[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-15 02:22 EST --- Ok, I'll concede to use atlascpp for the package name. Here's an updated package that I believe fixes all of the MUSTFIX issues: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/atlascpp-0.6.0-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/atlascpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 12:46 EST --- I'm concerned about the potential for conflict with the existing atlas package in Extras: The ATLAS (Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software) project is an ongoing research effort focusing on applying empirical techniques in order to provide portable performance. At present, it provides C and Fortran77 interfaces to a portably efficient BLAS implementation, as well as a few routines from LAPACK. The current naming makes this package look like it supplies C++ bindings for atlas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 13:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) -rpmlint output: W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZNK5Atlas9Exception4whatEv ... rpmlint on FC4 x86_64 and FC5 i386 both missed this one. === MUST === - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel package Done. - Comments say test fails on FC6, but infact it is failing on all x86_64 arches because of an x86_64 warning. Patch the code to not use -Werror so that checks can be run I think it would be better just to fix the test code and keep the -Werror. This might get sent upstream. - Fix linking of all the .so files, they should be linked with -lAtlas and libAtlas needs to be built first. I wonder if this is a smp_mflags build - Explain why you do not build with optional zlib or libbz2 Because I didn't notice the configure output? :) - README indicates that this package requires socket streams such as skstream, explain why this is not in the Requires It probably should be. But since the package that Requires: this one also Requires: skstream directly, I didn't catch this. - Why are man pages in doc/man not installed? Oversight. I've added most of them. Others are not included as they contain the build root path in the man page name (probably some doxygen artifact) - Should tutoral/ be installed? No. These are doxygen sources. The tutorial is included in %doc doc/html - Fix license to match actual license Fixed. - Fix Source0 URL so that I can actually verify the upstream source is 0.6.0 actually out yet? Works for me? - Why name Atlas-C++ instead of atlascpp? Because even though upstream uses both Atlas-C++ and atlas-cpp, the former best matches the actual tarball name. I'll post a new srpm once the tests have been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 14:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) -rpmlint output: W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 Which dist and version of rpmlint (rpm -q rpmlint) are you running that produced this warning? I can't reproduce it on FC4-x86_64 or FC5-i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 14:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) I'm concerned about the potential for conflict with the existing atlas package in Extras: ... The current naming makes this package look like it supplies C++ bindings for atlas. Upstream's name is unfortunate in this sense, but I think it's better to preserve upstream's naming than to change it to something different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||198837 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||Atlas-C++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-13 22:19 EST --- -rpmlint output: W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZNK5Atlas9Exception4whatEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTVN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11streamBeginEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase13streamMessageEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase9streamEndEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase10mapMapItemERKSs W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11mapListItemERKSs W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase10mapIntItemERKSsl W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase12mapFloatItemERKSsd W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase13mapStringItemERKSsS3_ W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase6mapEndEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11listMapItemEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase12listListItemEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase11listIntItemEl W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase13listFloatItemEd W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase14listStringItemERKSs W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBase7listEndEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBaseE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBaseC2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7ElementC1ERKS1_ W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message11DecoderBaseD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7Element5clearENS1_4TypeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7Encoder14mapElementItemERKSsRKNS0_7ElementE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7EncoderD1Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7ElementaSERKS1_ W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs3XMLC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas7Message7EncoderC1ERNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasObjects-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas9ExceptionD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZNK5Atlas9Exception4whatEv W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTVN5Atlas9ExceptionE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6BridgeD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasMessage-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas9ExceptionD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas9NegotiateE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZTIN5Atlas6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas9NegotiateD2Ev W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs6PackedC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE W: Atlas-C++ undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libAtlasNet-0.6.so.1.0.0 _ZN5Atlas6Codecs4BachC1ERSdRNS_6BridgeE
[Bug 198835] Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Atlas-C++ - WorldForge message protocol library Alias: Atlas-C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198835 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
