[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 03:00:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ndisc6 Short Description: IPv6 diagnostic tools Owners: sgros Branches: F-12 InitialCC: sgros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444
--- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-11-18 03:05:56
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
No problem, i'm still learning; about the dangling symlinks, i can confirm
that
if i add file based requires:
Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf
Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf
i get no more warnings. I read somewhere in the wiki that adding file based
requires is unsafe, am i wrong? Alternatives?
It's not unsafe, but it is not recommended to use file requires since it means
that file lists need to be downloaded and resolved to figure out the
dependencies.
Just add Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts, which provides both of the aforementioned
files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536796] Review Request: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks - KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536796 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 03:14:51 EDT --- Thank you for the review Sven. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/kde-plasma-smooth-tasks-0.0.1-0.1.wip20091116.fc11.src.rpm Done. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kde-plasma-smooth-tasks Short Description: KDE taskbar replacement with window peeking ability Owners: thomasj Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||che...@gmail.com --- Comment #51 from Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 03:23:28 EDT --- hmm i am curious why not call python3 - python and the old version python-compat2.6 or whatever? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18
03:22:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
(In reply to comment #20)
No problem, i'm still learning; about the dangling symlinks, i can confirm
that
if i add file based requires:
Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf
Requires: %{_datadir}/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf
i get no more warnings. I read somewhere in the wiki that adding file based
requires is unsafe, am i wrong? Alternatives?
It's not unsafe, but it is not recommended to use file requires since it means
that file lists need to be downloaded and resolved to figure out the
dependencies.
Just add Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts, which provides both of the
aforementioned
files.
Hmm.. The problem/warning is with already added requires dejavu-sans-fonts and
when you run rpmlint on the installed packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 03:28:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813610 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream (sha1sum). c704446d8793509265bdc5574e584a54784f7a1e hunspell-ht-0.02.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 03:33:14 EDT --- thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538303] New: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538303 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-minitest - Small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mk...@magoazul.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-minitest.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-minitest-1.4.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: minitest/unit is a small and fast replacement for ruby's huge and slow test/unit. This is meant to be clean and easy to use both as a regular test writer and for language implementors that need a minimal set of methods to bootstrap a working unit test suite. miniunit/spec is a functionally complete spec engine. miniunit/mock, by Steven Baker, is a beautifully tiny mock object framework. f13 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813620 mk...@fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-minitest.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-minitest-* rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/minitest-1.4.2/.autotest rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Unit/output%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Assertions/_assertions%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Unit/TestCase/passed%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-minitest-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/minitest-1.4.2/ri/MiniTest/Spec/nuke_test_methods%21-c.yaml %21 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The .autotest file seems valid and can be used by ZenTest autotest, though I'm not familiar with it's operation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468701] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2008-11-25 23:18:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 03:39:39 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-11-18 03:55:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) (In reply to comment #21) Just add Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts, which provides both of the aforementioned files. Hmm.. The problem/warning is with already added requires dejavu-sans-fonts and when you run rpmlint on the installed packages. If it still complains and the symlinks aren't broken, then it's a false warning. Just ignore it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525432] Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 04:04:23 EDT --- openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 04:03:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-ppc/result/* [ ... lots of unverisoned sonames in /usr/lib/libbear_*.so ... ] These are OK. They are used exclusively by the binaries shipped with the game, we don't even provide a -devel subpackage. Wasn't sure. rpmlint is a good help, but it can't know all... +APPROVED+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - BitTorrent Tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(matt_dom...@dell. ||com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 04:07:13 EDT --- rhnlib seems to be a special case and you can ignore those warning yes, it is special case but please remove libselinux-python. I would like, but if I remove it, it is not included. I build test package with that Requirese: removed and got: $ rpm -qpR /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-rhncfg-git-c9cd2e0cf23a7bd6eaed93435c305d7b1c975378/noarch/rhncfg-5.9.13-1.git.c9cd2e0cf23a7bd6eaed93435c305d7b1c975378.noarch.rpm python rhnlib rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 License should be GPLv2 and Python (e.g. compile.py is based on Python-licensed code) - asked spot about this to be sure Did not know. Done. PYTHON-LICENSES.txt should be added to %doc Done This require should be moved up to the main package. Done. Therefore please remove all provides from the spec file unless you have a proper explanation for them. Old heritage. I tracked it to year 2003 and could not find reason, why it has been added. Dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 04:10:33 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhncfg/rhncfg-5.9.14-1.src.rpm Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhncfg/rhncfg.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528333] Review Request: gnunet-gtk - GNUnet GTK+ User Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528333 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fe...@fetzig.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fe...@fetzig.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fe...@fetzig.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fe...@fetzig.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528379] Review Request: gnunet-fuse - FUSE filesystem for GNUnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528379 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fe...@fetzig.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fe...@fetzig.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528379] Review Request: gnunet-fuse - FUSE filesystem for GNUnet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528379 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 04:29:47 EDT --- Requires: fuse is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309
--- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-11-18
04:37:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
* Obsoletes
- I don't think Obsoletes: rubygem-net-ldap = %{version}
is needed because rubygem-net-ldap is not imported into Fedora
yet.
