[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 09:29 EST --- Well, (In reply to comment #10) SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm * Documentation - Please add more documents --- AUTHORS NEWS --- - INSTALL is not needed because this is needed when trying to install by themselves. * URL Which URL is preferable, http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse-convmvfs/ or http://fuse-convmvfs.sourceforge.net/ ? Then, for your pre-review of 226795 - Well, this package seems somewhat special. For compiler package, the files, which usually should be in -devel package for other cases, are allowed to (and quite often, should) be in main package. But other pre-reviews seems good. Okay.. This package (fuse-convmvfs) is APPROVED by me. Please follow the procedure of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . During the procedure, I will receive a mail which tells that you need a sponsor and the I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 12:17 EST --- Thanks for you help. But still there's one trouble now, I stucked when excute ./common/cvs-import.sh, it failed like this : Checking out the modules file... Module 'fuse-convmvfs' already exists... Checking out module: 'fuse-convmvfs' Unpacking source package: fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3-2.fc6.src.rpm... L fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3.tar.gz A fuse-convmvfs.spec Checking : fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3.tar.gz on https://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/repo/extras/upload.cgi... This file (40ca966feb47d2fcdaedb682655fd3e3 fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3.tar.gz) is already uploaded Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the new ./sources file A sources cvs update: use `cvs add' to create an entry for .cvsignore ? import.log ? devel/.cvsignore cvs commit... cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 12:22 EST --- Well, the process is in way of changing and lots of people are actually in trouble. I confirmed that you wrote SyncNeeded, so all you can do for now is just to wait... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 22:36 EST --- Ok, I just successfully import the SRPM. I'm in the stage of make build, but plague return failed : /usr/bin/plague-client build fuse-convmvfs fuse-convmvfs-0_2_3-2_fc7 devel Server returned an error: Insufficient privileges. I've configured plague client, and plague-client list_builders runs well. So do I have to wait for something to sync again? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 23:07 EST --- Well, if you did a procedure properly, perhaps within a day you will be able to do make build with success. I forgot for my case, however http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/BuildSystemClientSetup says: -- Please Notice Sync to buildsys is a daily thing. So, sometimes you might have to wait for a day to get access of the build server to give make build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-11 11:55 EST --- Now update to 0.2.3 SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm RPM URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.3-1.fc6.i386.rpm Spec URL: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/yportages/FC-6/sys-fs/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-11 12:26 EST --- Well, I will review this after I take a rest once (I live in Japan, EST+14h). By the way, it looks that this package is rather simple, so: NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEWhide_resolved=1 Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-12 02:01 EST --- I pre-reviewed this request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 And the SPEC URL updated to this : ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fuse-convmvfs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-09 11:35 EST --- Well, the srpm on comment 5 gets 550... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-06 20:21 EST ---
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Release: should use the %{?dist} macro instead of have fc5 hard coded.
Everything else seems fine. Next thing to do is follow the notes from Comment
#4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-23 13:43 EST --- Hi ZC! A couple quick notes: * Are you sponsored? If not, you need to block the bug FE-NEEDSPONSOR as well. * It's customary to post direct links to the srpm and spec file you're asking to be reviewed, not entries in CVS or tarball downloads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-17 00:47 EST --- 0.2.1 was released: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fuse-convmvfs/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.1.tar.gz?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 06:20 EST ---
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
* MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows error as
W: fuse-convmvfs incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2-1 0.2-1.fc5.y
Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with
the current version of your package.
Change 0.2.1 to 0.2.1.fc5.y
- MUST: dist tag is present
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package fuse-convmvfs, in the
format fuse-convmvfs.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: This package contains License file as COPYING.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
GPL.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README.
- MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
* Source URL is NOT present and NOT working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request: fuse- |package name here |convmvfs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197445] Review Request: fuse-convmvfs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-convmvfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197445 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-01 14:19 EST --- *** Bug 197446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
