[Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-11 12:41 EST --- I have create a new release of the RPMs. SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog-1.2.19-4.src.rpm Becouse I don't have a 64-bit engine, it will be nice, if anyone can doublecheck the use of the --libdir option suggested in comment #7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-11 16:08 EST --- The build completes in mock on FC5, x86_64. However, things don't look right in the built package: lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 33 May 11 15:10 /usr/bin/gprolog - ../lib/gprolog-1.2.19/bin/gprolog -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot 864648 May 11 15:10 /usr/lib64/gprolog-1.2.19/bin/gprolog That link seems to be dangling. The same for all of the links in the gprolog-compiler package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-11 16:59 EST --- I didn't want to urge you to split off the compiler package. In fact after looking at it, I would say it would be better not to do it. As for the case of x86_64, I think we should let the build be in /usr/lib. Otherwise it may mean patching Makefiles to use the correct path (possibly the %prefix/lib dir is hardcoded somewhere. If it is easy to fix, do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 16:28 EST ---
Output of rpmlint gprolog:
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libengine_fd.a
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libbips_pl.a
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libbips_fd.a
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/include/gprolog.h
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libengine_pl.a
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/liblinedit.a
W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/include/fd_to_c.h
Would it make sense to split off the prolog to c compiler into
an extra package. This would contains these object files and
the compiler programs gplc, ma2asm, etc...
rpmlint of gprolog src rpm:
E: gprolog configure-without-libdir-spec
Will adding --libdir=%{_libdir} to the configure command line break the build?
Note, that on x86_64, %{_libdir} will be /usr/lib64.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
