[Bug 552154] New: Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/hunspell-mai.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Maithili hunspell dictionaries koji scratch build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1900296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 03:19:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-CPAN-Inject Short Description: Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|caol...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 03:45:51 EDT --- * source files match upstream: 4f65dda91fa576568e2b0be14bde4c4d mai_IN.oxt * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 03:51:54 EDT --- Caolan thanks for quick review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hunspell-mai Short Description: Maithili hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no
--- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2010-01-04 03:53:32
EDT ---
Your source url is wrong, use
http://downloads.sourceforge.net, not a specific mirror and %{version} macro:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/arpon/arpon/ArpON-%{version}/ArpON-%{version}.tar.gz
Download with wget -N to get correct timestamp on tarball.
Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
%{__install} -pm 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}
%{__install} -pm 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/
%{__install} -pm 755 arpon %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}
%{__install} -pm 644 man8/arpon.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/
Could be done as
%{__install} -D -pm 755 arpon %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/arpon
%{__install} -D -pm 644 man8/arpon.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/arpon.8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2010-01-04 04:05:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: selenium-remote-control Short Description: Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 04:06:50 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2010-01-04 04:07:00 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: git-bugzilla Short Description: Attach patches to a bugzilla bug Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2010-01-04 04:25:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) OK, the URL and Source links can be added. About the licensing problem: I e-mailed the author of the package, whether he has some more information about this. The files are used in fixmacps utility, which fixes PostScript files generated on Mac computers. If the license will still be a problem, we will have to exclude this utility and these two files from the package. Only Fedora Legal can give the definitive answer, but in my opinion we are not allowed to distribute such files and they have to removed even from the source archive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-01-04 04:47:20 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 04:50:54 EDT --- Upstream release 0.8.0 for maemo. Unfortunately there is no source tarball available at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226382] Merge Review: rusers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226382 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsk...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226384] Merge Review: rwho
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226384 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsk...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226556] Merge Review: xferstats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226556 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsk...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@root.snowtree.se --- Comment #5 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2010-01-04 04:59:35 EDT --- License http://www.boxbackup.org/license.html looks like BSD with advertising, though it's not exactly the same. It's probably a good idea to let fedora-legal confirm that it's close enough. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544684] Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544684
Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thom...@fedoraproject.org
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|thom...@fedoraproject.org
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04
04:58:03 EDT ---
[tho...@tusdell srpm-review-test]$ spectool -g gqradio.spec
--2010-01-04 10:53:00--
http://download.sourceforge.net/gqmpeg/gqradio-1.9.2.tar.gz
Resolving download.sourceforge.net... 150.65.7.130, 210.146.64.4, 198.142.1.17,
...
Connecting to download.sourceforge.net|150.65.7.130|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2010-01-04 10:53:01 ERROR 404: Not Found.
---
Please fix macro consistency: %name = %{name}
Will do a full review later.
--
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #23 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:04:25 EDT --- I mark this as a FE-DEADREVIEW and leave the files in place. Upstream is not answering and there wasn't a new release for a long period. Jussi, thank you for your time and your help with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524006] Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:10:35 EDT --- I asked the person from the original review request for cpulimit again if he/she is still interested to go on with it. Are you still in the mood to bring this package into the Fedora Package Collection? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ashay.hum...@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #34 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:09:04 EDT --- Ashay, is there any progress? There was another review request by Xia submitted #524006, if you have no time it would be an option to close this review and go with the one of Xia. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513779] Review Request: python-simplesettings - Simple settings initialization for Python libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513779 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:12:53 EDT --- The source was deleted at Google Code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04 05:35:53 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04 05:32:36 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:36:44 EDT --- The new spec and SRPM will come soon because 0.7.0 was released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:39:54 EDT --- Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsurl/+bug/502887 need to be solved first ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549590] Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(pa...@hubbitus.in | |fo) | --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-01-04 05:37:57 EDT --- If it hosted on sourceforge it is case described in guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(clau...@claudioto | |masoni.it) | --- Comment #26 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 05:58:33 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=51848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #6 from Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04 06:08:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) ping? Pong! I guess it took 2 months to recover from the shock mentioned in comment #4... I'll give it a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(xav...