[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-17 22:01 EST --- Closing as RAWHIDE, as per bug #198944 we're pulling it into Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-04 08:58 EST --- Note: this package accidentally for assigned to me. That's wrong, I'm not interested in it and won't do a review. This bug should be treated as it was in a NEW state (it still blocks FE_NEW so most people will know that nobody is reviewing this yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn|193807 | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-04 19:39 EST --- Reassigning to myself, dropping libsvg-cairo dependency bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-28 07:37 EST --- #21 confirmed as building and working on x86 rawhide as of today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-27 17:59 EST --- I've updated the core packages to allow compiz to run on straight rawhide and packaged up a version of compiz that works with aiglx. More details here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/2006-June/000300.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-16 15:33 EST --- While restoring bugzilla state based on bug emails, I seem to have inadvertently closed this bug as NEXTRELEASE, when it was a dependent bug that had previously been closed. Reopening, and setting to ASSIGNED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-14 00:28 EST --- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-10 06:50 EST --- Just to update everyone control-center-devel has been resolved in the development branch. libsvg* has been put into the FC-5 and development branches so the dependencies are there now for the development branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-10 06:50 EST --- Just to update everyone control-center-devel has been resolved in the development branch. libsvg* has been put into the FC-5 and development branches so the dependencies are there now for the development branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-09 10:07 EST --- Hehe, compiz on Fedora... A part of the work is done. Spec URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/compiz-0.0.13-1.fc5.src.rpm Here what is made: * Fri Jun 9 2006 Alphonse Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.0.13-1 - update to 0.0.13 - remove novell.png from the sources archive. - add a patch for remove all novell.png entry in the sources. - disable libsvg (only requiere by cube plugin, the plugin work witout but unfortunately the nice fedora logo is no more on the top of the cube... snif). - remove xgl from requiered packages. - chang packages description. - Remove Mesa build-in source stuff. So for further go, It need some additional: - Where can we find FBConfig mesa patch for the current rawhide, have find this one, on the compiz mailing list http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/2006-April/72.html. is that patch? - Where can we find SRPMS for Aiglx? - What are the good/best card for aixgl, I will buy one this w-e to test aiglx too. I impatiently wait the patched for mesa and Xorg :-D Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 Bug 192432 depends on bug 193807, which changed state. Bug 193807 Summary: Review Request: libsvg-cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193807 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-07 16:00 EST --- [LEGAL] compiz source currently contains trademarked Novell logos, and does not to the best of my knowledge provide explicit legally binding approval to permit the redistribution of their trademarked logo. In order to meet the requirements of trademark law, if compiz is included in Fedora Core or Extras, we will then need to do one of the following options: 1) Request upstream to remove the trademarked logo from the repository and source archives, to permit the package to be redistributable without violating their trademark terms. or 2) Request them to insert explicit permission in the sources for the redistribution of their trademarked logo. (unlikely) or 3) We need to recreate the tarballs, without the trademarked logo. Doing any of these should comply with Fedora legal policies I believe. If there are any deeper concerns, we should directly contact Red Hat legal councel to resolve any concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 Bug 192432 depends on bug 193679, which changed state. Bug 193679 Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-07 17:15 EST --- We're definitely interested in making compiz usable on fedora, but there are a number of issues with the current approach that needs to be worked out: - Must work with aiglx. Packaging Xgl is fine and compiz should be able to run on Xgl too, but Xgl can not be a dependency of the compiz RPM. compiz will need further patches for this to work, specifically it needs to default to strict texture binding and indirect rendering. - We should update to compiz 0.0.12 - Can't include mesa source, must work with system mesa. Current rawhide mesa almost works, but needs a patch to provide a few extra FBConfig attributes. - We can't pull in libsvg-cairo. No development is going on on that library anymore. librsvg is the svg renderer to use going forward, and it now renders to a cairo surface too. Short term we'll have to disable the svg functionality, longer term I'm sure upstream will take a patch to port to librsvg. - the %description mentions EXT_texture_from_drawable, it's now called EXT_texture_from_pixmap. In either case it's too much of an implementation detail to put in the %description. However it should mention that compiz is also a windows manager. I'm currently working on patches to the core packages (Xorg and mesa) to make it possible to run compiz on aiglx, will keep this bug