[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-05 20:06 EST --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-31 22:14 EST --- So, nearly six months later, any chance that something can happen here? Or should this ticket just be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 17:26 EST --- From the lead Citadel developer: Mon 11 Dec 2006 12:43:30 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd Do you guy's have contact with Omar at all? Is libical dead again? Is there a new maintainer? I've sent him a few emails but I seem to have lost touch with him. He was given admin access to the SourceForge site, and we all expected that he was going to upload his code there, which would essentially make it *the* new version. Andrea Campi and Eric Busboom were happy to hand over maintainership of it to him. I really don't want to take ownership of libical if we don't have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-11 06:02 EST --- I emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Oct 28, no reply so far. Sigh, looks like this upstream may have died as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 22:41 EST --- It would still be good to see a response to Toshio's questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-16 16:30 EST --- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-04 22:21 EST ---
Hope upstream is still alive or it'll start to look like the libical name is
cursed :-) Have you tried Omar's email directly?
The Version-Release string doesn't look right to me. You have:
Version: 0.26.6
Release: 0.1.aurore%{?dist}
The tarball is libical-0.26-6.aurore.tar.bz2
The tarball unzips to: libical-0.26
This isn't definitive but maybe:
Version: 0.26
Release: 0.1.6.aurore%{?dist}
More Licensing Woes:
src/libical/icallangbind.c
src/libical/icallangbind.h
(C) COPYRIGHT 1999 Eric Busboom
http://www.softwarestudio.org
This package is free software and is provided as is without
express or implied warranty. It may be used, redistributed and/or
modified under the same terms as perl itself. ( Either the Artistic
License or the GPL. )
The README says dual licensed LGPL/MPL but this conflicts Probably Eric
Busboom needs to be contacted to see if he relicensed the library at some point
and this was an oversight.
hula uses an embedded copy of libical-0.24 so I'd like to see an active upstream
that I can tell the hula developers they should start porting to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-05 20:42 EST --- Erk. The COPYING file is null. Thats why I didn't include it. I'll poke upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 01:39 EST --- Hi.. I will review this package for you.. Review for release 0.1.aurore: * Source libical-0.26-6.aurore.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libical-devel looks OK * rpmlint of libical looks OK * File list of libical-devel looks OK * File list of libical looks OK Needs work: * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) I am not certain that the release tag is ok. So I will ask on fedora-packaging. * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) The tagball contains a COPYING file. You should add it to the %docs Notes: Looks good. Once I find out about the release tag and the COPYING is included, it should be all good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-21 01:43 EST --- Actually, I just reviewed an email I sent on a similar subject. I asked about non-numeric values in the release string and this was the response. Not if you move the non-numerical bit to the least-significant place (= the very right). So, I am satisfied with that. Fix up the COPYING file and I can approve the submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 02:25 EST --- Just some comments: * The spec file and http://www.aurore.net/projects/libical say: This is a modified version of the original libical project. i.e. this package would conflict with the original libical I am not sufficiently familiar with libical, but this raises concerns on your package: - Is this libical*aurore API compatible to the original libical? What are the differences? - Is the original libical still alive? - How is this package supposed to interact with an original libical? * The package installs its headers to /usr/include. Though the headers all are prefixed ical*, this pollutes the system header include path. Besides this, the package seems to be clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 02:41 EST --- One existing package in FE that could be checked whether/how it works with this version of libical is gnokii (maintainer Cc'd). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 03:17 EST --- libical has lacked a solid upstream in the past. Most of its users have forked their own copies. (kdepim, sunbird, evolution) This version seems to be an attempt to merge them back together. The original libical has been dead since 2003. According to pbone.net, libical has not been packaged for any version of Fedora/Red Hat before at all, ever. It was pulled from Debian a while back, nothing ever used it. Backward compatability does not seem to be a realistic concern. Citadel seems to be its sole non-forked user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 04:35 EST ---
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
* Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error
- MUST: dist tag is present
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package libical, in the
format libical.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
GPL.
- MUST: License file COPYING is included in package.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct as
36c80c43940841e53e5a985204851c46.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like README.txt.
- MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
- MUST: Header files are going in a -devel package.
- MUST: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel
package.
- MUST: This package contains shared library files located in the dynamic
linker's default paths, and therefore this package is calling ldconfig in %post
and %postun. But Devel package is NOT calling a %post/%postun section that calls
/sbin/ldconfig.
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
* devel package contains the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