It has been deployed in production already -also the reason why I'm
submitting
the package-;
What do you mean here? I googled rubygem-net-ldap and it seems
that only Suse uses it, and I don't think we should take care of
Suse's naming way.
https://terminal.ogd.nl - it's in production in a private environment
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538326] New: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-LWP-Online.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-LWP-Online-1.07-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module attempts to answer, as accurately as it can, one of the nastiest technical questions there is. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] New: Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Summary: Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gpate...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: Hi! I've created a fork of the original OTP daemon from TRI-D Systems, acquired by Red Hat. The project is at http://otpd.googlecode.com. It is a one time password daemon capable of authenticating HOTP-compliant devices, such as softtokens and hardtokens. I'd really appreciate if you can review this to be included in fedora extra and (later) in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538046] Review Request: spacewalk-certs-tools - Spacewalk SSL Key/Cert Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538046
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 04:46:34 EDT
---
Package doesn't contains a verbatin copy ot the license
text (No blocker, but please contact upstream to include
one into the upstream package)
Since I'm part of upstream, I added it there.
I also changed license to GPL2 and Python (been notified yesterday in review
491088).
Please use %global instead of %define
Done
We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Done.
question: Who should ownd %{rhnroot}
rhn-client-tools. Added to Requires. Nice catch.
and %{rhnroot}/certs
This package should. Done.
Updated SPEC:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-certs-tools/spacewalk-certs-tools.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-certs-tools/spacewalk-certs-tools-0.7.2-1.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-18 04:48:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) https://terminal.ogd.nl - it's in production in a private environment ... What is this? (it seems to be asking me to enter some password in the language I cannot understand), and I doubt Fedora should take care of this project(?) (it is almost impossible for Fedora to take care of every such private project). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537823] Review Request: hunspell-ht - Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537823 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 04:48:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hunspell-ht Short Description: Haitian Creole hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #1 from Giuseppe Paterno gpate...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 04:50:12 EDT --- Sorry, I mentioned extra, but I meant fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-11-18 04:54:28 EDT --- Look, this is my company's project and my company is (partly) taking care of pushing the project's dependencies into Fedora. It doesn't really matter whether we have an extra Obsoletes just for the first real release of this package through Fedora now does it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538332] New: Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538332 Summary: Review Request: covered - Verilog code coverage analyzer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/covered.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/covered-0.7.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Covered is a Verilog code-coverage utility using VCD/LXT style dumpfiles and the design to generate line, toggle, memory, combinational logic, FSM state/arc and assertion coverage reports. Covered also contains a built-in race condition checker and GUI report viewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538335] New: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-CMOS.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-CMOS-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * NMOS Transistor * PMOS Transistor * Ground * Vdd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: dia-CMOS - |Review Request: dia-Digital |Dia Digital Shapes |- Dia Digital Shapes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538339] New: Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Summary: Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electric2.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electric2-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * CKT Breaker * Generator * Isolator * Transformer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538340] New: Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Summary: Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electronic.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-electronic-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * Antenna * Bell * Button * Capacitor * Electrolytic capacitor * Crystal * Di-Gate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538337] New: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia Digital Shapes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia Digital Shapes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Summary: Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia Digital Shapes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-Digital.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dia-Digital-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The following shapes are included in the package: * Buffer * Inverter * AND * NAND * OR * NOR * XOR * XNOR * Multiplexer/Demultiplexer * Adder/Subtractor/Multiplier/Divider * Register * Connection Point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292
Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@sandro-mathys.ch
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-11-18 05:00:01
EDT ---
OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
$ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/noarch,SRPMS}/spacewalk-proxy-html*
spacewalk-proxy-html.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/var/www/html/_rhn_proxy/index.html
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Save to ignore.
OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. .
NEEDSWORK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Please use %global instead of %define (and move it to the top of the spec file
as people would look for it there):
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
Please don't obsolete a package that didn't exist in Fedora/EPEL before. This
also makes the provides unnecessary.
OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source
URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.
