[Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-12 23:45 EST --- Would a gnuplot style Can't redistribute complete modified source, only source + patches license be acceptable to the author? Apparently this is acceptable to the OSI. Personally I was shocked that something with such a license gets to call itself GNU. But thats getting off topic... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-11 03:02 EST --- Hmm, Couldn't he make up a License (using an OSI one as starting point) which is fully OSI except that it doesn't allow changing the Inform language? Which then brings us to the next question, would such a License be open enough for Fedora? Otherwise you can always package it for the repo that must not be named. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 182235 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 19:54 EST --- I contacted Graham Nelson regarding this issue. He has his reasons for not wanting to use an OSI-approved license. In his words, I am nervous of the GPL, and its cognates. Not because I dislike the principle of thing, or do not share the generally egalitarian outlook - but because I want to keep the definition of the language stable. I therefore don't want to give people the right to create derivative works. All the other rights are fine - open source, compile it yourself, distribute it yourself, no fees or patents, use it even commercially without permission, sure. I just don't want Inform to be like awk, with no copy of awk compatible with any other on points of detail. I can understand where he's coming from on this and I'm not convinced I want to change his mind. I'm going to go ahead and let the issue drop. I appreciate the attention from both Jason and Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-30 02:45 EST --- Jason, I would be more then happy to contact that address, I'm waiting for a comment from Chris on this, does he want me to contact that address or will he do so himself? Chris? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-30 01:23 EST --- Has anyone contacted [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the license? That would seem to be the proper contact address these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
