[Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |17784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo+ | --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-09-26 12:23:19 EDT --- Looks good for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226638] Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226638 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-09-26 12:43:22 EDT --- We have until the 29th to get this in for the F-12 beta freeze. Let's go! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|17784 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:49:20 EDT --- *** Bug 226369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:57:17 EDT --- *** Bug 226809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 04:20:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) cvs done. Thanks, package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|guido.grazi...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 05:14:04 EDT --- 1. Since --without-tcl doesn't affect the build much, I have now removed it. 2. I have checked with Martin (upstream Debian), and he said he never needed Tcl support, so we can disable it. C, C++ is mostly used. So, I have disabled producing c++-lib/tcl/Makefile in AC_OUTPUT in the snacc-configure.patch. It should build fine, now. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snacc.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snacc-1.3-4.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11, EL-5 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708902 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708907 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #22 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-09-26 05:35:34 EDT --- 1] use install -p to keep timestamps https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 2] cron, doesn't work from cron log: (CRON) bad username (/etc/cron.d/afraid-dyndns) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468
Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-09-26
06:10:55 EDT ---
OK - rpmlint output
../SPECS/gstreamer-plugins-espeak.spec:28: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
It can be safely ignored, as rpmlint thinks you are running configure here:
sed -i 's/NANO=1/NANO=0/g' ./configure
(rpmlint reports the warn even if you comment the line, you could check if a
bug report has been already opened about that, i only found this one:
bug 462360)
However, if you modify the line to:
sed -i 's/NANO=1/NANO=0/g' configure
rpmlint doesnt complain anymore.
As a side note, it's not a must, but maybe changing configure.ac
and running autoconf before building is somewhat more elegant.
OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc
OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is LGPLv2+)
OK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun
OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build
koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708305
OK - The spec file must be written in American English.
OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
4e4a2d2363c50be72ed5d26a319439c3 gst-plugins-espeak-0.3.3.tar.bz2
NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations)
NA - package not relocatable
OK - A package must own all directories that it creates
OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings
OK - Permissions on files must be set properly
OK - Each package must have a %clean section
OK - Each package must consistently use macros
OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content)
NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc)
OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package)
NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package)
NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file
OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names.
OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate.
OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
Package APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-09-26 06:11:30 EDT --- 1] keep timestamp when performing install (add -p switch to install command) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 2] Source0 doesn't exists $ wget http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Source/CLconverter-0.4.8.tar.gz --2009-09-26 12:01:54-- http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Source/CLconverter-0.4.8.tar.gz Resolving www.information-hq.org... 69.174.114.214 Connecting to www.information-hq.org|69.174.114.214|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-09-26 12:01:54 ERROR 404: Not Found. 3] wrong format of Source0: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Spec_file_pieces_explained 4] Url tag is reffering to 404 page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #16 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-09-26 11:15:34 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: R-RM2 New Branches: F-12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225685] Merge Review: device-mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225685 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-09-26 12:53:10 EDT --- It's wired...I'm still not able to build this package on koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1709529 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 --- Comment #7 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 06:27:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Adel, you miss the -p in the install command to preserve timestamps Good catch, fixed in 2.1.5-3 thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 08:53:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) Hmm, you shouldn't need to obsolete the static library since it hasn't been in existence as a separate package and you just added the static provide a day ago. I did it just to be sure that everything will be ok. :) All issues have been fixed and this package has been APPROVED Good. I suppose that it's safe to close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225245] Merge Review: am-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225245 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 11:55:50 EDT --- perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524451] Review Request: puppet-module-yum-development - Puppet module for yum (development)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524451 Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@pobox.com --- Comment #1 from Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com 2009-09-26 10:11:06 EDT --- I presume the idea is that the module files shipped in the package should not need to be edited? If not, would they be better placed in /usr/share/puppet/modules/source/module? (Or .../modules/source/environment/module if you have different content to ship in development, testing, and production versions of the module.) Then, users could create symlinks in /var/lib/puppet (or where ever) to meet their own environments layout. This might well be something to bring up on the puppet-dev or -users list. I know the common modules haven't gotten very far yet, but I'm sure other puppet users have given this problem some thought and it might be beneficial to try and come up with a somewhat standard layout for shipping module packages. Plus, then it could be documented on the puppet wiki and potentially save you some work writing a nice README.Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226149] Merge Review: mockobjects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226149 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225939] Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225939 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225928] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-el