$ md5sum spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz
SOURCES/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz
fea871e8665d756cbde595ca6932281d spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz
fea871e8665d756cbde595ca6932281d SOURCES/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.1.tar.gz
OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
N/A - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
OK - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not
[Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-11-18 05:09:37 EDT --- All issues have been correctly addressed. - This package (rhncfg) is APPROVED by red (Sandro Mathys) - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 05:23:23 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 05:23:17 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 05:23:29 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 05:23:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rhncfg Short Description: Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 05:37:35 EDT --- Please use %global instead of %define Done Please don't obsolete a package that didn't exist in Fedora/EPEL before. Done. Although I disagree with such step. Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-html/spacewalk-proxy-html-0.7.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #14 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 05:35:52 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 05:43:54 EDT --- Oops, just realised that the fedora-cvs flag never got set on this ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 05:45:39 EDT --- Also, the proper link for the final SRPM is http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/sesame/janino-2.5.15-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-11-18 05:51:01 EDT --- A first check after a mock build yields: GNUnet.src: W: strange-permission gnunetd.init 0755 Can be solved by setting that file to chmod 644 and installing it with install -m 755 instead of using cp. GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/gnunetd gnunet GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/gnunetd gnunet GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/gnunetd gnunet GNUnet.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/gnunetd gnunet Can be ignored GNUnet.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/gnunetd GNUnet.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd GNUnet.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/gnunetd $prog Please fix. I also get a flood of GNUnet.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency when running rpmlint on the installed packages. Please check this as well. Furthermore please add comments to the patches as to where they come from and if they have been brought to upstream's notice at some point (bugzilla etc.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #21 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 06:00:12 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 06:04:22 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 06:04:15 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 06:04:26 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-11-18 06:08:23 EDT --- You can build in rawhide however please do not close this, I need to find time to review the result properly and approve the merge review (unfortunately, it seems I'm a bit under water those past days) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538360] New: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Inject.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Inject-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Following the release of CPAN::Mini, the CPAN::Mini::Inject module was created to add additional distributions into a minicpan mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468701] desktop-mime-type.prov should be in redhat-rpm-config.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |rawhide Summary|Merge Review: |desktop-mime-type.prov |desktop-file-utils |should be in ||redhat-rpm-config. --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr 2009-11-18 06:32:30 EDT --- desktop-mime-type.prov from desktop-file-utils should certainly be in that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||538361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538361] New: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538361 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Checksums - Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 538360 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Checksums.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Checksums-2.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Write a CHECKSUMS file for a directory as on CPAN. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 06:43:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fvkbd Short Description: Free Virtual Keyboard Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496689] Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496689 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 06:48:01 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538326] Review Request: perl-LWP-Online - Module for accessing web by proccess
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538326 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||538363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||538363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538363] New: Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538363 Summary: Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 538326,538360 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip-0.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The pip (Perl Installation Program) console application is used to install Perl distributions in a wide variety of formats, both from CPAN and from external third-party locations, while supporting module dependencies that go across the boundary from third-party to CPAN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #17 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 06:47:51 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496688] Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496688 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 06:47:56 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 06:53:07 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 06:53:01 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 06:53:42 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 06:52:56 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #17 from Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.ch 2009-11-18 07:06:23 EDT --- - Added preferences-system-windows icon reference to bmpanel2cfg.desktop - As icon cache re-generation seems to be unnecessary now, it has been removed Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.6.pre1/bmpanel2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/bmpanel2/2.1-0.6.pre1/bmpanel2-2.1-0.6.pre1.fc11.src.rpm I would prefer if you could sponsor me as the 'l7 review' associated with Christoph may still take some time. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536683] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-uml2 - Implementation of the UML2 OMG metamodel for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536683 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 07:05:53 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 07:06:36 EDT --- $ koji build --scratch dist-f13 hlint-1.6.12-1.fc11.src.rpm : Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1813996 : 1813996 build (dist-f13, hlint-1.6.12-1.fc11.