[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2009-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638





--- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net  2009-12-08 12:26:33 
EDT ---
From the spec, something got done at some point, all hope is not lost! (thanks,
ajax ;-)) :

* Tue Feb 10 2009 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
- Merge review cleanups (not finished, #225638)

Nevertheless, I've taken the liberty to at least partially continue the changes
by including all of the obvious and unavoidable ones. Here is the detail :
- Don't prefix summaries with A nor suffix them with a dot.
- Move .so symlink to the devel sub-package (#203620).
- Add highest known version to the cdparanoia-III obsoletes.
- Remove incorrect buildroot removal from %%build.
- Use acceptable %%clean section.
- Provide cdparanoia-static in the devel sub-package since the *.a is there.
- Use single-command scriplet syntax for /sbin/ldconfig calls.
- Escape all macros in changelog.
- Include license file since it is present with the sources.

I'll rebase my other changes (cosmetic cleanups and install patch) against this
new spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2009-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638





--- Comment #6 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net  2009-12-08 12:45:39 
EDT ---
The latest suggested changes to the package against the latest spec are here :
http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/cdparanoia/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2009-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638


Bug 225638 depends on bug 203620, which changed state.

Bug 203620 Summary: cdpranoia-libs .so should be in -devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203620

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2008-12-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638


Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||a...@redhat.com




--- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net  2008-12-22 16:42:11 
EDT ---
CC'ing ajax, since he seems to have updated the package quite a bit lately.

I've updated the cleaned up spec file found here :
http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/cdparanoia/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2008-12-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638


Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(a...@redhat.com)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2007-10-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-22 11:14 EST ---
Too late for Fedora 8... ping again?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2007-09-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-12 07:23 EST ---
Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8.

If you'd like a co-maintainer for this package, also just let me know, I'd be
interested. It could also be interesting to get the latest 10pre version during
the Fedora 9 development for it to get some more testing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia

2007-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium
   Priority|normal  |medium
Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-31 12:03 EST ---
Please find an updated spec file and a patch to the current spec file containing
some suggested changes and fixes :
http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/cdparanoia/

- Move .so symlink to the devel sub-package (#203620).
- Reorder and clean up the spec file.
- Remove use of ver and realver.
- Convert spec file to UTF-8 and escape all macros in changelog.
- Add highest known version to the cdparanoia-III obsoletes.
- Include install patch to have DESTDIR work and libs +x for correct debuginfo.

It's quite a major cosmetic cleanup overall :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review