[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-22 13:01 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-21 06:38 EST --- Sure, what do I need to add to the initalCC for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-21 06:28 EST --- Hello Paul, Could you add me to this package, if you don't mind ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-21 06:05 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-21 07:38 EST --- Just re-post a cvs request by adding my fas name to the initialCC (which's laxathom) Thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-21 07:52 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj,laxathom Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-18 08:49 EST --- Paul are you okay, it has been months and I am getting worried. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 14:42 EST --- Sorry about that. My main box has thrown a wobbler and I'm trying to get things working on it again! Not long now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-26 22:28 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-16 05:59 EST --- src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-3.fc9.src.rpm Doh! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-16 05:59 EST --- src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec Fixed the BAD mergh? stuff. I'll remove the %monodir define next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |om) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-16 11:38 EST --- I'm pleased now, I have no complaints left - aside naturally a request that you add a note why we excludearch ppc64 with a reference to the #241850 so one day in the future everyone can remember why we do that.. hopefully we can get that bug closed soon and this won't be needed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-14 12:12 EST --- I think it's safe to say John has vanished. Dave, do you want to take this over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-14 13:21 EST ---
GOOD:
Builds in mock (fedora-development-x86_64)
Spec is in readable US English, and sexy sed magic
Cleans up after itself
Owns all the good stuff
BAD:
mono-tools.src: W: strange-permission mono-tools.patch 0600
File permissions should be %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Should excludearch ppc64 on account of #241850 - remember to add a note please
(I suspect I forgot this in the previous mono reviews - please apply liberally
to mono specs)
mergh?:
I'm still not liking that whole defining the libdir thing, it seems like a build
system bug which we are hiding but in this case it's even uglier than before.
Please consider removing the define and just invoking %{_libdir} as an argument
to configure.
You might also want to expand the description a bit so it makes more sense for
users such as which tools this package provides.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-06 17:40 EST --- John - you out there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 07:37 EST --- Updated src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec Quite a lot of fixes included in it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:21 EST --- And if you could just adjust that license tag :) John owns the review but if he has no time or interest in finishing it I would like to offer to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 19:03 EST --- Updated src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Fixed! Not sure if John has vanished -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-23 22:47 EST --- Sorry for the delay. Same error, but at least has lib64... make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-native-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./creat e-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.GetPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFileGenerator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Ref lection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path /usr/lib64/create-native-map. Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-22 20:08 EST --- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.3-2.src.rpm Should fix the x86_64 problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-19 16:19 EST --- Build failed inside mock, FC6 x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-18 04:14 EST --- Is that inside or outside of mock? It's building fine here (mock x86, outside x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-18 02:28 EST --- Nope. 1.2.3-1 doesn't build on x86_64. make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-nati ve-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native-m ap.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./create-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.Ge tPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFile Generator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Reflection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native -map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path /usr/lib/create-native-map . Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings make[2]: *** [/usr/lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-15 20:22 EST --- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Got everything except gnunit(2) to work. I've reported these upstream, but there doesn't seem to be a way to switch them off during the build - I've therefore excluded them from being added to the final RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-30 01:08 EST ---
- devel package missing %defattr
- missing SMP flags or note why not
- does not run on x86_64.
$ monodoc
/usr/bin/monodoc: line 7: libdir: command not found
cannot open assembly /monodoc/browser.exe
It appears the build did not automatically substitute the libdir variable.
create-native-map also has problems:
$ create-native-map
cannot open assembly /usr/bin/../lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe
which is in the right spot under /usr/lib64
gnunit and gnunit2 aren't working either:
$ gnunit2
Unhandled Exception: Glade.HandlerNotFoundException: The handler for the event
DeleteEvent should take '(System.Object,Gtk.DeleteEventArgs)', but the signature
of the provided handler ('OnWindowDelete') is '(System.Object,System.EventArgs)'
rpmlint sez:
E: mono-tools hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
Conditional for pre mono libdir Fedora. OK.
E: mono-tools no-binary
E: mono-tools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Ignore, we don't consider mono noarch
E: mono-tools zero-length /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/NEWS
Content free. May rm.
E: mono-tools script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/COPYING
Weird. Recommend removing the exec bit.
W: mono-tools-devel summary-not-capitalized .pc file for mono-tools
Ignore
W: mono-tools-devel no-documentation
Ignore
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-28 08:42 EST --- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.src.rpm Address the above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-23 09:42 EST --- I did build it in mock, development x86_64 Adding BuildRequires: gettext seems to fix the languages thing. I also get a warning from the desktop file: /var/tmp/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-monodoc.desktop: warning: The 'Application' cate gory is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of AudioVideo, Audio, Video, Development, Ed ucation, Game, Graphics, Network, Office, Settings, System, Utility instead Possibly Development would be appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-18 17:58 EST --- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-3.src.rpm Fixes the above, but I must disagree, find lang does find languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-06 21:32 EST --- Doesn't build, missing gecko-sharp, gconf-sharp, and %find_lang doesn't find any langs. A spec that addresses these: http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/mono-tools.spec The Summary doesn't seem to go with the %description, these are mono tools and not necessarily a documentation system. The description in the included README seems closer. URL is 404'd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-30 20:02 EST --- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-2.src.rpm Lots of changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-15 22:12 EST --- I don't really feel competent to review mono packages, but here are a few generic comments: Is the name of the package monotools or mono-tools? The URL seems to be incorrect. It's up to you whether you separate BuildRequires: with spaces or commas, but you should be consistent. The %description is a bit content-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-14 18:12 EST --- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-1.1.17-1.src.rpm Dammit - version number was wrong! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
