[Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager

2008-07-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for 
the apt package manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191040


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora
Version|devel   |rawhide




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager

2006-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for 
the apt package manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|163778  |163779
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-12 16:51 EST ---
No SRPM seems to be available for 5.89-3, but if it's the same as -2 apart from
the specfile changes, approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager

2006-05-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for 
the apt package manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776  |163778
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-11 15:56 EST ---
Issues:

- Shouldn't the package be noarch?
- Missing dependency on apt (similar issue seems to exist in the corresponding
  smart package too, by the way)

Cosmetics:

- Summary and %description could mention Fedora even though it's in %{name},
  and %description could be expanded a bit.
- Upstream spelling is APT-RPM, that could be used in summary and description 
too


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager

2006-05-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for 
the apt package manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-11 17:01 EST ---
Fixed in

Spec URL:
http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt.spec

* Thu May 11 2006 Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 5.89-3
- Apply comments from review #191040c3 (by Ville).
  - Fix summary and description
  - Config files are arch-independent, so we should become noarch
  - Create versioned dependency on apt (make sure it's repo-md capable)
This creates a circular dependency which should not impose any
issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review