[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694


Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 CC||lemen...@gmail.com
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com  2009-08-03 05:51:28 
EDT ---
I think that we may close this ticket.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-01-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694





--- Comment #5 from Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com  2009-01-28 08:43:13 EDT 
---
Thanks a lot for the review !
I've added the disttag as that one makes it much easier to reuse the spec file
for different releases and I just forgot to add it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694


Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|co...@gnome.eu.org
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694


Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694


Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org  2009-01-23 13:52:23 EDT 
---
Thank you for the update.

I note you are not using %{?dist} tag, however this is not a blocker.

There is a test suite provided in the package, but it won't run correctly as
dictd drops privileges to user nobody and won't be able to create/append log
file _dictd.log in test/ directory. I'm not sure that's fixable.

Please consider using install -p for install to preserve timestamps of
installed
files.

Review:
OK  source files match upstream:
1b316bf797ff239eb87110c18cd7d5d9  dictd-1.11.0.tar.gz
d1883d09f65179a3b6aa16579cb5a7e9  libmaa-1.1.0.tar.gz
OK  package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK  specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK  summary is OK.
OK  description is OK.
OK  dist tag is not present.
OK  build root is OK.
OK  license field matches the actual license.
OK  license is open source-compatible.
OK  license text included in package.
OK  BuildRequires are proper.
OK  compiler flags are appropriate.
OK  %clean is present.
OK  package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
OK  package installs properly.
OK  debuginfo package looks complete.
OK  rpmlint is silent.
OK  final provides and requires are sane:
config(dictd) = 1.11.0-2
dictd = 1.11.0-2
dictd(x86-64) = 1.11.0-2
=
/bin/sh
chkconfig
config(dictd) = 1.11.0-2
initscripts
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libdbi.so.0()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
N/A %check is not present. Provided test suite won't correctly run
N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK  owns the directories it creates.
OK  doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK  no duplicates in %files.
OK  file permissions are appropriate.
OK  scriptlets present look OK
OK  initscript looks OK.
OK  code, not content.
OK  documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
OK  %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK  no headers.
OK  no pkgconfig files.
OK  no static libraries.
OK  no libtool .la files.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694





--- Comment #3 from Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com  2009-01-22 10:38:02 EDT 
---
fixed in dictd-1.11.0-2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2009-01-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694


Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||co...@gnome.eu.org




--- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org  2009-01-10 15:30:14 EDT 
---
please use default %defattr:
%defattr(-,root,root,-)

You should use %postun scriptlet; without it, the daemon will not
restart itself after a package update.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd

2007-02-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: dictd


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225694





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-21 04:56 EST ---
dictd-1.9.15-9 has the most common review issues fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review