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 07:12:36 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #25 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 07:40:07 EDT --- Ok, I imported files into CVS for devel and F-12 branches. Build in koji was also successful. I suppose this bug entry could be now closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=28 Bug 28 depends on bug 450551, which changed state. Bug 450551 Summary: OCaml binaries give rpmlint warning about executable-stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450551 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-11-18 08:14:53 EDT --- Did you file an update for F-12 in bodhi? If not, when you do, you can put this BZ # in the update, and have it close the BZ when the package is pushed to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165552] Review Request: banner - Prints a short string to the console in very large letters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165552 Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at 2009-11-18 09:00:36 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: banner New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jima oliver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-11-18 09:23:25 EDT --- All issues have been correctly addressed. --- This package (spacewalk-proxy-html) is APPROVED by red (Sandro Mathys) --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-miscfixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ucs-fixed-fonts selected|ucs-miscfixed-fonts |set of bitmap fonts |selected set of bitmap ||fonts --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 09:34:00 EDT --- oops, looks like i have done cvs request with wrong package name :( really sorry for that it should be usc-miscfixed-fonts New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ucs-miscfixed-fonts Short Description: Selected set of bitmap fonts Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig can we do something now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 Luca Botti luca.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538420] Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Albert Bogdanowicz albert.bogdanow...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538420] New: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Summary: Review Request: main package name here - short summary here Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: albert.bogdanow...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~ab277290/Fedora/samtools.spec SRPM URL: https://students.mimuw.edu.pl/~ab277290/Fedora/samtools-0.1.7a-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Another bioinformatics package. SAM Tools provide various utilities for manipulating alignments in the SAM format, including sorting, merging, indexing and generating alignments in a per-position format. URL: http://samtools.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 --- Comment #17 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 09:47:11 EDT --- Ok, now I really applied correct patch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1814160name=build.log http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps-0.12-4.fc12.src.rpm But still there are problems in requirements, you might find in build log lines like: Warning: prerequisite Acme::PlayCode 0 not found. These ^ are problems of mentioned three packages, which I have to fix first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #29 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-11-18 09:55:05 EDT --- why not F-11 and EL-5 too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494292] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-html - The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494292 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 09:57:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: spacewalk-proxy-html Short Description: The HTML component for Spacewalk Proxy Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538420] Review Request: samtools - SAM (Sequence Alignment/Map) format is a generic format for storing large nucleotide sequence alignments. Tools for sorting, merging etc. sam format files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Albert Bogdanowicz albert.bogdanow...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: samtools - |package name here - short |SAM (Sequence |summary here |Alignment/Map) format is a ||generic format for storing ||large nucleotide sequence ||alignments. Tools for ||sorting, merging etc. sam ||format files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #30 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 10:05:26 EDT --- No particular reason, inertia primarily. I can request CVS branches for F-11 and EL-5 too, but first I'll have to look how that's done. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Julian Aloofi julian.fed...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||julian.fed...@googlemail.co ||m AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|julian.fed...@googlemail.co ||m Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-11-18 10:10:39 EDT --- Similarly to #28. Set the cvs flag to ?, and see this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-18 10:13:59 EDT --- (Changing the version to rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #52 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 10:30:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) hmm i am curious why not call python3 - python and the old version python-compat2.6 or whatever? Python 3 is intended by upstream to be the future of Python, but we have many critical components that use Python 2. Python 2 and Python 3 are sufficiently different that we need both (try writing print in each). Python 2 will be around for a long time. Changing the meaning of python to mean python 3 rather than python 2 in specfiles/yum/rpmdb would have a very high chance of breaking something during updates, and I don't see any real benefit. Hence the plan is to continue to use python- to mean the existing python 2 stack, and python3- for the new parallel-installable python3 stack. For more information see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python3F13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-11-18 10:22:40 EDT --- Last week I sent again a message to upstream about the naming issue. So fare no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-18 10:34:23 EDT --- mdk-1.2.5-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdk-1.2.5-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Julian Aloofi julian.fed...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Julian Aloofi julian.fed...@googlemail.com 2009-11-18 10:32:07 EDT --- OK, I'm taking this. rpmlint output on the spec file is clean so far, a full review is coming soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532205] Review Request: microba - Set of JFC (Swing) components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532205 Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #6 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2009-11-18 11:07:56 EDT --- * Updated URL to use sourceforge.net project website. * dgc-0.98 will not print searchpath, as it is not required. Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/dgc.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/dgc-0.98-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538451] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538451 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Refactor - Perl extension for refactoring Perl code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Devel-Refactor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Devel-Refactor-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Devel::Refactor module is for code refactoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-18 11:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) I am definitely going to sponsor Marcus, but the l7 packages still need a lot work. Marcus and I have talked about this on IRC and in private, sorry it's not in bugzilla. Well, then will you sponsor Marcus soon if he applies for the sponsorship? Now bmpanel2 review request (bug 530301) can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-18 11:12:19 EDT --- For sponsorship issue, please wait for a moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538458] New: Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538458 Summary: Review Request: perl-Format-Human-Bytes - Format a bytecount and make it human readable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-pip-0.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module returns you a printable string which is more readable by humans than a simple bytecount. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #6 from Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me 2009-11-18 11:17:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Caio 'kaio' Chance I'm going to review this in the next few days unless you have any more comments on the documentation? Steve no thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532382] Review Request: fvkbd - Free Virtual Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532382 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bnoc...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2009-11-18 11:19:53 EDT --- Should this replace the matchbox-keyboard? I believe it's supposed to be the successor to the matchbox-keyboard, as it handles CJK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