@bachelot.o ||rg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 06:24:44 EDT --- Xavier, putting this on needinfo until you've got something for the highscore issue (just some bookkeeping so that this drops of my bugs needing attention list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226523] Merge Review: vconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226523 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsk...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsk...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2010-01-04 06:31:01 EDT --- Sure, no pb. I didn't heard back from upstream on this issue (nor on the others 1.1.4 issues either) and I hadn't had time to hack anything myself. I'll ping them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #30 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 06:26:50 EDT --- Closing this, as this has been imported and build now (just some bookkeeping so that this drops of my bugs needing attention list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 06:33:40 EDT --- Thanks Rex! Sorry for delay - so what about F12? Do we really need it? F13 should be our target, for interested people it can be in kde repo for F12... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 06:35:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Jan 04 2010 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net - 0.7.1-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.7.1 to fix issue with make * Mon Jan 04 2010 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net - 0.7.0-1 - Added man pages - Updated to new upstream version 0.7.0 * Mon Dec 28 2009 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net - 0.6.0-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.6.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226664] Merge Review: ypserv
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 06:38:20 EDT --- ++ source files match upstream ++ package meets naming and versioning guidelines ++ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently ++ dist tag is present ++ build root is correct ++ license field matches the actual license ++ license is open source-compatible ++ latest version is being packaged ++ BuildRequires are proper -- compiler flags are appropriate erase --enable-yppasswd(it's not an option in configure) ++ %clean is present ++ package builds in mock ++ debuginfo package looks complete ++ final provides and requires look sane -- %check is present and all tests pass upstream don't provide any testcases ++ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths ??(not sure) owns the directories it creates ++ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't ++ no duplicates in %files ++ file permissions are appropriate ++ no scriptlets present -- %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package config files is taken from documentation ++ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary ++ no headers ++ no pkgconfig files ++ no libtool .la droppings ++ not a GUI app $ rpmlint i386/* ypserv.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided yppasswd ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypxfrd ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypxfrd ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Ngo Than t...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Ngo Than t...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 06:49:03 EDT --- sysreport is now retired. fixed in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info
2010-01-04 07:03:33 EDT ---
Legend: + - Ok.
- - Error.
+/- - It item acceptable, but I strongly recommend enhancement.
= - N/A.
MUST Items
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
$ rpmlint *
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[-] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Package have PEAR channel for installation:
http://htmlpurifier.org/download#PEAR
And must be registered in system PEAR database:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
$ md5sum htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz_reviewed
88c6107a278aeb18757a1c99b03be59a htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz
88c6107a278aeb18757a1c99b03be59a htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz_reviewed
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1900534
[=] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[=] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[=] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[-] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
Package have many useful documentation and it should be included in %doc
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[=] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[=] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[=] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[=] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix)
[Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
--- Comment #9 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-01-04 07:38:07 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
Please change
%{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.gz
to
%{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.*
because the compression of the manpages is applied automatically to the
package
and we might switch to something different than gz.
It might also not be compressed at all, therefore this is even better (the last
. is removed):
%{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 544684] Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544684 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 07:43:16 EDT --- Fixed. The change is so small that I did not increase the release. Same links. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542991] Review Request: ArpON - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542991 Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-01-04 07:42:09 EDT --- There was another review request submitted: bug #551651 please coordinate with the other submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name --- Comment #8 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2010-01-04 07:41:37 EDT --- There was an earlier review request submitted: bug #542991 please coordinate with the other submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@hubbitus.info --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 07:53:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review and a happy new year, Pavel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 07:54:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tcpreen Short Description: A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 08:05:55 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: boxes New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: jhrozek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139
--- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04
08:10:07 EDT ---
OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/pino-*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
FIX - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+)
OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
005215400dcd00844558fbbe9b30fc46
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review.
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
FIX - MUST: consistently uses macros: %{buildroot} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library
files that end in .so must go in a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a
%{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly validated with
desktop-file-validate in the %install section.
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin,
/sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the
file instead of the file itself.
Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok
OK - Debuginfo complete
OK - docs complete
Issues:
- The timestamp of Source0 still doesn't match SourceURL. Please use a download
manager that preserves timestamps, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
- Build is not verbose, please use waf build -v
- You are not using parallel make, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make
- your macro usage is not consistent. You are using both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and
%{buildroot}. Please only use one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #11 from Liberty libe...@live.com 2010-01-04 08:17:06 EDT --- I have tried link, it is working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #12 from Liberty libe...@live.com 2010-01-04 08:20:04 EDT --- I have uploaded SRPM here: http://ifile.it/j3ceih5/goldendict-0.9.0-3.20091226git7a03248.fc12.src.rpm and spec file: http://pastebin.com/m29f19a4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org 2010-01-04 08:23:56 EDT --- It's not quite that easy %doc has the side effect of wiping out the whole of /usr/share/doc/pkgname-ver so instead I'll just move the docs aside and install them all through %doc http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20100104/olpc-os-builder-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20100104/olpc-os-builder.spec Thanks for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2010-01-04 08:48:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Does it make sense to package the client without the server? Sure because the server is available for other distrbutions. Or is it also on the way? The server will come but I don't want to specify a point in time. A few other comments: - License is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2 only I missed that. Thanks will be fixed in the next update. - Could you explain your strange release number? The numbering system that is used by upstream is indeed a bit strange. For me this looks like a Debian thing. I will get in touch with upstream. Maybe they drop some numbers of their release... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542991] Review Request: ArpON - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542991 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||saga...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 08:51:23 EDT --- Hello, I was trying to package Arpon for fedora security spin https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Spin . Please edit the wiki and add your name corresponding to Arpon there. Let me close my review request as duplicate of yours is that ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552253] New: Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552253 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-MockObject-1.09-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-MockObject.spec Description: Test::MockObject is a highly polymorphic testing object, capable of looking like all sorts of objects. This makes white-box testing much easier, as you can concentrate on what the code being tested sends to and receives from the mocked object, instead of worrying about faking up your own data. (Another option is not to test difficult things. Now you have no excuse.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #33 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 09:23:55 EDT --- ReviewBoard built in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1900941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Alexander Kahl ak...@imttechnologies.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ak...@imttechnologies.com --- Comment #30 from Alexander Kahl ak...@imttechnologies.com 2010-01-04 10:04:58 EDT --- Hi, I've been following this review for some time now as I'm not aware of any existing self-executable CL-based packages in Fedora besides CL implementations themselves so this could well be the very first one; I would like to see things learned from the review in the wiki as I'm going to package CL stuff myself sometime in the future and I find the existing Lisp-related guidelines sparse; e.g. I'd conclude from what is written down right now that providing self-executable Lisp machines that are not the original implementations themselves is impossible, instead it looks like Lisp is treated like scripting languages in Fedora (which is - of course - utterly wrong) since the guidelines force use of cl- prefixes for both libs (OK) and programs (bad) and source code distribution only. I could be wrong here since the guidelines mentions Libraries and Programs in the headline but doesn't refer to the latter in the following body. Source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp Would you mind starting a discussion about this in fedora-devel? I'd really like to see this resolved in an official manner and make Lisp-based projects first-level citizens in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 10:17:35 EDT --- Thanks, built successfully. Closing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04 10:23:57 EDT --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-04 10:30:24 EDT --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #31 from David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.com 2010-01-04 10:43:27 EDT --- The second sentence of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp is: This document does not describe conventions and customs for application programs that are written in Common Lisp. So that document doesn't apply. To my knowledge, there are *no* special written guidelines for packaging applications *written* in Common Lisp (CL). You just follow the usual conventions for packages (adding WHICH CL implementation you used in the package name). I know that maxima is another packaged application written in CL, so PVS isn't unique. It might be nice to have guidelines, but someone will have to figure out good guidelines first :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 --- Comment #5 from Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 10:52:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Why tabsize of 5? It just seems non-standard :) Don't suppose I could convince you to use 4 or 8 or to just use spaces? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize That's fine - it is your choice at this point. I was just curious. Do we really need that ugly looking thing above the %configure? This was a separate question. Why do we need to run all the autotools by hand? Does it still work if we remove them? Do we need to mess with CFLAGS? You updated the BuildRequires but not the Requires? You have some single %s in the changelog, 0.0.7-3, line 2, at the end. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 10:57:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: polkit-kde Short Description: PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop Owners: jreznik rnovacek ltinkl than rdieter kkofler Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 --- Comment #7 from Tomáš Bžatek tbza...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 11:05:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I've added Conflicts: in libgnome-keyring.spec and explicit Requires: libgnome-keyring in gnome-keyring.spec for both gnome-keyring and gnome-keyring-devel subpackages (as discussed above). This should guarantee good upgrade path without breaking the things. New Spec: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/libgnome-keyring/libgnome-keyring.spec New SRPM: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/libgnome-keyring/libgnome-keyring-2.29.4-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #32 from Alexander Kahl ak...