfil the guidelines or they don't apply to this package. Items marked CHECK aren't covered by the guidelines but you should check and fix them anyway in my opinion. Items marked BAD violate the guidelines in some point and need to be fixed. - GOOD: rpmlint run on vacation-1.2.7.0-5.fc11.src.rpm doesn't flag errors/warnings - GOOD: package name according to guidelines - GOOD: spec file named properly - BAD: package doesn't meet packaging guidelines: the source URL is wrong, it should be downloads.sourceforge.net/... (just verified it with spectool) - GOOD: licensed according to licensing guidelines (be it GPLv2 or GPLv2+, see below). - BAD: license in spec file doesn't match license in package, as the licensing in the source tarball isn't really clear: the README file states that it's under the GPL (see file COPYING in the directory) which could be construed as GPLv2 only (as that is the version shipped) but also GPLv2+ (as they didn't specify a specific version). Please consult upstream about this, they really should clarify if they mean GPLv2 or GPLv2+ and state it in the source files themselves. BTW, Comment #6 isn't really correct about the original source being incompatible with the GPL as the source files are really under BSD without advertising clause (or MIT), i.e. there is no issue with this being licensed incompatibly, just that we can't be quite sure what license this is under. You can flag it as GPLv2 in the meantime, just to stay on the safe side. If upstream tells you that it really is GPLv2+ (as I assume), then include documentation that they did tell you that (e.g. a copy of the mail) in the package documentation when changing it in this version in a future release (this is not necessary if they clarify it in the shipped sources themselves in a future version). - GOOD: license shipped as documentation - GOOD: the spec file is written in American English - GOOD: the spec file is legible - GOOD: sources used to build the package match upstream source - GOOD: builds in mock for x86_64/Rawhide - GOOD: all build dependencies listed - PASS: doesn't ship locale files - PASS: no libraries shipped - GOOD: package is not relocatable - GOOD: all shipped directories owned by package, direct dependency or filesystem - GOOD: no duplicates in %files - GOOD: permissions on files are set properly - GOOD: package has a %clean section - GOOD: package uses macros consistently - GOOD: the package contains code, not content - PASS: no large documentation files - GOOD: %doc doesn't affect runtime - PASS: no header files - PASS: no static libraries - PASS: no pkgconfig files - PASS: no libraries included - PASS: no devel package - GOOD: no *.la libtool archives - PASS: no desktop file - GOOD: doesn't own files or directories owned by other packages - GOOD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install - GOOD: all file names are valid UTF-8 - CHECK: from now on, please state in the changelog what you changed (e.g. - changed license to GPLv2 until licensing is clarified with upstream (#474802)), just referring to a BZ ticket number doesn't explain it sufficiently. This package is APPROVED, provided that you fix the license tag to GPLv2 (temporarily, until this is clarified with upstream) and the source URL before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Rindt dri...@visetics.com 2009-08-03 08:05:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I'm sorry, for not to pointing you to all these issues before - seems that I looked to your first srpm very inattentively. It's no problem. The files are updated for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 08:17:56 EDT --- Fabian, is there a status update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2009-08-03 08:24:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for your comments and for providing the potrace-devel package. I've removed the gzip line from the spec file and added a patch that changes the Makefile to link the separately packaged potrace library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 08:28:38 EDT --- $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC rfc822.c is under MIT license. Only the man page has any mention of a GPL (GPLv2+) license. Please ask upstream to clarify this. ** The current GPLv2+ license marking is correct: if the source code or COPYING doesn't specify a version (released under GPL), then the license tag is GPL+. The same is used if the COPYING is some version of the GPL without a specification what license the program is under. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 08:54:11
EDT ---
I sponsored you. Don't hesitate to contact me directly via xmpp or email (
lemen...@gmail.com ) for any question regarding rules of slightly complex
role-playing game, named Fedora package maintainership
REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is silent
[pe...@workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[pe...@workplace Desktop]$
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec .
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz*
591597c0787822c9fd56c7a3da214e81edd3c98f32d16858221e02dfc0f63779
mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz
591597c0787822c9fd56c7a3da214e81edd3c98f32d16858221e02dfc0f63779
mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz.1
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575556
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- The package must consistently use macros. So, I advice you to change rm -rf
%{buildroot} to rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %install section.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Please make a last change mentioned above regarding simultaneous using of
%{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (easyfix). Fix it and proceed with the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests
Please, also use
This package is
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515230] New: Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Summary: Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dav...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is my first Fedora package, so I presume I'll need a sponsor for this package Spec URL: http://projects.autonomy.net.au/python-dmidecode/export/392a9976b14d558d4b2f331b5a44ee97912fc5e3/contrib/python-dmidecode.spec SRPM URL: http://src.autonomy.net.au/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode-3.10.6-6.fc11.src.rpm Description: python-dmidecode is a python extension module that uses the code-base of the 'dmidecode' utility, and presents the data as python data structures or as XML data using libxml2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #10 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2009-08-03 09:00:45 EDT --- Many thanks for the review, Remi. New SRPM: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Fixes URL, description and dependency rpmlint silent koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #21 from Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com 2009-08-03 09:18:01 EDT --- Hey Emily, Could you please find time to make the above suggested changes? Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #9 from Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com 2009-08-03 09:37:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name:sblim-indication_helper Short Description: libraries for writing CMPI providers Owners: praveenp,srini Branches:F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch,srini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #14 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 09:33:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC Neato. Where do I find this? rfc822.c is under MIT license. Only the man page has any mention of a GPL (GPLv2+) license. Please ask upstream to clarify this. ** The current GPLv2+ license marking is correct: if the source code or COPYING doesn't specify a version (released under GPL), then the license tag is GPL+. The same is used if the COPYING is some version of the GPL without a specification what license the program is under. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F Only that the README doesn't say under the GPL, but under the GPL (see file COPYING in the directory) which could be interpreted as under the GPL as found in the file COPYING (which would be specifying a version as this is exactly version 2 and nothing else). IANAL and all that stuff, but IMO better be safe than sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-08-03 09:39:08 EDT --- I will take a new look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #10 from Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com 2009-08-03 09:40:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name:sblim-indication_helper Short Description: libraries for writing CMPI providers Owners: praveenp Branches:F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch srini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #15 from Till Bubeck t.bub...@reinform.de 2009-08-03 09:42:35 EDT --- Again, thanks for the comments. changelog: - changed license to GPLv2 until licensing is clarified with upstream - changed source URL from download... to downloads I've uploaded again an updated SPEC/SRPMs to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-6.fc11.src.rpm Please review, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2009-08-03 09:43:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Flickr-Upload Short Description: Flickr upload tool Owners: ksyz Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 09:52:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC Neato. Where do I find this? It's a Debian utility, e.g. http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/devscripts It's going to be in the next rpmdevtools release: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Bug 478372 depends on bug 513744, which changed state. Bug 513744 Summary: Swig update required https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513744 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515247] New: Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 Summary: Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ch...@chessgriffin.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2.spec SRPM URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2-0.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: tint2 is a simple X11 desktop panel and taskbar intentionally made for Openbox3, but that should work with other window managers. tint2 is intended to be unintrusive and light in resource utilization, while following freedestkop specifications. Home page: http://code.google.com/p/tint2 This is my second submission. Rpmlint -vi is clean on spec, SRPM, and RPM. Builds cleanly in mock. Built cleanly on koji scratch build for f11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575660) and f12 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576012). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-03 10:32:26
EDT ---
I suggest that you drop
--docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
and just run
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir}
explicitly at the end of install, since rpm anyway removes the documentation
directory.
**
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
- You may want to change
%{_mandir}/man1/tint2.1.gz
to
%{_mandir}/man1/tint2.1.*
in case the man page compression format changes in the future.
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Add COPYING to %doc.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
**
You still need to do the informal reviews. Please review only bugs not marked
with FE-NEEDSPONSOR.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady|Ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||Ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #6 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 10:36:04 EDT --- Since this is for Fedora 12 a more adequate source rpm would be http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #17 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 10:45:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Again, thanks for the comments. changelog: - changed license to GPLv2 until licensing is clarified with upstream - changed source URL from download... to downloads I've uploaded again an updated SPEC/SRPMs to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec That is actually the -5 release ;-)... SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-6.fc11.src.rpm the spec file in the SRPM contains the changes. Please review, thanks! You wouldn't have had to put these up for review again, it would have been okay if you just requested CVS for your package and fixed these items in there. Anyway (and again): APPROVED. Now go, make your CVS request ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #3 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 10:45:32 EDT --- Given that it is for f12 this one would be more appropriate http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-08-03 10:51:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356041) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356041) updated spec to incorporate all changes from comment # 15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480
--- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de
2009-08-03 10:50:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I've updated the spec file using 'cp -p' as per the above guidelines it looks
like from my reading and testing install is only usable for individual files
rather than directory structure like in an icon theme.
This is correct. Just stick with cp, create-icon-theme.sh takes care of the
permissions. Sorry for the noise.
As post uninstall the theme.index wouldn't exist. I think it needs a -t
option.
No, if index.theme doesn't exist, gtk-update-icon-cache is not run - this is
what we want. It will complain about the missing dir, but this is why we have
/dev/null || : at the end. (Well, at least we *should* have this at the end,
you only have || : because your scriptlets are outdated. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
for the most recent version.)