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225928 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 11:30:01 EDT --- Should be reopened, since it exists in all current Fedora distributions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 11:56:17 EDT --- perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 11:24:42 EDT --- I'm afraid, that review still needed (until you'll remove it from distribution completely). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225802] Merge Review: gjdoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225802 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226507] Merge Review: tux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226507 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|CANTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428007] Package review: cronie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #43 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 11:21:31 EDT --- *** Bug 226529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #40 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 11:21:31 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 428007 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 12:59:25 EDT --- cmusphinx3-0.8-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmusphinx3-0.8-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225682] Merge Review: desktop-printing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225682 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:11:30 EDT --- It should be marked as dead (cvs tree shiould contain dead.package file with some description). Please, remove all sources and add dead.package file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com 2009-09-26 06:50:18 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :) I'll adjust the sed line before importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #14 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-09-26 11:14:54 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: R-msm New Branches: F12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #13 from Mario Basic ma...@information-hq.org 2009-09-26 10:36:22 EDT --- I was reorganizing my website so there was a little mess with the URLs. I have fixed the broken URLs, so I've repacked the package and these are the new links: SPEC URL: http://www.information-hq.org/download/projects/CLconverter/Spec/CLconverter.spec SPRM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/download/projects/CLconverter/Srpm/CLconverter-0.4.8-2.fc11.src.rpm I think I got all previous remarks covered. If you have some more, please tell me so I can work on fixing them. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 04:07:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanks for reviewing! (In reply to comment #1) 1) The name might be missleading as it isn't really fusecompress1 but kind of a migration tool, fusecompress1-migrate would be approriate to avoid confusion. How about fusecompress_offline1 since that's the name of the utility it installs? Yeah that makes sense. 2) Use install rather than mv mv is being used to rename two files that were installed by make install. (renaming the binary from fusecompress_offline to fusecompress_offline1 and the man page from fusecompress_offline.1 to fusecompress_offline1.1) This seems proper to me. Do you agree or is there some way to use install in that situation that's better? Sure as this is already installed using install again does not make much sense. 3) Well the rpmlinit messages is clear, remove the +x from the source files. Fixed SPEC: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress_offline1.spec SRPM: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress_offline1-1.99.19-6.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708383 Looks good now, - Use install instead of mv well you didn't do that but a changelog entry isn't a blocker ;) = APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 08:15:32 EDT --- Can you please upload the srpm to your FASUSERNAME.fedorapeople.org space please ? I'm having timeouts from your current host space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226486] Merge Review: tetex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226486 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Resolution|DEFERRED|NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 11:33:02 EDT --- Since texlive was pushed to current distributions, this ticket should be closed as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #32 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-09-26 11:14:29 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rmol New Branches: F12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226316] Merge Review: privoxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226316 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 11:56:46 EDT --- perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 08:33:40 EDT --- Done (in devel branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guido.grazi...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 05:16:32 EDT --- Adel, you miss the -p in the install command to preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com 2009-09-26 06:58:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gstreamer-plugins-espeak Short Description: A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak Owners: sdz Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:06:50 EDT --- awesfx was returned to FEDORA, but this ticket has nothing with this new awesfx. I'm changing status to NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225845] Merge Review: gnu-crypto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225845 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thom...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 13:44:16 EDT --- Hi, Source Url is missing. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for how to deal with this. rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Not sure if rpmlint is silent counts here :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226328] Merge Review: pwlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226328 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:33:57 EDT --- Please, remove all files, except dead.package, from devel cvs branch, because it still rebuilds sometimes (people sometimes got confused, because spec-file still exists). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225801] Merge Review: gimp-print
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225801 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226809] Merge Review: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226809 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:57:17 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 197189 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226362] Merge Review: redhat-artwork
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226362 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:51:13 EDT --- Indeed, cvs tree should be cleaned up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226369] Merge Review: rgmanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226369 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:49:20 EDT --- BTW, it was splitted again from another package. :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 520563 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226137] Merge Review: Mesa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226137 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #12 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus ste...@seekline.net 2009-09-26 07:58:31 EDT --- rpmlint reports some errors and a warning: ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh-debuginfo.ppc: E: debuginfo-without-sources ne7ssh-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings. I guess the warning about no documentation can be ignored since the base package contains license information and so on. All others should be checked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Bug 516059 depends on bug 516058, which changed state.