@imttechnologies.com 2010-01-04 11:18:01 EDT --- Hi David, (In reply to comment #31) The second sentence of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp is: This document does not describe conventions and customs for application programs that are written in Common Lisp. So that document doesn't apply. Ooh I must have missed that - thanks for pointing that out! To my knowledge, there are *no* special written guidelines for packaging applications *written* in Common Lisp (CL). You just follow the usual conventions for packages (adding WHICH CL implementation you used in the package name). I know that maxima is another packaged application written in CL, so PVS isn't unique. Didn't know 'bout that one, thanks again. It might be nice to have guidelines, but someone will have to figure out good guidelines first :-). The original ones seem to have been written by Spot, I wonder if he just took over those from Debian or whether he really knows about coding Lisps. Well the only someones in question is Fedorans who can code Lisp (or here CL in particular), right? So why not make something up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 --- Comment #15 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 11:20:29 EDT --- I think that this package should rather go to rpmfusion since it requires non free gstreamer plugins. it asks for faac plugin when adding anything to the file queue should we patch even more to skip that checking ? the choice is yours and btw, the faac plugin is broken in rpmfusion any thoughts ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #33 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 11:31:56 EDT --- I just started a thread to discuss the issues on fedora-devel, as requested. Let's discuss the issues there, where others can see the discussion, instead of hidden away in this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roysj...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 11:45:28 EDT --- OpenVAS 3.0.0 was released recently, and this package no longer appears under the same name. The list of packages is: openvas-libraries 3.0.0 openvas-scanner 3.0.0 openvas-client 3.0.0 Optional: openvas-manager 0.9.8 openvas-administrator 0.4.0 gsa 0.8.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538298] Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roysj...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 11:51:12 EDT --- OpenVAS 3.0.0 released. Where did the openvas-plugins package go? See http://openvas.org/ : OpenVAS 3.0: openvas-libraries 3.0.0 openvas-scanner 3.0.0 openvas-client 3.0.0 Optional: openvas-manager 0.9.8 openvas-administrator 0.4.0 gsa 0.8.3 The module openvas-server has been renamed to openvas-scanner and includes any platform-dependent elements of openvas-plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538299] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538299 Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roysj...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 11:51:32 EDT --- OpenVAS 3.0.0 was released recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-01-04 12:21:00 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Ashay Humane ashay.hum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ashay.hum...@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #35 from Ashay Humane ashay.hum...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 12:34:20 EDT --- Please close this and go ahead with Xias review. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #18 from Eric Sandeen esand...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 12:45:08 EDT --- Yep, sorry for not closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #15 from Leon Keijser keij...@stone-it.com 2010-01-04 12:43:29 EDT --- Thanks for the patch and your time spent so far. Yeah, christmas and newyear went by really fine, thanks. Hope you had a nice time as well :) I just started working again today and will pick up all of this as soon as time allows. Upstream released a new version as well, so i'll combine the two and report back here with a fresh srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #17 from Eric Sandeen esand...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 12:46:28 EDT --- uuidd is clearly in util-linux-ng now: # rpm -qi uuidd Name: uuiddRelocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.17 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 0.1.git5e51568.fc13 Build Date: Mon 19 Oct 2009 07:56:41 AM CDT Install Date: Wed 28 Oct 2009 12:59:16 PM CDT Build Host: x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com Group : System Environment/DaemonsSource RPM: util-linux-ng-2.17-0.1.git5e51568.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Carl Byington c...@five-ten-sg.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Carl Byington c...@five-ten-sg.com 2010-01-04 12:46:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mopac7 Short Description: Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 --- Comment #1 from Marek Grac mg...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 13:04:09 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1901427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||xja...@fi.muni.cz Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|xja...@fi.muni.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552331] New: Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 Summary: Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mg...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://marx.fedorapeople.org/piranha.spec SRPM URL: http://marx.fedorapeople.org/piranha-0.8.4-15.el5.src.rpm GIT URL: http://git.fedoraproject.org/git/piranha.git Description: Various tools to administer and configure the Linux Virtual Server as well as heartbeating and failover components. The LVS is a dynamically adjusted kernel routing mechanism that provides load balancing primarily for web and ftp servers though other services are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 13:29:11 EDT --- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 13:43:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Given the existence of the mx/mx-devel packages, a little more description in the -devel packages might help I'm going to shortly improve all the descriptions. It looks like the gnome-shell people are going to be making use of this so I want to remove all mention of Moblin in the description as it looks like its going to be used in gnome-shell (this library will replace nbtk for Moblin 2.2) and gnome-shell pulls in a chunk of nbtk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(m...@marcus-moell | |er.ch) | --- Comment #25 from Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.ch 2010-01-04 13:46:20 EDT --- Hi, sorry for the late reply. Going to push this week. I was in holiday the past few days. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465
--- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2010-01-04 13:46:34
EDT ---
just had a quick look:
* I think that %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/mx needs to be tagged with %doc.
