[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-07 03:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #39) > I got some rpath errors when building on a x86_64 system, i didn't see any on > a > i686 system. Ok, I shall fix it. Looks like Koji does not check for RPath errors. Let us continue the discussion on bug #369381. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-07 03:02 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #34) > > Yes, it is, i have just uploaded a new one with some rpath fixes. > > I am curious as to why you wanted to apply those RPath fixes. I have good > reason > to believe there are no such issues. I used > "%__arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths > /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot" > in my ~/.rpmmacros as mentioned in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 > and found no problem. > > I got some rpath errors when building on a x86_64 system, i didn't see any on a i686 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-07 01:10 EST --- I have opened a new review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=369381 and will close this as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 369381 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|i386|All --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 17:39 EST --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=228611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 17:32 EST --- Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/glade3.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/glade3-3.4.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Glade is a RAD tool to enable quick and easy development of user interfaces for the GTK+ toolkit and the GNOME desktop environment. The user interfaces designed in Glade are saved as XML, which can be used in numerous programming languages including C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, C#, Pike, Ruby, Haskell, Objective Caml and Scheme. Adding support for other languages is easy too. Glade-3 is meant for GTK+ 2.8 or newer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 17:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #34) > Yes, it is, i have just uploaded a new one with some rpath fixes. I am curious as to why you wanted to apply those RPath fixes. I have good reason to believe there are no such issues. I used "%__arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot" in my ~/.rpmmacros as mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 and found no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo| |ra-cn/in-review/glade3.spec | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 03:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > You can finde spec file etc here. > > http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgs/glade3/ > > Thanks a lot. That would make my job much simpler. This looks like the Spec > submitted by Yijun Yuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Yes, it is, i have just uploaded a new one with some rpath fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 03:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #32) > You can finde spec file etc here. > http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgs/glade3/ Thanks a lot. That would make my job much simpler. This looks like the Spec submitted by Yijun Yuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 02:33 EST --- You can finde spec file etc here. http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgs/glade3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 01:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #30) > That'd be great! You'd want to open a new review ticket though. Cc: me and > I'll > review it. Hey Michel, thanks for the offer. However a few people (like Matthias Clasen) were suggesting that I reopen this bug. Would that be fine? Since you are probably going to review it, I shall leave the choice to you. Unfortunately I could not locate any of the Spec/SRPM pairs submitted for Glade3 till now. So I am writing it from scratch with a bit of help from the Glade2 package. Should be done by today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-05 18:30 EST --- That'd be great! You'd want to open a new review ticket though. Cc: me and I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-05 15:41 EST --- Shall I pick up this review request and submit a fresh pair of Spec & SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-05 15:35 EST --- http://glade.gnome.org/ "One of the main differences from glade-2 is that C code generation has been removed from glade-3: this has been done on purpose, since using generated code is deprecated; the preferred way to use glade files is with libglade (if code generation is needed, this can be provided as another tool or plugin, code generation is simply not a part of the glade-3 project). [...] It has a few useful new features such as stacked Undo/Redo and Multiple Project supportand respects the same XML format as glade-2." It seems that Glade-3 does have some compatibility with Glade-2. So what is the current status? Is the Glade-2 package going to be replaced by Glade-3, or they are going to be kept side-by-side? Debian is already providing Glade-3 in Lenny (testing) and Sid (unstable). See http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=glade&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-24 06:19 EST --- Hi, Please anyone feel free to take this or submit it again, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:54 EST --- Any news on when Glade3 becomes available for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-19 06:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #22) > > And a mismatch between the RPM package name and the tarball package name. > > So what ? How is it important ? It's completely non-important. > > What makes what you're suggesting a good idea? > > The fact that there is no real need to maintain glade2 and glade3 in parallel. This would be news to me. Has glade3 been made glade2 compatible? Last time, I tried, nothing could be further from truth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-19 05:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #22) > > And a mismatch between the RPM package name and the tarball package name. > > So what ? How is it important ? > > > What makes what you're suggesting a good idea? > > The fact that there is no real need to maintain glade2 and glade3 in parallel. > > What about making a glade3 package there obsoletes the glade2 package. Having a glade2 package with the glade3 code inside, sound a little weird to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 20:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #22) > > And a mismatch between the RPM package name and the tarball package name. > > So what ? How is it important ? > > > What makes what you're suggesting a good idea? > > The fact that there is no real need to maintain glade2 and glade3 in parallel. > > well, go a head and take it please. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 19:50 EST --- > And a mismatch between the RPM package name and the tarball package name. So what ? How is it important ? > What makes what you're suggesting a good idea? The fact that there is no real need to maintain glade2 and glade3 in parallel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: glade3 |Review Request: Glade3 - A ||User Interface Designer for ||GTK+ and GNOME Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 08:01 EST --- Update to 3.2.0 Spec URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/glade3.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/glade3-3.2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-12 19:26 EST --- And a mismatch between the RPM package name and the tarball package name. What makes what you're suggesting a good idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-12 14:11 EST --- Hmm, would people be offended if I offered to just update the current glade2 package to glade 3 ? assuming that glade3 can read all glade2 files and libglade can read all glade3 files, I don't really see any reason to keep both. The only downside is the number mismatch between the package name and the tarball version; but I don't think reusing glade as a package name is an option at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |com)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-28 08:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > URL? I think he means the URL in additional bug info: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/glade3.spec and for the srpm: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/glade3-3.1.4-0.8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-21 05:20 EST --- URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo |ra-cn/fe-review/glade3 |ra-cn/in-review/glade3.spec --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-07 06:17 EST --- Hi, I made an update to the spec file, to use the latest 3.1.4 package. Besides that, the spec and srpm download URL has been changed a little. Please have a look and tell me what to do next, thank you all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-27 14:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > Hmm, is it going to be a painless dropin replacement for older versions of glade > available in core? We can infer from the name of the source distribution and the binary--i.e., deliberately different from the 2.x series--that the answer is "no". But I don't see how this is a packaging issue. (I asked Yuan Yijun to ignore my comment #8 and I ask that others do the same. This is an upstream issue.) I think it's up to the Core and glade2 package maintainers whether they want to keep that package alive alongside a glade3 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-27 14:06 EST --- Hmm, is it going to be a painless dropin replacement for older versions of glade available in core? Regarding the packaging. 1. Builds fine in mock (x86) 2. glade3 rpm contains no documentation as does the -devel package (which is fine for the devel). 3. src.rpm has the mixed spaces/tabs warning 4. Why does this have an epoch number? As glade3 is a new package, it shouldn't need an epoch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-27 01:13 EST --- libgladeui belongs in its own package because it is useful on its own (i.e., without the glade3 binary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 18:48 EST --- Hmm, I can't see the logic (to be honest) of splitting the package in the way you have. To me, it makes far more sense to have glade3 with the binary and any shared libs (will the glade3 binary run without the libs?) and having a devel file with the .so files. Also, why have you moved from the standard version-release system to version-release.number? Please re-instate any changes that you made to the spec file prior to the version you want reviewing in the changelog - it helps people learn. 3.0.2 is quite an old version now - any chance of moving it to 3.1.4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:43 EST --- *** Bug 220710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:42 EST --- Okay, this is a dup of something I've submitted for FE. The problem with libgladeui is the potential for clash with the current libgladeui (okay, different version I know)... As it's Christmas day, I'm doing nothing today other than with my family, so I'll hack on with this tomorrow. In the meantime, my version of the spec and srpm are available at http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3-3.1.4-1.src.rpm http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3.spec Personally, I'd rather not separate out the libgladeui from the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-03 14:11 EST --- spec updated according to your advice, thank you! please have a look: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/glade3/glade3.spec ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/glade3/glade3-3.0.2-0.6.src.rpm changes: * split to 3 packages: glade3, libgladeui, libgladeui-devel glade3 is the binary, the desktop related files including a proposed icon from tango project libgladeui is the library and shared resource files (pixmaps and catalog xml) libgladeui-devel is the headers and development documentation * changed requires and buildrequires * update description from the website. Still looking for a better description for libgladeui * incorporate various things from Martin's sample file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-02 22:00 EST --- Is there a persistent need to change the package name with each major glade release? The package "glade" hasn't appeared in Fedora Core since 2. Do there continue to be reasons someone might want to have packages for glade 0.6.x and glade 3.x installed concurrently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|218172 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||218172 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-12 17:55 EST --- I think you should split up the package. I see there three (or two depends on point of view) independent parts: glade3, libgladeui and libgladeui-devel. I have one good reason for such division - for anjuta2 glade3 plug-in you need only libgladeui(-devel), not whole glade3. I think that glade3 is front-end for libgladeui, from a development point of view. You can compare my package with yours; the specfile is here: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=10171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: glade3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-31 09:32 EST ---
> BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)
The included intltool needs this. If intltool were not included, you
would do "BuildRequires: intltool" instead.