Bug 516058 Summary: Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class
for validating email addresses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
Resolution||ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2009-09-26 14:18:54
EDT ---
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the webapp specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1709685
[x] Rpmlint output:
dokuwiki.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 38, tab: line 1)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Okay since this is in a sed line.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal
requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
Not present and not included.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
c75c4781b8698041c3c9b6b0fec2ac2e dokuwiki-2009-02-14b.tgz
c75c4781b8698041c3c9b6b0fec2ac2e ../SOURCES/dokuwiki-2009-02-14b.tgz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Koji build done.
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 --- Comment #3 from Pierre Dorbais pierre.dorb...@free.fr 2009-09-26 14:28:49 EDT --- I made some changes Spec URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso.spec SRPM URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm chd...@chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chd...@chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ciso-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chd...@chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint SRPMS/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chd...@chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint SPECS/ciso.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-09-26 08:09:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) 1] keep timestamp when performing install (add -p switch to install command) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Even if preserving timestamps was useful (Which it isn't the case), there are no timestamps which are useful to be preserved in this package. 3] wrong format of Source0: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Spec_file_pieces_explained Except that the URL is invalid, I don't understand your point is. Jan, your comments were not useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-09-26 14:36:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) rpmlint reports some errors and a warning: ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless Hm, I don't see this warnings. What version of rpmlint you are using? $ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.90-1.fc11.noarch ne7ssh-debuginfo.ppc: E: debuginfo-without-sources I have deep search but nothing found relevant this. Grep all files by strip also does no results. So, really this is applicable to library, not executable binary? ne7ssh-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation I think it is may be safely ignored. ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel Yes. And it also commented in spec. So, it come from -examples subpackage what you suggest merge with -doc. I do that. But examples required ne7ssh for compilation. So, no error there. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 14:57:31 EDT --- ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel I've thought you're a guy who preaches of flexibility. What flexibility do you gain by making a separate noarch -doc package strictly require two -devel packages and their dependency-chain? None. It has become less flexible. Technically, ne7ssh-doc does not need ne7ssh-devel for anything. The examples and a build environment are fully optional. Somebody who actually wants to compile stuff will need to install the development group's packages first, anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guido.grazi...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 08:38:44 EDT --- Hello, your package doesnt build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1709089 You need to BR: intltool (at least) Your devel package must also Requires: pkgconfig as it includes a .pc file Please not also that the spec file posted here has a small diff against the one included in your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-26 08:40:11 EDT --- Hmm, you shouldn't need to obsolete the static library since it hasn't been in existence as a separate package and you just added the static provide a day ago. ** All issues have been fixed and this package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 15:38:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 15:36:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 15:35:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 15:37:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-09-26 15:50:44 EDT --- Ok, I will take a look later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||RAWHIDE
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 16:13:30 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99 pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz
f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99 pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
OK - check for outstanding bugs on package (merge reviews/rename/re-reviews).
Issues:
1. rpmlint says:
pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh 0775
pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-99hd-apm-restore 0775
I think we can ignore those.
pm-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log
Can be ignored per comment in the spec.
pm-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Can be ignored.
