[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #7 from fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 03:24:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Well, how should I think of desktop file for now? I think reverting the desktop file in the rpm would be a workaround. It's a problem when a language specific tool is shown on other language menu items. It would be better to remove the .desktop file after ibus-anthy language bar could show the menu. That's why I asked to file a bug in ibus-anthy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-12-23 03:24:02
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Ugh. blas.ini in %{_bindir}??
Yes... it is in the same place that upstream places it (with this strange 644
permission, already fixed). Is it the wrong place?
Absolutely. It should be placed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/. Please ask upstream to
fix this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||550001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|550001 | Depends on||550001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 03:46:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) Well, how should I think of desktop file for now? I think reverting the desktop file in the rpm would be a workaround. It's a problem when a language specific tool is shown on other language menu items. It would be better to remove the .desktop file after ibus-anthy language bar could show the menu. That's why I asked to file a bug in ibus-anthy. Filed as bug 550001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 03:51:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: plexus-interpolation Short Description: Plexus Interpolation API Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 03:58:22 EDT --- removed all Requires for perl packages. updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207
--- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 05:02:01
EDT ---
1) Scratch build again failed for rawhide, See log
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1887806name=root.log
May I request you to please check spec file and see if all BuildRequires
packages for this pki-common package is built in rawhide.
This time we are missing dogtag-pki-common-ui package.
2) But I also observed that build
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887883) is successful if
we remove
BuildRequires: dogtag-pki-common-ui
3) I also see few more things can be cleaned up in spec file
for Requires: lines
you can replace following lines
Requires: %{_javadir}/pki/cmsutil.jar
Requires: %{_javadir}/pki/nsutil.jar
with simple
Requires: pki-util
4) There is no rhgb package in Fedora active branches but yes yum will give you
its replacement plymouth-system-theme which is empty(meta) package. So why
would this package need theme package?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 05:12:26 EDT --- Thanks. Koji build:-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887911 As issue2 in above comment is not blocking this review. I will approve this package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 05:18:16 EDT --- 5) you can change defattr of -javadoc subpackage to %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 05:33:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887819 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) f8e9e4d1230ed80cfe38a5f28b5e96dc655ba54c pki-java-tools-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) don't forget to change defattr of javadoc subpackage to %defattr(-,root,root,-) 2) again why this package have Requires: pki-native-tools though this is not a blocker. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Andreas Petzold andreas.petz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreas.petz...@gmail.com --- Comment #93 from Andreas Petzold andreas.petz...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 05:54:42 EDT --- Reply to comment 92: I've downloaded the binary tarball Songbird_1.4.2-1434_linux-i686.tar.gz yesterday, but it's not working for me on F12: (songbird-bin:21336): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/home/petzold/download/Songbird/gst-plugins/libgstpulse.so': /usr/lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined symbol: vorbis_version_string (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstjpeg.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstjpeg.so: undefined symbol: _gst_debug_get_category (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so: undefined symbol: _gst_debug_get_category (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstapp.so': /usr/lib/libgstapp-0.10.so.0: undefined symbol: gst_buffer_list_get_type (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so: undefined symbol: gst_video_format_parse_caps_interlaced (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmatroska.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmatroska.so: undefined symbol: gst_util_array_binary_search (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpulse.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpulse.so: undefined symbol: gst_message_new_request_state (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdv.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdv.so: undefined symbol: gst_tag_list_new_full ././songbird-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gst-0.10/gst/_gst.so: undefined symbol: gst_task_pool_get_type Could not initialize GStreamer: Error re-scanning registry , child terminated by signal Googling these error messages, I've found the advise to set LD_BIND_NOW=1 when running songbird. This seems to help a bit, but songbird is still crashing randomly. Scott, what did you do to make it work for you? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-12-23 06:23:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gummi Short Description: A simple LaTeX editor Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915
--- Comment #4 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com
2009-12-23 06:29:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Absolutely. It should be placed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/. Please ask upstream
to
fix this.
Leave it to me.
Can you tell me something about this implicit requirements that my package is
asking for?
By the way, here is a little update in the páckage but I just realized that if
we move %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help to
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/help the help section of the software will break.
Is there a more elegant solution to this problem?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #5 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 06:41:49 EDT --- ooops! Sorry. Here goes the files. SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/freemat/4.0-2/freemat.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/freemat/4.0-2/FreeMat-4.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fab...@bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-12-23 06:52:50 EDT --- - Do you really need 'python_sitearch'? I guess that this is a left-over from the template. - Can you please preserve the timestamps in the install section? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps The biggest issue is still the missing license statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-12-23 07:31:01
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Absolutely. It should be placed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/. Please ask
upstream to
fix this.
