[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 10:57:17 EDT --- *** Bug 226809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Core |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 06:19 EST --- The first and third issue (i.e. BuildRoot and superfluous %ghosting) are still in -2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-05 02:36 EST --- Jesse, please review and would be great to add the component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-05 06:29 EST ---
Some comments regarding the spec file:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root
Please use the recommended BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Prereq: fontconfig
This is not necessary in font packages, since they could be installed in systems
without fontconfig. See a policy explanation in
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-May/msg00887.html
Moreover, provisions are made in the spec file to check the presense of fc-cache
before running it.
# %%ghost the fonts.cache-1 file
touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/sinhala/fonts.cache-1
%ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/sinhala/fonts.cache-1
This is not necessary for fontconfig 2.3.93, i.e. for FC=5. If this package
is intended for Fedora =5 only, ghosting this file is superfluous.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO||188267 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO_REPORTER --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-05 11:18 EST --- Other than the above comments, rpmlint has this to say: W: fonts-sinhala wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/fonts-sinhala-0.2/COPYING W: fonts-sinhala wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/fonts-sinhala-0.2/license.txt Those two files may have windows encoding or the like. Fix that and the comments above and I'll be happy to approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-05 13:52 EST --- Do we have a plan in place to get translations for the desktops? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-29 00:34 EST --- Translations for this locale seem woefully incomplete. Aside from that, sounds OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
