[Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players

2008-07-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197442


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora
Version|devel   |rawhide




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players

2006-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-24 06:39 EST ---
Built successfully for devel.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players

2006-07-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-28 08:54 EST ---
Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/fatsort.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/fatsort-0.9.6.1-3.fc5.src.rpm

I use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of %{optflags} now.

Using mount -o loop and mkfs.vfat you can make a FAT partition in an file to
test this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players

2006-07-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-06 05:38 EST ---
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
 
* MUST Items:
 - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
 - MUST: dist tag is present
 - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package fatsort, in the
format fatsort.spec
  - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
  - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license 
GPL.
  - MUST: This Package contains License file as LICENSE.txt
  - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct 
(ddf8e98b27455da104e8cca13d29d0cc).
  - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
  - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
  - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
  - MUST: This package used macros.
  - MUST: Document files are included like README.
  - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.

  * Source URL is present and working.
  * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:   
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
  * BuildRequires is correct



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 197442] Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players

2006-07-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fatsort - sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on cheap mp3 players


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: fatsort -   |Review Request: fatsort -
   |sorf fat of FAT32/FAT16 on  |sort fat of FAT32/FAT16 on
   |cheap mp3 players   |cheap mp3 players




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review