Leave it to me.
Can you tell me something about this implicit requirements that my package is
asking for?
By the way, here is a little update in the páckage but I just realized that if
we move %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help to
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/help the help section of the software will
break.
Is there a more elegant solution to this problem?
If it breaks, then the files are needed by the main package and thus cannot be
placed in -doc, instead they are placed in the main package.
Now you have
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/toolbox
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help
so change this simply to
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}
or
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/
both of which are equivalent, but the latter is IMHO clearer to the reader of
the spec file.
It's a bit off that the datadir is versioned. Only a few packages do this. Is
there a configure option or whatnot to change the datadir to
%{_datadir}/%{name} instead of using %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513497] Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513497 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mmo...@redhat.com ||) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513497] Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513497 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-12-23 07:39:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581
Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fab...@bernewireless.net
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-12-23
08:04:32 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Package:
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one
supported architecture
Tested on: F12/i386
[x] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM:
[...@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Binary RPM(s):
[...@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable
[x] Buildroot is correct
master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
License type: MIT
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL
Upstream source: 404ad9b0b2052686dee28936403aa3e7
Build source:404ad9b0b2052686dee28936403aa3e7
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales
[-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
[x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files
[x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every
%files section
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[-] Included tests passed successfully
[x] Package consistently uses macros
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content
[x] Included filenames are in UTF-8
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required
[-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present
[-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete
[x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
[-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI
application
[-] Follows desktop entry spec
[-] Valid .desktop Name
[-] Valid .desktop GenericName
[-] Valid .desktop Categories
[-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
[-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install
[-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
[x] Latest version is packaged
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock
Tested on: F12/i386
[x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888127
[?] Package functions as described
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used
[-] The placement of
[Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-12-23 08:12:43 EDT --- Upstream closed the bug [1] about the license as 'wont fix'. [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browsegroup_id=20323atid=120323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 08:15:48 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing this. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-minimock Short Description: The simplest possible mock library Owners:tomspur Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-12-23 08:18:58 EDT --- Looks good, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550067] New: Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550067 Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Template-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Template-Tiny-0.09-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: WARNING: THIS MODULE IS EXPERIMENTAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE Template::Tiny is a reimplementation of a partial subset of the Template Toolkit, in as few lines of code as possible. It is intended for use in light-usage, low-memory, or low-cpu templating situations, where you may need to upgrade to the full feature set in the future, or if you want the familiarity of TT-style templates. It is intended to have fully-compatible template and stash usage, with a limited by similar Perl API. Unlike Template Toolkit, Template::Tiny will process templates without a compile phase (but despite this is still quicker, owing to heavy use of the Perl regular expression engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-12-23
08:54:25 EDT ---
I made a full review. Here are my comments, questions etc:
* Package does not build in mock. It pulls gcj. We want openjdk. I added that
BR fol the rest of the review.
As far as I know, all java packages need these BR's and R's:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires
* Additionally, the guidelines tell us to include these R's for maven:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#maven
* rpmlint says
plexus-io.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-io
Is this ignorable? Why?
! javadoc package does not require the main package. (just a warning. I don't
know if this is intentional)
? Shouldn't the release tag just be 0.1.a5%{?dist}
! For macro consistency plexus-io can be replaced by %{name} at two places
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23
08:57:42 EDT ---
Could you post the new url to the spec file?
The one above should be an old one, because there are still the spaces.
Just some other comments:
- %gobal over %define
see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
- BR: python-setuptools-devel is not needed, python-setuptools is enought
- How about modifying the description a bit?
You could use %{python_sitelib} instead of
``/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages``, so the example in the description will
always be uptodate.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375
--- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 09:02:48
EDT ---
%{_bindir}/%{name} is a file, not a directory.
Good catch, rushed update. Now fixed.
SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon-0.1.0-5.fc12.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 09:04:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) as far as i understand it right, you should use wildcards for every versionnumber in your filelist. But I'm not sure, just make sense to me, as far as i understand it correctly. Sorry I don't understand what your asking. Is this a geneeral query, or something in the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-12-23
09:18:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I made a full review. Here are my comments, questions etc:
* Package does not build in mock. It pulls gcj. We want openjdk. I added that
BR fol the rest of the review.
As far as I know, all java packages need these BR's and R's:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires
Fixed.
* Additionally, the guidelines tell us to include these R's for maven:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#maven
Fixed.
* rpmlint says
plexus-io.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-io
Is this ignorable? Why?
