[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-21 21:46 EST --- I have added it to owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-05 22:27 EST --- Hey Paul. I don't see gtk-sharp in the owners.list. Can you please add it? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-26 02:46 EST --- There isn't anything in FC-5 or rawhide which uses gtk-sharp anymore. Have a word with caillon and alexl. The removal of gtk-sharp-1.0.10 was taken about a month back and before it was placed on the orphan list, I snapped it up. It is now an FE package, so by default only has a rawhide entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-26 02:54 EST --- gtk-sharp *IS* in Fedora Core 5. Thus it makes no sense to branch it there and rebuild it in Extras for Fedora Core 5. It does make sense to do this for FC6. Do you concur? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 15:59 EST --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 16:43 EST --- ok, all those changes look pretty good. I'll go ahead and APPROVE this package. Thanks for all your hard work on it. Please remember to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 17:10 EST --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 18:03 EST --- Why do you want a FE5 branch when this is already in FC5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 19:22 EST --- gtk-sharp has been moved from core to extras as there is nothing in core which uses it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 21:52 EST --- FC5 has gtk-sharp. Why did you request a branch for FE5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-23 16:48 EST ---
W: gtk-sharp non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gconfsharp-schemagen.exe 0644
Should this be 755?
Yes and fixed.
W: gtk-sharp strange-permission gtksharp-libdir.patch 0666
The patch should probibly be 644.
Done
Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-10.src.rpm
E: gtk-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
Is this normal for mono packages?
It is for the moment. The problem is that the current FC5 release of mono still
depends on everything being in /usr/lib irrespective of the processor used. The
version in rawhide/FC6 has this problem corrected. When FC5's version is
upgraded to the current version (1.1.17), the hack goes.
All the other problems have been fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 03:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
3. At first I was getting the:
mono: mono-codeman.c:257: new_codechunk: Assertion `!err' failed.
make[2]: *** [gapi_codegen.exe] Aborted
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10/generator'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14252 (%build)
But then I realized the cause. I hadn't disabled selinux on my new build
machine. Mono apparently tries to do something odd to the stack when
compiling,
and selinux blocks it.
Sep 18 22:09:31 thulsadoom kernel: audit(1158638970.725:4300): avc: denied
{
execmem } for pid=25215 comm=mono scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0
tcontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process
Disabling selinux gets it compiling on both i386 and x86_64...
See the Extras/MockTricks wiki page for how to install a local policy module
that allows mono to run under mock with SELInux enabled.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 16:17 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-9.src.rpm Fixes the problems you've had! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 17:05 EST --- Builds fine here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 00:38 EST ---
1. Your Source0 still isn't quite right. I was able to get the source via:
http://go-mono.com/sources/gtk-sharp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10.tar.gz
That md5sum matches:
e21fb3c5a39374f86ba70b926311a6d0 gtk-sharp-1.0.10.tar.gz
e21fb3c5a39374f86ba70b926311a6d0 gtk-sharp-1.0.10.tar.gz.1
2. looks good.
3. At first I was getting the:
mono: mono-codeman.c:257: new_codechunk: Assertion `!err' failed.
make[2]: *** [gapi_codegen.exe] Aborted
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10/generator'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14252 (%build)
But then I realized the cause. I hadn't disabled selinux on my new build
machine. Mono apparently tries to do something odd to the stack when compiling,
and selinux blocks it.
Sep 18 22:09:31 thulsadoom kernel: audit(1158638970.725:4300): avc: denied {
execmem } for pid=25215 comm=mono scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0
tcontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process
Disabling selinux gets it compiling on both i386 and x86_64...
rpmlint says:
E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgladesharpglue.so libgladesharpglue.so
E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libglibsharpglue.so libglibsharpglue.so
E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgtksharpglue.so libgtksharpglue.so
E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgnomesharpglue.so libgnomesharpglue.so
E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgdksharpglue.so libgdksharpglue.so
E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libpangosharpglue.so libpangosharpglue.so
From looking at other mono packages I think this is normal for them.
W: gtk-sharp non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gconfsharp-schemagen.exe 0644
Should this be 755?
W: gtk-sharp strange-permission gtksharp-libdir.patch 0666
The patch should probibly be 644.
E: gtk-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
Is this normal for mono packages?
W: gtk-sharp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
Not a blocker, but would be nice to fix.
E: gtk-sharp-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gtk-sharp-1.0.10/
glib/glue/error.c
Probibly that source file should be 644.
W: gtk-sharp-devel summary-not-capitalized pkgconfig file for gtk-sharp
Can be ignored.
E: gtk-sharp-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/gtk-sharp-devel-
1.0.10/HACKING
Should be 644.
E: gtk-sharp-gapi summary-too-long Glib and GObject C source parser and C
generator for the creation and maintenance of managed bindings for Mono and .NET
Could boil that down some?