I have been told that gtk-doc will automatically get tagged as docs due to the
%{_datadir}/gtk-doc dir being tagged as %doc.
* Also please span the description to 80 columns as much as possible.
Will update when I update the description
* Source0 seems wrong.
In the rush I didn't update the URL. Will fix.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2010-01-04 13:56:41 EDT --- One additional note, INSTALL says: These optional extensions can enhance the capabilities of HTML Purifier: * iconv : Converts text to and from non-UTF-8 encodings * bcmath : Used for unit conversion and imagecrash protection * tidy : Used for pretty-printing HTML I think add Requires php-bcmath and php-tidy is good idea to provide full power of package out of the box (until Fedora has not soft dependencies and install suggestions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331
--- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2010-01-04 14:15:15
EDT ---
So:
* first, please make rpmlint happy:
rpmlint piranha.spec
piranha.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 80, tab: line 85)
rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/piranha-*.rpm
piranha-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
piranha.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
(add URL tag)
piranha.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /etc/sysconfig/ha/modules
/usr/lib64/httpd/modules
This seems to be ok, the target is provided by httpd which is required, but see
my comment at the very end.
piranha.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/piranha 0775
Fix this please.
piranha.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/sbin/piranha_gui /usr/sbin/httpd
This is ok, as previously, though the _gui suffix isn't really motivating for
being linked to apache.
piranha.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/log/piranha/piranha-gui
piranha.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/sysconfig/ha/lvs.cf
Zero-length files shouldn't be packaged, either provide some default
configuration (or at least explanation what users should use them for!) in them
or remove them.
piranha.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/piranha-httpd
Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/package name.
piranha.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/log/piranha/piranha-gui-access
Likewise.
piranha.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/piranha-passwd 0700
piranha.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/piranha-passwd 0700
The file doesn't seem to contain passwords = should be 755.
piranha.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel
Users/groups must not be removed after package removal, refer to:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups
btw, you can also use getent to check whether a given user/group exists (see
the examples on the above referenced page).
Don't forget to remove shadow-utils from Requires(postun) as well.
piranha.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/piranha-gui
In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload'
entry, which is necessary for good functionality.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript
* please refer to Source and Patch policy here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
* use macros in the %files section
(https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:RPMMacros) --
%{_sysconfdir}, %{_sbindir}, %{_initddir}, %{_initddir}, %{_localstatedir}
* there is quite a mess what concerns licensing -- some source files (pulse.c,
linkstate.c, nanny.c) refer to GPLv2+ (not just GPLv2), most refer to
unspecified version of GPL (fos.c, lvsconfig.c, main.c, lvsd.c, util.c). Two
files have quite problematic licensing: ipvs_exec.c contains just Copyright
1999 Red Hat Inc., and send_arp.c contains funny licensing which however could
be troublesome (there were some cases that packages didn't pass review because
you couldn't use them to prepare nuclear war or something like that).
To sum up = Everywhere should be a licensed fully specified, I guess you
wanted GPLv2+. Can you satisfy this condition for send_arp.c? If not, I'd ask
spot what to do with this.
* directory layout: the package misuses /etc/sysconfig heavily. The apache
configuration files should placed under /etc/httpd/conf.d, web and logs
should be moved to /usr/share. What's the purpose of the modules symlink?
= There shouldn't be anything besides the pulse in /etc/sysconfig.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #32 from Carl Byington c...@five-ten-sg.com 2010-01-04 14:35:27 EDT --- Ah, that seems to work. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-8.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1901500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487098] Review Request: python-djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 14:49:54 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-djblets New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sgallagh python-djblets is a required dependency for ReviewBoard, which is being considered for inclusion in the Fedora Hosted infrastructure. We need to branch this package to EL-5 for this support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 14:52:07 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: ReviewBoard New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sgallagh ReviewBoard is being considered for inclusion in the Fedora Hosted infrastructure. We need to branch this package to EL-5 for this support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:09:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:10:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:14:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:07:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:11:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:13:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=54 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:16:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:18:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:17:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:19:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-04 15:21:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
