[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-06 09:05 EST --- Given that this package was approved (Comment #6) earlier, I shall now import and build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-06 10:25 EST --- 16330 (mod_fcgid): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/16330-mod_fcgid-1.10-7.fc6/ owners.list updated, FE6 comps entry added, FE-5 branch request made -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-29 11:56 EST --- Another update. The recent FC5 selinux-policy package update has split out a separate selinux-policy-devel package, as per FC6. So the buildreqs are now the same for FC5 and FC6 onwards. Packages (1.10-6) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-29 05:23 EST --- Another update. I've split the SELinux policy module off into a subpackage. This has the benefit for people not using SELinux that the main package has no dependency on selinux-policy, and installation time is reduced as there are no scriptlets to run. Packages (1.10-5) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 05:09 EST --- Update to package so that it builds in rawhide, where the /etc/httpd/build symlink has gone, and selinux-policy-devel is required. Packages (1.10-3) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ Could you just give this new package a try and re-approve, since this is what I'd be importing into CVS? As a ametter of interest, which application(s) have you tried this with? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-20 05:08 EST --- Sorry about the time taken to knock this one over, been ill or busy or both. - All the items I'd previously pointed out are well and truly fixed - The SELinux module is EXTREMELY cool and much appreciated, a fair bit of consideration has gone into it. Anything that encourages people to better consider system security (in a sane and non-onerous manner) is a Good Thing. Two thumbs up, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-20 11:27 EST --- Bug appears to have been closed by mistake. I have some tweaks I need to make here, as the selinux-policy package has been split into selinux-policy and selinux-policy-devel in rawhide. I'll upload a version that builds on rawhide shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-05 07:21 EST --- I have updated the SELinux policy again to allow FastCGI apps to do DNS lookups. Packages (1.10-2) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-04 06:33 EST --- Package updated to -10: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ I updated the SELinux policy module to allow httpd to read httpd_fastcgi_content_t content without having to set the httpd_builtin_scripting boolean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-04 09:50 EST --- A new upstream version (1.10) has been released. I have also updated the SELinux policy to allow httpd_fastcgi_script_t to read /etc/resolv.conf without having the httpd_can_network_connect boolean set. Packages (1.10-1) available in usual place: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/mod_fcgid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-18 01:57 EST ---
NEEDSWORK (but not much)
Review for release 8.fc5:
* RPM name is OK
* Source mod_fcgid.1.09.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* Works OK (some of my scripts aren't ready for it though. :-))
* Builds OK in mock (Core 5, i386 and x86_64)
Needs work:
* Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
(wiki: QAChecklist item 7)
Note from me: Your spec uses a lot of %{_rm} style expansions (rather
than plain ol' whatever-rm-is-in-$PATH) so this may confuse rpmlint
et. al. I personally don't have an issue with it as long as it's
readable and consistent.
* The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install
Notes:
* I got the following barf to console when removing the package via
rpm -e (FC5, up-to-date targeted policy)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mfleming]# rpm -e mod_fcgid
/usr/sbin/semodule: SELinux policy is not managed or store cannot be
accessed.
/usr/sbin/semodule: SELinux policy is not managed or store cannot be
accessed.
libsepol.sepol_genbools_array: boolean
allow_httpd_fastcgi_script_anon_write no longer in policy
I do like having the policy there, mind you. I should probably do something
similar for mlmmj (which can be tricky with targeted policy out of the box)
* Would it be possible/useful to scrape the upstream documentation,
primarily for the extra directives info?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