2. Some non blocking suggestions:
Might add a '-p' to your install lines to preserve timestamps of the sources?
Currently it's pointless to add smp_mflags, but if there are ever more source
files
to compile it might be worth considering.
I see no blockers at all, so this package is APPROVED.
Sorry for the long delay here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226657] Merge Review: xrestop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226657 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(sandm...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 16:22:09 EDT --- As far as I can tell you've never commited to this package, do you still want to maintain it? Items 1 and 5 are outstanding still... all the others have been fixed by other people over the years. The buildroot does meet the guidelines, even though it's not a standard one. The comments are not a blocker. I guess I will go ahead and APPROVE this review, but it seems odd to have a package maintained by someone who has never once commited to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #34 from Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de 2009-09-26 16:34:37 EDT --- Approved package because Mamoru Tasaka have checked it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #2 from Mads Villadsen m...@krakoa.dk 2009-09-26 16:43:19 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. I updated the spec file and src.rpm, and I tested that it actually builds in koji this time. http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #1 from Mads Villadsen m...@krakoa.dk 2009-09-26 16:45:01 EDT --- Updated the spec file to contain a BuildRequires on intltool since the package contains translations. http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler-0.2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 17:04:13 EDT --- This is imported and built. Closing now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226155] Merge Review: mod_perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226155 --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-09-26 17:16:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362781) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362781) Patch to the mod_perl spec file Here's a patch that removes all the errors that can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 17:48:07 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 17:48:02 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-26 19:36:23 EDT --- # yum install sysreport (clip) Package sysreport is obsoleted by sos, trying to install sos-1.8-16.fc11.noarch instead Package sos-1.8-16.fc11.noarch already installed and latest version Nothing to do ** The package just needs to be removed from any current distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525909] New: Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Summary: Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gia...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/sysprof.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/sysprof-1.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Sysprof is a sampling CPU profiler for Linux that uses a kernel module to profile the entire system, not just a single application. Sysprof handles shared libraries and applications do not need to be recompiled. In fact they don't even have to be restarted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 19:39:54 EDT --- This package was in Fedora but moved to RPMFusion when kmods were banned. Now it does not need anymore a kernel module so I'd like to move it back to Fedora. Old review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net 2009-09-26 21:30:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362799) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362799) patch to make EMBOSS use system pcre Fixed and working (it compiles) patch to use system pcre attached. Please test if the software is working correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net 2009-09-26 21:35:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) All the rpmlint errors have been eliminated, the following warnings remain: EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/lib/client.jar https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#class-path-in-manifest EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/lib/axis/commons-logging.jar Isn't this the same as ant-commons-logging or jakarta-commons-logging, which are in Fedora already? If yes, then this needs to be fixed to use the system-provided package. If not, see above. EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libeplplot.so.3.2.7 e...@glibc_2.2.5 It shouldn't do that. Please explain that to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219112 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525913] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize-GZip OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The WWW::Mechanize::GZip module tries to fetch a URL by requesting gzip-compression from the webserver. If the response contains a header with 'Content-Encoding: gzip', it decompresses the response in order to get the original (uncompressed) content. This module will help to reduce bandwith fetching webpages, if supported by the webeserver. If the webserver does not support gzip-compression, no decompression will be made. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1710108 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525914] New: Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com Alias: perl-Net-GitHub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-GitHub OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 525913 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Net-GitHub.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Net-GitHub-0.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GitHub (http://github.com) is a popular git host; this package is a Perl API for working with GitHub users and repositories. *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #11 from Alex Musolino musoli...@gmail.com 2009-09-27 01:18:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Can you please upload the srpm to your FASUSERNAME.fedorapeople.org space please ? I'm having timeouts from your current host space. Done - I forgot that I had access to that service now. Spec URL: http://musolinoa.fedorapeople.org/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://musolinoa.fedorapeople.org/avra/avra-1.2.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
