[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-07 10:32 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: xine-lib New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: scop,abompard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-07 14:39 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-14 07:35 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: xine-lib Updated Fedora Owners: abompard,scop Updated Fedora CC: [none] I've been already co-maintaining this package for a while, so I suppose it wouldn't hurt to move me from initialcc to a real co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-14 15:58 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-01 01:12 EST --- Imported and built, thanks a lot ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-30 12:00 EST --- Moving to FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-29 02:15 EST --- At the moment, libdvdnav is not in Extras, so we need to review and accept it before enabling dvd support in xine-lib. Since the libdvdnav sumbission will have to go through Legal review, it may take some time. So I'd rather have xine-lib without dvdnav support imported in the close future, and add the support when libdvdnav is in Extras. Are you guys OK with that ? Ville, would you like to co-maintain xine-lib with me in Extras ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-29 04:20 EST --- Yeah, feel free to add me as a co-maintainer when this goes in. Note that xine-lib uses a bundled/modified libdvdnav by default, dunno how feasible would it be to try to convert it to use an external one. But yeah, that can be looked into later. I have nothing to add here at the moment, so as far as I'm concerned, this is approved. I'll set this to FE-ACCEPT tomorrow in order to provide a bit of time in case someone (spot?) wishes to take one more look at the package contents. Please delay importing until this is in FE-ACCEPT state. Oh, one little thing, I think xineplug_decode_gdk_pixbuf.so and xineplug_vo_out_caca.so are good candidates for moving into the list of plugins potentially to be moved to a xine-lib-extras subpackage later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-19 02:48 EST --- Ok, looks even better. One more question about pruned stuff: What's the problem with including the DVD reading functionality in this package? The capability to read data from encrypted DVDs is not implemented directly in xine-lib as far as I can tell. Based on some recent discussions in private mail with spot, that would be the only real problem with including DVD reading libraries in Fedora. The ability to read unencrypted DVDs would be useful to have. And even though the actual MPEG data on them couldn't be decoded in software with packages in Fedora, there are hardware solutions to that, such as the em8300/dxr3 cards supported by the em8300* packages in FE, and probably full-featured DVB cards (ie. ones that have a MPEG decoder chip). Enabling libdvdnav in xine-lib would also allow enabling the dxr3 hardware MPEG decoding functionality in it. The dxr3 functionality here is associated with libavcodec, rte, and fame, all of which can't be included in Fedora, but they're only used to re-encoded non-MPEG content to MPEG for feeding to the em8300 devices. MPEG playback with em8300 requires none of those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-18 04:42 EST --- - cleanup docs - remove mms - delete more source files in the cleanup script - drop patch3 (affecting mms) About the 3rd line, I realized I did not remove all the source code files in the input plugins dir, so I changed the script to do that. http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib-1.1.2-17.src.rpm The failure in mock may be beacause my FC5 is a yum-upgraded FC4, I don't know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-17 06:33 EST --- You're right about gdk_pixbuf, I thought you meant you tried on both x86 and x86_64 and it failed only on the latter. - add BR gtk2-devel - remove xineplug_decode_gdk_pixbuf.so from x86-only http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib-1.1.2-16.src.rpm find -name *mpeg* in the sources dir yields some results, but I don't think it's mpeg decoding code. It looks more like interfacing with ffmpeg or code for the mpg container. In any case, I trust Legal in this. I tried to build the package in mock, and it fails because of an improper selinux label on /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.2. Is it fixable ? Will it fail in the Fedora Buildsystem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 16:46 EST --- Preliminary review: - src/libdts: most likely needs to be removed. The code contains links to http://www.videolan.org/dtsdec.html - check it out for more info. - The option summary after ./configure contains lots of things containing the word mpeg - is it just the message or does the source tarball require further cleanup? - The cleanup script removes src/libspudec twice, maybe the other one was supposed to remove something else? - xine-lib-dxropts.patch is not needed because src/dxr3 is pruned. - Build fails on x86_64: File not found: /var/tmp/xine-lib-1.1.2-14.fc5-buildroot/usr/lib64/xine/plugins/1.1.2/xineplug_decode_gdk_pixbuf.so File not found: /var/tmp/xine-lib-1.1.2-14.fc5-buildroot/usr/lib64/xine/plugins/1.1.2/xineplug_vo_out_vidix.