[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2008-07-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192546


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora
Version|devel   |rawhide




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-23 10:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 Everything looks OK, but how about enabling GNOME support ? It looks like it 
 can
 be embedded in the panel this way. It'd be a nice feature to have IMHO.
 
 By the way, version 2.2.1 is out.
 

In addition to the GNOME support, it looks like it also has some SSL/crypto
support that would be worthwile to enable.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-23 13:11 EST ---
- Upgrade to 2.2.1
- Add --prefix='pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix in %con$
- Add gnome-panel-devel, openssl-devel in BuildRequires

Changes available: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|163778  |163779
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-23 15:26 EST ---
MD5Sums:
8d2ef679f42e7a593dc88b750d0cca4c  gnubiff-2.2.1.tar.gz

Good:
* Source URL is canonical
* Upstream source tarball verified
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* All directories are owned by this or other packages
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* All desired features are enabled
* Package builds in Mock.
* Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5.
* rpmlint produces no error.

Bad:
* Don't pass '--prefix=`pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl
--variable=prefix`' to the %configure macro.  It's not needed.

Minor:
* In the file section, '%{_datadir}/info' should be '%{_infodir}'.  Refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros
* Unnecessary documentation: ABOUT-NLS  Changelog.  The first is a generic
build tools file, and the second is duplicate information that is included in
the NEWS file.

Once these items are fixed, considered this approved.

+1 Approve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-24 00:11 EST ---
- Remove --prefix='pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix OK
- Remove ABOUT-NLS  Changelog in %file section OK
- Fixing %{_datadir}/info to {_infodir} OK

Package imported in Extras


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-22 16:31 EST ---
Change available at http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-21 17:31 EST ---
Ok, i've made the changes.
Source : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review



[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff

2006-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnubiff


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776  |163778
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review