W: gtk-sharp-gapi spelling-error-in-description maintainance maintenance
Should be fixed.
W: gtk-sharp-gapi no-documentation
Can be ignored.
W: gtk-sharp-gapi non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gapi-fixup.exe 0644
W: gtk-sharp-gapi non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gapi_codegen.exe 0644
755?
W: gtk-sharp-gapi-devel summary-not-capitalized pkgconfig for gapi-sharp
W: gtk-sharp-gapi-devel no-documentation
Can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 04:34 EST --- #12 - if you're using rawhide, the version of mono shipped is architecture agnostic so on a 64 bit box, things go into /usr/lib64. Under FC5, everything is under /usr/lib I'll need to check on the errors you're seeing as I can't reproduce them here. #11 - it's done that way so I can see what's going on (needed for the time being, I'll switch to -q on the next release). The patch is invoked on anything above FC5 #10 - thanks #9 - always get the source from www.go-mono.com/source-latest (IIRC). I'll fix that. Thanks for the comments. I'll get -8 out sometime today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 07:54 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
#12 - if you're using rawhide, the version of mono shipped is architecture
agnostic so on a 64 bit box, things go into /usr/lib64. Under FC5, everything
is under /usr/lib
I'm using FC5 and it's not, apparently.
I'll need to check on the errors you're seeing as I can't reproduce them here.
Build log attached.
#11 - it's done that way so I can see what's going on (needed for the time
being, I'll switch to -q on the next release). The patch is invoked on
anything above FC5
Apparently that's what you meant, but that's not what happens. I.e. it gets
called on fc5, too. Ah, I see the problem. Change all
%if %{?fedora}
to
%if %{fedora}
i.e. without the question mark. Still, some files get installed in %{_libdir}
nonetheless:
File not found by glob:
/home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/*.so
File not found:
/home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gapi.pc
Full build.log attached (built with my fix %{?fedora} - %{fedora}).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 07:58 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136479) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136479action=view) Build log on FC5/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 09:59 EST ---
If you're using FC-5's mono (1.1.13), then nothing has changed. Everything is
under /usr/lib. This has caused me no end of problems ensuring that the likes of
monodevelop et al work properly under both FC-5 and rawhide.
The correct way of doing the %fedora bit is %{?fedora} - it's the same as
using %{?dist} and gives the version in use as the return value. Just having
%{fedora} is wrong.
Have a look at the monodevelop, gtksourceview-sharp etc spec files for further
examples.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 10:09 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8.src.rpm The srpm has been verified as building in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 10:10 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136482) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136482action=view) my mock config log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 10:11 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136483) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136483action=view) root log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 10:23 EST --- RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8-root-dominik/usr/lib/*.so File not found: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gapi.pc File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/*-sharp.pc Obviously not in 64bit mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-17 10:56 EST --- This is very very annoying! I'm using exactly the same hack for monodevelop etc and the fedora buildsys allows it through for all platforms. I'm at a loss as to why your box should fail! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-16 20:33 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
3. Still doesn't seem to build for me in mock/devel:
Patch #0 (gtksharp-libdir.patch):
+ patch -p1 -b --suffix .libdir -s
+ autoreconf
configure.in:50: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_PATH
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14789 (%prep)
Are you sure you have the most recent spec up (-7?)
That's because the patch and autoreconf call are invoked only on fc5:
%if %{?fedora} 5
%patch0 -p1 -b .libdir
autoreconf
%endif
FYI: builds fine outside mock on FC5/x86_64
Another nitpick: use %setup -q
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-12 21:20 EST ---
Per the conversation on IRC, I'll go ahead and move this review forward...
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (LGPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
See below - Sources match upstream md5sum:
Pending - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
Pending - BuildRequires correct
Pending - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Pending - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
Pending - No rpmlint output.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
See below - Should build in mock.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
Issues:
1. I can't seem to find the source download for this version.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=40240
has 1.0.8 as the latest stable version.
Where can this source be found?
2. Might include AUTHORS and HACKING and README.generator files?
3. Still doesn't seem to build for me in mock/devel:
Patch #0 (gtksharp-libdir.patch):
+ patch -p1 -b --suffix .libdir -s
+ autoreconf
configure.in:50: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_PATH
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14789 (%prep)
Are you sure you have the most recent spec up (-7?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 16:03 EST --- Kevin : Andreas is on holiday for a while. Do you want to finish the review? According to Andreas, it's about fit to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-10 11:45 EST --- #2, are you using FC5 or 6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-10 12:40 EST --- mock under fc6/devel. Happy to provide any further information... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-10 16:06 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7.src.rpm Fixes galore! Now builds in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177512 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-10 17:34 EST --- Good. Looks much better now. Please trim down the description for the gapi subpackage though. It is a bit excessivly long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-10 17:39 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec Shortened the gapi subpackage description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177512 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