This is the place where mvn looks for fragments. And they are clearly non
conffile because users should not edit them.
! javadoc package does not require the main package. (just a warning. I don't
know if this is intentional)
Perfectly ok. There are many times when you want to install just the javadoc
for local reference and studing the API without any need to use it.
? Shouldn't the release tag just be 0.1.a5%{?dist}
Fixed.
! For macro consistency plexus-io can be replaced by %{name} at two places
Fixed
Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-io.spec
SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-io-1.0-0.2.a5.fc12.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/Gnomecanvasmm widget for “boxes and lines” environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 09:33:37 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 09:34:07 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 09:38:43 EDT --- Thanks! Good to go. This package (plexus-io) is APPROVED by oget -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 09:42:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: plexus-io Short Description: Plexus IO Components Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 10:08:54 EDT --- Sandro, I don't mind accepting this now with the old version, if it's clear, which file has which license. You can choose, between - adding a comment above the License: field - refer to a file upstream, where anything is explained - breack down in the %files section. See [1] for further information. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550100] New: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebast...@when.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-olpcgames.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-olpcgames-1.6-1.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888451 See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 [sebast...@localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./RPMS/noarch/python-olpcgames-1.6-1.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebast...@localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./SRPMS/python-olpcgames-1.6-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550102] New: Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 Summary: Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-mtl/ghc-mtl.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-mtl/ghc-mtl-1.1.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell Monad Transformer Library A standard library part of haskell-platform. This package is needed for ghc-6.12 to build a bunch of packages already in fedora including ghc-gtk2hs, ghc-uniplate, happy xmonad, and haskell-platform of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 10:23:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) SHOULD: - If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. This is basically just one file; I'm not sure if upstream would include license separately. Upstream don't *have* to include a license file, you just need to say hi and ask them to do so. If they don't, it'll ok, too. Joshua, you started good. Do you intent continuing this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550102] Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high CC||fedora-haskell-l...@redhat. ||com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 --- Comment #4 from Peter Halliday phalli...@excelsiorsystems.net 2009-12-23 10:26:53 EDT --- I actually am not sure why the define was there at all, because I wasn't using it.I removed the define. I changed python-setuptools-devel just to python-setuptools. I changed the description as you suggested. I also updated both the spec file and the SRPM as per the changes to the original URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #15 from David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com 2009-12-23 10:37:11 EDT --- Let's try using emacs-nox or xemacs-nox. Agree. That's an unfortunate solution if it's long-term, but it's a reasonable short-term solution *AND* it would definitely help narrow down where the bug is. Please modify the spec so that it'll be easy to switch back to normal emacs or xemacs. It's my hope that using *emacs-nox is a relatively temporary solution. Your earlier patch modified exit-pvs-process by replacing (sit-for 1) with (accept-process-output nil 1). Although it's a nasty hack, you could instead repeatedly (1) wait for 1 second using sleep, then (2) use system to invoke ps directly and see if the process is gone. Yeah, that's a nasty hack. Might work, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550104] New: Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 Summary: Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fhorn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/magento/magento.spec SRPM URL: http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/magento/magento-1.3.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Magento is an ecommerce web application. Since it is a web application, this electronic commerce browser works on many platforms, making your store application easily manageable from any location. Magento is the perfect ecommerce browser for the sell professional and novice alike. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550104] Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 Frederic Hornain fhorn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550105] New: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105 Summary: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-parsec/ghc-parsec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-parsec/ghc-parsec-2.1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell parser library Part of haskell-platform, currently need for ghc-6.12.1 to build ghc-network, haskell-platform, and darcs I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550105] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-12-23 10:49:56
EDT ---
oglappth.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary oglappth
oglappth.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary oglappth
oglappth.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liboglappth.so.2.0.0
e...@glibc_2.2.5
oglappth-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Fix the summaries. Judging by the description,
Library for creating portable OpenGL applications with easy-to-code
scene setup and selection operations.
the summary should be e.g.
An OpenGL wrapper library
**
The -devel package doesn't contain static libraries, so drop their mention from
the summary.
**
The changelog does not conform to Fedora standards. Leave the Mon Jan 12 entry
(replacing the + with a -), drop the rest.
**
Source url should be
http://www.uku.fi/~thassine/projects/download/current/lib%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
**
Change
%{_includedir}/*
to
%{_includedir}/oglappth/
for clarity.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 10:55:04 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 10:56:05 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-12-23 10:56:51
EDT ---
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
NEEDSWORK
- According to the naming guidelines, the name of the package should be
liboglappth, not oglappth.
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK
- Source URL is incorrect, but source matches upstream.
