[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Bug 198331 depends on bug 198330, which changed state. Bug 198330 Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CANTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-01 08:56 EST --- I don't want to submit this package so want to close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|198330 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-12 02:25 EST --- Well, it is a publishable explanation, but does not seem to explicitly answer the questions asked from such an explanation (again, see comment 2 and the Wiki): - why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet, and - when it's planned to get merged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-12 02:26 EST --- I have asked about this to Author and waiting for answer from him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-13 00:52 EST --- I need help i am not able to modprobe kernel module. modprobe spca5xx FATAL: Error inserting spca5xx (/lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2133_FC5/extra/spca5xx.ko): Invalid module format whereas installed driver from this package is at /lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2133_FC5/extra/spca5xx/spca5xx.ko now how can i solve this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-13 01:00 EST --- if i do manual module insertion insmod /lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2133_FC5/extra/spca5xx/spca5xx.ko it succeeds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||198330 OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 02:41 EST --- All kernel modules should be named kmod-*, otherwise installers (yum/apt/smart etc.) are likely not to be able to handle them properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 02:58 EST --- *-kmod is correct for the source package. But see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules , missing A publishable explanation from the author(s) why the module is not merged with the mainline kernel yet and when it's planned to get merged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 04:29 EST --- Ville Skyttä, Should i have to include publishable explanation from upstream source's Author? If yes then i am going to contact author for that and will include it in package. But where can i add that file in spca5xx-kmod package or in spca5xx-kmod-common package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 05:48 EST --- There is one file regarding this i included already in spca5xx-kmod-common and its contents are like this = Dear users, For some strange reason Luca Risolia is setting a lot of drivers inside the main Kernel tree, specially those chips supported by spca5xx. Maybe there are not enought hardware to Hack:) As a consequence, you have to choice between spca5xx or the others. The problem is, hotplug will detect, the in kernel driver and maybe reject spca5xx claim. If you load the spca5xx first with modprobe spca5xx there are no problem. You can also blacklist the in kernel driver:) .If you get problem with the main kernel drivers, don't ask me please, you should ask here to get help: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net or here for the v4l2 features :) video4linux-list@redhat.com best regards Michel Xhaard http://mxhaard.free.fr == But I have not found any problem from this package in FC5 with any 2.6.16 kernels. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-11 12:44 EST --- The explanation is not required in any package (although it doesn't hurt). Its intention is to help FESCO to decide whether the module is appropriate for FE, and it is sufficient to include the explanation in this bug report, see the Wiki page. I think the text in comment 4 does not answer that request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