BTW: icon-theme.cache is not part of this package, so it wont get removed when
the package uninstalled. You need to
touch %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/moblin/icon-theme.cache
during install and include it ghosted in the files section.
Another thing I realized while looking at the source: You are not creating any
symlinks for the icons, so many apps will have no stock icons. Add the
following to your spec at the end of %install, when the Makefile.am files are
already removed:
# create symlinks for gtk stock icons, these are not really 'legacy'
# this uses the legacy-icon-mapping.xml file
cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/icons/moblin
for size in 16x16 24x24 48x48; do
(
cd $size
for context in *; do
if [ -d $context ]; then
(
cd $context
INU_DATA_DIR=%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} /usr/bin/icon-name-mapping
-c $context
)
fi
done
)
done
Voila, now the icon theme contains more than 3 times more files.
Last but not least create-icon-theme.sh should be running during %build. Not
that it makes a difference, I'm just pedantic. ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-08-03 10:54:29 EDT --- Well, all changes except preserving the timestamps. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-08-03 11:07:17 EDT --- No, there isn't, I flubbed that. :) Here's the new version: SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-0.rc1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 355981] Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355981 Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||faithinfamil...@yahoo.com --- Comment #14 from Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 11:11:33 EDT --- *** Bug 515188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 11:21:04 EDT --- Excellent, I'll have a look a this shortly. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515280] New: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Summary: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mno...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/gnome-colors-icon-theme/gnome-colors-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/gnome-colors-icon-theme/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The GNOME-Colors is a project that aims to make the GNOME desktop as elegant, consistent and colorful as possible. The current goal is to allow full color customization of themes, icons, GDM logins and splash screens. There are already seven full color-schemes available; Brave (Blue), Human (Orange), Wine (Red), Noble (Purple), Wise (Green), Dust (Chocolate) and Illustrious (Pink). An unlimited amount of color variations can be rebuilt and recolored from source, so users need not stick to the officially supported color palettes. GNOME-Colors is mostly inspired/based on Tango, GNOME, Elementary, Tango-Generator and many other open-source projects. More information can be found in the AUTHORS file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-03 11:24:44 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-08-03 11:23:34 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576200 new...@dhcp-lab-124 SPECS $ rpmlint /home/newman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(zdzi...@irc.pl) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-03 11:07:22 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||gnome-colors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 --- Comment #27 from Ashay ashay.hum...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 11:32:48 EDT --- Ok, I added that: http://ashay.info/rpm/cpulimit.spec http://ashay.info/rpm/cpulimit-1.1-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2009-08-03 11:37:28 EDT --- New SRPM: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp-2.0-4.fc10.src.rpm PHP requirements minimized. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576229 Rpmlint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-08-03 11:34:25 EDT --- Meh, looks like upstream intentions are to continue bundling the fonts, which makes me think that simply doing all this inside of the existing lyx pkg is preferable. Closing-NOTABUG (Unless anyone feels strongly otherwise, speak up!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|guido.grazi...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-03
11:46:43 EDT ---
Well,
(In reply to comment #34)
Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mausezahn.spec
SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src.rpm
This does not build (at least) on x86_64:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576215
From diff:
--
diff -uNr mausezahn-0.34.6-2.fc9.src/mz-0.34.6/CMakeLists.txt
mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src/mz-0.34.8/CMakeLists.txt
--- mausezahn-0.34.6-2.fc9.src/mz-0.34.6/CMakeLists.txt 2008-09-05
17:16:54.0 +0900
+++ mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src/mz-0.34.8/CMakeLists.txt 2009-07-30
01:33:28.0 +0900
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
cmake_policy(SET CMP0003 NEW)
endif(COMMAND cmake_policy)
+SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS -Wall -O2 -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -
fasynchronous-unwind-tables)
+
ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(uninstall
COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E echo Use 'xargs rm install_manifest.txt'
to uninstall this program
)
@@ -13,3 +15,6 @@
add_subdirectory (src)
add_subdirectory (doc)
+
+
+
-
Well, this CMAKE_C_FLAGS is wrong on x86_64, and on rawhide even
on i686 (on rawhide build target is for i686, x86_64, ppc, ppc64).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-08-03 12:07:58 EDT --- then the changes will be done in lyx pkg? (just asking, I'm multitasking badly while packing for summer vacations) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-08-03 12:12:24 EDT --- Yes, that's my tentative plan at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-08-03 12:14:34 EDT --- fair nuff, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 12:29:29 EDT --- Yep, zlib-devel seems to be enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-08-03 12:28:58 EDT --- Hello Jussi, build in koji fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576283 You need at least to include zlib-devel in BRs guido -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-08-03 12:29:09 EDT --- + Home page change : ok + Package description from new home page. : OK + Requires php-mbstring : OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