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK
- Add INSTALL=install -p to make install to preserve time stamps.
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
- You might want to add statements
[ -s NEWS ] exit 1
[ -s README ] exit 1
in %setup to make the build fail and thus become notified if these files
acquire content.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'.
NEEDSWORK
- This is automatically picked up on at least Fedora 12; if you want to build
for EPEL then you need to add Requires: pkgconfig. Better safe than sorry, so
please add this.
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 Bug 532306 depends on bug 533725, which changed state. Bug 533725 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 10:56:49 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 10:58:45 EDT --- Well, for now I won't object to use %test_files. So would you modify your spec file if there is something you want to do so and reupload your spec/srpm again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 --- Comment #2 from Damien Durand splinu...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 11:33:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: crun Short Description: Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool Owners: splinux Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: splinux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #10 from Josiah Carlson josiah.carl...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 11:39:14 EDT --- FYI, I released a new version with all of the license and code updates yesterday. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-12-23 11:44:28 EDT --- Just wanted to post the same thing as Josiah - there's a new release with the fixes and I'm going to create a new srpm with it. Might very well get 2010 until I'm able to do so, tho. But maybe I'll find some time to do it earlier... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lxt...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(dwhee...@dwheeler | |.com) | --- Comment #24 from David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com 2009-12-23 12:03:28 EDT --- Petr - thanks for releasing version 2.0 of DiVinE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 12:14:23 EDT --- Just a few comments for now, because I'm unsure, if reviewing this is the right procedure... - use %global and not %define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - permissions of buildmanifest.py need to be 664, like they where. But this is no executable script and contains #!/usr/bin/env Fix this with [1] to delete the shebang and not touching the permissions. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files About the procedure: It seems, the original submitter does not care anymore about this package and you want to take it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers would be the best thing to do in this case and no new review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23 12:25:09 EDT --- Well for SOURCE1, I leave it to your choise how to package it (however please make upstream clarify the license first) --- This package (jconvolver) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 12:31:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pki-setup Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Setup Framework Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #94 from David Halik auralva...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 12:36:41 EDT --- 1.4.3 is on it's way to being released, so I'm going to wait for that. @Scott the svn checkout isn't the same as their officially released source ball (different paths, structure, etc), so I wait for that. Otherwise I have to change the build process to cope and it's a bunch of extra work for nothing. Songbird dev stevel will notify me when the ball is out, so I'll get on it soon after. @Andreas You should probably post your issues on the songbird help list, because what I do here with the respin is very different than what they provide. I use almost all system components from Fedora, except for xulrunner and tagib, they package everything to their own patched copies. It's very likely that gstreamer bugs will not be the same because of the different versions involved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550138] New: Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550138 Summary: Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SPECS/xcftools.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/srpms.fc12/xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Xcftools is a set of fast command-line tools for extracting information from the Gimp's native file format XCF. The tools are designed to allow efficient use of layered XCF files as sources in a build system that use 'make' and similar tools to manage automatic processing of the graphics. These tools work independently of the Gimp engine and do not require the Gimp to even be installed. This package builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888672 rpmlint output : [buil...@fedobox ~]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/xcftools-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550139] New: Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 Summary: Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allis...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino-0.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc12.src.rpm Description: A fast, easy and free Twitter client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550143] New: Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 Summary: Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alagunambiwel...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://download.sf.net/webattery/webattery.spec SRPM URL: http://download.sf.net/webattery/webattery-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Webattery is a command line tool to display battery status with a cool battery like output. This my first package, need Sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23
13:10:31 EDT ---
It would be easier to remove %{buildroot}%{_docdir} and add '%doc doc/html' to
the %files devel section...
Furthermore docs need to be installed in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. The
above would fix this issue, too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 12:56:33 EDT --- Lorenzo, you should open your own review request and close this one as dublicate of your new request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23
13:27:29 EDT ---
Just a few comments, because I'm no sponsor anyway:
- $ rpmlint webattery-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/webattery-*
webattery.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
webattery.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
webattery-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/webattery-1.1/src/webattery.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
* in %install needs to be rm -rf %{buildroot} as first line
* no-buildroot-tag can be ignored, this is not needed anymore in fedora
(only if you want to import it in EL-5, too...)
