[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2008-07-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora
Version|devel   |rawhide




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-13 13:07 EST ---
Please add 'denis' as a co-owner of this module.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-13 18:04 EST ---
Please provide the bugzilla name.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-13 20:59 EST ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-03-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-15 10:44 EST ---
Built, asking for FC-6 branch.  Added to owners.list too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|163778  |163779
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-09 14:11 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
 Dep on libburn is because libisofs can actually make a call to libburn I'm 
 told.

I've been told that a few times here too, but I'm still too thick to understand
how does that happen.  Anyway, I won't block the package on that, but suggest
finding out the real details and fixing in future package revisions if 
applicable.

Approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-07 06:26 EST ---
Upstream 0.2.4 tarball is available, but it's not quite the same as the copy
included in 0.2.4-1 SRPM, lib micro version has changed.

Upstream URLs changed: libburn - libburnia, libburn-download - 
libburnia-download

I think the doxygen docs belong to -devel rather than the main package.

The dependency on libburn is still there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-03 15:26 EST ---
http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs-0.2.4-1.src.rpm

New upstream tarball (emailed to me, they haven't posted it on their website
yet, Ill wait for that before importing/building).  This should resolve the
remaining issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776  |163778
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-02 15:43 EST ---
- All build dependencies are spurious
- -n libisofs-devel could be replaced by just devel in devel's %package and
  %description, and libisofs by %{name} in -devel main pkg dependency
- Summary: s/A library/Library/
- Unowned dir /usr/include/libisofs
- Add CONTRIBUTORS to %doc
- Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files
- Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs?
- Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package?
- Bad grammar in %description: libisofs the library to ..., dunno if the last
  sentence of it is needed, it's subject to bitrot


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-02 15:45 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 - All build dependencies are spurious

Sorry, libburn-devel is not, but others apparently are.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-02 16:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 - All build dependencies are spurious
Ah, probably carryover from when the package was built in libburn.

 - -n libisofs-devel could be replaced by just devel in devel's %package 
 and
   %description, and libisofs by %{name} in -devel main pkg dependency

Whoops, more carry over from previous package.

 - Summary: s/A library/Library/

Fixed.

 - Unowned dir /usr/include/libisofs

Hrm, I assumed that it would pick up ownership of that since it was creating the
dir, my bad.

 - Add CONTRIBUTORS to %doc

Hurray for new files.

 - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files

This is a complaint with upstream that I've asked them to fix.  Is this really a
problem that I should chmod the source?

 - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs?

Upstream issue, I'll ask them to fix it for the next release.

 - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package?

I was told yes, but I'll clarify.

 - Bad grammar in %description: libisofs the library to ..., dunno if the 
 last
   sentence of it is needed, it's subject to bitrot

Yeah, this was their upstream content.


http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs-0.2.3-2.src.rpm
Spec url is the same.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-02 17:13 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)

  - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files
 This is a complaint with upstream that I've asked them to fix.  Is this
 really a problem that I should chmod the source?

Well, it took you many more keystrokes to ask that question than fixing it would
have taken... :).  Why not?  Don't we want proper permissions for all installed
files?

  - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs?
 Upstream issue, I'll ask them to fix it for the next release.

Unless I'm missing something, I think it should be patched in this package. 
Unless of course you prefer waiting for the next upstream release before
continuing the review.

  - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package?
 I was told yes, but I'll clarify.

Looks spurious to me.  Nothing is linked against libburn, nor it is dlopened,
and I don't see anything else in libburn that would be a candidate for
explaining the dependency.  Caveat: I haven't tried actually using this package
for anything.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images

2007-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-01-02 22:23 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 (In reply to comment #3)
 
   - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files
  This is a complaint with upstream that I've asked them to fix.  Is this
  really a problem that I should chmod the source?
 
 Well, it took you many more keystrokes to ask that question than fixing it 
 would
 have taken... :).  Why not?  Don't we want proper permissions for all 
 installed
 files?

I'd rather see it fixed upstream.  I'll fix it if needbe, but this really
doesn't hurt anything.

   - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs?
  Upstream issue, I'll ask them to fix it for the next release.
 
 Unless I'm missing something, I think it should be patched in this package. 
 Unless of course you prefer waiting for the next upstream release before
 continuing the review.

As I prefer it to be fixed upstream, I'll either get them to do another release,
or at least generate the patch based on an upstream source fix.

   - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package?
  I was told yes, but I'll clarify.
 
 Looks spurious to me.  Nothing is linked against libburn, nor it is dlopened,
 and I don't see anything else in libburn that would be a candidate for
 explaining the dependency.  Caveat: I haven't tried actually using this 
 package
 for anything.

I should have something more for you tomorrow after discussing with upstream. 
I'm just playing package monkey here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review