> --add-category X-Red-Hat-Base
No. This is Extras, not Core.
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/scrollkeeper
What's that? Unusual enough to add a comment in the spec file, please.
> scrollkeeper-update -q || :
> scrollkeeper-update -q -o %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} || :
There are no such files in the package(s).
> update-mime-database
The package does not install such files which need this.
* The package description refers to a "glade2" package and GTK+ 2.0,
whereas this is glade3 for GTK+ >= 2.8. It is not spelled "GLADE"
either. Upstream calls it "Glade".
* Run "yum install glade2 glade3" and look at the desktop menus.
They are almost identical and don't say which one is Glade3.
As long as both shall coexist, I suggest you patch that.
* %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README TODO
You have these duplicated in both packages. Including them in either
one is more than enough, preferably "libgladeui" (or the main pkg
if nothing is split off).
* The build.log says:
| checking for GTK... yes
| checking for GNOME... configure: creating ./config.status
| config.status: creating Makefile
| Configuration:
|
| Source code location: .
| Compiler: gcc
| GnomeUI Catalog:no
Adding "BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel" changes that to "yes".
If not wanted, use the --disable-gnome switch for reproducible builds.
* glade3-devel is missing:
Requires: gtk2-devel libxml2-devel
> %package devel
> Requires: %name = %{version}
Ought to be full %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: gail-devel
Huh? No reference to libgail can be found.
> Provides: glade-devel
Splitting of libgladeui and libgladeui-devel instead of this sounds
sane. You don't really want to occupy both the "glade3-devel" and
"glade-devel" namespace.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GN|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo |OME/sources/glade-3/|ra-cn/fe-review/glade3 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-02 23:09 EST --- spec and srpm uploaded to ftp for review, which is at ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/glade3 mock build passed, there is something I'm not sure, that is BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) since I don't know if it is an intltool dependency or glade3's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-02 12:41 EST --- We're going to need something to actually review, so a spec and an SRPM are absolutely necessary. Sponsorship is granted only after the packager has demonstrated familiarity with the packaging guidelines; please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-02 01:49 EST --- Hi, I'm not an FE contributor, and I didn't bother reading those instructions. Please help me if anyone would sponsor me, thanks! No, there is no standalone spec and src.rpm, only cvs version available. We may have a directory on ftp.fedora.cn for this purpose later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-02 00:35 EST --- First off, is there still any interest in getting this package into Extras? Unfortunately this ticket did not properly block FE-NEW, it seems nobody ever noticed that it was even here. It looks like it wasn't submitted through the normal review request submission form. Secondly, if there is still interest, could we get direct links to a specfile and a src.rpm? Finally, I don't see that the submitter is a member of cvsextras, so I'll block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Feel free to unblock if that's incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||163776 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 14:50 EST --- (Adding blocker on FE-NEW.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