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 17:30 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) - src/libdts: most likely needs to be removed. The code contains links to http://www.videolan.org/dtsdec.html - check it out for more info. Probably need to be removed. From libdts website: Provisional Warning: DTS Inc. claims that use of libdca software, to decode DTS compressed sound data on a DVD could violate DTS's patent rights. If you are unsure about the legality of using and distributing this code in your country, in particular in the USA, please consult your lawyer before downloading it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 17:44 EST --- - removed libdts - fixed the cleanup script to remove libspudec only once - dropped dxr patch - listed xineplug_decode_gdk_pixbuf.so and xineplug_vo_out_vidix.so only on x86 http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib-1.1.2-15.src.rpm The mpeg-related configure switches are there to skip the mpeg tests (saves me from hacking even more the configure script) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 18:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) - listed xineplug_decode_gdk_pixbuf.so and xineplug_vo_out_vidix.so only on x86 This doesn't look like the correct fix to me. vidix is x86 only IIRC so that part is maybe ok, but gdk-pixbuf appears to be just a matter of missing BR: gtk2-devel. The mpeg-related configure switches are there to skip the mpeg tests Note that I was talking about the printed configuration summary after ./configure is run, not switches passed to it. Eg. xine-lib summary: [...] * demultiplexer plugins: - avi - mpeg - mpeg_block- mpeg_audio - mpeg_elem - mpeg_pes - mpeg_ts - qt/mpeg-4 [...] etc dts removal looks incomplete: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/xine-lib-1.1.2-15.fc5-buildroot/usr/lib64/xine/plugins/1.1.2/xineplug_decode_dts.so More later tomorrow - others' feel free to chime in on the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 12:06 EST --- No idea. Some packages have been waiting a long time, eg. mkvtoolnix 9+ months in bug 177134. See also http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-August/msg00199.html There was a word from someone that getting the legal queue moving would be put on the Board's agenda, but I haven't heard more about that, and summaries for the two last Board meetings seem to be missing from Wiki. Rex, any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 12:25 EST --- Rex, any news? Other than the last 2 FPB meetings weren't held (for various reasons). I'll make sure it's discussed by FPB at next opportunity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 12:31 EST --- How is this package going to coexist with the various xine-libs available from other repos and legally used by people in countries with no software patents ? Since xine-lib has to be crippled to make it into Extras, won't it create an unnecessary annoyance ? Does it add real value to FE ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-12 07:27 EST --- Ah yes, sorry. This version actually builds... * Tue Sep 12 2006 Aurelien Bompard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.2-13 - drop patches 2 and 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-12 07:29 EST --- http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib-1.1.2-13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | BugsThisDependsOn||182235 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 13:17 EST --- This probably needs an ack from legal before it makes much sense to spend time on a review - adding blocker on FE-Legal. (Removing explicit Cc to me, I already receive the traffic through the fedora-package-review list.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 13:28 EST --- as with other media packages you will need to use a modified tarball with all of the patented codec support removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 13:39 EST --- That is already done, see comments in the specfile. I think a legal ack is needed nevertheless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 13:54 EST ---
Source0:
http://download.sourceforge.net/xine/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Patch4: xine-lib-1.1.2-new-ffmpeg.patch
doesn't look like it
I see the comment in %prep it should be up with the sources.
# The tarball is generated from the upstream tarball using
# the script in SOURCE1. It prunes potentially patented code
comment should be moved and id have a guess that the ffmpeg patch dropped
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