* webattery.c needs to be 644, please change this in %install
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #16 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 13:45:48 EDT --- Argh. The elisp code calls add-submenu AT COMPILE TIME! Since this function doesn't exist in (x)emacs-nox, the compilation fails. I still don't understand why the accept-process-output hack isn't working for you, though. It runs code that is supposed to check for process statuses, on both emacsen. Since it solved the problem I was having with XEmacs, I know that code is being run. I'm going to make a virtual 32-bit machine and see if I can debug the hang you're seeing. It looks like the same hang, but may not be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-12-23 14:26:01 EDT --- I'll take a look, Not a blocker, looks like we have an upstream release/tarball, woo, ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/apps/KDE4.x/admin/polkit-kde-1-0.95.1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #10 from Carl Byington c...@five-ten-sg.com 2009-12-23 14:24:49 EDT --- done http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth-0.98-5.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888795 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-12-23
14:41:21 EDT ---
Well,
* License
- I guess the license for this package should
be GPL+ or Ruby or Artistic.
* rcov for %check
- build.log says:
---
89 + rake test
90 Hoe.new {...} deprecated. Switch to Hoe.spec.
91 (in
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16)
92 which: no dot in
(/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin:/usr/local/sbin)
93 /usr/bin/ruby -w -Ilib:ext:bin:test -e 'require rubygems; require
test/unit; require test/test_mime_type.rb; require
test/test_mime_types.rb'
94 RCov is not available. In order to run rcov, you must: sudo gem install
spicycode-rcov
---
I don't know well about RCov, however when I install
rubygem-rcov, rake check fails as:
---
[tasa...@localhost mime-types-1.16]$ rake test --trace
(in
/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16)
Hoe.new {...} deprecated. Switch to Hoe.spec.
rake aborted!
undefined method `test_files' for #Hoe:0xb75d9a78
/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:53
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb:91:in `initialize'
/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:51:in
`new'
/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:51
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2382:in `load'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2382:in `raw_load_rakefile'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2016:in `load_rakefile'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in
`standard_exception_handling'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2015:in `load_rakefile'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1999:in `run'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in
`standard_exception_handling'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1997:in `run'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/bin/rake:31
/usr/bin/rake:19:in `load'
/usr/bin/rake:19
---
ref: http://bugs.gentoo.org/288996
Would you check this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:42:32 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:41:16 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:40:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:45:30 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:39:18 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-12-23 14:43:39 EDT --- Simple spec. $ rpmlint *.rpm */*.rpm polkit-kde.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides PolicyKit-authentication-agent polkit-kde.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided PolicyKit-kde polkit-kde.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/polkit-kde-authentication-agent-1.desktop 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. License: OK Source: OK (better, when using verifiable upstream tarball) macros: OK Obsoletess/Provides: OK I see now issues or blockers, looks good, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:46:49 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:44:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:43:25 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:47:59 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:53:36 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:51:22 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:50:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-12-23 14:49:33 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 14:57:13 EDT --- Oh no,... forgot to add the branches :'( Sorry, Dennis. Package Change Request == Package Name: python-minimock New Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 Owners: tomspur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 14:59:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pki-native-tools Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Java Tools Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 15:07:43 EDT --- (fixing the short description) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pki-native-tools Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Native Tools Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-12-23 15:08:16 EDT --- The Requires: pkgconfig should be for -devel which actually contains the pkgconfig file. Otherwise the package looks very clean now. APPROVED Fix the require before import to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-12-23 15:10:56 EDT --- Whoops, this slipped under my radar. I had a look at the requirements: to build itext in EL-5 three more packages would have to be built. Looks like too much work, I'll just have to deal with an older release of jmol in EL-5 for good. Sorry for bothering you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143
--- Comment #2 from Alagunambi Welkin alagunambiwel...@gmail.com 2009-12-23
15:08:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
* in %install needs to be rm -rf %{buildroot} as first line
* no-buildroot-tag can be ignored, this is not needed anymore in fedora
(only if you want to import it in EL-5, too...)
* webattery.c needs to be 644, please change this in %install
Cleared all, should I replace the given src.rpm and spec file with the new one
or do I need to add them separately along with the old src.rpm and sepc file?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright kwri...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 15:13:48 EDT --- ugh! back to the first description: Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Java Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks projects tracking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #16 from Tareq Al Jurf talj...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 15:15:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: invulgotracker Short Description: Tasks projects tracking tool Owners: taljurf Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: taljurf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-23 15:25:34 EDT --- dmenu-4.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmenu-4.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-12-23 15:24:42 EDT --- Thanks! I won't add it until the license is cleared. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jconvolver Short Description: Real-time Convolution Engine Owners: oget nando Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Carl Byington c...@five-ten-sg.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Carl Byington c...@five-ten-sg.com 2009-12-23 15:46:26 EDT --- done http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth-0.98-6.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=186 New Package CVS Request === Package Name: liboglappth Short Description: An OpenGL wrapper library Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