updated as that work progresses. thanks, Kristian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-05 07:18 EST --- Spec URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/compiz-0.0.10-1.fc5.src.rpm Several changes, some based on the Eric Work version: - update cvs mesa version with this of yesterday. - add devel package, but comment out a this time. - more use of macro. - remove compiz gconf entry when unstalling the package (preun). - update fedora-log.patch, patch compiz.schemas file too. - remove extra comments. - fix version, so old user of the package must uninstall the old package to be able to install the new one. - fix release in changlog. this version is well cleaned, rpmlint complain only for the licence (X11/MIT/GPL), and for the gconf .schemas (he says W: compiz non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz.schemas but all gconf schemas are there, so i think that this warning may be ignored?). Thx to Eric for him work! (if the next time you sendings me a patch it will be still better ;)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-05 14:12 EST --- I am sorry for the confusion about the SPEC files. I should have sent my changes to Alphonse Van Assche instead of submiting my own. Ignore my SPEC file and use the one supplied by Alphonse as his is now much better than mine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 16:34 EST --- I have never see this spec file, and find this kind of practice really bad! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 06:52 EST --- I have been working with Alphonse on getting these packages running on FC5. There are 3 dependencies required. One is just the control-center-devel part of the package. I have a spec with the needed changes from the lastest in rawhide (I can create a patch). The other two are libsvg, and libsvg-cairo with devels. For Xgl you will need to also add glitz. One possability is to include the devel files with compiz, I believe its only 3 or 4 files. I have created new SRPMs based on those by Alphonse and built all required packages on both i386 and x86_64 in mock, with only minor rpmlint warnings. The source packages can be found at the following URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/ Maybe I can help speed up getting this package accepted. Seeing as how Ubuntu 6.09 and SuSE 10.1 now have thes packages included I think FE should fill this gap for Fedora users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:08 EST --- Created an attachment (id=130330) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130330action=view) control-center-2.14.1-1.fc5.2 add devel patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 07:16 EST --- Created an attachment (id=130332) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130332action=view) control-center-2.14.2-2 add devel patch Sorry for the badly worded comment before its getting a little too late. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||193679 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 08:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Created an attachment (id=130332) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130332action=view) [edit] control-center-2.14.2-2 add devel patch Sorry for the badly worded comment before its getting a little too late. The whole control-center problem should be worked on and solved in Bug 193679; (In reply to comment #6) For Xgl you will need to also add glitz. One possability is to include the devel files with compiz, I believe its only 3 or 4 files. That sounds really dirty. Why not provide a proper glitz package? And one bug one package please, otherwise it will confuse everything. BTW and just out of interest: does compitz work with Xaiglx / Xorg 7.1 these days? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 11:19 EST --- Yes compiz work with Xaiglx. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-March/013577.html I will try to compile compiz with these patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||193807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 17:11 EST --- The following SRPM has a newer Mesa and is checked with mock and rpmlint. SPEC URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~ewwork/repo/5/SRPMS/compiz-0.0.11cvs-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-31 12:30 EST --- done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-30 10:18 EST --- New repository because there was no enough disk space on the first place. Spec URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/compiz-1.0.0-4.src.rpm For building compiz, the control-center-devel package with 2.14.0 is requiered. Pre made package are avalable here: SRPM: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/control-center-2.14.0-1.src.rpm Spec: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SPECS/control-center.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-31 01:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) For building compiz, the control-center-devel package with 2.14.0 is requiered. Pre made package are avalable [...] This is going to be a problem -- control-center is already in Core and Extras packages are not allowed to replace packages from Core. The proper way to solve this kind of problem in Fedora-Land would be to convince the core maintainer to release a update that also builds the devel package. That's probably not that easy, but you should at least try (e.g. create a patch for the control-center.spec from Core, open a bug here, describe the situation and attach the patch to the bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 10:42 EST --- Hi Rudolf, It's the same mesa version problem which that of xgl. cf. bugid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
